Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Politics

Has Online Shopping Left Warehouse Workers WIthout Political Power? (msn.com) 45

A writer for the New York Times editorial board argues we don't yet fully understand the impact of warehouses. "Thanks to the rise of online shopping and the proximity to so many American doorsteps, warehouses have become a major source of blue-collar employment," both in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and beyond. "In Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley, more than 19,000 people work in the warehouses that prepare our packages. Thousands more drive the trucks that deliver them."

But while the total number of warehouse-related jobs almost replaces the jobs lost from the closure of a major steel plant, "the political power that blue-collar workers once wielded has not been replaced." Despite their large numbers, their importance to the economy, and their presence in Northampton — a swing county in a crucial battleground state — warehouse workers don't form an influential voting bloc in the way that steelworkers did... It turns out that making stuff isn't the same as distributing it. Working in a steel mill is a communal act that lends itself to the pursuit of political power in a way that warehouse jobs do not. Steelworkers toiled alongside one another, forming lifelong bonds, bowling leagues and unions that delivered a reliable voting bloc. Back when thousands of workers streamed out of the gates of Bethlehem Steel at quitting time, "politicians would come out to shake our hands," Jerry Green, retired president of United Steelworkers Local 2599, told me.

Factories were so good at political mobilization, in fact, that some credit them for democracy itself. Women and working-class men won the right to vote in the United States, Western Europe and much of East Asia after about a quarter of those populations were employed in factories, according to recent research by Sam van Noort, a lecturer at Princeton. Warehouses, by contrast, have no such mystique. Nobody campaigns outside the Walmart distribution centers here. Workers tend to be hired by staffing agencies and many stay for only a few months. They work on their own and rarely socialize. They are notoriously difficult to organize. Alec MacGillis, author of "Fulfillment: America in the Shadow of Amazon," told me that the biggest challenge for labor organizers at Amazon warehouses was getting workers to stay on the job long enough to feel a sense of solidarity.

Malenie Tapia, who moved to Bethlehem from Queens, N.Y., five years ago and took a job as a "picker" in a Zara warehouse, explained why. For eight hours a day, she grabbed items off numbered shelves and delivered them to packers who packed them into boxes. Talking to co-workers was forbidden, she said, except during a brief lunch break. "Sometimes I would go to the section in the back, where there would be less eyes on you, and sneak in a little moment of conversation," she said.

Here's what happened when the reporter asked a pair of Latino workers about their political opinions: Most of all, they fretted about being replaced by machines. They spoke with dread about a fully automated McDonald's and a robot that unloads container ships. They didn't seem to see themselves as part of a working class that could band together to demand protections for their jobs.

The hot political issue around warehouses isn't the workers at all; it's the traffic and loss of green space associated with them. Both the Democratic and Republican candidates in the race for a state representative seat in Northampton have vowed to stop the proliferation of warehouses, which some citizens' groups say destroys their rural way of life. If warehouse workers had a political voice, they might push back. But they don't, so they won't. Warehouses have been an economic boon. But politically, for workers, they are a loss.

Has Online Shopping Left Warehouse Workers WIthout Political Power?

Comments Filter:
  • Democracy supposedly has its roots in classical Athens. Yeah, I know, Athens had direct democracy (not representative democracy), only men over 30 with military service could vote (no universal suffrage), and they had ostracism to try and counter abuse of power. Athens was never very stable under democracy, either - it always collapsed pretty quickly. You'd barely recognise it as the same political system as what we call democracy today.

    The political theory that emerged from industrialisation was Marxism

  • If they all decide at once to walk out, it would paralyze the parent company.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      If they all decide at once to walk out

      Did you miss the part where they are not allowed to talk to one another?

      • by drnb ( 2434720 )

        If they all decide at once to walk out

        Did you miss the part where they are not allowed to talk to one another?

        No you missed a contemporaneous comparison, comparing glory days of unions steel workers to warehouse workers. I worked in a warehouse in the 1980s, company parties, softball leagues, bowling leagues, plenty of informal hanging out with coworkers on your off hours, lots of friendships created at work, and plenty of talking at work too.

    • I wonder whether that is true. A company like amazon is so distributed that it probably would take a lot of warehouses to shut down at once before they are deeply impacted.

      • It basically means that if they organized, they would have a lot of power, but unorganized they have little power.
  • Lack of unions does. You need unions in order to organize voting blocks so that you can have political power. it's the old adage, divided we beg United we bargain.
  • by MrKaos ( 858439 ) on Sunday October 27, 2024 @05:49PM (#64898263) Journal

    the political power that blue-collar workers once wielded has not been replaced

    It's been outsourced to China where the workers there have no rights of assembly or speech.

  • Luddites (Score:1, Insightful)

    by PetiePooo ( 606423 )

    Most of all, they fretted about being replaced by machines. They spoke with dread about a fully automated McDonald's and a robot that unloads container ships. They didn't seem to see themselves as part of a working class that could band together to demand protections for their jobs.

    And why should their jobs be protected if a robot can do it? I mean, sewing machines are part and parcel of today's standard of living. Imagine a world where the seamstress union was able to successfully ban them and shirts cost 4 times what they do now because everything had to be hand sewn.

    Automation is always viewed as an evil by the class of workers it's replacing, but it is inevitably a net positive for the world as a whole, as the price of goods drop and production increases. The class of work

    • Re:Luddites (Score:5, Insightful)

      by sjames ( 1099 ) on Sunday October 27, 2024 @05:58PM (#64898273) Homepage Journal

      Since it's such a minor setback for the workers, perhaps the society as a whole should share the burden as well as the benefit. Perhaps if they had time and were allowed to talk, they might put together some sort of group that could lobby for that. Perhaps they could call it a union.

  • One big difference (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MpVpRb ( 1423381 ) on Sunday October 27, 2024 @05:51PM (#64898269)

    Working in a steel mill or factory takes skill, sometimes requiring years to learn
    Working in a warehouse requires a short bit of training, sometimes just a few hours

    • Working in a steel mill or factory takes skill, sometimes requiring years to learn Working in a warehouse requires a short bit of training, sometimes just a few hours

      As someone who worked in a warehouse in the 1980s, contemporaneous to when unions were strong, I would say no, not a few hours. But I would say 4-6 months, not years, to become skilled at it. Unloading trucks, tagging merch, stocking shelves, picking for orders, etc.

      Also the article is flat out wrong regarding "They work on their own and rarely socialize.". Again, not true at all, company parties, softball leagues, bowling leagues, ... Again, back in the days when unions were strong.

      • I'd say it is heavily dependent on the type of warehouse. An early 20's relative of mine worked a a food packing warehouse. They made him a low level supervisor after a month, mainly because he could read, write legibly, and do basic math. He also showed up to work on time and always finished out his shift. Apparently this put him in the top 5% of their workforce.

        • by drnb ( 2434720 )

          I'd say it is heavily dependent on the type of warehouse. An early 20's relative of mine worked a a food packing warehouse.

          Yeah, my experience was strictly with stuff heading to department stores, no food. Now that did include some jewelry and firearms that required special handling, mostly stocking in a secured area and constant observation from the truck to that area.

          They made him a low level supervisor after a month, mainly because he could read, write legibly, and do basic math. He also showed up to work on time and always finished out his shift. Apparently this put him in the top 5% of their workforce.

          Not entirely surprised, there was a strong contingent of stoners among the long time full timers at my warehouse. The ladies were good, most of them working mom's with kids old enough for them to return to work. The only problem they had were when the trucks were

    • Working in a steel mill or factory takes skill, sometimes requiring years to learn Working in a warehouse requires a short bit of training, sometimes just a few hours

      Electricians and machinists are skilled. Working an assembly line is not. Doing work that's in a warehouse or factory is not skilled, it's "located," and irrelevant in re: skilled labor or not.

      But you knew that and were trying to poison the well with "equality," right?

      • I am probably more skilled than you, but I do understand that America needs to be a middle class country, and not an Oligarchy. A minimum wage and exploitation of workers will not support a strong Democracy.
        • I am probably more skilled than you, but I do understand that America needs to be a middle class country, and not an Oligarchy. A minimum wage and exploitation of workers will not support a strong Democracy.

          White collar and skilled labor are not the same. I'm white collar. You seem less able with language and reasoning. You win. You're "more skilled."

          • Just to get to your squirrels in you brain, you think that Oligarch should throw around a million dollars a day in order to get their political candidates elected? Even when you know it is a quid pro quo, that those Oligarchs live off of Government Contracts?
            • I'm sorry. What was the topic? This is a parade of unhinged non-sequiturs. The poor grammar doesn't help any.

              • The topic is how American workers have no choice but to take a minimum wage job at a warehouse, and be happy about it. Even though... there is a lot of money up for grabs there, and it all goes to American Oligarchs. They build schools for children, a task that should be reserved for the Government, if taxes can be raised from the Oligarchs.
    • I am not going to argue you have to be a genius to work in the average warehouse, but it certainly requires more than just a few hours of learning. The tasks are simple enough, but you still need to internalize them to do them with anything approaching competence.

  • It turns out that making stuff isn't the same as distributing it

    Or maybe they're not unionized workers anymore. How is that not the most obvious factor here?

  • They work on their own and rarely socialize. They are notoriously difficult to organize.

    Complete bullshit. When you compare workers of a contemporaneous period, lets say the end of the glory days of the unions, warehouse workers also made enduring friendships, engaged in company softball and bowling leagues, spent a lot of off hours handing out with coworkers. Been there, done that, worked is a warehouse in the 1980s.
    What's different is the steel working is a more technical and dangerous job. It take years to become skilled at it, I'd say it takes about six months to get skilled at basic war

  • Women and working-class men won the right to vote in the United States, Western Europe and much of East Asia after about a quarter of those populations were employed in factories

    French first revolution happened before the industrial revolution. It was a landscape without factories, and working-class men (not women at that time) asked and obtained the right to vote

    Unfortunately, the paper backing the allegation is not freely available, hence I cannot tell if it addresses that point.

    • What I learned from the French Revolution, is that Oligarchs thought that cake was so available that nobody needed to starve to death.
  • Despite their large numbers, their importance to the economy, and their presence in Northampton â" a swing county in a crucial battleground state â" warehouse workers don't form an influential voting bloc in the way that steelworkers did... It turns out that making stuff isn't the same as distributing it.

    Working in steel plant is skilled work - you can't just drag someone in off the street and expect them to do the work.

    On the other hand, moving pallets, picking items, driving delivery trucks are really (comparably) unskilled jobs. A person can be brought in off the street and be trained to work in a warehouse in a few hours.

    Thankfully, if warehouse owners ever faced a serious strike, all the owners would have to do is convert their systems to Spanish and start hiring some of those asylum seekers entering t

The last person that quit or was fired will be held responsible for everything that goes wrong -- until the next person quits or is fired.

Working...