Vietnam Courts Microsoft and Vice Versa 298
wbren writes "Bill Gates and Vietnam's Prime Minister Phan Van Khai have signed two 'memoranda of understanding' regarding Microsoft's presence in Vietnam, according to this AP story. They met Monday at Microsoft's Redmond headquarters for a closed door meeting and a tour of Microsoft's "home of the future". The agreement reached is expected to strengthen Vietnam's IT industry, as well as provide software training for 50,000 of the country's teachers. Khai's visit also triggered protests in Seattle, reminding everyone of Vietnam's human rights record."
Further news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Further news... (Score:3, Informative)
My father was one of those "advisors." Long before the Gulf of Tonkin meant anything, my dad was participating in a hot war in Vietnam.
Some people would still argue with me.
BTW, Eisenhower sent in the first wave of troops, not Johnson.
And again (Score:2, Insightful)
That's just dreaming though , Admittedly companies have no need to do anything like this , it wo
it's just business, like Linux or Google (Score:2)
Re:it's just business, like Linux or Google (Score:2)
I do imagine they wouldn't want there systems on anything like china has.
Re:And again (Score:2)
You seem innocently naive of southeast Asian politics. A foriegn company asking for human rights improvements would be a HUGE insult to said Vietnamese officials. They'd probably go home and kick a few peasants just for spite.
Re:And again (Score:2)
Re:And again (Score:2)
Vietnam already has all the MS software they could want. What this is doing is legitimizing it, as MS did recently by "selling" 50,000 licences to the govt of Indonesia for bootleg software they were already running. Most likely the US govt has been leaning on them, and as Vietnam now exports a lot to the US, (I just heard that the US is Vietnam's largest trading partner now, pr
Heh (Score:5, Insightful)
Weird, because previously the Vietnamese were known for their choice of light, modifiable systems that proved very effective against monolithic, bloated American engineering.
Now it'll be the other way around -- take that, Charlie!
Re:Heh (Score:2)
For that matter, why are you using IE if you hate MS so much?
Horrific (Score:5, Insightful)
Joke aside, I don't really see the relevance of the story. MS has relationships with many governments, that the Vietnamese governemnt is now also among them doesn't strike me as exceptional.
Finally, I also don't understand what mentioning the human rights situation in Vietnam has to do with this article. Don't get me wrong, pointing this situation out is important, but why in this context?
MS and other big software houses do frequently deal with nations that have a very bad track record when it comes to human rights. (And in case you didn't notice, free software does too. Just think about China using Linux). So I again have to ask: What's the news?
Re:Horrific (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not so much disagreeing (I agree with much of your argument), just picking up on your comments about Linux being used in places with poor human rights records: a central tenet of the GPL (and some other free software licenses) is that *no*restrictions* be placed on where the software is used. This sounds absurd, until you recall South Africa: I believe that there's still software kicking around that technically can't be used in South Africa "because of Apartheid".
Personally, I'd prefer it if $HUMAN_RI
Workaround: xtSP violator model (Score:3, Interesting)
Lets remind ourselves that $HUMAN_RIGHTS_VIOLATOR can use the loophole in (L)GPL that allows xSPs running GPL apps without abiding by the license (as they do not re-distribute the code).
Here are some workarounds for opressive governments worldwide:
a) have xSPs (Microsoft, Google, Yahoo et al) do the dirty work fo' ya (Microsoft a bit less likely to use GPL software for that, but still).
Motto: We're snitches so you don't ha
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
If somebody's willing to violate someone else's human rights, then they're probably willing to violate someone else's copy rights.
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
I recently found some software AiR-Boot [ecomstation.ru] that was briefly GPL, but since the invasion of Iraq the author changed the terms and now says "You may only use this software, if you are NOT and were NEVER working for american (US) government at any time", also moving it from a US to a Russian server.
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
I think this highlights the problem with being dogmatic on licenses: how many "good" (subjective) people once worked for the US government, and - for whatever reason - don't anymore? This license explicity bars them from using AiR-Boot. I'd go further and say there are "good" (there's that word again...) people *still* working for the US government. Hell, the US government is more than just the Whitehouse and the DoD. What about aid projects? The US Geological Survey? The National parks Service?
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
It also shows that putting pressure on governments rarely affects those who make hte decsions you disagree with; as for instance the sanctions against Iran after 1991 killed many children leaving Saddam's fat from black marketeering.
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
But who'd make the call who was a human rights violator?
Well, I'd argue - from a free-software POV - that no-one should. I might personally prefer it if, say, the US DoD was prevented from using my (hypothetical) software package, but how do I put that into the license? Do I have exceptions for humanitarian operations? Who decides?
So, much as I hate it, I feel it's better if free software licenses *don't* prohibit entire countries from using them.
Re:Horrific (Score:2)
This is an actual current-events story that somehow made it onto /.. It's was one of the top local stories yesterday,
Minnie Rosoft (Score:4, Funny)
Had to dump her in the end though because she was simply the most vain and jealous woman I'd ever met...always wanted to monopolize everything.
Does this mean... (Score:5, Funny)
This doesn't change anything (Score:2, Offtopic)
If you say otherwise you're just a commie too. Good freedom loving software is made in Redmond.
Why can't teachers at MY KIDS school get training? (Score:5, Insightful)
The US has more than 3 times the [cia.gov] population of Viet Nam. Do we have 50000 teachers who have some IT training?
Just put this story together with yesterday's story about US students turning away from computer [slashdot.org] related careers. What does Viet Nam's government do to get something out of Microsoft that our own state and national govt won't do?
Re:Why can't teachers at MY KIDS school get traini (Score:2)
Re:Why can't teachers at MY KIDS school get traini (Score:2, Insightful)
So now America is outsourced to India which will be outsourced to Vietnam.
Re:Why can't teachers at MY KIDS school get traini (Score:2)
One MS staff programmer will teach 30 vietnamese natives, who will teach the masses. All for the price of a big mac.
What good is 50k MSCE's? (Score:2, Troll)
Protests in Seattle (Score:2)
Re:Protests in Seattle (Score:2)
As they say (Score:2)
I think it (Score:4, Insightful)
Scarry - very scarry.
Re:I think it (Score:2)
Getting there first (Score:2)
Wonder if they'll sell a special "light" version of windows.
Kilgore was RIGHT! (Score:2, Funny)
people look happy in Vietnam (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:2)
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:2)
Then try to say 'I want democracy, not communism.' in vietnamese and count the seconds before you're arrested.
In Vietnam, today, people may not even move unless explicitly allowed to by the state. Let alone running a successful business. No real criticism of the state is tolerated. When sending mail to your Vietnamese friends, never send a CD-R. The government will open your mail and check for political/ideological content.
Yet, you are right to sa
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:3, Interesting)
They don't call it "Communism". That is our label. And from a political point of view, I don't know if they really see voting as that much of a benefit. The fact that you state it this way shows that you're still stuck in the 1970's.
They see their political ladder as a series of steps fueled by corruption. And guess what, they see ours the same way. And maybe they're better off because they
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:2)
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:2)
And, God help those who are critical of the state these days.
Really? When did they throw Michael Moore and Al Franken in jail?
Re:people look happy in Vietnam (Score:2)
Oh, I see. So this has happened to who? I'd appreciate some evidence.
You sure are a brave man for posting this seeing as how Bush's jackbooted thugs could kick in your door at any moment for being so radical and sassy.
human rights? (Score:2)
I thought that that issue was solved at the moment the US army left Vietnam some decades ago. Or are they going to discuss all the tons of agent orange that were left as a goodbye present?
Ok, that was too easy
But I hate to see this happening. I would have preferred Vietnam to follow the software policy of its big brother China. Would be better for them and the rest of the world.
And we have seen mu
Re:human rights? (Score:2)
Yep, it was. We all know that the US was guilty of all kinds of human rights violations 35+ years ago, but the protests in Seattle have to do with what's going on now in Vietnam [amnestyusa.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft: Defender of American Values (Score:3, Funny)
What's the Problem Here? (Score:2)
Seriously, after aging hippies apologize for wrecking SE Asia, I'll get upset at Microsoft.
Bill is king (Score:2)
What an ass.
How is going to hear what's really going on from these guys.
language (Score:2)
Sad Move (Score:2)
Protesters (Score:3, Informative)
I've personally spoken with one such refugee who escaped to the Philippines and eventually made it to the US. After the US pulled out, he went home and destroyed all of his documentation proving he worked on the US Base as an aircraft mechanic. He watched his neighbors literally disappear overnight! His house was searched and his family threatened. He moved his wife and kids to his mother in-laws and then he fled the country. It took him many years to save up enough money to have his family smuggled out of the country.
Vietnam is guilty of many Human Rights violations, many more of the Vietnamese died when the US pulled out then were killed in the entire war! The country denied having any American POW's but we all know they did.
I think it's despicable that we would open trade agreements with the country. They failed to build their own economy due to the oppressive nature of Communism. So why help bail them out with trade deals? The same with China... I think it's a mistake, China has shown little results from all the investments we've made. They are actively trying to crack down on the formerly free people in Hong Kong and not to mention Taiwan. Again, why do we give money to Communists?!?! We know their economy will eventually collapse just as it did in Russia.
Re:Protesters (Score:3, Insightful)
Aside from the fact that freedom has nothing to do with economic development (Stalin, Hitler and Pinochet had all quite good economic results), you have maybe not noticed that the Vietnamese economy [cia.gov] is growing faster than the US economy [cia.gov], and not by a small margin (7.7% against 4.4%).
The fact they are still underdeveloped might have some connection with the fact their country was pretty much razed to the ground some years ago
Vietnam Courts Microsoft? (Score:2, Funny)
Meanwhile up the Da Nang River (Score:2, Funny)
ComCap (Score:2)
I thought Linux was communist... (Score:2)
If Linux is so anti-capitalist why isn't Vietnam looking for Linux solutions?
Vietnam courts Microsoft (Score:2)
Vietnam courts Microsoft
Microsoft courts Vietnam
1990s:
Microsoft "Vietnam"s Courts.
Perhaps they'll start a 'Software Reform Campaign" (Score:2)
(Estimates of direct executions range from 5,000 to 50,000, and deaths in labor camps from 50,000 to 500,000. Numbers at the high end of the range are suspect, as they were reported in what appear to be propaganda pieces.)
The government there still operates forced labor police "re-
Comparison (Score:2)
GDP of Vietnam = US$227.2 billion.
Market capitalization MSFT = US$243.5 billion
Granted, MSFT's income is only about US$36 billion, but they don't have to maintain a country.
And while Vietnam can muster a fairly impressive sized army, MSFT has Steve Ballmer.
ahem... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Right .. (Score:2)
We may actually end up with a live re-enactment of that scene in South Park where the general says "Get me Bill Gates" ... and shoots him ... win-win all around.
Re:Right .. (Score:2)
Re:Righ[tt] .. (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:no sense of irony (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually I'm sorry to say that people just don't have those rights any more in the US. They can be imprisoned without knowing why, their lawer isn't allowed to talk about the charges, they can be deported to third countries for torture or just thrown out of the country (see recent case of an Iranian teenager) or they can be shipped off to someplace like Guantanamo Bay where you have exactly zero rights and are very deliberately dehumanized. Now you can argue about the justification for this if you like, but the US would rank well below Canada and many European countries (just for example) in a scale of civil rights or freedom right now.
Your point about it being quite possible for US citizens to criticise other nations is spot on though, whatever their govt. is doing.
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: a sense of irony (Score:2)
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2, Insightful)
Pure FUD. If it weren't, you would not have been allowed to make your post and have been arrested and sent off to some mythical gulag by now.
I suggest calming down and gettin
Manichean sense of irony (Score:2)
Pure FUD. If it weren't, you would not have been allowed to make your post and have been arrested and sent off to some mythical gulag by now.
I don't live in your country : )
I
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
Show where a natural born American citizen who has not been engaged in terrorism or linked to it has been sent to Guantanamo.
Don't you think this should be a court's task, to determine whether somebody is or is not linked to terrorism and what the punishment should be?
Is it right that an army officer who doesn't even speak the other person's language decides on somebody else's future by saying: "I believe he is connected in terrorism, let's send him to Guantanamo." I know officers. I wouldn't let them
Re:no sense of irony (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
Why do you bother to ask when the link you've given spells it out in plain English?!?
I recommend everyone babbling about inhumane treatment read that link; see esp. the list of what all detainees are being provided daily. Compare with treatment of Americans captured in Iraq. Note that "Heads sawed off with knives" is not on the GB prisoner's list.
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
They're not American citizens and are not entitled to a civil trial anymore than a captured Nazi would have been 60 years ago. They have already been found guilty by a military tribunal; to have these trials publically would jeopardize the lives of our intelligence operatives.
They are illegal combatants. Do you understand what this means? They are not protected by the Geneva convention. Why? Because they don't wear uniforms. Why is this so bad? Because uniforms are the way armies protect their people; the
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
U.S. citizens are being held in other detainment facilities across the country with a similar "no legal rights status". Here in South Carolina, there is one being held at the Charleston naval base.
As for how many other citizens are being held across the country or at Gitmo. We have no idea.
Why? Because the government refuses to tell us.
-Eric
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
Actually, we always have our rights. Violence infringes our rights, it does not cause them not to exist.
You want to say: "Don't worry, in theory you still have you rights."
That probably doesn't help those people who spend years in prison in the US and other places who have no possibility to go to court.
If the government is so sure the prisoners in Guantanamo are terrorists, why aren't they brought to trial?
Doesn't the American government trust the American legal system? How is it possible the exe
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:no sense of irony (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, yes indeed. Makes you wonder how we hear so many tales of torture and abuse [rushlimbaugh.com] coming out of Gitmo. You'd think they'd all be dead or shut up in dungeons never to be heard from again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:no sense of irony (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, it isn't ironic at all. I'm one of those Americans who protests human rights abuses of other countries. I also protest the ones committed by my own government. I didn't vote for this administration and I have done what I could to make my voice heard through letters and email to my legislative representatives.
What is ironic, is when President Bush or Ms. Rice makes accusations about human rights abuses, not when U.S. citizens who honestly deplore what our own government has been doing do so.
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
It's not ironic.
It's hypocritical.
Get the terminology right, people...
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
Yeah, the same Americans who 35 years ago were protesting the US's attempt to keep the communists from taking over Vietnam are now complaining that said communists are running a repressive regime.
Re:no sense of irony (Score:2)
Actually, the Americans compalaining about the Vietnam govt in this instance are mostly Vietnam-born, mostly form the South I'd guess. So no irony there I'm afraid.
Re:This being America.... (Score:2)
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Stones, glass houses, sin, etc.
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:3, Insightful)
No, no, you see, when the US oppresses people (by turning the AC down and playing loud rap music) it's the US government's fault, and when governments opposed to the US oppress people (by killing and maiming them) it's also the US government's fault.
Logically this makes sense, but only if you belong to what is known as the "reality based community". Apparently if there was no United States, the world would be a playgroun
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
The point was that Americans are often too quick to judge when you yourselves don't have the best record to stand on.
So instead of going around like your shit don't stink think twice about what you're doing. I mean for instance, look at the Vietnam war. It killed millions of Vietnam civillians and for what? The "evil communists" still won anyways. If you just left them be they'd probably be much better off.
But think of it this way, when America was being settle
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
You're kidding right? The name Pol Pot ring a fucking bell to you?
And before you retort, yes, he was killer of Cambodia, but those in charge of Vietnam were no less clean.
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Just for your information, I'm in my thirties and I've traveled all over the world. Hope you can wrap your brain around that, not that I'm saying you're "close minded". I've seen the world, and if you think the US is oppressive compared to most of the world I think *you're* the parochial one.
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
It isn't that the USA is the worst. It's that your shit stinks just like the rest of us. This holier than thou attitude is exactly my point.
Example: What we call murder you call "collateral damage". What we call violating the geneva convention you call "Operation Iraqi Liberation", etc, etc, etc...
To say the USA does nothing good is stupid. They do plenty of good [and often more than Canada for instance].
The point, if you care to follow, is that you do shit that y
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Sorry if it doesn't exactly endear me to paying the slightest bit of attention to whatever kind of argument you're lamely attempting to make.
I learned long ago not to bother arguing on
And yes, the ironic content in this post is entirely intentional.
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
So really, in what way is my post ironic? Do you even know what the word means?
Tom
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2, Informative)
If they think so, it's because that's what they've been told by school teachers who want to rewrite history.
"the Ohio National Guard shot four students dead"
The Ohio National Guard fired into the air, over the heads of the protesters, who were throwing rocks and bottles at the RETRE
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
As far as treatment of prisoners, we can turn on US corporate television and hear about how John McCain was treated and the Hanoi Hilton and whatnot. You never hear about how NLF prisoners were treated on Con Sen Island though, which was as bad or worse.
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Re:The US/RVN's human rights record in Vietnam (Score:2)
Re:Obligatory Bush quote (Score:2)
Re:Forget (Score:4, Insightful)
As far as LBJ's "half-assed effort", LBJ never vetoed a military target, ever. LeMay wanted to bomb dikes so as to starve to death millions of civilians (like he did in Korea) and also carpet bomb Hanoi and kill the civilian population there (like he did to Pyongyang, and ever major city in North Korea, and every major city in Japan in the war before that). So if you mean an intentional massacre of civilians on the scale that the US did in Korea or Japan, yes, LBJ vetoed that because the powers-that-be in the US felt it would be politically harmful to US interests outside of Vietnam.