![Republicans Republicans](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/republicans_64.png)
Trump's Campaign 'Says It Has Been Hacked', Reports CNN (cnn.com) 210
CNN reports:
Former President Donald Trump's campaign said Saturday in a statement that it had been hacked.
Politico reported earlier Saturday that it had received emails from an anonymous account with documents from inside Trump's campaign operation. "These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States, intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process," Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement to CNN.
Cheung pointed to a recent report published by Microsoft that said Iranian operatives had ramped up their attempts to influence and monitor the US presidential election by creating fake news outlets targeting liberal and conservative voters and by trying to hack an unnamed presidential campaign... Still, it's not clear whether Iran was responsible for the hack. CNN has reached out to the Iranian mission to the United Nations for comment...
Politico reported it had received emails that contained internal communications from a senior Trump campaign official and a [271-page] research dossier the campaign had put together on Trump's running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance. The dossier included what the Trump campaign identified as Vance's potential vulnerabilities...
In 2016, days before the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee server.
Politico reported earlier Saturday that it had received emails from an anonymous account with documents from inside Trump's campaign operation. "These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States, intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process," Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement to CNN.
Cheung pointed to a recent report published by Microsoft that said Iranian operatives had ramped up their attempts to influence and monitor the US presidential election by creating fake news outlets targeting liberal and conservative voters and by trying to hack an unnamed presidential campaign... Still, it's not clear whether Iran was responsible for the hack. CNN has reached out to the Iranian mission to the United Nations for comment...
Politico reported it had received emails that contained internal communications from a senior Trump campaign official and a [271-page] research dossier the campaign had put together on Trump's running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance. The dossier included what the Trump campaign identified as Vance's potential vulnerabilities...
In 2016, days before the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee server.
Russia (Score:5, Insightful)
"Russia, if you are listening..."
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Russia, if you are listening..."
Beat me to it, Putin's puppet, who beseeched Russia to hack Hillary, so that he could put her in jail, not only deserves to be hacked, but every thing should be made public, and not stop. I mean, it's what he would want.
He's a fair man, amirite?
Re: Russia (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: LOL! :D (Score:3, Funny)
"Justice" Thomas got a new RV so it doesn't matter.
Re: (Score:2)
Like in some fucking 3rd world banana republic. Which is where the US will go if this crap is not stopped.
Re: LOL! :D (Score:5, Interesting)
Like in some fucking 3rd world banana republic. Which is where the US will go if this crap is not stopped.
Let's face it, we're there already. Congress has been allowed unfettered insider trading (and worse, to be permitted to trade stocks the laws they are voting on influence, and vice versa) for decades and the results are predictable. People are still arguing about whether this is fascism even while congress is passing laws written by corporate lawyers which make it ever more legal for corporations to control the government, because they think if it's not Italian it's only sparkling white nationalism. The Supreme Court is stuffed with hard right authoritarians who all refuse to recuse themselves even in cases of obvious conflicts of interest, and the majority of whom have obviously taken extensive packages of bribes.
The Reagan-era plan of compromising the public education system in order to avoid an educated proletariat so that consent for fascism could be manufactured among the religious right (who by definition have already proven that they can be influenced en masse by propaganda and mythology) has paid off brilliantly, and we are reaping the "rewards" today — unsustainable profit for the wealthy as demonstrated by a booming stock market that remains at elevated levels even after a significant plunge, while homelessness continues to rise and real wages continue to fall.
Re: LOL! :D (Score:5, Interesting)
All the justices and some of their spouses are grifting off their Supreme Court gigs, even Robert's wife. The liberal justices tend to get theirs through sweetheart book deals and speeches. The right wingers are more business oriented and prefer direct graft. Thomas is the worst, and naturally unshameful about it.
There is a justice Reed O’Connor, in Texas ( a Federalist Society judge), who has been accepting Elmo's cases. He owns Tesla stock. The rot goes deep and the Federalist Society is one of the hearts of that rot.
Re: LOL! :D (Score:4, Insightful)
The Supreme Court has an explicitly published rule that justices may sign book contracts and receive reimbursement and market-rate speaking fees for legitimate appearances (whatever the definition of legitimate may be). And those incomes are supposed to be reported on the annual conflict of interest form. Thomas took that rule to mean that since accepting gifts of $250k motor homes wasn't prohibited it could be accepted, and similarly since it wasn't on the form it didn't have to be reported - or disclosed when the gift-giver had cases in front of Thomas.
Re: LOL! :D (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
More probably it's related to the long history of rich and politically connected people getting off light no matter what their crimes may be so long as the victim wasn't also rich and/or politically connected.
Re: (Score:2)
I believe Mueller.
There was some guy here on slashdot screaming about Mueller going to frog march Trump and Trump going to jail and so on.
And now you are here telling us Mueller said Trump did all these bad things.
Yet.... weird, nothing happened.
Maybe because it's bullshit?
More importantly though, check out your score here. You are at -1 informative! I had always wondered if someone's score could get to -1 and keep the original upvote meaning, like Informative, or Insightful, and it turns out it is possible.
Trump is a criminal. Just relax and embrace it. (Score:3, Insightful)
I didn't see anyone arguing whether or not they were technically crimes or not, although we all know nothing trump can do as president really is a crime now that the supreme court has his back.
But regardless of what they were, the acts were corrupt.
If you love trump why not embrace who he is, a criminal. Just be at peace with it. Maybe you like criminals to hold power, if they commit the right crimes. You wouldn't be the first person in history to think that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"Russia, if you are listening..."
Hey! Sorry we can't come to the phone, we're a little busy, but if you leave a message we'll get back to you as soon as we can. If it's something we're not going to like, try simply shouting it out the nearest high-floor window -- be sure to lean way, way out so people can hear you ...
Re:Trump doesn't lie. He bullshits. (Score:5, Insightful)
Bullshit is just lies where you aren't invested in the details.
>And *to this day* the media will not call him out on bullshit. They are *still* flabbergasted on how to deal with it.
"Money over all else" - the American motto. The house might be on fire, but if American media thought it might make an extra buck by telling you to stay in your living room because something scary was outside your front door... guess what they'd say? A buck today is more important than destroying the system that produced the buck and maybe not having a buck at all tomorrow.
They know how to deal with Trump. Laugh at him, report that they're not going to waste their time on serious efforts to break down the endless stream of bullshit and address each individual claim. They don't want to because it doesn't give them as much material and it doesn't draw as many eyeballs.
Re:Trump doesn't lie. He bullshits. (Score:5, Informative)
They are *still* flabbergasted on how to deal with it.
Indeed. And that is because there never has been an even remotely this disconnected-from-reality US president before.
Well, ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Trump's Campaign 'Says It Has Been Hacked'
Well, this certainly couldn't have happened to a more deserving bunch of people.
Re:Well, ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't know why this is showing as 'troll'; it seems right on the nail.
Well, we have some MAGAs here, those who believe that the man many of them consider the actual second coming of Christ. They believe rules and morals are for other people.
By the way - I am not kidding about them believing he is the second coming - here's the book they are planning on incorporating into the old testament. The book that shows their religion is this - you can buy it on Amazon It's Titled "President Donald J. Trump, The Son of Man - The Christ" https://www.amazon.com/Preside... [amazon.com]
They consider their cult leader to be prophesied in their holy book - the actually do worship him as the second coming.
Now is it clear why I was marked troll? I am mocking and blaspheming their religion.
Re: (Score:2)
Putin wishes he had that kind of power.
The biggest booster for Trump is a single letter social media platform. Will history remember Musk as a visionary who took us to Mars and beyond or a partisan political hack who backed the wrong horse in Nov 2024?
(And please do mark my post -1 Troll - you'll only confirm the cult like reverence for a billionaire who is only today commanding his readers to join the 'Resistance', whatever that means.)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, we have some MAGAs here, those who believe that the man many of them consider the actual second coming of Christ. They believe rules and morals are for other people.
Yep. Pretty much like all power-hungry creeps.
Re:Well, ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
It is *representative* of many more than 1 million people. It is a cult. While most MAGAtards won't go so far as to claim that Trump is holy, I would wager both my testicles and ovaries of various relatives that there is FAR MORE than 1 million Americans who do, in fact, believe that it would be acceptable to incorporate Donald J. Trump, as named, into the existing Bible as a new revision or version. I seriously do, without a doubt, honestly, 100 % believe that. For real.
Re: Well, ... (Score:2)
I would be careful about making that claim. Mike Lindell made a claim and promised $5 million if it could be disproven . Someone and the courts are making him pay.
I wouldn't put it past the Magats to take you up on your claim. The courts might not enforce it, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Last I checked, slashdot was community-moderated. Has that changed?
Re: (Score:3)
Last I checked, slashdot was community-moderated. Has that changed?
Last I checked, there was zero transparency in moderation on Slashdot, so we don't know who or what is doing the moderation. And that has not changed. The difference between now and before, of course, is that Slashdot used to not be owned by crypto grifters (but I repeat myself there.)
Bullshit (Score:4, Insightful)
As the article relates, they have provided no evidence for this claim. Further, we know the convicted felon is a known liar, such as his most recent lie [politifact.com] about being in a helicopter crash years ago.
Unless, and until, any evidence is shown for this "hack", it can only be considered a political stunt to get attention for the narcissist. That is all.
Re:Bullshit (Score:4, Informative)
Journalists have received and confirmed some of the allegedly hacked material, so it's not just Trump saying it.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I also suppose if the hacker was a Politico employee as well that would legally restrict them from publishing the documents.
Re: (Score:2)
Those quotes make this sound more like a leak, than a hack.
Re: Bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)
Mr. 6 Times Bankrupt probably didn't do too well in business school
Bullshit. He aced his thesis, which was entitled "Here is a large check from Daddy."
Surprise, Surprise (Score:4, Insightful)
And this, kids, is what happens when you hire for ideology conformity first, and competence second.
(Project 2025 aims to ensure the Federal government follows this hiring methodology. The Pendleton Act, which it seeks to ignore if not overturn, is there for a reason.)
Re: (Score:2)
Hostile forces (Score:5, Funny)
"These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States
Nah... Just foreign sources hostile to Trump. That leaves only a few billion suspects.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
So a republican did it (Score:4, Funny)
"intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process" - that definitely sounds like the calling card of the Cult of Trump right there. Clearly they got hacked by a republican.
Oh no! (Score:2, Funny)
Anyway I had Italian sausage tortellini for dinner and it was fantastic. Anyone grilling this weekend?
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, it's supposed to rain starting tomorrow and I just spent the day moving a bunch of boxes between two storage units. Got a quick dinner of West-Mex fast food. Gonna take a shower and chill the rest of the night I think.
Too bad about that hacking. Now things may be released that paint Trump in a worse light, if that's possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Dang, it is cooling off a bit, should break out the grill and have a steak. Thanks for the idea.
So it depends on what they got (Score:2, Insightful)
No that's partially because legacy media outlets are protecting Trump in order to keep all that sweet sweet ad revenue flowing in. And also it doesn't help that they are owned by billionaires who are looking forward to the massive tax cuts and all the deregulation that would follow a Trump dictatorship.
But sti
Re: (Score:2)
I have ribs in the oven!
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah. Me too. With baked potatoes and apple crumble from the apple trees.
Re: (Score:2)
Anyway I had Italian sausage tortellini for dinner and it was fantastic.
That sounds really tasty. We're doing Greek chicken bowls.
Why would Iran do us such a favor? (Score:2)
If Iran hates us so much, why would they not want Grab 'Em By The Wherever in charge of our country?
Re: (Score:2)
Soleimani
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know it is a foreign state actor or what.
But in general, generating chaos is a good thing from a foreign adversary's perspective. Making US democracy more of a mess (is that even possible at this point?) is a win for them, independently of who gets elected.
Re: (Score:3)
Because, as he bleeds America dry, he would simultaneously arm Israel to the teeth and unconditionally support whatever kind of war they get involved in. Potentially one with Iran.
Democrats seem mostly on board with the same, but at least there's a chance for some kind of change. Whereas it's literally religious doctrine for Republicans to support Israel.
Re: (Score:2)
Democrats seem mostly on board with the same, but at least there's a chance for some kind of change.
I was encouraged by Kamala calling for a cease fire in relatively clear terms. I hope that democratic voters get behind that, which I think there's a good chance of, so that there's a chance she sticks to it. The US ceasing support for genocide in Gaza is an important step to cooling down the situation in the region.
Re: (Score:3)
I would not assume that Iran is motivated to have "peace" between Israel and Hamas. They are currently pulling off a masterful 4-D chess move that helps them, hurts Egypt specifically, makes America look incompetent, and hurts western trade generally. It is in their interest for this situation to continue indefinitely.
To explain, the Gaza war is a pretext for Iran-backed Houthis to attack shipping entering the Suez Canal. Ships are rerouting to avoid this, costing Egypt billions in transit fees. The cana
Two words, same word (Score:2)
Womp womp!
Our "democratic" process? (Score:4, Funny)
interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process,
Ever heard of the electoral college? That's to democratic process what Ragu sauce is to Italian cuisine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Our "democratic" process? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your government is 50%+1. Except that in your Italian restaurant some customers get priority in service in the kitchen, while others aren't welcome and are actively snubbed by staff every chance they get.
There's nothing better about the American system than the 50%+1 of general democracy, but there are many things worse about it than other democracies, especially how the electoral college was designed to solve a problem that is not only not relevant in the modern age, but it actively failed to solve that pr
Re: (Score:3)
Well, you got democracy right. You were very overly optimistic when describing republics. What you should have pointed to is the need for adhering to the constitution. Unfortunately, it was too difficult to amend, so it's been largely ignored since at least the 1940's and probably earlier. (OTOH, there usually hasn't been anyone around that I would trust to amend in such a was as to improve things.)
As for how much the constitution is adhered to...consider that we aren't supposed to go to war without a d
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Thus a republic can be democratic or non-democratic. So being a republic does not preclude a country from being a democracy.
See also: Why Republicans keep saying "we're a republic, not a democracy". [slate.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting how the areas of the American government that function more like a democracy consistently get better results for the people (or "the mob" as you call them).
Conversely, the segments of American government that function more like a republic deliver worse results.
Let me guess, you also like to rail against "elites" and stick it to the man.
"Hacked" - as in I'm dumb and got phished (Score:5, Insightful)
We all know he or one of his subordinates clicked the link in the phishing e-mail and gave up their logon credentials.
Re: (Score:2)
Makes me wonder why we use terrible email clients so readily. GUI clients tend to be bad. Sylpheed was good at keeping the text/plain, mutt too. When clients show the text/html rendered, people are easier to trick. So why do we do it? Phones and WhatsApp, signal, SMS etc are plain text, media is obvious when it's an attachment.
Re: (Score:2)
When clients show the text/html rendered, people are easier to trick. So why do we do it?
For the same reason that letterheads and custom stationery exist. Back when we wanted something better than plaintext emails you couldn't do nearly as much nefarious shit with HTML as you can now.
Re: "Hacked" - as in I'm dumb and got phished (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
i think any IT security professional will tell you that 99.99$ of the time, "i got hacked" means "i voluntarily gave my data, money, or credentials to someone shady who simply asked for them."
And when we're dealing with the illiterate ding dongs in the GOP, that number goes up to 100%.
Should publish everything... (Score:5, Interesting)
The voters have a right to know who they're voting for, transparency should be an enforced requirement for any political candidate.
Re: (Score:2)
The voters have a right to know who they're voting for, transparency should be an enforced requirement for any political candidate.
While you ponder what that knee-jerk reaction actually entails, here's a quote from the article:
The research dossier was a 271-page document based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements, with some — such as his past criticisms of Trump — identified in the document as “POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES.”
Re: (Score:2)
The voters have a right to know who they're voting for, transparency should be an enforced requirement for any political candidate.
Riiight ... because that's what you'd be saying if someone had obtained Harris' private communications via hacking.
I actually remember Slashdot when it was certainly politically leftward, but most posters would still be at least a bit ashamed of saying "privacy is bad, do you have something to hide??"
There's a Mike Royko column about this (Score:3)
There's a Mike Royko column about a machine hack being a few points behind where he should be before the election. Then the Chicago Tribune or Channel 5 beat reporter is called to his campaign office, where a brick or bullet was fired through the window. "Lucky nobuddy was hurt. Musta been 2, 3 hunnerd dollars damage. People coulda been killed!. [pause] You gonna write all this up, right?".
Yeah, sure.
Not Vance's biggest vulnerability (Score:5, Funny)
The dossier included what the Trump campaign identified as Vance's potential vulnerabilities.
I don't think the dossier is very useful, since it probably doesn't include "Say he fucked a couch," and that has worked way better than any of the facts.
Re: (Score:2)
The dossier included what the Trump campaign identified as Vance's potential vulnerabilities.
I don't think the dossier is very useful, since it probably doesn't include "Say he fucked a couch," and that has worked way better than any of the facts.
Your honesty ("we just make up shit, and it works!") is refreshing ...
Could these be from... (Score:5, Funny)
...disgruntled customers of his Mar-A-Lago document selling operation unhappy with the product they got?
Re:Could these be from... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, the best he shows off to randos to prove he's a big boy. Sometimes he gets things posted to social media... The mediocre stuff he stacks in a disused shower.
It's possible he only managed to monetize those documents by charging foreign agents Mar-a-lago membership fees, which pretty much tracks with his financial 'acumen'. Without Fred Trump's money, Donald Trump would be a failed used car salesman in jail for fraud.
So somebody broke to Trump's bathroom? (Score:4, Funny)
That is where he keeps all the really important stuff, right?
Re: (Score:2)
That is where he keeps all the really important stuff, right?
Well, that is established best practice (ref Hillary Clinton and email servers).
Really hacked??? (Score:5, Funny)
Or did Trump just brag about his password being "DaughterHot!"
Re: (Score:2)
Not even that hard, username Imgod ir TRUMP!!!, password maga - nobody can crack that! Daughterhot!, that is .3 years by the NSA, no chance that is it. Actually, my guess is username Trump, password: password.
Hack or Leak? (Score:3)
The Trump Campaign is saying hacked (phished), but their credibility on all things is less than zero.
The only actual evidence seems to be from the source:
Asked how they obtained the documents, the person responded: “I suggest you don’t be curious about where I got them from. Any answer to this question, will compromise me and also legally restricts you from publishing them.”
So that does sound like they hacked/phished, but they could also be freaked out about an NDA they signed, or a mixture of the two, an insider who escalated their privileges.
Either way, it seems weird the source flat out told Politico that they would be legally restricted from publishing them, either way, I suspect they'd just since politico refused I'm guessing they'll send to wikileaks or whomever else is willing to published hacked materials nowadays.
Re: (Score:3)
Since they sent them to a right controlled media agency in the first place, one may assume this could be a false flag operation by the Trump campaign that leaked their own info to Politico.
Politico's reporting is generally considered centrist (for the US).
I think the hacker/leaker chose it for impact. Leak to MSNBC and people get really skeptical, leak to Fox and the reporter requests to meet with you, and which point you're thrown in a van and dumped in the river. Leaking to Politico is your best bet to get published (though not in this case) and be taken seriously.
Baloney (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm of two minds...
On one hand I seriously doubt any of it is true; I think this is just some attention-getting bullshit. It sounds like they're laying the groundwork for contesting the 2024 election on account of they were 'hacked'.
BUT,
On the other hand, what's the chance that Trump hired a competent IT staff and that something like this was inevitable, and that it *did* happen? If so, there are likely to be some juicy, juicy stuff in there.
Re: (Score:3)
Juicy stuff like what? That they plan to install a dictator and bring us to various shades of dystopia? Not a secret. Maybe we find out that he grabbed another woman by the pussy? Not sure what else you think the big reveal could be.
"Pleased to meet you; I am the Devil." (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I am not kidding or even exaggerating when I say that I can't imagine anything being revealed as part of this hack, or any hack, that would be so bad that I can't imagine him hinting at it
Orders from Daddy? I strongly and powerfully don't see any reason why they would tamper with the election?
Clowns to the left, jokers to the right. (Score:2)
Stop towing some party line and do the investigating yourself. After doing that though you'll probably come to the same conclusion as I ... clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am stuck in the middle again. I don't want to vote for any of these ass-hats. God-damned buffoons all of them.
Re: Clowns to the left, jokers to the right. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Where are they “towing” the line to?
Presumption of loyalty (Score:3)
Trump's #1 value is loyalty. If you are loyal to him, nothing else matters. If you are disloyal to him, nothing else matters.
It's natural that he would assume that all of his campaign staff are loyal to him, and would never intentionally leak internal communications to the press. Therefore, it must have been a hack.
Re: (Score:2)
What a simpleton ...
Translation (Score:2)
He wants to repeat the Clinton thing with Harris and this is the "accuse them of what you're doing" part. Remember, both the DNC and the RNC got hacked last time this game was played, but for magical reasons (Russia) only the DNC stuff got released.
We know Trump's maintained back channels to Russia, from prior to his presidency all the way through it. Do you really think those channels are gone when he's such a useful idiot / unwitting asset?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you really think those channels are gone when he's such a useful idiot / unwitting asset?
Do you really think he doesn't know he's working towards Putin's goals? I think he's dumb enough to think that would be a good idea, and also dumb enough to think he was working with him and not for him, for the future of the white "race" which his family has always been all about the supremacy of.
If you canâ(TM)t protect yourself⦠(Score:2)
⦠why should anyone leave you in charge of a country.
Missed opportunity (Score:4, Interesting)
Something's really off with this.
Shouldn't he be blaming Crooked Joe Biden for hacking his campaign? Or the FBI? Or Hilary Clinton?
Since when does he actually blame the culprit?
Very odd.
could set the launch codes... (Score:2)
to 00000000 - I mean, nobody would guess that, right? So much denial that it was real I think it was totally true.
So which disgruntled staffer..... (Score:2)
Dear Trump campaign (Score:3)
"Your computers are being used by criminals!"
'We know.' :-)
Re:Vance dossier (Score:5, Interesting)
I'll give you a quick summary. Peter Thiel, a gay republican billionaire has been grooming JD Vance for political office. When you look at Vance's career it's pretty clear he was a DEI hire. https://www.axios.com/2024/07/... [axios.com]
Here's a more in depth piece on Vance and Thiel. https://archive.ph/vyJlQ [archive.ph]
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, the RNC was also hacked.
Funny, though, whoever did the hacking only released the DNC's dirty laundry. They held the RNC's stolen information closely for purposes of their own.
Funny, isn't it, tovarisch?
Re: (Score:2)
RNC says it was not hacked. FBI says otherwise. https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10... [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Anytime US intelligence agencies are the source you can pretty much assume it is propaganda. They wouldn't be talking unless it was to some purpose. The NYT is a quite willing intelligent asset which they protect by never exposing their sources misrepresentations unless they become too obvious to ignore.
The larger reality is that information from US intelligence agencies is not only unreliable because they are willingly misleading. US intelligence assessments for the last 50 years have mostly been wrong. W
Re: russiagate (Score:2)