With Carly Fiorina As Running Mate, Cruz's H-1B Stance Now In Question (computerworld.com) 327
dcblogs quotes a report from Computerworld: In 2013, Sen. Ted Cruz emerged as one of the Senate's top H-1B visa supporters, and argued for a 500% visa cap increase. But during his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, Cruz had a conversion. Cruz's presidential platform proposed a $110,000 minimum wage for visa workers, among other restrictions, as a way of ending their use as low-cost labor. The move marked a complete turnabout on the H-1B issue. Cruz's decision Wednesday to add former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina as his running mate if he wins the nomination, may make his newly found H-1B beliefs a hard sell. At HP, Fiorina was a prominent supporter of the offshore outsourcing model, said Ron Hira, an associate professor of public policy at Howard University. "To pump up profits, she was an early adopter of the practice, which given HP's status as a leading Silicon Valley firm, pushed other firms to adopt offshoring," said Hira. As offshoring gained, Fiorina played a leading role in defending globalization. To make her point, in 2004, Fiorina said: "There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore," reported the San Francisco Chronicle.
Really? (Score:2)
He wondered aloud, "Why are we even contemplating running mate issues prior to a Presidential nomination?"
Carly Fiorina is... (Score:5, Interesting)
a bad business person.
Like many other CEOs, she thought short-term without considering the long-term implications of her actions.
She pushed outsourcing to the detriment of American workers
She eroded the previous HP quality
She bought a horrible company in Compaq
She failed to properly integrate Compaq into HP
She failed to leverage a crown jewel in the DEC Alpha, and contributed to its cancellation after the acquisition
She destroyed the value of the overall business of HP
I don't need to say she is anti-American, though she may be. Definitely a business failure though, despite the golden parachute.
Re:Carly Fiorina is... (Score:5, Informative)
The unforgivable sin was the damage to the handhelds (including calculators).
Re: (Score:3)
When you have an instant drop on all the involved companies, you know tha
Re: (Score:2)
There's just this hazy assertion that it might have been worse otherwise because HP servers are descended from Compaq servers. All I know for sure is that Fiorina turned the combined current market share of HP and Compaq into less than the market share of HP at the time of the merger.
She still did better than AOL/Time Warner, then.
We can't know what the result would have been, until we invent time machines and alternate universes.
Re:Carly Fiorina is... (Score:5, Insightful)
She was an utter moron, the very picture of the idiot CEO who has no fucking idea what the business they've been put in charge of does, and just starts running amok through various business units, building debt with shit purchases, and then firing the R&D people because they can't get the two or three quarter turnarounds the fucking retards put on the Board by the institutional investors (read: corporate rapists) think is needed.
Re: (Score:3)
Like many other CEOs, she thought short-term without considering the long-term implications of her actions.
That might have been forgivable if she'd had any success at all with the short-term results of her actions.
Re:Carly Fiorina is... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, she did get a 7% bump in the stock price.
When news got out that the board sacked her.
Re:Carly Fiorina is... (Score:5, Informative)
She also made Lucent what it is today. Let's never forget Lucent.
Re: (Score:3)
Carly is just a ploy to get the Trump voters. Cruz notices that the republican base wants a bad business person with a long record of destruction, so he has to put one on his ticket to match Trump.
Who cares? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
they are meant for each other. he has the world's most punchable face (look it up, its a fact) and she, well, she's not all that far behind in that area, either.
Re: (Score:2)
But the media and establishment really, really, really, really want Cruz. So he's gonna get it, cuz they said so.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not so sure. The establishment may be pushing cruz to force a contested election so that they don't have to pick either Trump or Cruz.
The media also wants a contested convention because that's ratings gold.
Re: (Score:2)
Please, how much money do you want to bet that Trump won't get the Republican nomination at this point? Whatever it is I'll see it. He has it locked down at this point. The "controversy" is a media invention designed to get readers. It doesnt really exist.
Only complete idiots (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Only complete idiots (Score:4, Interesting)
Trump recently pivoted in a debate to say that he now supported the H1B program, in spite of what his web site said. Megyn Kelly followed up just to make sure she heard him correctly. Then the next day, probably after talking to Rudy Guiliani and other trusted advisors, he flipflopped back to his original position.
So you can't trust Trump on H1B either. He'll say whatever it takes to win the election. I bet even he doesn't know what he'll do if he got elected, on that and any number of issues foreign and domestic.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know what, I'm still trying to figure out a bright side.
Re: (Score:2)
The question was about highly skilled workers, which is what we imagine H1B to be. But that's not what H1B is.
The sales pitch is Einstein and von Braun. The reality is the foreign guy that answers the phone when you call Dell for tech support.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cruz is one of those people who will say/do whatever it takes to get elected. Tea partier? Sure, why not. Establishment pet? He will obey for votes. H1-B visas? What difference does it make, as long as it gets him votes? He'll flip-flop on anything you pay him to do, and then bore you to death with a long, legalistic, and incorrect explanation of why he is not actually flip-flopping.
You're confusing Trump with Cruz. Trump is that way, but Cruz has an entire worldview of insanity, and it's cast in concrete. Don't let his debating skills as a lawyer fool you. Yes, he can speak on either side of any issue, but when he gets to pick the side he wants, the country is in big trouble. The only risk with the Donald is that he picks a V-P like the big dick Cheney.
What a mystifiying decision (Score:2)
Ted Cruz was already a distant second banana, and has decided to pump up his popularity by inviting as running mate the least popular vagino-American in Silicon Valley. The only possibly worse choice would be John McAfee.
Re: (Score:2)
At least McAfee would be worth a few jokes. Fiorina is only deserving of unmitigated contempt. One of the worst CEOs in recent history, which is astounding, consider the amount of competition for worthless brain dead senior management there is these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Hans Reiser might be a psychopath but at least he's not incompetent. Carly has not the slightest bit of adequacy.
Heh. (Score:5, Funny)
Cruz may need H1-B status to work as POTUS.
Madame Vice President (Score:5, Funny)
Official Cruz-Fiornia campaign portrait:
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/... [asset-cache.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's "Wayland". Get your gay puppeteer references straight.
Oh, and here's a little gift for your thoughtful and appreciative comment:
https://youtu.be/---tyXiY1fE [youtu.be]
[Many people forget that in the '70s, Wayland and Madame were so popular that they actually made movies. This clip is from the unforgettable "Norman...Is That You?" with Redd Foxx. Also, I apologize to the young'ns that will be completely puzzled by the reference.]
In question now? (Score:2)
Cruz's recently acquired anti "H1-B stance" is election year politics just like his recently acquired anti TPP stance.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The guy is a sociopath. He has no sincerely held views, no real beliefs, he's just a pure political animal, a Frank Underwood with eyeliner.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The guy is a sociopath. He has no sincerely held views, no real beliefs, he's just a pure political animal, a Frank Underwood with eyeliner.
I do think is evangelical views are sincere, which makes him even more unvotable for to me.
H-1B Is not offshoring (Score:3, Informative)
H1-B is bringing in guest workers to the United States, but keeping the work in house.
Offshoring is simply moving the work to a foreign country.
The article and summary seem to have confused the two.
Re: (Score:2)
Reading too much into it (Score:2, Interesting)
On the bright side, maybe Fiorina would try to offshore Congress?
Re: (Score:2)
maybe Fiorina would try to offshore Congress
I say we outsource Congress to SE Asia and the Executive branch to China. TSA can be replaced by lowest bidder. I heard that some company named i-SYS will do it for free. Let's grate America up again!
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps more interesting though is that several weeks ago there was also a rumor going around that Cruz had an affair with
Re: (Score:2)
they forgot that the party doesn't like Cruz either.
Where I live the media were running stories only a couple of weeks ago about how Cruz was hated by the Republican elite, almost as much as they hate Trump. Yesterday I read about how Cruz is teaming up with Kasich to stop Trump, and the Republicans love Cruz.
No-one seems able to explain how that was ever going to work, so of course it fell over at the first hurdle, and Trump won five more States. If Cruz has Fiorina as his running mate, what about Kasich?
None of this makes any sense unless you get no
Who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)
Cruz strikes me as an opportunist who will engage in policy-based evidence making. It doesn't matter how good or bad the H1-B program is - he will denigrate it or support it based entirely on what will win votes and/or please major campaign contributors and/or result in some concession in some sleazy backroom deal. Cruz will do with H1-B whatever gains him the most political capital, and Carly's position is irrelevant.
Not that Cruz is much different from most of the other contenders, Democrat or Republican.
I always thought Cruz was insane, even in Texas (Score:2)
Fiorina as V-P? Does Cruz think the presidential election is an UNpopularity contest?
Even by Texas standards of insanity, his desperation is hilarious.
Born in Texas, but now I'm an ex-Texan of the no-vote-for-you party and I donated my poll tax to Bernie Sanders.
Re: (Score:3)
Just like you I couldn't make heads or tails out of this choice... until I figured out that what must have happened is that all of Cruz first choices turned him down and he had to settle for Carly.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, at this point I'm hoping the Donald gets the nomination, but no one will agree to be his V-P. That would be a hilarious end for the party that claims to be the legacy of Abe Lincoln's Republican Party and the GOP of Ike and Teddy. Just a sad brand hijack.
Why question his stance and not hers? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think he chose her because the establishment likes her, she will attract more women and she can go toe to toe with Hillary without the automatic label of sexist.
I am surprised Trump didn't ask her first ... maybe he did.
Trump is going to have a Hispanic woman as his running mate.
More Than One Issue (Score:2)
There's more than one issue, and I dare say that when it comes to the issues, H-1B visas are not at the forefront of American politics. Most people outside of the tech industry don't even know what the hell they are. Whatever differences Cruz and Fiorina have regarding H-1B visas really don't matter - it's not a significant part of the platform.
Cruz is a Theocracy loving shit sucker (Score:2, Informative)
And Fiorina ran HP, and via mergers, Compaq and DEC into the ground and perpetuated the off shoring nonsense that helped destroy major parts of the tech industry in the US back then.
As much of a nazi demagogue as Trump is, Cruz and his minion are even worse. Sucks that the Dem candidate likely to win that nomination is a corrupt cunt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Don't forget Lucent. She helped make Lucent what it is today.
Here's a carrot (Score:3)
You were just named a vice presidential candidate, Ms Fiorina. So why the long face?
http://assets.nydailynews.com/... [nydailynews.com]
First Palin. Now Fiorina (Score:2, Insightful)
WTF is wrong with the Republican Party?
Prediction (Score:2)
Having followed politics a while, I predict a response similar to the following:
"There certainly have been abuses in the H-1B program. We should apply the lessons of these experiences, review the guest worker laws, and tighten them if necessary such that companies that truly cannot find qualified citizens still have access to guest workers, yet avoid the abuses we've been seeing from companies lacking a genuine need."
Minimum wage (Score:3)
It's *sounds* good to set a "minimum wage", but H-1B abuses are not about money, they're about abusing workers in every other way. Employers have no problem paying a worker for 40 hours work at a fair wage since they can pressure them into working 80 hours.
Ok, Slashdot... (Score:2)
You do realize that H1-B visas are probably a pretty minor thing in the grand scope? Maybe there might be more important or pressing concerns in presidential hopefuls than how they come down on visas for the tech industry?
Cuz that was the first thing on your mind when you heard this announcement?
Republican Mind Control (Score:5, Funny)
The People: "I am not fucking voting for Hillary! I won't! I swear, I won't!!!"
Republicans: "Oh, yes you will. You will vote for exactly whom we want you to."
Re:Why does Slashdot oppose H-1B? (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the problem is bringing them here at the same wages they make in India. If they force the corps to pay them a wage equivalent to what an American worker in the same job normally makes then it's not a problem. Using them as cheap labor is racist.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the problem is bringing them here at the same wages they make in India.
H1-B workers already make way more than they do in India. You couldn't even survive in America on typical Indian tech wages, because of the much higher prices here.
Anyway, there is no reason to expect Ted's position on this to change because of Carly. VP candidates typically have zero input on policy.
Re:Why does Slashdot oppose H-1B? (Score:5, Informative)
Anyway, there is no reason to expect Ted's position on this to change because of Carly. VP candidates typically have zero input on policy.
Biden - *IAA. Cheney - Halliburton. The last two VPs had strong connections to certain lobbies and those lobbies did well during the tenure of those VPs.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
So then you should lobby for an equal pay law. this is a European thing. To get it you need real unions and politicians that understand that equality is as important as freedom and fraternalism. However, what I learned form the average US citizen, unions are evil and equality is evil. Under the assumption that H-1B visa applicants work for less then this is classic capitalism. That is what you decided to have.
Re:Why does Slashdot oppose H-1B? (Score:4, Informative)
For instance, Acme Widgets decides that instead of paying its own IT workers at $80,000 apiece, it'll just contract out its IT work to a company like Infosys or Tata. That company just happens to employ lots of H-1Bs as its workers for contracts, making $40,000 each, but it tells Acme they'll work for an FTE rate of $50,000, saving Acme $30,000 per worker. No workers were directly replaced, so they get away with it.
-1 Disagree (Score:5, Insightful)
I modded you down because I disagree with you. It's not racism. H-1B takes jobs away from qualified Americans. I hope I was quick enough that nobody sees your post. Please stop posting crap that's wrong. Otherwise I'll keep modding down all of your garbage that I disagree with. I'm posting anonymously so I don't undo your well deserved downmod.
- chipschap
Re: (Score:2)
- chipschap
This miserable dog of an AC used my nickname without authorization of any kind. I certainly had nothing to do with the post above. Unethical doesn't even begin to describe the AC's action.
Re: (Score:2)
However, permission isn't required for using pseudonymous nicknames online.
Saved my bacon more than once, that did.
Re: (Score:3)
I modded you down because I disagree with you.
FYI that is absolutely the wrong reason to mod someone down.
Mod them down if they are spam, or their tone is flamebait or trollish.
If you merely disagree, write a well-reasoned post explaining why you disagree. Which you did, but you shouldn't have down-modded, that's abuse.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How about not at all? The US already has work visas, which worked perfectly until businesses wanted cheap imported labor, and undying loyalty (90 days until deportation is a big motivator.)
I see H-1Bs abused all the time. From recruiters demanding 5-7 years of Apple Swift2 so the employer can say they can't find anyone in the US, so have to go overseas, to "secret requirements" which only can be fulfilled by a H-1B worker. I have been told by bosses that Americans and Europeans are lazy and are going to
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Informative)
Well since the late 90s american law firms have taught companies how to disqualify american workers for jobs and get in H1Bs instead. A Pittsburgh firm famously got on Youtube for a seminar were they did that. It hasn't stopped. In my region it's gotten so bad for H1Bs that there are barely any large companies that have american IT workers, at the same time myself and hundreds of others who have applied for some of these jobs were not hired. While I can't tell what rate those workers are then paid, what exactly do you suppose is the reason to discriminate against american IT workers?
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Insightful)
What do you see that makes you think they are being done right?
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Insightful)
Funny. When lefties talk about illegal immigration from Mexico they're all "tear down the wall" "no human is illegal" and so on. But when they talk about H1B, i.e. something that makes THEM loose jobs, instead of some "dirty rotten fascist Republican-voting redneck in his farm in Texas" then suddenly it seems that all men may be made equal, but when it comes to techie jobs, Americans are more equal than Asians.
You know what's even funnier, other than your caricature of "lefties"? That you think the Right gives a crap about illegal immigration. There is one sure way to stop illegal immigration: aggressively identify and prosecute the businesses that hire them. If they can't get jobs, they won't come here. But you don't hear or see anyone doing that, do you? That's how you know that no one, left or right, gives crap. So forget "lefties". Look to the Chamber of Commerce and the politicians they have in their pocket.
Re: (Score:3)
What do you see that makes you think they are being done wrong?
If you're looking for a job and scan the job search websites on a regular, you will notice job listings with unusually high qualifications that never get filled for months. I'm not talking about the proverbial "must have five years of experience in a technology that came out six months ago" job listing. The corporations use these job listings as proof that qualified Americans can't be found and foreign workers are needed to fill these jobs.
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem here appears to be fraud. In Canada, we had similar abuses going on with the Temporary Foreign Worker program (the equivalent of an H1B). In general, companies were using a number of different tricks, from putting out job listings with very difficult to fulfill requirements, or in some cases putting out job listings but then rejecting any Canadian applying for the job regardless of qualification. The TFW program was so poorly managed, and the Provinces so unwilling to enforce labor codes, that unskilled workers from the Philippines were being brought in to staff fast food restaurants, but the real crime was large companies, like the Royal Bank of Canada attempting to layoff their IT staff to hire people from India. It was all technically against the rules, but as there was virtually no oversight at all, companies were literally committing visa fraud, all facilitated by major international recruitment companies like Actyl.
The low skilled jobs were grating in their own way because what they were doing was allowing fast food joints, particularly in the communities servicing the oil sector in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan to put cheap labor in place, in some cases, once their rents and fees were deducted, these TFWs were making far less than the provincially-mandated minimum wage, and often housed in pretty astonishingly shitty conditions to boot. In the end, the former Conservative government was forced to largely shut down the TFW program to save itself from embarrassment.
The whole time, of course, if applications weren't being rubber stamped and if the provinces had been enforcing labor standards laws for the foreign workers, this would never happened. Of course, the politicians and the bureaucrats put on a good show of being ever so shocked by the abuses, when one has to infer from the number of abuses and the length of time that it had all gone on, that the whole thing had been a wink-and-nod affair for a long time before the whole thing finally leaked to the press. Naturally a few McDonalds outlets were targeted for fines, but the big companies apologized and were never fully investigated.
The solution I agreed with in the end wasn't to kill the TFW program, because there are sectors in which local labor markets can't fill the need, but rather to make it the first step to immigrating and ultimately becoming a citizen. Barring that, at least enforcing existing laws and regulations would have been a start.
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Interesting)
Absolutely. Bringing in foreign workers distorts a labor market, very much in business's favor. One of the big defenses of using the TFW program to bring in Asian workers to hand out coffee and burgers was "We can't get anybody to work up here in Frozen Butthole, Alberta", to which my response was "Well, no, you can't get anyone to work in Butthole, Alberta serving coffee for $15, when it costs over $1,000 month for the privilege of sleeping in a closet. If you pay $40 an hour, which is what serving coffee in the frozen tundra is really worth, then you'd be surprised."
One of the biggest scams going was a guy in Northern British Columbia whose company was bringing in Chinese foreign workers, and he'd made himself a litle sideline with a big tenement to house them, and then he'd charge them rent! And the real evil was that because these are sponsored workers, if they bitched, he fired them and they got sent back to the country they came from. The TFW program had quite literally turned some foreign workers into little better than indentured slaves. It was a sort of quasi-legal human trafficking operation, with the Government of Canada and the Provincial governments looking the other way, because, you know "BUSINESS!"
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:5, Informative)
All you have to say is: "There is no applicant that fulfills my requirements, I promise" and for good measure you make up a job posting with requirements such as 10 years of experience with Exchange 2016 and a minor in archeology. That's literally the extent of the H1B and the lottery only applies if your company needs more than a certain amount of workers per year, I forgot the exact limits. If you need only a few workers, you're guaranteed to have the applicant you want, it's less than an hour of paperwork and far less issues with HR (it's a modern slave trade).
Where I work we regularly hire through H1B, we pay 35k/y for a PhD from China or Eastern Europe and as an added benefit we/they get a fast track through the green card and permanent resident process later on, in comparison we pay 125k/y and relocation costs for similar degrees from American sources.
500% increase would be 1.25 million H1B's/year on top of the 'regular' .25M work immigrants through other methods such as Visa's.
Re: (Score:2)
All you have to say is: "There is no applicant that fulfills my requirements, I promise" and for good measure you make up a job posting with requirements such as 10 years of experience with Exchange 2016 and a minor in archeology
You also need to interview people who apply and find a way to disqualify every single one of them.
Re: (Score:3)
This isn't hard. Do you know how many times I've had good interviews, but I hear from people I know working at the place that I wasn't hired because HR said I was "To expensive due to experience", "Overqualified for the position", or "We felt they were not a good fit". None of those has any substance to them, but they are considered valid reasons to not hire someone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
don't require holders to remain at the same company.
That would help.
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:4, Insightful)
Well the main problem in general is no one checks the 'why' in why a person is not hired. The companies get to say "We tried to find a local, but none were suitable for this position", the majority get thrown out during the paperwork phase before even getting an interview. Less than 1% get interviews and of those any reason under the sun is 'valid'. Technically they can't avoid hiring you for age, gender, or other protected status traits, but even that happens all the time because the company doesn't even have to tell you why you weren't hired. Most people get form letters that simply say "We found a more qualified applicant". Which is hilarious if the same job then appears in the paper (or online) the next week at that same company.
If the company had to disclose why they didn't hire someone and could only hire an H1B for skill, things would be much different. The companies would hate it though.
Re: (Score:3)
FTFY
Re:-1 Disagree (Score:4, Insightful)
Well the main problem in general is no one checks the 'why' in why a person is not hired. The companies get to say "We tried to find a local, but none were suitable for this position", the majority get thrown out during the paperwork phase before even getting an interview. Less than 1% get interviews and of those any reason under the sun is 'valid'. Technically they can't avoid hiring you for age, gender, or other protected status traits, but even that happens all the time because the company doesn't even have to tell you why you weren't hired. Most people get form letters that simply say "We found a more qualified applicant". Which is hilarious if the same job then appears in the paper (or online) the next week at that same company.
If the company had to disclose why they didn't hire someone and could only hire an H1B for skill, things would be much different. The companies would hate it though.
I looked at the requirements for hiring H1Bs as an employer - this is pretty much spot on. You basically have to swear that you can't find a local qualified worker and that's the end of it. Oh, and pay a few thousand bucks to the government. After that you can bring your H1B(s) over as long as you get a slot.
The whole thing needs to be shut down. You can read elsewhere on here where I describe the conditions around my wife coming here 23 years ago as an H1A. It's the exact same thing only in the medical industry. Most of the foreign nurses that you see here are the equivalent of the cheap programmer, with the main difference being that nursing is easier (bluntly speaking) and more standardized with a required board exam, so they do as good a job as an American would. Just much cheaper, and that's the point. Get rid of H1B and wages would rise and more Americans would be interested in being nurses. Allowing H1Bs simply manipulates the market in favor of business, cronyism 101.
Re: (Score:3)
You should report your employer for violating the law. You might be able to get some money as a whistleblower.
And the other side (Score:5, Insightful)
H1Bs even if implemented "correctly" are bad for the nation. If that person is so exceptional, the company can pay for them to immigrate. You know, like we did for the majority of human history.
Your thesis works if, and only if, there is a single global economy with the same rules for all workers. The whole "but we are global" argument falls flat on it's face because that scenario does not, and will not ever, exist. It's always about higher profits at the expense of the worker, always. If China required unemployment insurance, health insurance, retirement plans, caps on hours a person was allowed to work and/or forced to work, and all of the safety and regulation training companies are required to provide in the US, do you think labor would still be pennies on the dollar in exchange? H1B workers receive huge tax breaks, and allow companies to bypass legal work restrictions. You know, like that one company who literally had slaves escape last year who were here on H1B visas? (One of how many obvious violations, and how many under the table threats.. yeah)
Look, if Politicians and Uber wealthy people really had _your_ interests in mind they would stop lining their own pockets and start lining yours. They don't, you are delusional if you believe they are on your side and looking out for you, the end.
Re:And the other side (Score:5, Informative)
If China required unemployment insurance, health insurance, retirement plans, caps on hours a person was allowed to work
In China, under the Social Insurance Law both employers and employees are required to make contributions (at different rates) to a pension fund, unemployment insurance fund and medical insurance fund, as well as the Housing Provident Fund. Employers, but not employees, are also required to contribute to the work-related injury and maternity insurance funds.
Under the Chinese Standard Working Time System, workers shall not work more than 8 hours a day and shall not work more than 40 hours a week; workers have at least one day off per week.
To the extent that labor costs less in China, it is due to the massive surplus of rural labor moving into urban manufacutring zones. However China's GDP per worker is only 17% that of the USA due to less capital per worker being available for productivity. But capital investment continues in China, worker productivity is growing, and wages are growing - especially as the surplus rural labor pool runs out.
Re: (Score:2)
if it had to do with racism against indians, then these companies wouldn't be racing to hire them in the first place.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't be too sure.
Trump needs to get 1237 delegates to win in the first round. If he doesn't and it goes to a second round, Cruz has a chance, though not necessarily a good one. If he doesn't make it, the wheeling-and-dealing begin.
Personally, I'm rooting for Trump to come up just shy--like 1200+. Then we'll see some fireworks.
Re: (Score:2)
The party bosses hate Cruz just slightly less than Trump. They'll try to find a way to nominate !Jeb but failing that it'll be Rubio or Kasich. It should be an interesting election. They say Hillary will get the women's vote and I suspect that is true but I don't know that many men that feel good about her. I guess I'll end up voting for whoever runs against her. I just hope it's not !Jeb.
Re:He doesn't have a running mate... (Score:5, Insightful)
The party bosses hate Cruz just slightly less than Trump. They'll try to find a way to nominate !Jeb but failing that it'll be Rubio or Kasich. It should be an interesting election. They say Hillary will get the women's vote and I suspect that is true but I don't know that many men that feel good about her. I guess I'll end up voting for whoever runs against her. I just hope it's not !Jeb.
I don't like Hillary that much, but I have to respect her for her taste in enemies. Mindless and irrational, usually sexist.
Congratulations. You're 3 out of 3!
Anyway, my #1 beef with Hillary is her personal identity. All of us have many of them, but I think her top one is probably "corporate lawyer" and certainly not "idealist". It's Bill Clinton who is first and foremost a "politician". Probably Obama, too.
None of which is related to the original H1B topic, unless you [amiga3D] are one of the folk who think President Obama needs one. (Also, I don't think Trump believed the birther nonsense any more than he believes most of the crazy stuff he says. His #1 identity is "salesman" or "con man" and he is just telling the 'customers' (the so-called Republicans voting in the primaries) what they want to hear.)
Re:He doesn't have a running mate... (Score:5, Insightful)
I have no idea why people paint dislike of Hillary as automatically sexist. I have no problem with her being a woman. I do have a problem with a leading candidate for President being a habitual liar, a follower of the poll of the week rather than a leader who joins the debate in order to sway public opinion, and someone with a long history of patronage and hypocrisy.
None of that has jack shit to do with gender.
Re: (Score:3)
It'll be a bit tough to hear Cruz's victory speech over the singing fat lady and the wingbeat of the pigs flying past the sun as it sets in the east.
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah - it would be more relevant for Hillary Clinton to pick a running mate. I suggest Bernie Sanders - he could attract the voters that are sceptical about Ms Clinton's credentials.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
She was the only one stupid enough to agree.
Re: (Score:2)
At this point, it just looks like desperation. It's hard to see how anyone is going to stop Trump.
Re: (Score:2)
At this stage, he only cares about the California delegates and probably has this fuzzy idea that Fiorina will help him with that - given how much this state loves her (what?)...
Re: (Score:3)
They'd just about have to be on crack to think that Fiorina would help them in California....
Most California Democrats in Northern California would instantly vote for a centrist Republican over either Barbara Boxer or Dianne Feinstein. They are completely out of touch with the views of the Silicon Valley voting block, with Boxer tending to be very pro-Hollywood and anti-tech, and Feinstein being very pro-spook and anti-tech. Somehow, both of them won their last elections because the Republicans managed t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unless he can start winning some states again, I don't see how he can hope to stop Trump. Before last night, maybe a slim chance, now, forget it. Trump has got the nod, which means Hillary Clinton is the next POTUS.