Mike Bloomberg Is Plowing Millions of Dollars Into a Secretive Tech Firm Called Hawkfish (cnbc.com) 62
As a way to help his 2020 presidential bid, presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg is pouring tens of millions of dollars into an unknown digital business called Hawkfish -- which Bloomberg himself founded during the spring. CNBC reports: Hawkfish will be the "primary digital agency and technology services provider for the campaign," Julie Wood, a Bloomberg campaign spokeswoman, told CNBC. She added that the firm "is now providing digital ad services, including content creation, ad placement and analytics" for their campaign. It will also help Democratic races across the country in future election cycles, she said. Bloomberg, a billionaire former three-term mayor of New York, started building the company early in 2019, before he decided to seek the Democratic presidential nomination, the campaign aide said. While the campaign declined to say how much Bloomberg has invested in the company, Bloomberg has said he will spend over $100 million on anti-Trump digital ads. His campaign has already spent at least $13 million on Facebook and Google spots.
Bloomberg, who was dedicated to denying President Donald Trump a second term before he entered the Democratic race, built Hawkfish with the intention of overpowering the formidable data operation assembled by the Republican National Committee and Trump's cash-flush campaign. Hawkfish appears to have been assembled in secret. It has no public website. A search of elections databases turned up no financial records connected to work for other Democratic causes. No other candidate in the 2020 race is known to have created a vendor designed to aide their bid. [...] Using research company Accurint, CNBC reporters went to a New York address that was associated with Hawkfish. At the address, 909 Third Avenue, an attendant at the front desk said no business named Hawkfish existed there. The Bloomberg campaign spokeswoman said the address, which is about a five-minute walk from Bloomberg's namesake company, was only used for receiving paperwork. The address is the same as Mike Bloomberg's longtime accountant, Geller & Company. Hawkfish's leadership ranks include longtime Facebook Chief Marketing Officer Gary Briggs, and Jeff Glueck, former CEO of location-tracking firm Foursquare.
Glueck hinted that other former Silicon Valley players were with the company, but didn't name names. "The Bloomberg campaign is posting Hawkfish jobs on its website, including graphic designer, copywriter, video editor and senior software engineer," adds CNBC.
Bloomberg, who was dedicated to denying President Donald Trump a second term before he entered the Democratic race, built Hawkfish with the intention of overpowering the formidable data operation assembled by the Republican National Committee and Trump's cash-flush campaign. Hawkfish appears to have been assembled in secret. It has no public website. A search of elections databases turned up no financial records connected to work for other Democratic causes. No other candidate in the 2020 race is known to have created a vendor designed to aide their bid. [...] Using research company Accurint, CNBC reporters went to a New York address that was associated with Hawkfish. At the address, 909 Third Avenue, an attendant at the front desk said no business named Hawkfish existed there. The Bloomberg campaign spokeswoman said the address, which is about a five-minute walk from Bloomberg's namesake company, was only used for receiving paperwork. The address is the same as Mike Bloomberg's longtime accountant, Geller & Company. Hawkfish's leadership ranks include longtime Facebook Chief Marketing Officer Gary Briggs, and Jeff Glueck, former CEO of location-tracking firm Foursquare.
Glueck hinted that other former Silicon Valley players were with the company, but didn't name names. "The Bloomberg campaign is posting Hawkfish jobs on its website, including graphic designer, copywriter, video editor and senior software engineer," adds CNBC.
Uhh (Score:2)
It has no public website.
The Bloomberg campaign is posting Hawkfish jobs on its website, including graphic designer, copywriter, video editor and senior software engineer," adds CNBC.
Re: (Score:3)
It has no public website.
The Bloomberg campaign is posting Hawkfish jobs on its website,
Yes, that sentence says that the Bloomberg campaign is posting Hawkfish jobs on the Bloomberg campaign website, while the article is saying that Hawkfish doesn't have its own public website. HTH, HAND!
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but that conclusion would require reading, possibly even thought. Too much work for poking fun at the editors.
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, the Hawkfish jobs don't appear to be posted on the Bloomberg campaign's website. [mikebloomberg.com] Rather, they're posted on the greenhouse website. [greenhouse.io]. That is also the website that Bloomberg's campaign is using to recruit its own staff.
Re: (Score:3)
[greenhouse.io]
Bloomberg's servers are on one of Jupiter's moons?
Ping times must really suck.
At least Rudi won't be able to go get it.
Re: (Score:2)
Are the ads truthful. Wanted trolls for troll farm, must have low ethical standards, have no regard for the truth be able to manage hundreds of identities whilst being comfortable with fucking up forums to push their messaging, warning, if your trolls results in worse polls or fail in any way, you will be immediately fired, NDA compulsory. Apply for the job, get all the details and screw the NDA, you could have so much fun with that fool.
He's just running a spoiler campaign (Score:2, Insightful)
If you know a moderate Democrat leaning to one of these rich bastards (Steyer & Delaney come to mind) or one of the sell outs (Biden/Buttigieg) now's the time to remind them that their interests do not ali
Bloomberg is efficient! (Score:2)
Bloomberg doesn't need to rent a Wine Cave for his fundraiser for his donors . . . he will just use his own Wine Cave! This will be cheaper and efficient, because it will cut out those Wine Cave those middlemen leeches who rent out Wine Caves for fundraisers!
In fact . . . Bloomberg won't need neither a Wine Cave Fundraiser nor donors . . . Bloomberg will be his own donor!
And the billions that he spends on his campaign will "trickle down" from his 1% part of the universe down through his campaign staff, a
Re: (Score:3)
Bloomberg might actually be a wine cave at this point.
Today his campaign is apologizing for using prison labor to make campaign calls. Exploiters gonna exploit.
His existence made more sense when he was a Republican.
Re:Bloomberg is efficient! (Score:4, Interesting)
Right, because Democrats never use slave or prison labor. Oh wait -
Clinton brought the corporate scum (Score:2)
Buttigieg is now doing the same thing. I don't think it's going to work this time though. The party's base is starting to demand values over platitudes, policy over "Hope & Change". Obama looks to be the last time a corporate Dem will fool the party.
Re: (Score:2)
Democrats defended slave holders back in the 1850s. Same party. Don't pretend it isn't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: He's just running a spoiler campaign (Score:2)
Gotta watch out for those fake presidential runs. If you dont watch out it'll backfire and end up getting you elected. That's what happened to Trump.
Re: (Score:3)
to get at Sanders & Warren.
Bloomberg doesn't have much support, but polls show the support he does have comes mostly at the expense of Biden.
So how does this hurt Sanders & Warren?
Here are the reasons he won't win:
1. Stop and frisk - Blacks won't vote for him
2. #MeToo - His past sexist behavior and crude remarks will hurt him with women
3. Big Gulp Ban - Lots of people don't like the nanny state
4. Yet another billionaire - The 0.0000001% aren't popular with progressives
5. Age - He is as old as Biden and older than Trump
6. Gun
Re: (Score:2)
Jews accept Jesus. They just think he's overrated. They accept the Father, and they might even be in on the Holy Spirit, too.
Could The Holy Ghost Be Jewish? [forward.com] — 2013
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, he's spending millions on his own campaign to stop himself from spending millions on taxes, that sneaky bastard. And those millions he spend on anti-smoking and anti-guns, clearly another effort to avoid taxes. And just think, you are the only one in the world to have figured this out.
muhahahaha (Score:2)
Thank you for repeating my point. (Score:2)
What was yours, for posting this?
Why say it twice?
Forgot your meds?
-1, Flamebait?? Seriously?? (Score:2)
I made very valid points.
Maybe you need to turn on your brain for once, dear modders ...
Better than ORCA? (Score:2)
Let's see if HAWKFISH runs any better than the ORCA program that Mitt Romney's "IT team" wrote in 2012. It was supposed to coordinate every aspect of his campaign, and run the "Get Out The Vote" volunteers. It failed utterly. With any luck, this one will, too.
Bloomburg's Campaign (Score:2)
Looks like the oligarchs are no longer satisfied with buying politicians. They're now trying to buy their way into office directly.
I wonder how I can make some money off this...
And they'll be handed their ass again (Score:1, Insightful)
And they'll be handed their ass again just like the last time. Clinton spent $1.2B and failed. And Bloomberg is even less likable IMO. He's also a fucking straight white male. Any one of these traits would make life difficult for him on the Dem side. All three combined mean he's utterly and completely unelectable even if he spends every single dollar of his wealth. That would be true even if Trump wasn't running, but Trump is running, thank god.
Re: (Score:2)
He's also a fucking straight white male.
Do you know who the frontrunner is in the primary campaign?
Re: (Score:3)
Dead man walking that's who. He's not going to recover from the Burisma and quid pro quo fallout. He also sniffs children, can't remember what state he's in, speaks about kids rubbing his hairy legs, and his crowds number in the dozens. Obama knows this, so he (wisely) chose not to endorse.
Re: (Score:3)
Seriously though, it's hard to see how he thinks he can win, joining this late. Was his plan to just skip all the debates because he doesn't like debating? Something is weird about Bloomberg.
Re:And they'll be handed their ass again (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You make an excellent point that explains an otherwise irrational candidacy.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously though, it's hard to see how he thinks he can win, joining this late
His mind is easy to grasp; he's another establishment group-thinker that has inculcated all of the conventional establishment thought on campaign finance and sincerely believes — as doesn't every other establishment bubble dweller — that election outcomes are primarily determined by which candidates spend the most money. And since he is equipped with the biggest war chest of them all it is understood in the establishment mind that he need only fund the biggest campaign with the largest budget a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know who the frontrunner is in the primary campaign?
No, I don't. Also, you don't either. Go on, cite some polls like a lemming.
Re: (Score:2)
So to keep with the post-2016 theme (Score:2)
If Bloomberg wins, it’s because he basically scaled up what Trump did in 2016 in going directly to the dumb voter and using Facebook/Google trickery as campaign promoters against the established gatekeepers of democracy. If he does not win, by logical deduction, that means Trump won 2016 not because of Facebook trickery (because by that logic, Bloomberg wins) and that voters are not dumb and do not believe everything on their Facebooks (because by that logic, Bloomberg will be polling past Biden prett
Re: (Score:2)
"Logical" https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: So to keep with the post-2016 theme (Score:2)
Millions (Score:5, Interesting)
>"Mike Bloomberg Is Plowing Millions of Dollars Into a Secretive Tech Firm Called Hawkfish"
Is this before or after he has been plowing millions of dollars in turning Virginia's legislature blue? Or the millions of dollars trying to strip people of their 2nd Amendment rights?
Re: (Score:2)
What if it saves one child's life but damns dozens of others to death by violence? Is it worth it then?
Also, if you want to know who made NYC "safe", you should look to Bloomberg's predecessor. The things he (and Bloomberg) had to do to secure that peace still anger the left.
Re: (Score:2)
>> and their "reasonable" gun laws have kept [New York] crime-free.
Is this some kind of joke?
Re: (Score:1)
Expecting gun control laws to do anything positive is always a joke. Gun control laws kill.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
>"If it saves a child's life, the Second Amendment should be repealed."
You are kidding, right? What a shill! Your whole post reads like a nightmare of misinformed, brainwashed, drivel.
Armed, good people in the USA avert between 500,000 and 2,000,000 acts of crime EVERY YEAR (99% of the time with nobody at all being killed). And this doesn't even count the incredible deterrent effect that controls crime. MANY lives are saved when good people are armed, because no matter what ridiculous anti-gun laws a
Amazed at your gun addiction (Score:2)
I am still baffled at what fucked up backward country you live in where it is a necessity for everybody to constantly carry around (and be ready to use) lethal force.
There are multiple other first world countries that don't have any open- or concealed- carry laws authorizing such proliferation of lethal force and still don't have the 99.9% murder rate that you seem to imply would immediately befell on your country if the gun presence in the public did drop the tiniest bit.
What are these country doing right
Ignorance (Score:2)
http://www.thepolemicist.net/2... [thepolemicist.net]
Re: (Score:2)
>"I am still baffled at what fucked up backward country you live in where it is a necessity for everybody to constantly carry around (and be ready to use) lethal force."
I doubt you are asking honest questions, especially based on the tone and content of your posting. As such, I don't think it deserves much effort in response except to say that almost nobody thinks everybody needs to carry, deterrence is effective even when it is a relatively small number (which it is here), and threats to one's life and
Re: (Score:2)
I am still baffled at what fucked up backward country you live in where it is a necessity for everybody to constantly carry around (and be ready to use) lethal force.
Tell that to the people who died because of 9/11. Exactly which part of the government helped prevent that? The only thing which stopped any of it was civilians operating as militia on flight 93.
If that plane really was intended to crash into the Congress which disarmed them, it is too bad it did not make it. They sacrificed their lives to save those who were responsible for it being necessary.
Re: (Score:2)
No.
Bloomberg Exploited Prison Labor... (Score:5, Informative)
https://theintercept.com/2019/... [theintercept.com]
"Former New York City mayor and multibillionaire Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg used prison labor to make campaign calls. Through a third-party vendor, the Mike Bloomberg 2020 campaign contracted New Jersey-based call center company ProCom, which runs calls centers in New Jersey and Oklahoma. Two of the call centers in Oklahoma are operated out of state prisons. In at least one of the two prisons, incarcerated people were contracted to make calls on behalf of the Bloomberg campaign."
Reality (Score:2)
'Bloomberg, who was dedicated to denying President Donald Trump a second term'...
Unless he figures out how to tank the market, thereby losing billions personally, seems unlikely.
Regardless of how invested voters care about how he presents himself, their primary concern all comes down to financial productivity. He's not come close to being less than an excellent performer in that manner.
There's no one that comes even close to consideration for those that count beans, and we all count beans.
Re: (Score:3)
Regardless of how invested voters care about how he presents himself, their primary concern all comes down to financial productivity. He's not come close to being less than an excellent performer in that manner.
There's no one that comes even close to consideration for those that count beans, and we all count beans.
If they count beans as poorly as you, we truly are fucked. [bbc.com]
He hasn't done a bad job. But it's not like he pulled some kind of miracle out of his ass. The ship, remarkably, is still on the course it was on long before he announced his candidacy.
Secretive? (Score:1)
Well, since he's a Democrat (this year), we don't have to know anything about it to know that it will be bad for personal freedom and prosperity.
Re: Secretive? (Score:3)
I love reading on public websites about 'secret' organizations - if I'm reading about it on Slashdot, it isn't secret.
Remember Obama For America 2008 (Score:3)
Remember back in 2008 when the press cheered on the digital tools and innovations OFA (Obama For America) employed time help Obama win in 2008? It was an amazing achievement, revolutionizing the way Presidential campaigns interacting with voters. Now that Republicans are employing similar technologies it's viewed as a bad thing.
Bloomberg ... built Hawkfish with the intention of overpowering the formidable data operation assembled by the Republican National Committee and Trump's cash-flush campaign.
Re: (Score:2)
Formidable. It means strong, powerful. It doesn't have a negative connotation. This is a competition and the opposition is not a pushover.