Trump Trades in Android Phone For Secret Service-Approved Device (cnet.com) 206
Who's got two thumbs and a Secret Service-approved phone to tweet from? On arriving in Washington on Thursday ahead of his inauguration, Donald Trump has handed in his Android device in exchange for an unidentified locked-down phone, according to Associated Press. From a report: The phone comes with a new number that is known only to a limited number of people. This marks a big change for Trump, who's frequently on the line with friends, business contacts, reporters, foreign leaders and politicians. Barack Obama was the first president to use a mobile device approved by security agencies because of hacking concerns. Initially he had a heavily modified BlackBerry and later switched to another phone that had most features totally disabled. He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.
If they're smart... (Score:2, Funny)
If they're smart it will have been a toy phone. He can beep-boop-beep on it to his heart's content. Bonus points if pressing the buttons makes a pleasant sound each time.
Re: If they're smart... (Score:5, Funny)
Last day to bash Trump! Then he will deport you.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!
You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?
Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?
Re:If they're smart... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
- he did nothing yet
- he was elected.
Perhaps you'll see me hate him in a few weeks, but not yet lol
Re:If they're smart... (Score:5, Funny)
I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
- he did nothing yet
- he was elected.
One Nobel Peace Prize, coming right up!
Re:If they're smart... (Score:4, Insightful)
If he can drone strike enough people, perhaps he can too ;)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I would argue that he has done something already. Those tweets about the trade deals, disparaging the UN/NATO, etc, are already having an affect on our foreign policy. This is evident by the moves that China has been making to enact their own trade deal as well as countries like Germany signaling that they are unhappy. He needs to realize that all of those off the cuff remarks do really mean something in the geo-political world because they signal his intentions. This bullshit about let's wait and see what
Re: (Score:1)
He's done plenty. Knocked billions off the value of multiple companies, scared the shit out of a lot of people who rely on Obamacare, divided the county...
Re:If they're smart... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's not him, but all the FUD created by medias lol.
Country was already divided, since it's voters that votes, not Trump.
All I just wanna say is -> wait and see! If he does bad, then protest all you want and kick he's sorry ass out of there, but please wait to see what he's going to do, and how.
We, in Canada, got one interesting guy which love to selfy and every media ""loved"" him... we're stacking record debt since then...
I guess many US and worldwide big shots are just playing with all your minds via media. Just calm down, wait and see for yourself.
TDLR : Don't "think emotionally".
Re: (Score:2)
That's not him, but all the FUD created by medias
I'm getting sick of hearing this B.S.
The effect Trump's casual comments on the on the stock market - on at least two occasions that I can name (Cancel Air Force1, Dec. 6th; Dollar too strong comment, Jan. 16th) are measurable and are matters of public record, as are many other troubling statements and contradictions by the man.
What are we to do, pretend that we don't see what we see?
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, um, he's not the only one dividing the country. As they say, it takes two to tango.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a work in progress.
I heard rumours that California is considering secession. Which would put Trump in a category previously occupied by one Abe Lincoln - president's who have started a civil war.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not even a USA citizen . . .
. . . and probably neither were a lot of folks who voted in the US Presidential Election . . . for all of the candidates.
Oh, and Trump's new phone is not called a "Smart" phone because of all the features and apps, but because it is a Maxwell Smart shoe-phone. Just until that number gets posted on the Internet . . . Trump's shoes will be ringing like crazy! What a hoot and a half for a boring party . . . ring up and talk to Trump's feet!
Re: (Score:2)
Actually? He ran a fraudulent ponzi-scheme style 'university' until the court decided he couldn't legally call it that.
Read up on what a ponzi scheme is some time, his university is nowhere close to that. What does this have to do with the office of the POTUS?
He cheated HUNDREDS TO THOUSANDS of small business contractors out of their earned due.
Proof?
He gave neo-nazis a political platform when he saw the GOP needed new eunuch enforcers.
Lie. Trump has never supported neo-nazis.
He publicly attacked cripples, minorities, women, gold star families, veterans, reporters, officials, scientists, teachers.
As if Hillary was any better?
He literally undermined the US POTUS office by de-requiring tax disclosures and other basic shit for the office.
It was never required. It was an optional thing, and never really provided the information you think it would. Trump's tax return is likely very complicated, and wouldn't show you his real earnings which are stored in the companies he owns. You would probably be surprised at how little he
Re:If they're smart... (Score:5, Informative)
Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!
You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?
Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?
I don't think he's stupid at all. I just think he's a boor and a con man.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Umm, because the electorate is more stupid?
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, because the electorate is more stupid?
The electorate in general is pretty stupid, yes. See my sig for more insight.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Because people enjoy having a president they can identify with.
Re: (Score:1)
The best part about Trump is that it's never going to get old. He keeps talking. If he could learn to shut the fuck up, people might eventually forget how stupid and dishonest he is. But he keeps reminding everybody, "Hey, I'm stupid and dishonest!"
Because people didn't want that piece of shit to be president either. You might be surprised to learn that this is totally independent of Trump's stupidity and dishonesty. (If Trump h
Re: (Score:1)
Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?
Because she was even dumber than he is? We're talking about relativism at this point. When you're talking about two retards, declaring one to be smarter than the other does not change the fact that they are both still a retarded.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:If they're smart... (Score:4, Insightful)
Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?
Partly because when SHE had the opportunity to hand in HER phone for a government one, she refused. Which I find hilarious.
The major reason I knew I, personally, could never vote for her was when (via leaked emails) it became clear that the reason she was mad at government IT and decided to use her own email server was because they wouldn't let her use her phone inside a SCIF. A SCIF is a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility [wikipedia.org]. The entire point to it is that it's safe from eavesdropping, and therefore is shielded from cell reception (or any kind of reception - it's basically a giant Faraday cage).
And Clinton was trying to force them to let her use her personal phone inside of it.
The actual reason she lost, her complete lack of touch with workers, is just gravy. But the fact that she was the type of over-demanding "VP of marketing" type who demanded IT completely ignore security was enough to make me hate her, ignoring the mountain of other reasons. And, of course, her complete disdain for security practices and those who set them up and enforce them then came back to bite her in the ass when her campaign's email was hacked, multiple times. So that was nice too.
Am I happy we wound up with Trump? No. That's a problem in the Primaries process, where other, better candidates were weeded out because despite the fact that the majority of the GOP hates Trump, they weren't able to settle on a single candidate. In a proper voting system like IRV, Trump never would have won the nomination. Am I happier that the harpy will never see the White House? Hell yes!
Re: (Score:2)
Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?
Because spewing racism while frothing at the mouth and making unrealistic and truly bizarre promises resonates more with Americans?
Because stupidity has nothing to do with popularity?
Because just because one man is incredibly stupid doesn't mean his opponent isn't incredibly dangerous?
Given the choice of having my country run by Kim Jong Un and a bobblehead Jesus I too would do my best to ensure the ever agreeable Jesus gets inaugurated.
Re: (Score:2)
Voters-R-Stupid [Re:If they're smart...] (Score:2)
Because voters are stupid. Trump knows how to play suckers. A million trade wars won't bring back old-style manufacturing jobs. It's educate or perish. He sold them snake-oil-nostalgia.
Re:If they're smart... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.
Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.
At least with him, there's a chance.
Re: (Score:1)
I can't believe I found myself missing the Mormon.
If he gets people killed, it's because she's a scu (Score:2)
> If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it's because SHE'S sleazy scumbag.
FTFY
Trump wouldn't have been elected if the Dems hadn't nominated Cruella de Vil.
Re: (Score:2)
That is the first time I have seen her compared to me. It is a surprisingly apt comparison.
Re: (Score:2)
Which of his opponents in the Republican primaries are you referring to?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.
Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.
At least with him, there's a chance.
No you elected an idiot because you are an idiot.
Clinton had flaws, but none of the things you mentioned were among them (with the possible exception of your weirdly sexist comment about her breasts).
Trump is worse in every way (Score:4, Interesting)
She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.
"Traitor"? Seriously? Can I have some of what you are smoking? And claiming that Clinton is less of a self serving liar than Trump is just idiotic.
Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.
Trump is dumb and incompetent AND sleazy and malicious. It's not either/or. The man collects vendettas like a teenager collects Pokemon cards. Whatever you imagine Clinton's faults to be, Trump has matched or exceeded each and every one of them. Trump is a reprehensible, cruel, ignorant, narcissist, whose only real talent is self promotion.
At least with him, there's a chance.
If you actually believe that then you are dumber than you claim Trump is.
Re: (Score:3)
As AC points out, just her email scandal showed how very corrupt she is. The Freedom of Information Act was designed to prevent corruption, and provide the American people with a view into the performance of their government. By running her private email server, she was able to prevent future FoIA requests from being delivered for information about what she did. What is more corrupt than bypassing a law passed by your own party to combat corruption?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Here's a 3d map of the vote by county. Pretty interesting. http://metrocosm.com/election-... [metrocosm.com]
The "popular" vote is due to just a few counties, which happen to also be safe places for illegals, and highly alleged to be corrupt. We don't know how much voter fraud happened in those places, but it is likely non-zero.
Being smart, Trump knew that these were no-win states, so he didn't waste any time or money campaigning there. He was going after the win rather than the popular vote. Considering Trumps rel
Re: (Score:2)
A few states? A few states? What crack are you smoking?
http://www.bbc.com/news/electi... [bbc.com]
Hillary decidedly took 4 states. That is a few states. She won 21 "states" (including DC which isn't a state, but is treated as one for the election). Out of the 51 "states", he won a plurality of the states.
On the rest of your post, things are bad, those decreased unemployed are mostly underemployed. Also, salaries have stayed stable, and not increased with inflation for the past 8 years (at least), this means we
Re: (Score:2)
Not likely - in the 95% of America that isn't a wildly liberal anti-gun and crime-free metropolis, we have guns.
should be been Bernie Sanders! (Score:4, Interesting)
should be been Bernie Sanders!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
During Obama's first run the DNC was concerned about Hillary splitting the ticket so a deal was cut with the Clinton's that included the SOS appointment and the nomination when Obama's 2nd term was up. You could tell the fix was in as usually there are usually many candidates to throw their hat in the ring and this is whittled down quickly. This past DNC nomination was unusual in that there were so few to come forward especially since there are so many better candidates than Hillary in the DNC. Bernie wou
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, as a resident of Maryland, I am just glad it wasn't O'Malley, he was an awful governor here and passed awful legislation such as the rain tax. We were happy for finally be rid of him, but I can't even imagine how bad a president he would be.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Yes, blame the blacks -- oh wait -- jews -- oh wait -- Russians for everything. It's literally impossible that Hillary might have lost because she ran an incompetent campaign while living in special bubble created by the press and her elite celebrity pals who told her that she didn't have to earn the election.
It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.
Bizarro World (Score:5, Insightful)
It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.
I'm curious what the sky looks like in the Bizarro World that republicans appear to inhabit where they actually believe this sort of crap. Tribalism at its finest people...
Trump's xenophobic actions and statements stand on their own. If you don't recognize him for the reprehensible human being he is then I'm not sure what I can do to help you. The best arguments against Donald Trump come right out of his own unfiltered mouth. He's on the record endorsing torture, denigrating women, opposing reproductive rights, calling for mass deportations,endorsing trade wars, cutting taxes on the richest but not the poor, removing health care from millions without a plan to replace it, supporting religious bigotry, and a whole lot more.
Re: (Score:1)
What you should be asking yourself is, how did this man who you describe as being reprehensible win?
Look at it this way: You go into the supermarket for an apple. All apples are the same price. One apple, say, the Tump variety, is wrinkly and smells funny. There is another apple there (Hilary farms), yet you pick the Wrinkly smelly one. Why?
BECAUSE THE OTHER APPLE WAS WORSE THAN THAT ONE.
If Trump's so godawful bad, what does that say about Hilary? If you answer "but but but racists and sexists and homophobe
Re: If they're smart... (Score:5, Interesting)
Because his supports have an IQ of a retarded ferret?
You'd think that after ~15-17 years of identity politics, labeling people as "racists, nazis, retards, bigots, sexists, etc, etc, etc" that the left would learn something. Seems to be a NOPE on that one. And it's only cost them in the US ~1200 seats of power. It's only cost them brexit. It's likely going to cost them Germany and France too. And with the shit that Trudeau and leftists are now pulling in Canada? I wouldn't be surprised if we see the death of the Liberal Party within the next 5 years. And I'll bet that instead of being introspective, people on the left are gonna double down. Just like the democrats in the US are, just like political parties, and media are in the US and Europe.
Just a FYI: The left are overrun with extremists. Whether it be people who claim they're anti-racists being racists, claiming to be anti-bigots, while engaging in bigotry. Engaging in general shitty behavior that enables a literal cultural desert because "cultural appropriation." Engaging in sexist or anti-sexual liberation ideologies. It doesn't matter. You are, where the right was ~25 years ago, when you were out there screaming about the "crazy religious right-wing nuts." Get rid of the crazies, dump the identity politics. In short: Get your shit in order.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots. They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, and they don't even bother to deny it most of the time. In fact some of them revel in it, including Trump himself.
This mistake was not countering the narrative that white males are oppressed and equality and progressive ideas have gone too far. Fear and resentment are powerful tools.
Re: (Score:3)
You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots.
Going by your reasoning, then democrats and people who support them are pedophiles right? After all, there are so many of them that have deep links to people like Epstein. And there's just so many articles on leftwing media sources, sites and so on in the defense of pedophiles, child porn, and so on. See how easy that works? Haven't learned a single fucking thing.
They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, ...
Repeatedly saying that, doesn't make it true. Then again, your definition of "racist and bigots" seems to be anybody who refuses to agree w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm having fun watching myself get modded down hard. =D
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Trump needs a real phone to call russian prostitutes and golden-shower them.
Sorry, Snowflake. This was yet another bogus Fake News story. Completely fabricated. And you fell for it.
Thanks for playing.
Re: (Score:1)
He's been accused of less rape that #42. So hypocrite.
Re: (Score:1)
the grapes are soar, eh hombre :)
Muchacho, aboot the only time grapes can soar is if e.g. launched out of a window in the Trump Towers.
Well... (Score:2, Insightful)
I guess someone will have to program Putin's number in it for him.
Re: (Score:1)
They'll just add a button with Putin's picture on it for him.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry, a helpful Russian agent will see to that.
Tweet less (Score:3, Interesting)
Did they take tweeter off it?
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know what the security implications are of having Twitter installed on the phone, but I'd be shocked if DJT didn't demand it. I'm sure a lot of his supporters and staff would like to have Twitter taken away so he'll stop making "He said WHAT!?!" headlines, but I'd be surprised if the inauguration was the last we heard of @realDonaldTrump. I do hope that he maintains a strict line between his personal opinions and tweets as @POTUS - I'd be upset if those weren't vetted in some fashion before being sh
Re: (Score:2)
Me too. Up until now, I've only been following one account. I just made it 2. And when I see him abusing @POTUS, I'll get really upset and I'll... I'll... I guess I'll just deal with it.
Re: (Score:1)
Hell yes. Hail Eris, let this be interesting.
The office? (Score:2, Funny)
The safest thing to do is give him a phone with no sim card, set the shortcut for twitter to open notepad, and let him tweet til his heart is content in that local text file.
Re: (Score:2)
Then later dump that text file to pastebin... 1000+ post /. comment section ensues
Re: (Score:2)
The safest thing to do is give him a phone with no sim card, set the shortcut for twitter to open notepad, and let him tweet til his heart is content in that local text file.
Wouldn't it be safer to give him an etch-a-sketch [dilbert.com]?
Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
tell me the phone somehow has Twitter blocked entirely.
Re: (Score:2)
Worse. They gave him access to a second account.
Reasonable and boring. (Score:1, Troll)
Lets face it, the President of the United States is the world's biggest target, Tump with getting elected without the popular vote + stating negative comments towards nearly anyone who didn't fully indorse him (people, corporations and countries) + have a reputation as a a bully and in general everything wrong with America. Really reinforces the fact he is a target. His off the shelf Android Phone, probably could be (Probably already had been) hacked from the resources of all the groups that hate him.
Re:Reasonable and boring. (Score:5, Interesting)
Let's face it. Your argument is kinda weak because every president elect has always been the world's biggest target regardless of how much of the popular vote the pres won (for the curious, the presidential candidates must always spend resources to optimize their electoral college votes because that's what counts, unlike the useless popular vote). The president's smartphone is always locked down and provided by the government IT specialists regardless of what his previous preferences were. Just last year, when the Samsung Galaxy S7 was "the thing", Obama was handed a "locked down" Galaxy S4 because this is how it works. The commander in chief must always be using a tested and locked down device.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
The rules of the game are to win the most electoral votes, the end. Harping on the popular vote is like a losing football team harping on the fact that they had more yards total offense or a higher TOP (time of possession). Doesn't matter-the rules say the team with the most points wins. If the rules say gain the most yards, the strategy of t
Justifying assasination? (Score:2)
So, if he is whacked today before taking office (and Obama appoints the next President, as CNN helpfully advised us will happen [youtu.be]), you'll be relieved and think — perhaps even state — the murderer has done all of a us a favor?
Re: (Score:2)
No, actually, I haven't. Maybe, because there were very few, and the idiots got promptly prosecuted [zombietime.com]?
Re: (Score:3)
...currently still known as the Washington Monument...
one, two, three, boom! (Score:1)
The Cyber (Score:2)
I hope they're also giving him a locked-down version of the nuclear football.
Not starting OS wars.. but (Score:4, Insightful)
I am personally glad our new president wasn't part of the iSheep sect.
Yeah but no but yeah but no (Score:2)
I use both iPhone & Samsung. If Apple doesn't give info to authorities on the terrorists I'll only be using Samsung until they give info.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 19, 2016
https://twitter.com/realDonald... [twitter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
...bring their manufacturing back into the US as they're a US company and should be creating US jobs.
I'd say they're a global company based in the US and, as such, should be creating jobs wherever it makes sense for their bottom line.
Very strange (Score:2)
Why believe the intelligence agencies now? -is this another vector for "leaks" and "very dishonest reporting" + "fake news"?
I'd say more but Trump is doing very well in digging himself into a hole without needed a shove.
At least he'll have Twitter (Score:3)
He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.
And really, that's the most important part for Trump.
Please please please..... (Score:2, Funny)
Tell me they replaced it with a Samsung Note 7.
Re: (Score:2)
why direct access? (Score:2)
It would be better if Trump just tweeted by sending text messages to his staff, who can then post it. That would also add an extra level of protection against making a fool of himself.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would anyone who isn't Trump himself want to protect him from making a fool of himself?
The more he speaks his mind, the better off everyone is. Let him dig his hole.
Re: (Score:1)
While he has made some mistakes and might benefit from a bit of feedback and moderation, Trump's tweets generally have worked for him pretty well.
It's the left that is digging their hole on social media right now with their over-the-top outrage, fear mongering, and name calling.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would anyone who isn't Trump himself want to protect him from making a fool of himself?
We elected him POTUS. When he makes an ass of himself, we all look bad. I'd prefer it if he'd stop.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe we are bad.
Don't worry (Score:1)
the idiot will soon tweet his new number and brag about it being secure.
More adapted to his very small fingers (Score:2)
Android? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
No, Trump vowed to banish Apple from the land because they refused to unlock that iPhone the FBI was bringing them to court about.
You know, the one they wanted the special "backdoor firmware" written for.
Apple refused, and Trump said he'd get rid of his iPhone until Apple became a good little dog and write the FBI their backdoor firmware.
Re: (Score:3)
iPhone is for poor people who want to feel like they matter, it's a status symbol among the blue collar crowd... like prada, louis vuitton, dolce & gabbana, armani.... things that higher class people get paid to hawk in public but in private would never actually use
So what kind of phone do the higher class people use in private? It's Windows Mobile isn't it?
Secret Service? (Score:2)
Even aside from their recent history of embarrassing scandal, you don't really think of them as one of the techie outfits.
Do we know what kind of phone? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Smart Move (Score:2)
Certainly smarter than Obama [nytimes.com]
SubjectIsSubject (Score:1)
What I want to know is (Score:2)
why no one has commented about this: http://metro.co.uk/video/donal... [metro.co.uk]
Is Trump trying to tell us something about his hotels? Does he have a bunch of video of politicians, heads of state, and CEOs doing things they'd rather not have become public knowledge?
Re: (Score:2)
The Secret Service is the Department of Treasury, not the NSA.
Re: (Score:2)
It's it any sensible setup it's twitter app never talks to twitter only a proxy.
Re: (Score:2)
This is actually a great idea. A Twitter proxy for the POTUS. He might notice a 30 minute delay before his tweets get posted, but it would allow staffers a chance for a, "Mr President, are you sure about this?" moment.
It might even be enough for him to catch himself - "Do I really want to admit to SNL that I'm still watching?" or some such.
Re: (Score:2)
True it need not even be automated but a staffer crossing an air gap.
Re: (Score:2)
It comes as no surprise that Trump would have to do the same for the sake of his security.
This is true; it is perfectly reasonable and expected that he would get a special, locked down phone. But at the same time, any excuse to be snarky about Trump is a good excuse to be snarky about Trump.