User-Error Problems With Iowa Caucus App Cause Online Confusion (nytimes.com) 349
Reports of Iowa precinct chairs struggling to use an app designed to help tally participation in the Democratic presidential caucuses on Monday fueled conspiracy theories on social media and raised questions about how smoothly the high-stakes nominating contest would unfold. From a report: Just hours before the beginning of the contest, the first of the 2020 elections, the headquarters of the Iowa Democratic Party received multiple calls from precinct chairs around the state reporting problems with the new app the party is using to calculate, tabulate and report results for the caucuses. The state party said nearly all of the calls were related to user-error problems, such as precincts in areas with bad cellphone service having problems downloading or logging into the app, or others simply asking about the app's functionality. Though the issues could possibly cause results to be delayed, the party said that it would not ultimately affect the reporting of results.
Sean Bagniewski, the Democratic Party chairman in Polk County, the most populous county in Iowa, said that only 20 percent of his 177 chairs could get into the app, but he added that there were "no malfunctions." "We're telling everyone to phone it in," Mr. Bagniewski said, referring to the hotline the party has used for decades to report results. Yet those issues appeared to trigger speculation on Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms that the app had been hacked, or that it was malfunctioning in a way that would benefit a certain candidate. Further reading: Results from Iowa caucuses delayed because of 'quality control'.
Sean Bagniewski, the Democratic Party chairman in Polk County, the most populous county in Iowa, said that only 20 percent of his 177 chairs could get into the app, but he added that there were "no malfunctions." "We're telling everyone to phone it in," Mr. Bagniewski said, referring to the hotline the party has used for decades to report results. Yet those issues appeared to trigger speculation on Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms that the app had been hacked, or that it was malfunctioning in a way that would benefit a certain candidate. Further reading: Results from Iowa caucuses delayed because of 'quality control'.
A certain candidate (Score:4, Funny)
So what I'm reading in TFS is "this app didn't kill itself".
Re:A certain candidate (Score:4, Funny)
That or modern smartphones are not capable of calculations involving the large number of Democrats in the race still.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
That or modern smartphones are not capable of calculations involving the large number of Democrats in the race still.
Also a consequence of Democrats having the habit of voting early, often, and even after they die.
I guess this should not be a surprise that there are so many voters given that the average age of Democrat voters is "deceased", which just happens to be the average age of the people running for the nomination.
Re: (Score:2)
Troll much? A much larger proportion of democratic voters are young people. You know, the people who actually have to live with the desicions politicians make for a long time.
Re: (Score:3)
Could you cite where Bernie (or any Democrat for that matter) has advocated for open borders (i.e. unlimited immigration and no border check points)?
Re:A certain candidate (Score:4, Insightful)
“Anybody who can go down 3000 feet in a mine can sure as hell learn to program as well... Anybody who can throw coal into a furnace can learn how to program, for God’s sake!” -- Joe Biden
Maybe Joe Biden will now learn to respect the skills of professional programmers now.
In related news ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
John Draper was running a close second.
Re: (Score:2)
I was betting on Pat Buchanan.
Re: (Score:2)
"... nearly all of the calls were related to user-error problems
In one or two places I might have bought that. But in so many places? I doubt it.
"... bad cellphone service
In so many places across wide areas, and in the same time frame? With no news reports about Verizon or Comcast having satellite or other problems?
Dead voters is a dead issue, though. Millions die (or move out of state) each year. All states have large numbers of dead or moved away voters st
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:PS (Score:4, Insightful)
Isn't Biden too old to get a sex-change operation now?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
He doesn't have to do all that, he can just 'claim' to be female and go and molest little girls in their own locker room.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Errors causing delays reporting...? (Score:5, Interesting)
Currently it seems like the result is falling back on an old tabulation method that shaves delegates off the leaders by counting the unaligned people (basically the delegate results are fractions and in many cases this will result in the decimal rounding down to the next lowest integer instead of up) and casting doubt on the results in general (Biden was reporting doing very poorly, indicating he wasn't viable in many of the caucuses and his campaign has already indicated they intend to dispute).
What Bernie does is irrelevant ... (Score:2)
When Bernie got screwed last time, he just bent over and took it. OF COURSE the DNC expects him to just take it again.
What Bernie does is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is what voters do. If Bernie supporters just vote for whatever Dem gets the nomination because Trump is the opponent then the DNC's tactics are successful and will be used again in the future. The only thing that can lead to party reform is denying a party a vote. Nothing else matters. Complain online, complain in person at rally, caucus, election, convention, etc ... it does *not* matter if they still get your vote. Your vote is your one and only
Re:What Bernie does is irrelevant ... (Score:5, Insightful)
And that, right there, is how our country got a President Trump in the first place. We'll see whether the powers that be in the Democratic Party learned their lesson or are going to keep playing their little games of thrones and run the party right into the ground.
Re:What Bernie does is irrelevant ... (Score:5, Insightful)
The party is already in the ground, Bernie isn't the one that killed it, he's just the coroner. The DNC is corrupt and as much as they claim they want a democratic government, their own party can't even establish a fair procedure with the end-decision basically coming to super-delegates unless every Democrat can agree on a single candidate. So basically they promote many people running so a small set of 1%'ers can decide the vote for the rest of the party.
And these people want to get rid of the electoral system and replace it with this, they can't even run their own elections.
Re: (Score:3)
>"or are going to keep playing their little games of thrones and run the party right into the ground."
Based on what I have seen in the primaries to date, they already have.
The Democrats lost 1000 seats with "Third Way" (Score:2)
I can't find the clip, but Michael Moore said it best. We lost when we ran Hilary, Kerry, Mondale, you name it. Obama ran as a lefty and governed as a righty. Clinton was the only Centrist who ever won and he's the one that started "Third Way". And He just benefited from the
When the Dems move right they lose because if I want to vote for a right wing candid
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Folks didn't stay home out of spite (Score:2)
When I voted for Bernie in 2016 I waited in line 3 hours. T
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
(Some) Europeans leave business alone so it can prosper, and tax the hell out of themselves.
Good luck with that in the US as "business evil, mmmm'kay?" is standard political rhetoric here.
Here's a good video from an actual Socialist (Score:2)
For the record I'm one of those "Democratic Socialists" who will leave capitalism in place. I don't think we're ready for a Star Trek Utopia just yet. Though I'm hoping we get to skip the part from that one time travel episode of Deep Space 9.
Re: (Score:2)
The only one you could write off from t
Re:Errors causing delays reporting...? (Score:4, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
When Obama was way out in front of the Republicans with a billion dollar war chest of donations, the Democrats also suddenly shut up about too much money in politics.
In the First Amendmrnt, freedom of the press isn't so much the institutional press as literally the means of mass production and distribution of speech. Presses would be outlawed or controlled as a backdoor means of censorship.
This is the core of the Supreme Court's unfairly mocked ruling that cash is speech -- it is used to buy advertising, t
They won't let Bernie win (Score:2)
> I don't understand what Bloomberg is doing here. He jumped in way late, and his commercials are kind of creepy.
He's only in the race to siphon votes from the candidates the DNC doesn't want to win. Look up how much he donates to the PACs, he is the DNC establishment incarnate. The reason they add so many candidates is so that they can use the ones that have no hope to siphon votes from those they don't control.
Spoiler alert: they don't want Bernie to win because they don't control him. The DNC prim
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Don't worry, they can find other uses for their campaign funds after the party is over, too."
We can only hope that money will be used to pay back the local businesses which keep getting stiffed.
Re: (Score:3)
they don't want Bernie to win because they don't control him
Nonsense. If Sanders wins, in two years we'll be bombing Syria or some damn thing.
Trump was elected on the platform of boxing up all foreigners and shipping them to the Space Force moon base, building a Great Wall of Mexico around Mexico (and possibly Canada), signing an executive order that only white babies named "Brett" or "Betty" get automatic citizenship, and to prosecute the Clintons until they are sentenced to hard labor in the MAGA hat sweatshops built with tax dollars in Kentucky.
Instead we got a f
Re:Errors causing delays reporting...? (Score:5, Funny)
Bloomberg/Hillary 2020.
Then after the election is won, Bloomberg suddenly dies with no cameras present and Secret Service out for a sandwich, White House procedures on guests signing in and out mysteriously not followed. In the aftermath, all involved are either given promotions, meet with traffic accidents or epstein themselves.
His staff finally admitted what he's up to (Score:3)
Bloomberg is a hedge against Biden imploding. The plan is that if Biden blows it in the first 3 primaries Bloomberg steps in with his billions and buys the election. The only question is will we let that happen?
I don't think so. Pretty much eve
Re: (Score:3)
Protip: DNC does not run Iowa caucuses. Bro.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the votes that matter, but he who counts the votes [twitter.com].
It's almost as if we could look up who made the app...
Re: (Score:2)
who counts the votes, and also HOW you count the votes. (see gerrymandering)
https://miro.medium.com/max/38... [medium.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently Hillary's campaign made the vote counting app... irony.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're right. When Bernie got screwed last time, he just bent over and took it. OF COURSE the DNC expects him to just take it again. They're cooking the books as we speak, either for Biden or Bloomberg's benefit.
-jcr
If that is the case let it be Bloomberg, he is the better out of two bad choices. Biden is going full senile old 'get off my lawn' shouting dotard on live television as we watch. Bloomberg on the other hand is at the very least a relatively moderate guy as business leaders go. He is also a real bonafide 100% documented billionaire who does not have a long chain of huge bankruptcies in his wake like a certain orange self professed business genius does. That is bound to piss the absolute hell out of Trump.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, I thought Bloomberg was passing on Iowa and New Hampshire to focus on Super Tuesday.
Don't forget Buttigieg (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hillary lost because Sanders is a poor loser and would never support her...that and she's somewhat of a ditz when it comes to politics.
Re: (Score:2)
One story I read this morning is that Bernie got like 300 caucus for him, but because the other candidates also got to at least 20, they each got 1 vote causing Bernie Bro's to storm out in protest.
I don't know if Democrats understand that their own process is rigged and that they only represent 50% of the (split) vote, the super-delegates get the other 50% of the vote and are basically the 1% agreeing on a candidate.
Dems like to throw stones at representative government but they are themselves in a massive
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They hired Shadow Inc. a secretive company that doesn't list any contacts or people, but through LinkedIn it is clear that these were basically people from the 2018 Hillary campaign building this app and donating to the DNC to get it in.
Comment removed (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
But you don't have that many Iowa caucusses. It's only one per four years. And thus it takes ages until all the bugs are ironed out.
The discipline formerly known as software testing (Score:2)
According to the _Times_:
'there were concerns that the app would malfunction in areas with poor connectivity, or because of high bandwidth use, such as when many people tried to use it at the same time.
"This app has never been used in any real election or tested at a statewide scale and it's only been contemplated for use for two months now," said David Jefferson, a computer scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, who also serves on the board of Verified Voting'.
(Even twenty years ago, FreeBSD
Re:Errors causing delays reporting...? (Score:5, Informative)
Not quite
After the first round they take all the candidates that have less than 15% of the vote and toss them as not viable.
In the second round the people that voted for candidates that are not viable get to change their vote to one of the viable candidates. Additionally, people that voted for a viable candidate can change their vote once they see who everyone else is supporting and why they are supporting them.
Also, this is all out in the open with people physically moving to the area for the candidate they are supporting, no secret ballot or subtlety.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The calculation above is correct, at the end of the night Sanders still walks away with 2 delegates even though he has two-three times as much people voting for him. Bernie Bro's walked out after that.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, all last night, they kept reporting that this rule had changed for this year.
I believe this year, that if you voted for a viable candidate on the FIRST round, you cannot change your vote in the 2nd round.
The talking heads on the news channels kept hammering this one into the ground while they tried to think of something to talk about with no
Did Apple revoke the app's certificate? (Score:2)
If you are caught using your enterprise cert to distribute apps outside of your company Apple can revoke the certificate and your side loaded apps will not open. This happened to FB some months back?
It was Android. (Score:2)
If you are caught using your enterprise cert to distribute apps outside of your company Apple can revoke the certificate and your side loaded apps will not open. This happened to FB some months back?
It was Android. One of the problems is that some users were mistaking the standard warning when side loading an APK for a malware warning. They thought they were getting hacked. As a result there were afraid to install it.
Re: (Score:2)
It was Android. One of the problems is that some users were mistaking the standard warning when side loading an APK for a malware warning. They thought they were getting hacked. As a result there were afraid to install it.
No, the grandparent poster had it right; although it was about a year ago. See https://apple.slashdot.org/story/19/01/30/1448227/apple-says-its-banning-facebooks-research-app-that-collects-users-personal-information [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Never mind my comment ... after reading the rest of the comments about this situation, I realized that you were talking about what happened to this app, not the Facebook one. Guess it's just too early in the morning for me.
The vote should not be in the cloud or an app (Score:3)
The vote should not be in the cloud or an app.
Re: (Score:2)
The vote should not be in the cloud or an app.
I can't understand why running elections seems to be so hard these days.
Given Iowa's population of about 3 million people, there are unlikely to ever be more than 1 million voters in any election. I don't see why they need to use any technology that wasn't available in the 19th century. If they just set up a two-level calling tree with landline voice calls, no single person would have to sum up much more than a few hundred numbers, which they could easily do on some old adding machines. They could tally up
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The software to write the app... support for the app...
vs paper and the ability to count.
Re: (Score:3)
You're assuming that accurate, reliable, safe, anonymous counting votes would be the primary design goals of any voting process. You will find evidence in every instance where the voting process was changed from pen and paper to any other method, that this basic bona-fide assumption does not hold true, in many cases it runs contrary to the actual implementations.
That is only on top of the inherent mathematic or conceptual difficulties in any voting process, as the tendency of first-past-the-post systems to
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Apparently it wasn't (Score:2)
The vote should not be in the cloud or an app.
Apparently it wasn't. :-)
Re: (Score:3)
Appers app, voters vote.
Iowa doesn't.
Speaking of smartphone voting in West Virginia... (Score:5, Interesting)
So, the Iowa Democrats contracted with someone (from the news, it's not clear who) to write them a voting app for the caucuses. The voting app needed to work for about 2000 people for a few hours this evening. And it completely collapsed. Absolutely useless -- worse, even -- they're reverting to paper backups. These guys had one job. Who created this app? Did they test it? Did they train the users on it? Worthless goddamn swine. Who is going to be held responsible? Nobody. There are no consequences when people fail in these situations.
This level of competence is why I don't think much of West Virginia's plan to enable voting on smartphone apps in actual elections. Tonight's debacle in Iowa may not be so bad compared to whatever happens in WV.
Re: Speaking of smartphone voting in West Virginia (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: Speaking of smartphone voting in West Virgini (Score:2)
In 2008 - 239,000
In 2012 - No DNC caucus
In 2016 - 171,517
So, if it is 2016 levels it is far from a record low turnout. But what I've read is they're seeing 10x the attendance coming in from enough precincts that the DNC decided to delay and "double check" the results.
In general, aside from Sanders, the Democratic line up is very weak. If, somehow, someone besides Sanders wins the primary I would put my money on Trump.
Apparently officials were not trained (Score:5, Interesting)
Did they train the users on it?
Apparently not, as some caucus officials were installing it for the first time tonight. They got the standard Android warning about side loading an APK and mistook this warning for a malware warning. They thought they were about to be hacked and did not install it.
Also there was apparently no real security designed into this system as officials were supposed to use their personal phones for reporting election results.
Re: (Score:2)
You're assuming that a political organisation tells you the truth about problems within the same organisation. That's cute.
Re:Speaking of smartphone voting in West Virginia. (Score:5, Funny)
Who created this app?
Probably one of the overpaid programmers we hear tell us how great they are and how many years of experience they have.
Did they test it?
Of course they did. They tested it on the latest and greatest desktop with their 128 core processor and maxed out memory.
Did they train the users on it?
That wasn't necessary. The UI was so intuitive with its borderless screens and dull, flat fonts that anyone short of a rhesus monkey could use it. It's so easy to use there wasn't even a need for documentation.
Re: (Score:2)
The app was written by Shadow Inc. Shadow Inc. doesn't list any developers or contact information, other than the fact they wrote 'apps' for various Democrat groups.
When you look the people and donations up however, they are a group of Hillary campaigners that wrote this app pretty much overnight and donated big bucks to the DNC to get it in front of the states. This is going to repeat itself in every state until Hillary (or Biden) wins.
I can't make this up (Score:2)
I'm 90% sure this is what happened: App was meant to cheat Bernie but there were too many Bernie supporters with cell phones and training on election watching.
Obama did something similar in 2008. He was sitting on a massive pile of cash going into the election and nobo
Why not look it up? (Score:2)
No, Shadow came from people who were working for Obama/Hillary: source [twitter.com]
What do we expect from politicians (Score:2)
The real question is how many smartphones have been ruined by the user managing to punch their selection? Then there's the folding screens and "butterfly ballot" part 2.
With a few notable exceptions, our would be leaders (on both sides) certainly can't be accused of technical competence.
Don't blame the users (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Don't blame the users (Score:5, Insightful)
If you expect someone to use a smartphone app in a place with no coverage, that's not a user error. That's a fail on the part of whoever was planning the system. If 5% of users can't get into your app, that's probably on them. If 80% can't, that's definitely on you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It can be systemic and user error. I don't know if this explanation holds up this morning still, but last night they were saying there were two apps, with two different passwords. People were starting up the precinct totals report app and using the wrong password until they got locked out.
videos of the apps (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Wow. They can't do anything right. (Score:3, Insightful)
One of the district secretaries (I think that's what they called them) called FOX commentators and told them that after the app "crashed" they reverted to the old "paper ballot and call it in" method. He? had been trying to do that, and they put him on hold. For over an hour. He still hadn't reported in by the time I got tired of watching the BS.
I've seen a corrupt small town sheriff steal an election better than these incompetents. He at least had the deputy take the lockbox with the ballots to a back country road where they thought no one was looking to swap the votes, before turning it in to the county courthouse.
I swear. The Dems can't steal an election, frame a President, or rig an impeachment for shit. Whenever I think of a traditionally Democrat controlled city, the first things I think of are crime riddled cesspools, run by corrupt incompetents. Many Republicans are actually Democrats running under a false flag, so don't think I just hate on Dems.
I got a lot of hate to go around.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I used to wonder how wealthy, prosperous nations would fall to fascism, and I don't wonder any more.
A fearful and angry electorate, mostly. Coupled with an elected legislature/parliament/assembly/etc willing to put aside values and ethics and side with a generally populist leader for short term political gain. Historically hasn't ended well for said electorate.
Re: (Score:2)
That's exactly right.
Oh, I'm sorry, were you trying to be snarky by stating obvious facts, and then pretending that they're false?
Re: (Score:2)
Well we have had politicians forever, and they all signed the Paris accords. So um, problem solved?
Re: (Score:2)
Good to know (Score:2)
Bad cellphone coverage is a 'user error'.
Hacking? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, it's worse than that, it's incompetence.
Re: (Score:3)
Have you heard the old gem, "Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence." Yeah, so has every successful malicious actor. It makes for a convenient exit strategy if they get caught and need the benefit of the doubt.
This just in... (Score:4, Funny)
Bad cell phone service is a user-error (Score:2)
I'm not going down the tin-foil hat rabbit hole of conspiracy theories.
I'm just looking at the reasons given:
QUESTIONS are a user-error?
This calls into question the competence of the Iowa Democratic party at a state wide level. As an organization. As a political party. Someone should take the existing leadership off to the side and tell them they should spend the next few summers running a lemonade stand.
I can't even imagine how such a thorough
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Like they used to say about Microsoft Windows (Score:2)
Some say "bug", others say "feature"
Trump won (Score:2)
Well...probably change the title to "DEMOCRATIC" Caucus because the GOP Iowa caucus went smoothly and Trump won 97% of the vote. Unless....it was the RUSSIANS (again)???
Meanwhile at Cacuses across Iowa... (Score:3)
Pointing at the small group of Biden supporters - "You guys! You don't have enough bodies. Go dig up some more voters! The graveyard is that way and you will find shovels in the corner. Hurry, folks are waiting!"
Re: (Score:3)
Here's some background on Shadow.
Yes, it was founded and run by people from the 2016 Clinton presidential campaign, who are well-connected to the Democratic Party establishment. Are these the same guys who told Podesta that his suspicious email telling him to log into Google again with his password actually was legitimate?
It looks like the Democratic National Committee hired a firm based on their political connections (rather than their competence) and forced them upon the Iowa Democratic Party. They insist