Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Security United States Politics

US Senators Seek Military Ban on Kaspersky Lab Products Amid FBI Probe (reuters.com) 96

An anonymous reader shares a report: U.S. senators sought on Wednesday to ban Moscow-based cyber security firm Kaspersky Lab's products from use by the military because of fears the company is vulnerable to "Russian government influence," a day after the FBI interviewed several of its U.S. employees as part of a probe into its operations. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents visited the homes of Kaspersky employees late on Tuesday in multiple U.S. cities, although no search warrants were served, according to two sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the FBI probe. Kaspersky Lab confirmed in a statement on Wednesday that FBI agents have had "brief interactions" with some of its U.S. employees, discussions that the company described as "due diligence" chats. The interviews were followed on Wednesday by the release of a defense spending policy bill passed by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which would prohibit the U.S. Defense Department from using Kaspersky software platforms because the company "might be vulnerable to Russian government influence," according to a summary of the legislation.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Senators Seek Military Ban on Kaspersky Lab Products Amid FBI Probe

Comments Filter:
  • wait... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Frederic54 ( 3788 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:08PM (#54713493) Journal

    the US military is using russian based software? you kidding me?

    • by 605dave ( 722736 )

      I know. It's always seemed odd to me that anyone would use Russian anti-spy ware (from a US point of view, if I were Russian I wouldn't use US services). That's a whole lot of trust to put in somebody, much less a political adversary.

    • Re:wait... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Presence Eternal ( 56763 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:11PM (#54713537)
      It's also using silicon fabricated in China and hiring Millenials.
    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      Yes.

      U.S. senators sought ...

      Posted from their Lenovo ThinkPads, no doubt.

    • Heh, wait till you hear about their rocket engines...

    • by bongey ( 974911 )
      Notice idiot, just because it is "Russian" owned , doesn't mean that the software actually comes from Russia.
  • by SYSS Mouse ( 694626 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:13PM (#54713553) Homepage

    That's all.

    • by swb ( 14022 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:19PM (#54714119)

      Maybe some of that, but the difference between that and Cisco being "guilty for being American" because of NSA hijacking shipments and hacking their hardware is what?

      The reality is that a Russian company is far more vulnerable to kinds of influence that would be outright illegal and American companies have the luxury of being able to open resist explicit efforts to compromise their systems and organizations in an actual judicial system.

      Sure, there's all kinds of secret FISA courts and national security leverage the US government can use, but Tim Cook isn't going to the gulag for telling the FBI and NSA to bugger off. A Russian company is far more vulnerable to what really are mafia tactics.

      • A Russian company is far more vulnerable to what really are mafia tactics.

        Exactly.

        This comes in the wake of a senior executive of Kaspersky being arrested for classified reasons. [krebsonsecurity.com] The Krebs article speculates on some reasons for the arrest.

        Even assuming Putin did not want to take advantage of Kasperky's position of having a software foothold on millions of machines, the corruption in Russia makes the firm particularly vulnerable to organized cyber criminals. That reason alone is enough to not trust Kaspersky code.

      • by bongey ( 974911 )
        Sure, because the US Government never does any illegal spying or anything illegal or try to put back doors in software or encryption algorithms. You live in a fantasy world if you think the US Gov has some moral superiority.
      • by Agripa ( 139780 )

        Sure, there's all kinds of secret FISA courts and national security leverage the US government can use, but Tim Cook isn't going to the gulag for telling the FBI and NSA to bugger off.

        What happened to Quest CEO Joseph Nacchio would never happen to Tim Cook.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I wouldn't touch that stuff with a ten foot Pole. Or even a Ukrainian.

  • Better idea. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:19PM (#54713607)

    Why not just cut to the heart of the issue and impose a ban on Microsoft products?

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      The communist menace [wikipedia.org] hasn't changed in the last 100 years.

      Thank God for J. Edgar Hoover and Senator Joseph McCarthy. They knew how to deal with traitors.

      If Kaspersky employees are traitors, give them the Rosenberg [wikipedia.org] treatment.

      If we are going to have a "witch-hunt", let's reactivate the House Un-American Activities Committee [wikipedia.org] and burn the real witches in this country.

      It's time to get rid of them and their fake news, for good.

      Make America great again!

  • by Oswald McWeany ( 2428506 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:20PM (#54713613)

    If Kaspersky is corrupt and letting Russian malware through (and I'm not saying they are, they're probably legit) could it be a little late?

    If Kaspersky were rotten and letting Russian Malware through, then that software would already be installed and hooked into the computers. Sure, getting rid of Kaspersky may help new computers not be infected, but if they were bad, then the military is already infiltrated to a degree.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Kaspersky is the one of the very few anti-virus that has been consistent that malware is malware - regardless of where it comes from (even governments) for decades now.
      If the US military wants their anti-virus software from companies that are willing to backdoor their products and/or turn a blind eye to malware, they are only hurting themselves.

    • It's not the letting malware through that's an issue, it's that it could include a backdoor right to ring 0 of the kernel. Anti-Virus has full root privileges on Windows, if the Russian FSB (KGB) through it's connections to Kapersky has managed to put a backdoor into the software you've just let the KGB into your network.

  • If the con artist gets wind there's an attempt to stop using Russian-based software because the company might be susceptible to Russian government influence, he'll order them to use it no matter what.

    Remember, this is the same guy who was explicitly warned not to bring Michael Flynn into the fold [nytimes.com] because Flynn was highly susceptible to Russian blackmail. He went ahead and did it anyway, then tried to blame Obama [businessinsider.com] when everything blew up in his face [businessinsider.com], ignoring the fact it was Obama who fired Flynn for insubor

  • Embrace it (Score:5, Funny)

    by qbast ( 1265706 ) on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:50PM (#54713867)
    I am using operating system from USA, antivirus from Russia and backup program from China. This way I have achieved multiple, geographically diverse backups for all my important data. I still need to test the recovery process though.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I am using operating system from USA, antivirus from Russia and backup program from China. This way I have achieved multiple, geographically diverse backups for all my important data. I still need to test the recovery process though.

      Your USA operating system was likely written in India as an added diversity bonus.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    This is the best endorsement for using Kaspersky ie. the US government is/was using them despite their being Russian. Also, lets be real...everyone already knows they are the best but this just about confirms it.

     

  • I've seen this with a lot of IT sections of larger companies where quite a few of the professionals actually don't know a lot about virus protection other than the concept that they should be using it. Quite often, if they're not working with virus definitions and protection on an ongoing basis, their knowledge is quite often years old, based on the norms of those years back then. And it's not really their fault. It's just because too many people are compartmentalized in doing exactly what they do, so that
  • I thought the current li(n)e was that there isn't anything wrong with Russian influence. Or does that only apply to The Holy One?

  • I think its a great idea to stop working with people who are under the influence of Russia.

    Anyone who may be compromised by Russians, say they have a shit load of their money tied in projects with russians banks also should be under severe scrutiny. Ah yea, so that why the President is under investigation

  • "U.S. senators sought on Wednesday to ban Moscow-based cyber security firm Kaspersky Lab .. because" we've already got backdoors into all the rest.
  • ...than the people writing the malware?

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Out of all the things to bitch about, I feel like to get actual work done, there are certain things we need to get past, and Micro$oft products in government offices is one of them.
  • GTFOH using buzzfeed news as source for senate bill is insane.

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...