K-12 CS Efforts Earn Microsoft CEO Ringside Seat For State of the Union Address 117
theodp writes: When President Obama delivers his final State of the Union address on Tuesday, the White House reports that the inspiring individuals seated with the First Lady will include Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. "Microsoft has been a leader in expanding access to computer science in K-12 classrooms," explains the White House, perhaps unaware that the company reportedly struck a deal to kill BASIC on Macs in 1985 and stopped including BASIC on PCs after Windows 95. Ironically, Microsoft now laments that girls began to stop seeing themselves as coders after 1984, which gave rise to the need for today's Microsoft-led national K-12 CS intervention. "Girls don't see other girls programming," Microsoft explained in 2013, "so they just don't know that it's available to them." So, is there such a thing as corporate Munchausen syndrome by proxy?
K12 CS efforts for girls only (Score:3, Insightful)
$$Money$$ (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Front row seat? Hell. It wasn't that long ago that it got you an overnight stay in the Lincoln bedroom.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:BASIC? Give me a break. (Score:4, Funny)
GOTO hell!
Re: (Score:2)
The problem isn't so much that BASIC went away as computers not being shipped with an accessible language anymore.
Lisp
Which Lisp interpreter shipped, and was easy for users to find, on the affected computers? The summary states that these include Macs prior to OS X and Windows PCs starting with Windows 95.
Re: (Score:2)
Feel free to mention a language you think is more suitable to get a new programmer going.
Lisp
Feel free to mention a popular operating system with a Lisp REPL.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.instructables.com/i... [instructables.com] (linking to instructables as the real server is already kind of slow).
Re: (Score:2)
One could argue that there always is a javascript capable browser available these days
One could also argue that these browsers can connect to the Internet, where there are many, many programming environments available. My kids started with Scratch [mit.edu]. They are now learning Javascript using the Khan Academy sandbox. Basic is a horrible first language. Microsoft did the world a favor by removing it. But Satya Nadella had nothing to do with that either way.
Re: (Score:1)
I remember when I was told if I wanted to program microcomputers (which is what they were called in the late 70s), then I needed to learn Assembler. I did, but it was obviously short-sighted advice. (I had previously learned FORTRAN and PL-1, so assembler wasn't *that* much of a stretch.)
Re: (Score:3)
BASIC going away and having to pay for a development system for the computer directly impacted many would-be young programmers, and pretending that it did not is pure foolishness. Events of twenty or thirty years ago regularly affect us in the present. Microsoft gained its position and holds it through inertia; you don't think there are lasting repercussions from making it harder to get into programming?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
At the time MS offered Visual Basic Express for free (and still does AFAIK
They do NOW, since 2005, but they didn't THEN. Or if they did, citation needed.
Re: (Score:2)
VBS (Visual Basic Scripting) came as a free Windows-based programming environment (especially if you wanted command-line utilities) and was available with a minimal editor as far back as I'v been playing with Windows Server (1996 I think).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The company that is bitching about not enough coders contributed to the decline of coders by not including BASIC with Windows.
What are you talking about? It was on the Windows 95 CD, on the Windows 98 CD and on the Windows NT CD. By the time it stopped being included with Windows installations you had VBScript instead but you could also easily download qbasic from Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
BASIC may not be an ideal language, but it had two advantages: it was fairly easy to learn, and it used to be there by default.
Being burnt into the firmware or installed with the OS offers one huge advantage. The beginner developer didn't have to choose amongst different languages, and worry about making the wrong choice. I suspect that this is a large part of the appeal of web development a decade later. Any computer with a web browser had HTML and JavaScript installed by default.
Re: (Score:2)
C# is much better than the open source options (Score:1, Insightful)
C# is a much better language than the ones we've seen developed by open source projects.
The interesting thing about C# is that it's simple enough for beginners to use and understand with ease, yet it's still powerful enough to use when developing large-scale software systems.
We can't say that about Perl. Perl is an absolute misery for beginners, and it commonly results in indecipherable messes even when used by professionals for small scripts.
We can't say that about PHP. PHP can be used by beginners, but th
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
C# is a bottom feeder's language. For power and generality there is no substitute for C++.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
I used to a have a six-fret reach... (Score:2)
Did Grace Murray Hopper see other girls programming?
OTOH, she invented you-know-what so maybe it would have been better if she had been discouraged.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it means "PC load letter".
Re: (Score:3)
Fewer boys are graduating HS than girls, fewer boys are getting Uni degrees, more boys actually commit suicide than girls. Women live significantly longer than men...here's an idea, rather than waste time, money & effort on a program that has dubious value lets maybe take a look at what we can do to reduce this clear gender gap in favor of girls/women.
uhmm, boys wear 'pink stuff,' carrying a purse, use makeup?
Re: (Score:2)
I think any commentary I add is likely to just detract from the awesomely stupid essence of that last quote. They don't know it's available to them? What the hell does that even mean?
A lot of girls emulate other girls and women, just as a lot of boys emulate other boys and men, to fit in. It isn't a rule, since there are definitely exceptions, but the shortage of female role models would have a negative impact.
That being said, computer science isn't exactly a popular field for boys either. It's simply popular enough that male outliers have managed to dominate the field.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
And this, dear readers, is why we can't talk about mental illness online [slashdot.org]. Or gender differences. Or racial differences [wikipedia.org]. Or religious differences [cnn.com].
Anyone who is *actually biased* uses descriptive language that picks out one side or the other.
Therefore, any descriptive language that picks one side or the other necessarily means the writer is actually biased.
And this is why we can't talk about inequalities or differences, online or in person. Whenever someone tries to point out differences they are labelled as
Re: (Score:1)
Yep. In other words, reverse-isms are now one of the main weapons used by those who want to prevent others from talking about -isms.
Let it go already (Score:4, Insightful)
perhaps unaware that the company reportedly struck a deal to kill BASIC on Macs in 1985 and stopped including BASIC on PCs after Windows 95.
Perhaps the author is unaware that those events were 30 and 20 years ago respectively.
To undo the decades-old events' damage (Score:2)
The event 30 years ago still has effects 30 years after said event, and the event 20 years ago still has effects 20 years after said event. These K-12 CS efforts are an attempt to undo the damage of the events 30 and 20 years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
The event 30 years ago still has effects 30 years after said event, and the event 20 years ago still has effects 20 years after said event. These K-12 CS efforts are an attempt to undo the damage of the events 30 and 20 years ago.
With comments like that, I'm wondering what the mental health landscape is going to look like in another 20 years when we need to solve for the obvious problem of rampant narcissism brought on by the damage of social media.
Oh, you think narcissism is bad now? Fucking please.
Devil's advocacy != cognitive dissonance (Score:2)
Aren't you one of the same idiots who spouts off about how, "if kids are interested in programming, they'll find a way to learn?"
Sometimes I have taken one side, sometimes the other. It is not a fallacy to take one side in one debate and the other side in an unrelated debate, or even to present both sides of a single argument. Devil's advocacy [wikipedia.org], or arguing the opposing side regardless of the beliefs that one holds personally, prevents a debate from becoming an echo chamber. Sometimes a discussion is lacking in exploring the probable ramifications of entry barriers, such as this post by betterunixthanunix [slashdot.org], and sometimes it's lacking in
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps you are unaware that events from 20 and 30 years ago affect us today, especially in politics. What you say is true, but it is also irrelevant. Welcome to Slashdot, I guess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
perhaps unaware that the company reportedly struck a deal to kill BASIC on Macs in 1985 and stopped including BASIC on PCs after Windows 95.
Perhaps the author is unaware that those events were 30 and 20 years ago respectively.
But that isn't even true. QBasic wasn't removed until Windows Me and at that point they had replaced it with VBScript instead.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
They don't care. They just want more dirt-cheap labor. After all, they only have to pay girls 68 cents on the dollar.
Why do you think that all of their stupid boot-camps teach useless shit like Ruby?
With the continued demand for the H-1B visa program, why is it that you think they're even interested in paying 68 cents on the dollar?
By the time we get done morally and legally raping ourselves over manufactured discrimination between genders, we'll find a new type of legal discrimination has completely taken over. Good luck competing with any gender when the invited competition will take the job for 20 cents on the dollar.
Re: (Score:3)
But gender is a major part of programming. Programming is essentially seen as an individual endeavor much like science. You are expected to grind out technical solutions to problems almost as puzzles. That brings with it the "individual" as the main driver, in contraposition to group science projects which are much harder to organize and require greater resources.
Girls are much more social than boys. The focus on individual effort just isn't as interesting to them. Boys can keep themselves amused for hours
Re:seems rather myopic of microsoft. (Score:5, Funny)
Well, it's not that small.
Re: (Score:1)
It gets bigger, doesn't it?
Re: (Score:2)
You keep telling yourself that.
Because programming may be individual, but software development is highly social - there are very few pieces of sof
You make it sound so easy. (Score:2)
hell, all you have to do is hit twitter to see people like @aloria (infosec engineer) fully participating in programming.
This statistic shows a timeline with the amount of monthly active Twitter users worldwide. As of the third quarter of 2015, the microblogging service averaged at 307 million monthly active users.
Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 3rd quarter 2015 (in millions) [statista.com]
I was a huge Obama supporter. (Score:2)
But now this. He's dead to me.
Misleading (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't matter how good Microsoft BASIC for Macintosh was because it wasn't included with the system. Instead, Apple users [eventually] got Hypercard, with very poor documentation. The reason why the Apple II, C64 and other computers with BASIC built-in promoted programming is twofold: they booted straight into it, and you didn't have to pay extra for it.
AFAIK the only computer to actually COME with BASIC for years and years was the Amiga. And that platform DID inspire a generation of programmers and hac
Re: (Score:2)
Bizarre summary (Score:3)
So it's your contention that girls left coding because MS killed BASIC in the 80's?
Seriously, dude?
Re: (Score:2)
Widely-available language for beginners (Score:3)
The point of the article How are students learning programming in a post-Basic world? [computerworld.com] isn't that we should all use Basic. The point is that there's a need for a single 'starter' language so that people who have no experience can get started using something. That language should come with practically all computers, should be portable enough so that you can write programs that port to many computers, should be immediately accessible so beginners can quickly learn some basics, and should be useful enough so that beginners can create useful programs.
There are a number of reasonable contenders, including Python, Ruby, and Java. A version of Ruby comes with MacOS, but none of these 'just comes' with the computer regardless of what OS you run - so in most cases, before you even get started, you have to explain how to download and install something. Not ideal. Java is what a lot of people use professionally, but it does take more time to get started when you know nothing. Python has many advantages for simplicity, but you need to install it in many cases.
Perhaps the dark horse here is Javascript ES6. Javascript is available almost everywhere, and people can get started quickly. As a first language Javascript's unusual approach to OO programming (with prototyping) has probably held it back, but ES6 adds standard class notation, and that might make it much easier to use as a starter language.
Re: (Score:2)
There are a number of reasonable contenders, including Python, Ruby, and Java. [...] Perhaps the dark horse here is Javascript ES6.
Javascript is in fact a better choice for a learning language than any of those others for a vast variety of reasons, first among them that it's available on every platform and in fact virtually always comes with the system. Python and Ruby are fads, and Java is dominated by one rich asshole, so that really only leaves JS.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't really care about popularity, just suitability and availability. Java is kind of a twisted mess. Everyone complains about how much senseless template code is necessary. Apps never act native, even if they kind of sort of look native. Ruby and Python both have weird characteristics that make them unsuitable, they'll just teach bad habits. Besides, like Perl (which has the same habit problem) they don't come with Windows.
BASIC needed killing (Score:1)
Microsoft probably did the world a favour by ramming a stake through its heart.
Slow clap. (Score:2)
>> President Obama delivers his final State of the Union address
Slow clap. I never thought we'd see a second term of Jimmy Carter, and well, we got two of them.
Totally false (Score:2)
Microsoft did not make a deal to kill BASIC on Macs. They made a deal to kill Apple's implementation of BASIC, because it competed with their own implementation. They sold it for a decade before discontinuing it in 1995.
Not only is this story a troll, it's an incoherent, factually incorrect troll. Somehow the author is trying to assert a connection between MS not bundling BASIC with their computers and girls being less interested than boys in programming. No clue what he thinks that connection is, but I
Oh the irony (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
"Math is hard". (Score:1)
Coding is too, but if they double the number of coders, there will be no more "shortage" of those willing to work for "girl" wages.
Makes sense when you look at it from the Microsoft viewpoint.