Russian Hackers Launch Targeted Cyberattacks Hours After Trump's Win (vice.com) 160
Hours after Donald Trump won the Presidential Election, a group of hackers that is widely believed to be Russian and was involved in the breach of the Democratic National Committee launched a wave of attacks against dozens of people working at universities, think tanks, NGOs, and even inside the US government. From a report on Motherboard:Around 9 a.m. ET on Wednesday, the hackers sent a series of phishing emails trying to trick dozens of victims into opening booby-trapped attachments containing malware, and clicking on malicious links, according to security firm Volexity, which observed and reported the five attack waves. The targets work for organizations such as Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, the Atlantic Council, the RAND Corporation, and the State Department, among others. One of the phishing emails included a forwarded message appearing to be from the Clinton Foundation, apparently sent by a professor at Harvard. The email used the professor's real address, and according to Volexity's founder Steven Adair, it's likely that the professor got hacked and the attackers then used his account to send out the phishing emails. (The professor did not respond to a request for comment.) One of the targets, who shared the email she received with Motherboard, said she "almost fell for it."
Nice of them to take Election day off (Score:2)
They took off Election day so they wouldn't taint the results. Good for them!
Re:Nice of them to take Election day off (Score:5, Funny)
Some more headlines:
Russian Hackers Launch Targeted Cyberattacks Hours BEFORE Trump's Win
Russian Hackers Launch Targeted Cyberattacks DURING US ELECTION
Russian Hackers Launch Targeted Cyberattacks ALL THE FUCKING TIME...
Re: (Score:1)
Russian hackers made me step in dog poop
Russian hackers made my milk go bad
Russian hackers made me late to work
Won't somebody please start a nuclear war with Russia so we can stop this madness!!??
Re: (Score:1)
BBC News summarized the evidence [bbc.co.uk] for the Russian state being behind a whole host of cyber-attacks since 2007, via the Fancy Bears hacking group. There is no smoking gun but the article and those linked within it (well worth reading) suggest evidence of Russian involvement in the language and timestamps of the malware as well as the list of targets: the Georgian, German, Romainian and Polish governments, Ukraine, Russian dissidents, NATO, the MH17 investigation team, as well as the US Democratic Party, US me
Re: (Score:1)
Russian infiltrator posing as Slashdot member posts fabrications to indirect and distract from Trumps involvement with the security services of enemy powers.
Re: (Score:1)
If you smash your skull you will find some useful meat inside. Go be something more useful like compost or meat.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure they had already accomplished all they needed to ahead of the election.
For the most popular, and among the most easily-hack-able voting machines, physical access and a USB stick were required. Kind of hard to do at every polling station in a District without being noticed.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The ex Soviets are past masters at infiltration. You hack the electorate not the voting machines..
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
They took off Election day so they wouldn't taint the results. Good for them!
And also to celebrate that their candidate won.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They're Russians, so they had to spend yesterday sobering up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They took off Election day so they wouldn't taint the results.
Sounds plausible, but the real reason that Russia took election day off is because they were publicly informed that if any Russian cyber malfeasance was detected there would be immediate and effective retaliation.
Re: (Score:1)
Bwa, ha, ha. That is just main stream media bullshit and chatter. Russia has to do a whole bunch more just to catch up to cyber crimes targeted at it. Reality is down that path are a series of targeted electro magnetic pulses, not nuclear, do not have to be, just thousands upon thousands of attacks, crippling metropolitan centres for weeks at a time. So no, everyone is backing off, except the criminals of course, they are still hard at it and that is why the big players, the governments need to work togethe
Re: (Score:1)
Stop with the bullshit rhetoric, it serves no one but blah blah blah...
You stop with the bullshit rhetoric. [nytimes.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Do you even know who owns the New York Times and not point putting a link, I refuse to obey and log in, screw em.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone who ever ran his own mail server would have noticed that spam and malware attacks follow the US work week and public holidays. So the simple fact is that most of these 'Russian' hackers are living in the USA.
Sorry, but your logic does not follow.
It would make the most sense to do your dirty deeds on busy days. Also, November 8, voting day, is not an official Holiday in most places.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe he will just sack the FBI and replace them with the New KGB.
False News (Score:5, Informative)
This is a funny story to post immediately after another story was posted about false news.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you understand the difference between "false" and "boring".
US, not Russia (Score:1)
The US is DDOSing, not the russians :
http://americanintelligencerep... [americanin...report.com]
See the difference? (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps a headline rewrite will put things in perspective:
Russian Hackers Launch Targeted Cyberattacks Hours After Clinton's loss
Emphasis mine.
See the difference?
Re: (Score:2)
See the difference?
Yes, you're a Trumpian.
Why would they stop now? (Score:1, Troll)
Getting Trump into the White House was just the beginning.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Were you born and spent your life in a video rental store, or something? Your accusations hint that your view of the world is like a bad Hollywood movie. Russian hackers can't "hack" the election and decide who gets to be president, get it?
Re: (Score:2)
Was that "get it" with the same tone of voice a mob enforcer would say "capisce"?
Are your comrades currently tracking down what school Mr quax's kids go to?
Re: (Score:1)
Russian hackers can't "hack" the election and decide who gets to be president,
Nice AC projection. Of course that's not how they operate they are way more subtle than that. Going through Wikileaks for instance was very crafty.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet you seem totally convinced that it was Russians that did it, when all your information comes from US govt sources or the BBC, which historically have a major propaganda machine against them. Legitimate or not, stop being a tool.
Re: (Score:2)
You are thoroughly mistaken in where you think my information comes from.
I am a German native speaker, and also can read French pretty well. The intelligence that Trump has been compromised has hardly filtered through MSM yet.
I put a pretty high chance on the possibility that you just put the ultimate Manchurian candidate into the White House.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe you're a Russian infiltrator.
Re: (Score:2)
Competent bunch :-)
So...phishing is news now? (Score:4, Interesting)
So...phishing is news now? Zzzzzzz...
Re:So...phishing is news now? (Score:5, Funny)
So...phishing is news now? Zzzzzzz...
No no, get it right. It's "Russian" phishing. Also it was Russian because they said so. Now remember to double or triple down and call everyone racist/sexist/homophobic/misogynist and keep wondering why this helped Trump get elected.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Government sponsored phishing is news. Always has been and always will be.
Re: (Score:2)
Government sponsored phishing is news. Always has been and always will be.
I see that some troll is in here "shaping" slashdot commentary. Hi Vlad, is that you?
NEWSFLASH!!! (Score:4, Informative)
Russian Hackers did shit during practically every day of Obama's presidency.
Conspiracy?!?!?!?!?
Re: (Score:2)
It's still Obama's presidency. They've been doing stuff all year.
Re: (Score:2)
But this is Trump's America now... I'm confused.
Re: (Score:2)
Russian Hackers did shit during practically every day of Obama's presidency.
Conspiracy?!?!?!?!?
YES!
Simple Definition of conspiracy
: a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal
: the act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal
How is this news? (Score:1)
Hackers sent out phishing attempts. How is this news? What next? The sun rose?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hackers sent out phishing attempts. How is this news? What next? The sun rose?
Well, here in the US, it will rise in about 3 to 4 hours. Of course, that is not news. . .
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
It is.
For whatever fucktarded reason - probably because they're being led by the nose by old senile fucks - people are jonesing for Cold War 2.0.
I mean, I can almost understand it - the Cold War era provided some of the best Hollywood movies. Brutalist architecture, an angry sounding language, and frigid temperatures are all a bit more scary than Achmed bin Jihadi and his hole-filled cast-off American t-shirt and pants as he screeches from the back of a beat up Toyota.
There's something to be said for bein
Re: (Score:2)
...old senile fucks - people are jonesing for Cold War 2.0....
You should talk, you just dated yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Words you should live by.
Of course they do (Score:4, Insightful)
With a bit of active help they got the president they wanted. Why stop now?
Re: (Score:2)
The Russians are so successful at what they are doing because the work along the fissures that are already there.
But I can't shake the suspicion that they have something on Trump. It's a tried and tested Russian method [wikipedia.org], and Trump visit the country many times. Given his sexual appetites it would have been easy for their secret service.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the Democrat's fault for having dirty laundry, the Russians didn't create it. Stop shooting the messenger. Also, what goes around comes around. We've done the same to other countries far more often. Hillary didn't need to delete thousands of emails. She didn't need to lie or forget about a bunch of things. The Russians didn't conspire to get Sanders out of the election. They didn't create Obamacare and allow insurance companies to take advantage of it (dropping tons of people so they would have re-sign up on higher costing plans). Etc...
It's all in the timing. . .
Trump has truckloads of dirt, but it all came out too soon. (Or too late, as he's getting the 'Trump University' case hearing-date extended (or at least trying to) from the day after inauguration to some time later. . . when he can pull strings and get the case dropped, perhaps.
Agent X7 must be proud of them (Score:1)
After all they did to help him, he must be very proud of them.
Re: (Score:2)
After all they did to help him, he must be very proud of them.
He's got a new debt to repay.
Re: (Score:1)
After all they did to help him, he must be very proud of them.
He's got a new debt to repay.
No, the debt gets pushed to the next administration, that's their SOP.
Proof (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone with a passing familiarity with malware knows that such spear-phishing scams may be /anyone/ /anywhere/.
So they're Russian, you say? (picture of Putin glowering at the top of the article) How come you're so /certain/ it's the Russian government and not, you know, the Russian Mob (Russian Business Network and affiliates) or someone in the RBN pretending to be FSB or any combination of Russian speaking expatriates or even the CIA posing as FSB or RBN or something much more mundane?
>undetectable
>detected
>passed by the filters
BECAUSE ANYONE WITH ANY SENSE IN HIS HEAD WHO IS WRITING MALWARE HAS ALL THESE FILTERS THEMSELVES TO MAKE SURE THEY PASS BEFORE RELEASING INTO THE WILD.
This has been standard operations for malware for the past, oh, nearly 20 years. Because the filters are only as good as the latest definitions and anything not in the definitions is going to skate right on by. THIS IS NOT NEW.
I'm treating these nearly fact-free vague news stories like this as pure propaganda, because that's what they are. Like our top-secret-hush-hush "CLANDESTINE" retaliations at the putative "russians" /announced/ on NBC News (fucking really?).
This fucking forced march into a new Cold War is fucking stupid. The clowns that have been pushing for it since the collapse of the Soviet Union need to be imprisoned at the very least.
--
BMO
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? That tactic seems to work just fine. If it ain't broke..
Re: (Score:3)
The clowns that have been pushing for it since the collapse of the Soviet Union need to be imprisoned at the very least.
So are you going to be the one to go to Russia and get them to lock up Putin? ... I ask because it normally takes at least two to quarrel.
Re: (Score:2)
Look closely why the Russians acted that way. They were being pushed. If somebody started crap in Cuba, where Guantanamo is, or Bahrain or Japan, where the US has bases, you can be a 100% the US will make sure shit hits the fan.
So number one fact that happened, EU sponsored coup d'etat against a pro-Russian govt in the Ukraine, where they have this major base in Crimea. Conclusion: Russians annexed Crimea and supported rebels in the East.
Number two: Trying to forcefully remove Bashar Al Assad from Syria. Th
Re: (Score:1)
Generally, when a US "agency" fingers a particular group as the source of an attack it is because they possess complete routing information.
Re: (Score:1)
When we're talking about spear-phishing then it's wise to look at the targets: who would benefit from hacking "Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, the Atlantic Council, the RAND Corporation, and the State Department"? This "Russian Business Network"? There is a widespread and long-standing series of attacks which points to the Russian state being the culprit. I'll post this again because it was unaccountably modded to zero before.
BBC News summarized the evidence [bbc.co.uk] for the Russian state being behind a whole
Re: (Score:2)
Its quite the opposite from a march to a new Cold War, what the stories are implying (and we'll see from January onwards how much meat there is to it) is that Trump and Putin will passively work together to cover eachothers asses. Putin hacks and flamewars the opposition in the US, Trump will let Russia do what it wants. Not
In non-related news. (Score:3, Funny)
10's of millions of turkeys are cooked and eaten just hours after Trump is elected!!! Proof of the end of times brought about by the election!!!
(Ok, so it is more like 384 hours, and this has nothing to do with Trump, but the two have to be related somehow right? Or could it just be that hackers do what hackers do?)
Re: (Score:2)
That's a good way to illustrate the post-hoc fallacies Slashdot is relying on these days.
Put the proof on the table (Score:1, Insightful)
or shut the f-ck up. The Russian hacker boogey-man bullshit is getting tiresome, and nobody believes it anymore. Anyone can compromise machines anywhere in the world and launch attacks from them, and the only ones who have been proven to do so are the NSA, so this is more likely some bullshit propaganda scare again. Show us the irrefutable proof that Russian state-sponsored hackers are attacking U.S. systems, or stop posting crap like this.
Re: (Score:2)
20% of our Uranium... Billions in cash to his proxy in Iran...
Please go elsewhere with your Breitbart news. I hear Facebook wants some.
Psychological Warfare 101 (Score:1)
Probably want some internal documents... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Success Rate (Score:2)
Only one person "Almost fell for it".
Russian Hackers: Give up.
This is stupid. (Score:2)
> The email used the professor's real address, and according to Volexity's founder Steven Adair, it's likely that the professor got hacked and the attackers then used his account to send out the phishing emails.
You don't need to access the account to include a SUBJECT header. Whoever wrote that article has no idea about how SMTP works.
Re: (Score:2)
> The email used the professor's real address, and according to Volexity's founder Steven Adair, it's likely that the professor got hacked and the attackers then used his account to send out the phishing emails.
You don't need to access the account to include a SUBJECT header. Whoever wrote that article has no idea about how SMTP works.
It sounds like you don't either, otherwise you would have said "envelope", not "subject". Sure, it can all be spoofed but it's way easy to just hijack a Windoze box, plus easier to cover tracks (though not foolproof...)
Re: This is stupid. (Score:2)
Aw my bad.
s/SUBJECT/FROM/
Re: (Score:2)
Whoops, you lost another geek point.
And So What? (Score:1)
Fucking Establishment Media is still trying to start another cold war...
Sorry bitches but the current administration isn't going to push your shitty pseudoliberal corny agenda.
Re: (Score:2)
Fucking Establishment Media is still trying to start another cold war...
Sorry bitches but the current administration isn't going to push your shitty pseudoliberal corny agenda.
Agreed that the media wants to re-ignite another cold war. It's good for advertising, and likewise good for the MISC (formerly MIC). The most I've heard out of Putin lately is that, "We want to be a citizen and trade partner with the Global Community."
Sure, supposedly 'Fancy Bear' is located there, but they could be VPN'ing in from anywhere on the planet.
The second half of your post is unintelligible, so I will ignore it.
Plain and Simple proper planning (Score:2)
The Election was late-breaking news and people were hungry for tidbits of information. That means many (not all, of course) normally wary and aware recipients of the eMail would have fallen for it, despite probably knowing better the other 364 days of the year.
The results may have played a role in the uptake, but it would have worked regardless of who won, as long as it was reasonably close, and that would include the state results only
no attack on RNC? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And then DRAIN THE SWAMP! LOCK HER UP!
Or just commend her and continue as normal. Or whatever. You won so it doesn't matter anymore.
Re: (Score:3)
They won't notice. Their eyes will be on whatever new devil brietbart manfactures to distract them.
Re: (Score:2)
Yay for one party rule!!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Is Russia trying to break apart the USA? (Score:1)
Of course! Just hold my beer so I can use both hands.
Re: (Score:2)
There's Russians under my bed!
Sarah Palin? ... is that you?
Re: (Score:2)
There's Russians under my bed!
Sarah Palin? ... is that you?
No, Sarah Palin said:
"They're rushing in my daughter's bed!"
Tip the veal, try the waitress . . .