Today's Politics May Be Bad for Your Health 203
An anonymous reader shares a report: An Iowa man is so bothered by the political climate that his psychologist says he asked for a higher dosage of his anxiety medication. A Chicago woman is so uneasy about politics that she has needed two dental implants to deal with her teeth-grinding habit. And a New York woman says she suffered her first flare-up of multiple sclerosis in 10 years due to political angst. Americans are stressed and politics is a major cause, according to psychologists, psychiatrists and recent surveys.
A study published in September in the journal PLOS One found that politics is a source of stress for 38% of Americans. "The major takeaway from this is that if our numbers are really anywhere in the ballpark, there are tens of millions of Americans who see politics as exacting a toll on their social, psychological, emotional and even physical health," says Kevin Smith, lead author of the study and chair of the political science department at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
A study published in September in the journal PLOS One found that politics is a source of stress for 38% of Americans. "The major takeaway from this is that if our numbers are really anywhere in the ballpark, there are tens of millions of Americans who see politics as exacting a toll on their social, psychological, emotional and even physical health," says Kevin Smith, lead author of the study and chair of the political science department at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
The Real News is very very bad. (Score:2, Interesting)
If you are aware and dig deeper than you can tolerate, the news is always upsetting but the USA is collapsing and as more people realize and pay attention the more will be upset at it's continued demise.
The thing to remember is that all democracies fall into despotism; it's the cycle of life. The only thing to worry about is will it be a relatively peaceful or horrific death.
Re:The Real News is very very bad. (Score:5, Insightful)
How is the US collapsing, because..twitter people are in a mad frenzy? Fact is our economy is booming and most Americans are better off now than they were 10 years ago.
You seem to be buying into the melodrama going on in the media. If anything the fact that even a complete fucking senile imbecile like Trump can't steer us too badly wrong should be heartening for Americans.
Re: (Score:2)
How is the US collapsing...
It's collapsing by the complete lack of empathy. The rich aren't just getting richer, they're getting more and more oppressive. And the poor aren't just getting poorer, they're getting more and more angry.
Citation needed. If anything, it's ONLY BEEN complete fucking senile imbeciles (politicians) that have the ability to steer us too badly wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, when people say "irony is dead", they really ought to be more ironic.
Re:The Real News is very very bad. (Score:5, Interesting)
I repeat, it's collapsing due to complete lack of empathy.
1) The rich aren't empathetic because they feel like the poor should simply apply themselves to their lives more.
2) The poor aren't empathetic because they feel like the rich should simply be paid a "normal" salary, instead of making waaay more money than they need to live.
Both are correct, so what to do? Empathy will start the "what to do" off, in the best way.
If you're poor, you should know that even rich people go through struggles and that these struggles are as real as any other struggle.
If you're rich, you should know that even poor people have goals, and making more and more money isn't the only goal worth having.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Just watch. Rome took longer to fall than the USA existed. It gets hard to point to a single moment when it's usually a gradual slide-- take Germany, or Italy which went quickly but it still took about 10 years each to go completely despotic AND they also went to the extremes of forceful expansion. People debate at which point it flipped but it was many points.
Italy was Making Italy Great Again (yes, Trump is taking credit for another's work.) The expression "he got the trains running on time" is akin to
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to people whose family members have died due to lack of a medication we've had for over a century that costs $5 to make a month's supply but costs about $500 retail.
Wall street's economy is booming, Main Street's, not so much.
Re: (Score:2)
About the only place I'm with you - our healthcare system needs some changes. For now they should just let anyone buy into medicare for a sliding scale (based on income) amount. But that problem has been long in the making and has been around for a long time, it's nothing new.
Wall street vs proverbial main street is rubbish. The standard of living in the US has gone up and continues to do so.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps "collapsing" is too strong a word, but I was truly disheartened today when I heard about this quote on Fox News:
What you are seeing is regicide. This is regicide by another name, fake impeachment.
- Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova
And I watched the video of it. Holy crap, Laura Ingraham doesn't even blink.
The Ingraham Angle - Regicide [youtube.com]
These two nonentities are suicide bombers that the Democrats have unleashed on the democratic process.
And she seems to anticipate some blowback and tells people to "get a sense of humor" as she moves on to Rudy Giuliani.
Let's rewind:
Regicide
: The murder of a king. Come on. Trump is NOT king. We don't have one. And impeachment is not murder or even a ju
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Sure there is: stop having a "global economy".
Trump isn't competent to do it, not by a long shot, but he is right that we need to restore our manufacturing base and stop outsourcing it to authoritarian rival nations like China.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Real News is very very bad. (Score:5, Insightful)
In so far as it's "going by" on a race to the bottom, let it pass.
The economy is supposed to be a system for meeting human needs and wants by exchanging labor with people roughly equal in power, not a race to be won by a ruling class.
Re: (Score:2)
The saddest part of the econom
Re: (Score:2)
It's not even living up to standards it used to maintain.
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to a global economy. When someone in Vietnam will do work for 1/3 the price of an American, wages will stagnate. There is nothing to be done.
our "real" wages have been flat since Nixon - 1970's.
Well before the huge onslaught of Made in China.
I'm not defending Made in China, I want my fucking towels, pencils and cutlery made here, for example -- but our wages have been flat before we sold our souls to China.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the guy in Vietnam has 1/3 the cost of living too. Somehow, prices in the U.S. aren't falling to match the income.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The real issue is that tariffs are essentially a subsidy of some good or service produced locally.
Not necessarily. They can also be used to maintain the balance when one nation is willing to destroy the environment to sell cheap and another has recognized that to be a long term loss.
Re: (Score:2)
If poor people lived naked in caves with their groceries, sure. But I've heard they like to wear clothes, eat off of plates using utensils, and then wash those clothes and utensils using machines. They live in houses made with imported building materials, and drive imported cars to jobs that also rely on imported materials.
Some of them even own iPhones.
Poor people spend most of their income. Tariffs are a sales tax, and sales taxes are regressive.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Plato tried to warn us
https://www.psychologytoday.co... [psychologytoday.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With strong constitutional guarantees of equal protection under the law and a strong judiciary that the minority can petition for a redress of grievances.
Or, alternatively, if you prefer, it can also be solved by arming everyone to the teeth, thus, ensuring that no group can be treated too much worse than average, without chaos erupting — the socioeconomic equivalent of mutually assured destruction. However, that approach is probably a bad i
Re: (Score:2)
>But in all seriousness, there is also the possibility of using disproportionate representation based on impact
You've just described the electoral college.
No, not even close. The electoral college gives disproportionate representation based on what state you live in, not on how much a particular issue affects you. It might approximate what I was describing if and only if all of the following are true:
Re:The Real News is very very bad. (Score:5, Insightful)
You really need to substantiate a claim like that. People have been foretelling doom since the dawn of language.
Re: (Score:2)
You really need to substantiate a claim like that. People have been foretelling doom since the dawn of language.
His tea leaves check out man, I can vouch for em.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't have to, we can learn from our mistakes (Score:2, Insightful)
1. Make voting mandatory. This prevents voter suprression tactics that despots use to transition to a dictatorship.
2. Ranked Choice voting. Again, this makes it very hard to do shenanigans.
3. Make voting a universal, inalienable right. Yes, this means ax murders & pedophiles get to vote. If your democracy has so many ax murders & pedophiles the can swing elections you've got bigge
Re: (Score:2)
You need to implement a proper voting system with the following rules:
(1) All politicians holding office MUST run for re-election.
(2) Every voter gets to vote for (+1) or against (-1) any one candidate.
(3) For each candidate the +1 and -1 votes are tallied separately.
(4) The candidate with the greatest number of negative votes is executed.
(5) Then the +votes and -votes for each candidate are added together to give a score.
(6) The candidate with the greatest score > 0 is elected.
(7) The candidate with the
The problem you're trying to solve (Score:2)
6. Give any politician above Dog Catcher a lifetime pension equal to their salary, and make sure the salary is upper middle class and indexed to inflation. Also give everybody Universal Healthcare (in case that was not obvious). Then make a law that once you've held office that's it. You retire from public life. You cannot hold a job, cannot own stocks, cannot sit o
Re: (Score:2)
False by counterexample
It depends upon how strictly you define democracy, but some democracies fall by military defeat. Confederate States of America is one example. Another poster cited ancient Athens.
TODAY'S politics? (Score:2)
"Politics may be bad for your health". There, FIFY.
Yeah well (Score:2)
I'm more concerned about my physical health when WWIII starts.
Facebook (Score:5, Insightful)
That's one of the main reasons I got off Facebook. Seeing people I know constantly reposting or liking distortions, out of context quotes, or outright falsehoods was starting to drive me to depression. Get off social media and your life instantly because significantly less stressful.
Re:Facebook (Score:4, Interesting)
Don't worry (Score:2)
I sell beautiful pots of the finest desert sand for convenient and healthful head-sticking.
Thankfully Trump (Score:2)
is bringing us all together. Like matter and anti-matter.
maybe time for a /. poll on that? (Score:2)
e.g. Trump 2020. Make liberals cry again! What public policy crisis or initiative does this attempt to address? None that I can see.
Stress (Score:5, Interesting)
Stress isn't even inherently bad. It's just bad for your health if you're under stress for a long period of time (either repeatedly or ongoing). In the short term, stress can lead you to take action to change your environment. Maybe you're stressed about some policy change so you get some friends together to protest it. Maybe that causes the policy change to be reversed. That's a positive outcome of stress. However, some people stress about things they can't (or aren't willing to) change and that doesn't tend to go away. It builds up and causes health problems. That's no good.
If politics is stressing you out, figure out if you can do anything about it. If you can, figure out if you're going to do anything about it. If the answer to either of these questions is no, stop worrying about it and just figure out how you're going to deal with it. Easier said than done, I know.
Re: (Score:2)
If politics is stressing you out, figure out if you can do anything about it. If you can, figure out if you're going to do anything about it. If the answer to either of these questions is no, stop worrying about it and just figure out how you're going to deal with it. Easier said than done, I know.
That's exactly how I handle stress. My wife always asks me how I'm never stressed out and my answer is that I don't think about or internalize stress. I only worry about the things I can control, while most things that cause stress are external and outside my control. Therefore, the amount of stress I experience is limited and almost completely self imposed (and therefore self-regulated).
Re: (Score:3)
The underlying cause is stress and it's well known that chronic stress causes health issues. Politics is just one possible cause of stress. ... However, some people stress about things they can't (or aren't willing to) change and that doesn't tend to go away. It builds up and causes health problems. That's no good.
If politics is stressing you out, figure out if you can do anything about it. If you can, figure out if you're going to do anything about it. If the answer to either of these questions is no, stop worrying about it and just figure out how you're going to deal with it. Easier said than done, I know.
I think part of the problem is that people are finally realizing that a) politics does actually affect their well-being, and b) they can't actually affect the material outcome (doesn't matter who you vote for, they're all a similar brand of crooked)
Add in to that the fact that it's nearly impossible to tell what's actually true anymore, at least not without a ton of work.
Re: (Score:2)
they can't actually affect the material outcome
And yet it isn't that way in every democracy. Different voting schemes - rank choice, multi victor districts, etc - result in people feeling like they can affect the material outcome which results in higher participation. Instead of realizing that they can't affect the outcome, we should change our voting system to let them affect the material outcome.
Re: (Score:3)
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference.
I'm a dinosaur and have run out of fucks to give (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm in my 40s, which means I am irrelevant to all of today's politicians, who only care about 20-somethings and the latest social justice fad.
I checked out of politics, social media, cable television, and most internet (save a few sites like this one) several years ago. I just ran out of fucks to give.
I also live in a hard-red state which will never go blue, so I don't need to worry about voting either, so even if I did have some fucks to give, I wouldn't have to give them to politics.
At the end of the day,
It's news that is based for your health. (Score:2)
And there even are studies to prove it.
Well that's what happens when life is really good (Score:2)
You have to go out of your way to find things to be upset about.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah twitter cracks me up. Seems full of people who wake up in their apartment and head over to Starbucks for their $8 iced coffee, stroll into work at 930am, do some sort of meaningless social media engagement job, head home at 430pm and then proceed to talk about how shitty the world is, how fascists are trying to murder them, and how terfs are ruining the world.
Then there are the digital beggars infesting it everywhere...
Easy cure (Score:2)
Just acknowledge that most, if not all of the world's government are plutocracies, that elections in almost all countries are a dog and pony show that don't really change anything for the average man on the street, and consequently stop caring and start enjoying real life until WW3 starts.
It's the Reporting, Not the Politics (Score:3)
I have two different friends who were completely stressed out about what's going on in politics over the last few years (amusingly for two completely opposite reasons) that I finally convinced to stop watching the 24/7 news cycle and read just one or two things on politics a day (their choice on the source). They've both destressed dramatically after only a few months. Sure they're still concerned about what's going on, but they're not making themselves sick with worry or anger. That's the difference.
Yeah, my dad cared and it was the death of him (Score:3, Funny)
My father was the most politically aware person I knew. He was hospitalized after he reinjured his back the week before Trump's inauguration. When my dad was hospitalized, for the first time in his life, he just didn't want to hear the news. He just couldn't take it anymore with everything else he was dealing with. He died in the hospital from a sudden heart attack two weeks later. My father was not a healthy man (he walked with a cane, and was obese) but I honestly believe Trump pushed him over the edge.
RIP Martin A Totusek
1961-07-07:2017-01-28
Re: (Score:3)
I noticed your comment was rated 'funny".
I was thinking the same thing, not it the 'haha he passed away' reason but just that it occured because of the news.
Regardless, I am sorry for your loss.
My co-workers (Score:5, Insightful)
I have mostly liberal co-workers who absolutely lose their minds over Trump (or basically any GOP politician) and I simply remind them there's virtually NOTHING you can do about it until election day, and the only thing you can do then is vote. So protest as much as you like and vote.
Just chill. This "us vs. them" attitude is garbage.
I also remind them Trump is not Benito Mussolini reincarnated or a neofascist, no matter what his opponents and MSM opinion talking heads say. They say it to get page views and viewer ratings.
Many of Trump's blunt policies appeal to Americans, and the overwhelming number of those Americans are not racists; They're simply tired of government not addressing pressing issues, like ignoring illegal immigration. So, Trump's blunt instrument approach (right or wrong) cuts through the red tape and gets to the heart of how people are feeling. Trump's simply a businessman/marketer with no couth, who has gotten his way throughout life by bullying and intimidation. He's a demagogue. His image should be underneath that word in the dictionary. When he lies or exaggerates, he's not doing it for your benefit; he know where his bread is buttered and he's playing to that audience.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:My co-workers (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
carving out a Kurdish state there and destabilizing the region for.. some other unnamed country to expand their territory
Ever hear of the Ottoman Empire? The Kurds are the least of Assad's worries right now.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't say illegal immigration was being ignored. After all, Obama was labeled the Deporter in Chief for a reason. And anyhow, I doubt a very high percentage of Trump's supporters who have been whipped into a frenzy regarding illegal immigration have been directly negatively impacted by it
This is the hysteria that should be avoided (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Puerto Rico is its own worst enemy. It gets huge gifts from the states, reduced taxes and regulations, and is still an economic failure due to electing corrupt politicians. No amount of money, not the entire wealth of humanity, can fix Puerto Rico.
It is not the responsibility of the United States to rescue every f**kup in the world, nor even one.
There are few things that would do more to make the Earth a better place than if every person were anti-Christ. Itinerant, deceitful, destructive malcontents are ha
Absolutely (Score:2)
I was previously someone who was constantly reading news and discussing current events online, but at some point I just realized that I was always fucking angry and I wasn't making any kind of meaningful change despite feeling horrible all the time.
Nowadays the only news I read is news about technology and science like you see on Slashdot, and my me
TDS (Score:2)
TDS will be in the next version of the DSM.
Re: (Score:2)
Race to the bottom (Score:2)
What strikes me is the politicians seem to be catering for the most stupid. Parties are not only unable to corral their imbeciles but compete for the most rage inducing topics. It is not that we have no smart people in the U.S. It is not hard to find people who find the political circus insane. But somehow, we are all taken hostage by raging idiots.
Something like a vicious circle. What smart, honest and sane person want to go into politics today ?
Matter of perspective (Score:2)
As a point of observation: this malady is highly dependent upon your political leanings. If your political views veer to the hard right, you're probably not nearly as stressed out right now as this article describes -- but rather, a great weight was lifted from your shoulders when Trump was elected. Likewise, if you skew hard left, you were probably light-hearted and carefree during Obama's two terms in office.
It's also worth noting that many of those who fall closer to the middle ground probably don't get
Psychotics (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I used to get stressed about it (Score:2)
Try Conservatism... (Score:2)
In America, conservatives are generally happier [washingtontimes.com] and find more meaning [theatlantic.com] in life than liberals.
One reasoning is that accepting that things are good enough the way they are is less stressful than perpetually pursuing perfection.
Hell simply moving to the political center reduced my stress compared to my "Bush sucks!" liberal days... there's always something to like regardless of what party gets in power, as long as things don't move towards authoritarianism...
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that there is no modern conservative party for people who aren't also socially regressive. To be a Republican, I'd have to be fine with putting immigrants in concentration camps, rolling back women's rights 50 years, and trying to make transgender people not exist. I don't think my conscience will let me do that.
The reason you are stressed out is that you actually believe what you just wrote.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a relationship problem. (Score:2)
We, in effect, married a narcissistic sociopath. He's got a fiendish knack for turning any story he comes near into something about him. He transgresses, then everyone else has to deal with his aggrieved victimhood.
The truth is, he doesn't really matter that much. He'll spend his time in the spotlight, then willing or no, he'll be replaced. His relationships are transactional; he uses people, dangling promises in return. That means when he's out of office, he will leave no legacy. Just a mess.
Re: (Score:2)
Medicare for All (Score:2)
Happiness is... (Score:3)
...a day away from the TV ...a day away from work, ...a day away from the phone and radio.. ...a day at the outdoors rifle range ...a day at the disc golf course ...a solid hour at the piano ...anything that takes me away from the non-stop political shitshow I've been witnessing since 1974, which was my first exposure to Politics. Nixon. If you people think Trump is crazy, Tricky Dicky will heartily recalibrate your craycray meter.
Nixon
Barcelo vs. Cuchin (Puerto Rico 1980 General Elections)
Carter. The Shah. The hostages.
Reagan. ---- Iran/Contra, I have no recollection of those events...
Bush the First.
Clinton ---- the beginning of the sellout of america
Bush the Second
Obama
All of the above make today look sane, Trump is just a continuation of the eternal shitshow.
Tune out, go outside. Like I'm about to. 5 o'clock whistle's about to blow
This is what the deplorables wanted (Score:2)
What Politics? (Score:2)
Politics is war by other means. (Score:2)
Politics is war by other means.
Sometimes it breaks down. Then you get war by the usual means.
Don't like it now? Hang in there. It can get a lot worse.
Or you can try to do something niw to make it better. Maybe one person can't turn a stampede - but enough might, and if you don't succeed, at least you can console yourself that you tried.
Your choice.
Then don't invest so much in it (Score:2)
Then don't invest so much of yourself in it.
Your political team can't always win. You will get a far bigger return investing all that energy into your family, friends, church, life ...
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Should be simple. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Torture? OFGS. Which HuffPost /Slate article claimed that? You know those polices of separation were from the Obama era, right? That's when those "cages" were built too. They're separated so that children aren't incarcerated along with their parents, just how they'd treat citizens who committed a crime. No one cares about those kids. llegally crossing the border once is a misdemeanor, but twice or more is a felony.
Re:Should be simple. (Score:5, Insightful)
No, I'm trying to provide for my children but the economic and environmental debt they will inherit has grown substantially in the past 4 years. Only by the most selfish of metrics could anyone say that they are better off than they were 4 years ago!
You're like a kid with a credit card who doesn't understand how debt works.
Re:Should be simple. (Score:5, Insightful)
Are you better off than you were 4 years ago? And do the policies of the candidates mean you will be better or worse off?
Sorry, but the President doesn't get credit for my personal life changes. Four years ago, I had just changed careers (yet again). My wife and I were renting a room in Ohio. Now we own our home an have children, and I'm a senior-level engineer. The POTUS didn't have anything to do with any of that. Sure, I'd say I'm doing better today, but that's the wrong question.
Instead, I'd ask if the country is better off. After all, that's really the government's job. Do other countries respect us more? Have we improved the groundwork for future industries? Have we mitigated the damage from natural disasters? Have we made progress toward fulfilling the promises made to our citizens and allies?
In a more general sense, are we forming a more perfect union, establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity?
If you ignore the circus, lies, twitter bullshit, narcissism, literal borderline retardation, etc.. of Trump the policies actually aren't so bad.
The problem is that the rest of the world doesn't ignore those things. The policies and their processes are reprehensible to the rest of the developed world, and the chaotic instability Trump leads undermines any reliability our nation carries. Even if Trump's policies don't damage the US directly, they've damaged the American reputation enough that we're now a second-tier participant in global decisions. Any chance America had to benefit from new policies (notably new technologies like the 5G rollout and renewable energy, and trade partnerships) is gone, because we've shown that we can't be trusted to abide by the treaties we've already signed.
I despise him and if Democrats run a moderate I will go Democrat, else I guess I'm stuck with the fucker unless he ends up not being the candidate somehow.
Voting in primaries is how you fix that. If you expect the Republicans will definitely run Trump, go join the Democrat party and vote for a moderate to oppose him. If you think there's a chance he could be unseated within his party, join the Republicans and vote for someone better.
Just look at the policies you prefer, and vote. Easy peasy. People get over-invested in the non-functional shit.
I tend to lean liberal for social policies, conservative for fiscal policies, and rather nonconformist on certain complex issues (like gun control). By the time of the general election, my views are hardly matched at all in the final candidates (even with primary participation). It's easy to say "just look at the policies!" but the reality is that a President is more than just somebody signing laws and shaking hands. They also represent the United States to the rest of the world, and that "non-functional shit" becomes critically important.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?
No.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you better off than you were 4 years ago? And do the policies of the candidates mean you will be better or worse off?
I am, but has nothing to do with the person sitting in the President's chair.
I had the misfortune of having my job collapse on me 4 years ago, and after 3 long years of flying near a stall all the time, a year ago I found employment that pays what I'm used to.
Nothing to do with the President.
But I am watching and taking notes, and already have a clear picture of who gets my vote next year.
Re:Should be simple. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:lol no shit (Score:5, Insightful)
"Donald Trump is no more of a corrupt incompetent moron than any of the people who came before him."
Obviously untrue.
In his refusal to release his taxes or divest from his business interests, he had broken important norms on Day 1 that set him apart from every president back to Nixon. Since then, his administration has been a flood of graft, nepotism, and despotism unlike anything the country has seen in over a century.
His son in law is in charge of middle-east peace. Foreign governments are booking rooms in his hotels and leaving them empty, then telling him how much they love his hotels on the phone, then the phonecalls are being deliberately mishandled to keep them from the public. He's publicly and privately asking foreign governments to help damage his opponents, then refusing the comply with congressional oversight because he deems it invalid.
He bullshits his way through every question he's asked on every topic, and in the rare cases he seems to have actual information at hand, it usually turns out to be made up.
He fires people for kissing his ass insufficiently, even when sufficient ass kissing would place them in legal jeopardy. That's not normal. If you think that's normal, you're incorrect.
He stared directly into a solar eclipse.
He slurs his words, sometimes the same word repeatedly as he struggles to make his mouth obey his brain.
Everyone he fires says he's out of his goddamn mind. The only defense he's ever offered is, "They're bitter that they got fired." Really? All of them? Nobody Obama fired said he was out of his goddamn mind. Nobody Bush fired said he was a crooked lunatic with no understanding of the responsibilities or limitations of his job.
If it's all lies, he's the single worst judge of character in the history of the presidency. Occam's Razor says he's mentally ill, and it's now being backed up by documentation released by the White House itself.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
lol.. the TDS is real with this one. None of this stuff is new to politics.
Bread-and-Circuses Exhaustion (Score:2, Interesting)
Your [TheHardWayOut's] comment is apparently triggering a moderation war, though the positives are still holding up. How about weighting moderation against mods received? Being modded up would yield more mod points to give. [And no, I don't know how I would fare. It actually seems that many of my negative mods get reverted. I actually don't care if some of my comments are provocative (as long as they make me think, too).]
On the topic, Trump's incompetence and megalomania are unprecedented. He's trying to su
Re: (Score:2)
"A norm going back to Nixon" is a 'norm' of... 6 elected Presidents, over 40 years. Out of 45 Presidents and more than 200 years.
Re: (Score:3)
Based on my own experiences and the ongoing experiences of folks in the LGBTQ community. I'm extraordinarily angry at the wrongful degradation and deprivation of health being perpetuated against me by the madness and psychopathy of the corrupt hard right. Our rights are being violated and the cost is being paid in in blood.
People who support calling men in dresses women really shouldn't complain about others madness. Your sex was determined at conception. The sooner people accept that reality the easier life will be for them. Your rights are not being violated and you aren't paying in blood. You're asking everyone else to pretend that your 'choices' magically change obvious facts and then you're mad when they don't want to play along. It's a modern day example of the emperors new clothes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Both because we badly need to deal once again with actual Confederate and Nazi trash, but a great stress relief that will come from cleansing our nation of these hateful traitors who wish to enslave themselves and their fellow man Besides, the world will be a better place as it was after the civil war and WWII, when the scum and filth crawled back into hiding
How's the weather in Portland? Take a deep breath and ask yourself why a civil war? Wouldn't forcing people at gunpoint to do what you want be the very definition of enslaving them? Think about what you're advocating. If you want to argue that a peaceful breakup of the US would let the different regions go their own ways that's fair enough. But the key to that is the people vote on how things go, not that they do it at gunpoint based on someone else's idea.