Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Politics Technology

Mark Zuckerberg Throws Pal Joe Green Under the Tech Immigration Bus 261

theodp (442580) writes "A month after he argued that Executive Action by President Obama on tech immigration was needed lest his billionaire bosses at Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC have to hire 'just sort of OK' U.S. workers, Re/code reports that Joe Green — Zuckerberg's close friend and college roommate — has been pushed out of his role as President of FWD.us for failing to Git-R-Done on an issue critical to the tech community. "Today, we wanted to share an important change with you," begins 'Leadership Change', the announcement from the FWD.us Board that Todd Schulte is the new Green. So what sold FWD.us on Schulte? "His [Schulte's] prior experience as Chief-of-Staff at Priorities USA, the Super PAC supporting President Obama's re-election," assured Zuckerberg in a letter to FWD.us contributors, "will ensure FWD.us continues its momentum for reform." Facebook, reported the Washington Post in 2013, became legally "dependent" on H-1B visas and subject to stricter regulations shortly before Zuckerberg launched FWD.us with Green at the helm."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mark Zuckerberg Throws Pal Joe Green Under the Tech Immigration Bus

Comments Filter:
  • by koan ( 80826 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:10PM (#47960065)

    There couldn't be a wrose personality to be in power than Zuckerberg.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:20PM (#47960143)

      Only idiots would trust Mark "People trust me. Dumb Fucks" Fuckerberg.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      There couldn't be a wrose personality to be in power than Zuckerberg.

      I dunno. Dick Cheney or Nancy Pelosi might be worse.

      • by Gr8Apes ( 679165 )

        There couldn't be a wrose personality to be in power than Zuckerberg.

        I dunno. Dick Cheney or Nancy Pelosi might be worse.

        Dick Cheney brought us the current mess. He set the bar. W was just his sock-puppet.

        • Dick Cheney brought us the current mess.

          I think you'd need to be more specific regarding which mess you're talking about. We have a lot of issues at the moment.

        • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

          Dick Cheney brought us the current mess. He set the bar. W was just his sock-puppet.

          Oh yeah, that makes sense. The son of a former President, former CIA Director, grandson of a U.S. Senator, and great-grandson of one of the 19th centuries rail barons was merely a sock puppet serving the interests of the son of a minor bureaucrat with the Department of Agriculture. You know, people should look at the nature of history before they start building conspiracy theories.

          • by Gr8Apes ( 679165 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @07:22PM (#47961301)
            If you in truth think Bush was the brains behind everything, I'd say there's quite a few missing links. Cheney, however, has been documented leading quite a few initiatives, such as the invasion of Iraq. His commentary after leaving office has also been revealing, as has the total lack of statements from W.
            • ..., as has the total lack of statements from W.

              Other than Carter, and lately Clinton, former presidents never made comments on policies after they left office. They had their time calling the shots, and now it's someone else's turn. W is doing what we should expect from people who are no longer in charge. He's keeping his mouth shut and letting the current team run the show.

          • by CyprusBlue113 ( 1294000 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @11:29PM (#47962113)

            Dick Cheney brought us the current mess. He set the bar. W was just his sock-puppet.

            Oh yeah, that makes sense. The son of a former President, former CIA Director, grandson of a U.S. Senator, and great-grandson of one of the 19th centuries rail barons was merely a sock puppet serving the interests of the son of a minor bureaucrat with the Department of Agriculture. You know, people should look at the nature of history before they start building conspiracy theories.

            Every family has their dumbass.

            • You miss the point. There is no way that Dick Cheney was pulling George W. Bush's strings. While it is possible that George W. Bush chose to uniformly follow Dick Cheney's advice, it was still merely advice that Dick Cheney had no ability to force him to follow. The real problem with considering Dick Cheney as the power behind George W. Bush is that Dick Cheney was nowhere to be found around W. while he was governor of Texas.
          • Dick Cheney brought us the current mess. He set the bar. W was just his sock-puppet.

            Oh yeah, that makes sense. The son of a former President, former CIA Director, grandson of a U.S. Senator, and great-grandson of one of the 19th centuries rail barons was merely a sock puppet serving the interests of the son of a minor bureaucrat with the Department of Agriculture. You know, people should look at the nature of history before they start building conspiracy theories.

            This son of a bastard nobody [wikipedia.org] changed millions of lives with war.

            If you think "stock" makes people great or powerful, then you're no better than all the various monarchies overthrown in the last few hundred years. Nepotism only goes so far.

            • Perhaps you did not notice, but he was the front man as well. It is believable that someone rises from nowhere to great power. It is believable that the son of a powerful family stays in the background and controls someone who has risen from nowhere to a position of great power. It is even believable that someone from nowhere might become attached to the son of a powerful family early on and exert control over him as he rises to a position of prominence. What is not believable is that a person from nowhere
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:10PM (#47960067)

    I hereby award you Most Unreadable News Snippet Award. Bravo.

  • by _Sharp'r_ ( 649297 ) <sharper@@@booksunderreview...com> on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:13PM (#47960093) Homepage Journal

    "His [Schulte's] prior experience as Chief-of-Staff at Priorities USA, the Super PAC supporting President Obama's re-election," assured Zuckerberg in a letter to FWD.us contributors, "will ensure FWD.us continues its momentum for reform."

    But, how is this possible? I thought Obama banned his team from becoming lobbyists after they left him [nbcnews.com]???

    I guess that rule doesn't apply to everyone. Good thing we have the most transparent administration ever and these lobbying efforts won't influence anyone...

    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:30PM (#47960195)

      "His [Schulte's] prior experience as Chief-of-Staff at Priorities USA, the Super PAC supporting President Obama's re-election," assured Zuckerberg in a letter to FWD.us contributors, "will ensure FWD.us continues its momentum for reform."

      But, how is this possible? I thought Obama banned his team from becoming lobbyists after they left him [nbcnews.com]???

      I guess that rule doesn't apply to everyone. Good thing we have the most transparent administration ever and these lobbying efforts won't influence anyone...

      Super PACs are run independent from individual campaigns and are not allowed to coordinate with candidates. So he wasn't part of Obama's staff, in theory...

    • I'm sure his press secretary would argue that was more of an aspirational statement. And that it was necessitated by Republican inaction.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:16PM (#47960117)

    What this boils down to is we've got a company propped up on nothing more than hot air and advertising that has to lowball the market in order to keep their ill-gotten goods. Keep in mind Zuckerbergs billions came from people investing in his company, it didn't come from actual sales of a product. Of course the man is a scam artist.

    1: To have Americans work on critical projects and not spill the beans to your competition, you need a NDA and non-compete agreement, both if which you pay American workers a premium for. With H1B's, you don't.

    2: When you hire a college grad with a school loan, you're paying their them to be educated irregardless if you like it or not.

    3: This is about wage arbitrage; whenever you sell products made in a slave wage state to a free state, you are in effect consuming the margin the labor pool in that free state would otherwise make to, and here's the key guys, put the cash in your pocket, you aren't doing a god damn thing for the world. There aren't more engineers, or better educated engineers, or better products, or better designed products, or better manufacturing and construction methodology. Do that enough and you destabilize the government like in Russia, and that one led to millions of deaths from the Russian Mob selling of arms, including nukes, to foreign countries.

    4: What are you doing, Zuckerberg, to motivate Americans to work hard? Because at the end of the day, if you aren't sharing the profits and are just exploiting you, Americans will destroy your business. Mexicans do the same thing nowadays, and the Indians, well, they aren't much better.

    • by bhcompy ( 1877290 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:43PM (#47960271)

      1: To have Americans work on critical projects and not spill the beans to your competition, you need a NDA and non-compete agreement, both if which you pay American workers a premium for. With H1B's, you don't.

      Well, Facebook is located in California where non-competes are not legally enforceable, so there's that

      • Exactly. So to get around this loophole they want to hire H1B workers that they can just send back to their home country after they're done exploiting them.
    • It's "regardless". When you say "irregardless" I can't take what you say seriously, no matter how correct you may be.
      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by Guest316 ( 3014867 )
        It's antinonunirregardless. Jeez, where do you people learn English?
      • Really? That's the one word you had problems with? All the mangled sentences are perfectly fine, but he uses one non-standard (by your reckoning) word, and his whole rambling post is to be ignored?

    • by pepty ( 1976012 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:14PM (#47960485)

      How to fix the H1-B problem:

      1. Keep the process of sponsoring H1-Bs roughly the same, but slightly more expensive.

      2. Once the recruit has the visa, he can work wherever he wants. The paperwork is the same whether he stays with his sponsor, goes to their biggest competitor, or goes to work at a coffee cart.

      3. Ban the other legal shenanigans that would quickly ensue in attempts to lock the visa to the sponsoring company.

      If the sponsor wants the worker to stay, they will have to pay them a high enough rate to keep them there.

      • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:51PM (#47960703)

        2. Once the recruit has the visa, he can work wherever he wants. The paperwork is the same whether he stays with his sponsor, goes to their biggest competitor, or goes to work at a coffee cart.

        The billionaires and multinational corps would never allow that. H1-B is purposeful wage slavery.

      • I think making h1-B direct employment only no third party body shops - might cut down a lot of the abuses
      • My neigbor is an H1-B1 alien. He has changed jobs two or three times since moving to the USA. It's clearly possble. In fact, I changed jobs myself while on an H1-B1 visa.

        The lock-in occurs when the H1-B alien wants to apply for a green card.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward
        As an H-1b myself, I often find Americans not well-informed enough on this issue..
        1) is what congress has been doing over time: imposing random additional fees, especially on large H-1b employers.
        2) has always been true. H-1b workers can change employers very easily, as long as there is no gap between employment. In fact, transfering H-1b is cheaper (and less legal hassle) than applying for a new H-1b. The real obstacle is the jump from H-1b to green card. This could take 2-9 years depending on the count
  • Fuck Zuckerberg (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Troy Roberts ( 4682 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:34PM (#47960219)

    Sort of OK? Fuck you Mark, you degenerate piece of shit!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:36PM (#47960229)

    Zuckerberg is also a traitor to the American tech worker.

    Hey, Mark, MSFT just laid off 18,000 people; Cisco just laid off a bunch; MSFT just the other day closed its research center right down the street from you - filled with gifted coders and brilliance. Mark, there is a MOUND of studies showing NO shortage of STEM works in the US.

    Some facts: The H-1B fiasco has cost Americans **$10TRILLION** dollars, since 1975. For anyone who wants to know the truth, read on.

    One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley has this to say about the H1-B worker problem http://www.cringely.com/2012/1... [cringely.com] Here's an attorney and his consultants teaching corporations how to manipulate foreign-worker immigration law to replace qualified American workers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... [youtube.com]

    H1-B abuse if accompanied by other worker-visa abuse L-1 Visa (H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg). There are more than 20 categories of foreign worker visas. http://economyincrisis.org/con... [economyincrisis.org]

    Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies on this problem. http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/... [ucdavis.edu]

    Federal offshoring of healthcare.gov website http://www.economicpopulist.or... [economicpopulist.org]

    How H1-B visa abuse is hurting American tech workers http://www.motherjones.com/pol... [motherjones.com]

    There is no stem worker crisis in America http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-wo... [ieee.org]

    Marc Zuckerberg and wealthy tech scions continue to perpetuate this trend http://programmersguild.org/do... [programmersguild.org]

    Yahoo http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs... [yahoo.com]

    Also, little known is the tactic of creating many different kinds of sub-visa categories to "fool the system". There are almost TWENTY different kinds of work visas. The whole thing is a sham and a lie, designed to drag down wages and keep from having to re-train Americans. Never thought I would see this day!

    Some of the information presented in the following links will shock most Americans, because American corporate leaders don't want us to know the truth, and they are paying off policy makers with contributions to keep the truth from us. Bill Gates, John Chambers, Mark Zuckerberg, Eric Schmidt, and many, many others - including the principals of the most prominent immigration law firms, who profit from this outrage, are lying through their teeth. There is NO shortage of STEM workers in the US!!

    Last, Zuckerberg has all out lied since day 1 about guaranteeing privacy on Facebook - just outright lied. Facebook has become something that teens shun and will soon go the way of MSFT, run by another deceiver, Bill Gates, on the H1-B issue.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:59PM (#47960393)

      I am an immigrant working in US on H1-B. Every time I see these stories, I know what comments there will be, but I'm getting tired of all the whining and bullshit.

      First of all, on the "poor underpayed H1-B" myth. I live and work in Seattle metro area. My base pay is $150k, and then another $40k on top of that in bonuses. This is after being with the company I'm at for slightly over 3 years. And I work 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, none of those crazy 60-hour work weeks. I have a fancy house, drive an expensive car, and even after mortage, property tax etc have enough left to support my family by myself, allowing my wife (an American citizen, by the way) to be a stay at home mom - and even then still have some left for my 401k and other savings. To sum it up, as an H1-B I live better than 9 out of 10 Americans do even here in Seattle, much less across the country.

      Now you guys say two things. First, that I'm "stealing your job". I'll be blunt: in the current IT job market, if you can't find a job, then either you are living in the wrong place, or (if you're in one of the tech hubs), you plain suck. I know some people hit by Microsoft layoffs: they were immediately snagged by Google and Amazon. It's a seller's market: a good developer today in US can walk out of the door and literally find a job elsewhere tomorrow. If you can't find a job, that's not because some H1-B "stole" it. It's because you're not good enough, and your expectations are too high.

      Speaking of expectations. One other thing that's often brought up is that H1-Bs "depress the wage" - as in, if we weren't here, you'd be paid more. Is that so? Well yes, of course it is, artificial scarcity (of labor, in this case) raises prices. But why do you believe you're entitled to even higher wages? You can certainly get the same wage as I do (if you're as good as I am) - and that gives you an extremely comfortable life, compared to vast majority of your fellow countrymen. With some prudent fiscal planning and the right investments, you can retire at 65 with over a million in the bank, and a house that you fully own - a luxury that most cannot even dream of.

      Yet you still have an audacity to complain that it's too little? You think you deserve more? But you don't have a determination to actually go and make yourself better to achieve that, no. You want someone else to stop competing with you so that you can just have it.

      You are sour whiners and losers, and that's why I can "steal" your job, and will keep on "stealing" it, while you will inhabiting your mom's basement, while posting inane ramblings on Slashdot about how you're being repressed by all those filthy smelly foreigners.

      • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:25PM (#47960551) Journal

        There are some problems you ignored. First is that the industry claims there is a "shortage" to justify high quantities of H1B's. There is no evidence of a general shortage, only spot shortages, which are necessary for those with glut skills to be accepted into new-trend skills.

        Second, is that during IT recessions they don't shut off the H1B spigot: visa workers keep coming. IT has been booming and busting since at least the 80's and I see no reason this pattern will change.

        And I have seen H1B workers being abused. Your example is only a spot sample.

        In general, the industry wants "instant employees" rather than spend time and money on training. This means that if a US techie loses their job in a glut area, they cannot get retraining for the new area because the company will hire an H1B worker that already has experience. The citizen can read books etc., but companies prefer existing paid experience.

        Companies just want what they want when they want it and don't want to pay anything inconvenient for these goals.

        Regardless of whether there are some H1B abuse myths floating around, the whole premise is based on a lie.

        • by david.emery ( 127135 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:35PM (#47960623)

          Mod parent up, please. In particular, the comment about industry being unwilling to invest in training is spot-on. I'm old enough to remember when it wasn't that way. (Example, how many remember getting training in Ada if you worked in the defense industry? Regardless of what you think of the language, 25-30 years ago that industry was willing to invest in its "human capital." )

          dave

      • by ranton ( 36917 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @06:51PM (#47961173)

        First of all, on the "poor underpayed H1-B" myth. I live and work in Seattle metro area. My base pay is $150k, and then another $40k on top of that in bonuses.

        First off, individual salaries of very highly skilled H-1B visa holders does nothing to undermine the "poor underpaid H-1B" myth. Does the fact there is a black president mean there is absolutely no discrimination left in the US?

        According to the Center for Immigration Studies [cis.org], H-1B Visa holders in the computer industry make on average $13k less per year than a citizen. In addition to that, 85% of H-1B workers work for less than the median wage for their occupation. Looks like you are not the norm.

        Just because you are one of the few H-1B workers that almost all US citizens would agree we want to immigrate here does nothing to disprove the fact that H-1B workers depress wages by flooding the market with underpaid workers.

        Every time I see these stories, I know what comments there will be, but I'm getting tired of all the whining and bullshit.

        The sad thing is when anyone complains about H-1B workers they are almost immediately accused of xenophobia and/or labeled as whining. I hate our H-1B system, but only because of how unfairly it treats H-1B workers. I am a consultant and I work with many of these immigrants. I am appalled at how horrible the system is that they describe. If we had a properly functioning H-1B program, instead of the indentured servitude it usually consists of, I would bet that H-1B workers would make above median wages.

        If they weren't just an exploited group (in the vast majority of cases), companies would only bring over the best and the brightest. And this would be wonderful.

        • If we had a properly functioning H-1B program

          I really question if we ever needed an H1B program. Because what it's doing is shifting the costs of training (if there is any) onto someone else. Not to mention the thousands of people who Microsoft and Cisco have laid off. Or the countless older workers who are being discriminated against (it seems like everyone's career ends at 40 - as they're laid off in favor of a younger H1B). If companies did not have H1Bs, perhaps all these 'undesirable' workers would have a lot more value in the job market. Or bet

      • Siding with the bosses isn't going to make you many friends. Don't cry oppression when you've sided with the capitalists.
      • by Bite The Pillow ( 3087109 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @09:18PM (#47961715)

        Have you read the link in this comment? It suggests that your experience is atypical.

        It is also outdated. However, there have been a lot of reports similar to this one, and only a few individuals like you stating the opposite.

        Is it remotely possible that you have an above-average experience?

        http://politics.slashdot.org/c... [slashdot.org]

      • by s.petry ( 762400 )

        Not only are you hiding facts, but attempting to offend as many people as possible in your fairy tale. I smell a big fat shill, but perhaps you are just trolling. Either way, claiming that the exception is the rule is asinine.

        Most H1B workers are not making the same wage as Americans, but the wage is only a portion of the argument. Not even the right portion mind you.

        The primary point is that Visa workers do take jobs from Citizens. That is not a question, that is a statement of fact. Citizens of any c

    • stop dreaming (Score:2, Insightful)

      by silfen ( 3720385 )

      Hey, Mark, MSFT just laid off 18,000 people; Cisco just laid off a bunch; MSFT just the other day closed its research center right down the street from you - filled with gifted coders and brilliance. Mark, there is a MOUND of studies showing NO shortage of STEM works in the US.

      If you mean that there is no shortage of people with STEM credentials, you are absolutely right. But most of those people are the product of a dysfunctional US educational system. They have fancy degrees but not the skills the US need

      • stop dreaming (Score:2, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Let them. That's the real problem. These companies do not want to move overseas, probably couldn't sustain the model they have if they did so, but want to exploit the system by paying overseas wages with the advantages they get from being a US company. Let them go elsewhere, there are plenty who would take their place. Instead, they are taking ad money from companies selling in the US, or selling products to US citizens banking on the expendable income that is common here while hoping to lower their emp

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward

        And eventually, they are just going to leave the US altogether, by moving their headquarters abroad, by "inversions", or eventually by just getting acquired by overseas competitors.

        Then we should let them go wherever else they want while withdrawing the blanket of US military protection from those parts of the world. You will see how quickly they rush back to US shores begging for protection from the corrupt barbarians who want bribes, ransoms and cut off their heads when they refuse. These people need to be reminded of who pays to keep them and their children safe which is the ordinary citizens whose taxes pay to maintain the most powerful military on the planet.

    • Never mind all that, who's the gorgeous woman on Cringely's page?

    • >Never thought I would see this day!

      you should have saw it when they started shipping skilled labor overseas, and the collapse of GM, and stateside manufacture. We were all fools to think we are any really diffrent than the other workers. In arrogance we threw them under the bus.

      Its time for US to unionize and fight back.
  • by Baldrson ( 78598 ) * on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:38PM (#47960241) Homepage Journal

    Its tragic that Mark et al are being forced to put up with just sort of OK US workers.

    You know one step that Mark et al could take that would grease the skids on their immigration reforms?

    Pay the geniuses they want to import what they're worth. See The Bottom of the Pay Scale: Wages for H-1B Computer Programmers [cis.org].

    In fact, Mark et al should either pay back salaries to all of the H-1b workers they've ever employed or Mark et al should be thrown in prison for fraudulent abuse of the H-1B guest worker provision.

    • Well, despite all that, I'm curious why they cannot simply open a satellite office in virtual space and employ their foreign workers remotely. What exactly is so unique about working for an internet site that you have to ignore the entire premise of the internet and be somewhere in person?

    • by NoKaOi ( 1415755 )

      Pay the geniuses they want to import what they're worth

      One of the best suggestions I've read for fixing the H-1B fiasco is that H-1B workers should have a minimum salary of $100k/yr. The whole idea of H-1B is that you can't find a non-foreign worker that has the skills you need. If somebody is so specialized and/or so good at a particular skill, then they should be worth more than $100k/yr. If not, then the claim of local scarcity is bullshit.

      • also need to add no OT abuse and no job lock.

      • $100k/yr, not high enough.
        We get told all the time how critical these individuals are for the company and that the company is unable to find or train an American worker for the job. So I am willing to call the companies' bluff and say I take them at their work. Given how important these individuals are to the company they obviously should be the most highly compensated individuals in the company so their total compensation package should exceed the compensation package that anyone else in the employ of the
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) *

      Maybe he could just train some US citizens to be better than just OK.

  • by briancox2 ( 2417470 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:42PM (#47960265) Homepage Journal
    He's throwing the entire pool of U.S. workers under the bus!! "...just OK..." ???
    • He's throwing the entire pool of U.S. workers under the bus!! "...just OK..." ???

      Judging from the foreign labor I've worked with for the last 6 or 7 years, compared to similarly qualified US workers, I'd say that description is upside-down. About the only thing the Chinese and Indian imports are better at is bowing and scraping and accepting more work than they can possibly do with nothing a "yes, yes, yes" deferring contriteness. That only makes them look like even worse productively, because so many tasks end up as crap, or late, or simply dropped.

      If they mean that foreign workers

  • by Blaskowicz ( 634489 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:49PM (#47960317)

    To "Git-R-Done" is a really strange expression, never seen it and I don't lknow what the fuck it means. Did Joe Green failed to use git the repository software and be done?
    More to the point, I didn't know what the FWD.us website was. Then, throwing people under buses is not nice.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Larry the Cable Guy: Git-R-Done http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497633/

  • by vitriol83 ( 2465302 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @03:51PM (#47960331)
    the disappointing thing about FWD.us is it focuses too much on increasing the quota of temporary (H-1B) visas, and almost no effort on streamlining the path from temporary to permanent. The reason isn't so difficult to see, temporary visas (6-years) are great for employers, not only do they bring in invaluable skills, but they also ensure those skills are tied to the company. They're not so great for either the temporary workers or other potential competitors in the labor market, because they are tied until the sponsoring employer *may at its discretion* apply for permanent residence status. Note in this case success is by no means assured, and may take up to two years. Personally I think the current H-1B quota is more than adequate if it were not used so heavily by a small number of companies, who account for the vast majority of applications. The most urgently needed reform is to not only streamline the permanent residence process, but to also give more agency to H-1B workers, to for instance self-petition for permanent residence status based on a number of factors. This will reduce the natural 'pull' to employers for temporary workers, and even the playing field between temporary and permanent residents.
  • Summary? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Duncan J Murray ( 1678632 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:10PM (#47960451) Homepage

    Or a collection of fullstops, dashes and capitalised consonants?

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Sunday September 21, 2014 @04:13PM (#47960481)
    Not so much. Critical to the _investor class_ maybe? But for anyone in tech this is the end of what's left of their careers. How are we suppose to compete which borderline indentured servitude?
    • How are we supposed to compete with borderline indentured servitude?

      Simple - be self employed.

      I'll wait for the inevitable answers about how hard it is to start a company, and tax implications, and inability to count on income since it depends on the economy.

      But, if you watch something like Shark Tank, you see an endless stream of actual small businesses that are somehow creating a market for a product that don't have any reason to exist - other than there is a market for it. Someone had a product, found a

  • Who is Zuckerwit btw?

    • by rossz ( 67331 )

      He's the social media billionaire that went zombie and got blown away by Faith when she boarded his mega-yacht.

  • I guess they were immigrating from Canada or Mexico.

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...