Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Communications Network Privacy Security News Politics Technology

Hacker Phineas Fisher is Trying To Start a 'Hack Back' Political Movement (vice.com) 123

An anonymous reader writes: The hacker who breached Hacking Team and FinFisher is trying to get more people to "hack back" and fight "the system." For some, thanks to his targeted attacks and sophisticated political views, Phineas Fisher is quickly becoming the most influential hacktivist of the last few years. In response to his most recent hack where he released a 39-minute how-to video showing how to strip data from targeted websites, specifically a website of the Catalan police union, Phineas Fisher told Motherboard, "Everything doesn't have to be big. I wanted to strike a small blow at the system, teach a bit of hacking with the video, and inspire people to take action." Biella Coleman, professor at McGill University in Montreal, believes Phineas Fisher has a good chance of inspiring a new generation of hacktivists and "setting the stage for other hackers to follow in his footsteps." She says he has been better at choosing targets and justifying his actions with more rounded and sophisticated political and ethical views than Anonymous and LulzSec-inspired hackers. Phineas Fisher told Motherboard, "I don't want to be the lone hacker fighting the system. I want to inspire others to take similar action, and try to provide the information so they can learn how."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hacker Phineas Fisher is Trying To Start a 'Hack Back' Political Movement

Comments Filter:
  • how about an example of his "sophisticated political views"?
    or is that an euphemism for whatever views writer of this puff piece holds?

    any real "sophisticated political view" would be nuanced and will not have a binary view of society and groups in it.
    but without binary views and resulting simplistic us versus them mentality, there wont be any "targets" to "attack" using illegal methods.

    • by ScentCone ( 795499 ) on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:47PM (#52169263)

      how about an example of his "sophisticated political views"?

      His views are so sophisticated that if you have to ask about them, you'll never understand them. Because, sophistication.

      • by tigersha ( 151319 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @01:55AM (#52169601) Homepage

        You are an old-timer and would never understand the fine subtle mind of a modern-day Millennial Hipster

        • by Anonymous Coward

          Don't come with your old-timer attitude and try to tell the youngsters who have experienced a suffering you can never begin to understand. These are people who have never experience the eruite brilliance of the original Slashdot in which every comment was a mind expanding work of brilliant literature. Check your privilege and never comment again, you oppressor of the younger classes.

        • by Chas ( 5144 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @08:54AM (#52170825) Homepage Journal

          Pretty much. Because such "minds" are nearly as sharp as a rubberized butter spreader (so dull you can't even call it a knife).

          Basically all these modern script kiddie hacker activist-wannabes understand is "us and them".

          So long as they perceive themselves as "the underclass", they're "morally" justified in doing pretty much ANYTHING. And, in their own mind, it's "okay", because they're on the side of "Right".
          And if they hurt innocent bystanders? Oh well, to make a omelette... Just so long as THEY are the chef and not the eggs.

          In reality, they're primarily power-tripping pseudofascist assholes who would fail a basic ethics course, because they have none.

          • by geek ( 5680 )

            Pretty much. Because such "minds" are nearly as sharp as a rubberized butter spreader (so dull you can't even call it a knife).

            Basically all these modern script kiddie hacker activist-wannabes understand is "us and them".

            So long as they perceive themselves as "the underclass", they're "morally" justified in doing pretty much ANYTHING. And, in their own mind, it's "okay", because they're on the side of "Right".
            And if they hurt innocent bystanders? Oh well, to make a omelette... Just so long as THEY are the chef and not the eggs.

            In reality, they're primarily power-tripping pseudofascist assholes who would fail a basic ethics course, because they have none.

            Not going to argue with you on the script kiddies. However you really need to look at Phineas Fisher and how freaking good he is. This guy is far far different than a script kiddie.

            You can debate his politics all you like but his skill set is second to none.

            • by Chas ( 5144 )

              My problem is with his politics.

              I never have a problem with anyone's skills.

              Just how they choose to employ them.

          • "Basically all these modern script kiddie hacker activist-wannabes understand is "us and them"."

            Let me correct that for you:

            'Basically all frustrated youths who want to take a shortcut to what they perceive as an unfair world understand is "us and them"'

            Anarchists in the late 19th century? Same story
            French Revolutionaries? Same story
            Bolsheviks? Same story
            Maoists in the 60s (both in China and Europe)? Same story
            Hippies in the 60s? Same story
            French Students going bonkers in 68? Same story (but at least The Se

    • by Anonymous Coward

      "Stripping data" from a website is not a power to be taken lightly.

    • by SQL Error ( 16383 ) on Monday May 23, 2016 @11:03PM (#52169313)

      He's an anarchist. Which these days means an emo kid with internet access.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        When we were anarchists, we were breaking windows at the Nike store. Kids these days are lazy.

        • My grandad used to tell me how the anarchists in his day blew things up to try start European wars, if say everyone since then has gotten exponentially lazier.

          • You haven't heard of the Taliban/ISIS? Get off Slashdot every once in a while.

            • by Anonymous Coward

              Anarchists reject authority. Talibans and Daesh operate under authority. They ain't no anarchists. Black block may qualify although they're mostly left wing useful idiots whose actions are used to justify even more brutal crackdowns on legitimate protests.

          • by tigersha ( 151319 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @01:56AM (#52169605) Homepage

            Gravillo Princip, who started the First, and indirectly the Second World War was an Anarchist. 100 Million dead people later, Europe is still ruled by a government

            • He doesn't get all the credit for starting the First World War. The Great Powers had maneuvered themselves into a situation where almost anything could touch off a war, and some of them were in political situations where backing down in a confrontation seemed more politically dangerous than starting a war.

              Essentially:

              1. Princip killed the Archduke Ferdinand
              2. Germany offered full support to Austria-Hungary
              3. France almost certainly offered full support for Russia
              4. Austria-Hungary issued demands to Serbia that
      • by geek ( 5680 )

        He's an anarchist. Which these days means an emo kid with internet access.

        I would say that was more true in the 90's than now. Just look at how hackers were depicted back then.

        Anarchist these days is really more libertarian. They want little to no government intervention because they see the police state we're in and the globalization that is ruining western society and do not trust it.

        Frankly I don't blame them.

        • by tnk1 ( 899206 )

          I agree with how out of control the centralization is getting, but I'd ask them just what they think they are going to achieve by these actions? What is their plan? Is it a real plan or just some bullshit manifesto where a certain result is semi-religiously assumed to magically happen if they generate enough chaos?

          There's a reason these governments have this power now, and unless there is something better that they can propose *and follow through on*, all they're doing is rolling the dice. It's one thing

    • by Anonymous Coward

      > but without binary views [...]

      Like "there are those with binary views, and then there are... uh..."

      Pfeh.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @02:45AM (#52169695)

      How about you read the guys writing. He is very clear about his reasoning and it really is not hard to follow. I'm proud of this guy regardless of what americans think, americans are afraid of their own shadow. I'm european and I hope more europeans (assuming he's spanish, could be wrong) follow in what he does. I would if I wasn't lazy and a bit shit. My shame is being too much like americans and becoming completely fucking useless, like all americans.

      He is against the overreach of our governments and intelligence services. He is against violent squashing of genuine civil/civic problems within his own society. He is against the balance of power shifting too far away from the peoples of the world and giving more [centralized] power to corrupt governments. He is against fascism in general.

      He targeted HackingTeam because
      1) Some of the founders are italian fascists (ie. believe in fascist ideology and work in that interest)
      2) They sold technology to severely dangerous governments and groups that use that technology to keep their boot on peoples faces.

      He gives reasons for his more recent stuff (copy & paste):
      More about the Mossos: A brief description in english of the events of 4F, when mossos badly beat and tortured several people and sent a couple people to prison for years on false charges: https://theanarchistlibrary.or... [theanarchistlibrary.org]

      A documentary on 4F (catalan and spanish with english subtitles), and Patricia Heras, who spent years in prison on false charges and committed suicide. She was on the other side of the city at the time of the events of 4F, but got in a bike accident and went to the hospital. The mossos took the people they tortured on 4F to the same hospital, saw her there, decided she also looked like a squatter, and made up some stuff to charge her with. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

      An interview (in english, with spanish and catalan subtitles) with a guy who was badly tortured and jailed on false charges after defending a friend from mossos (who weren't in uniform and didn't identify themselves as police) who were harassing her at a nightclub. In a rare victory (he was the son of a diplomat, so had the resources to fight back) the false charges against him were overturned and the police who lied and tortured him were sentenced (well, the 2 of them he was able to identify. The rest got away with it because police don't snitch on each other). https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] A documentary (catalan with spanish and english subtitles) on a woman who had her eye shot out by mossos attacking a peaceful demonstration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

      A long analysis of the political situation in Barcelona and the direction the elites are trying to develop the city. The mossos do the dirty work, harassing and driving out "undesirables" to reshape the city. https://roarmag.org/essays/pre... [roarmag.org] Mossos beating Juan Andrés BenÃtez to death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

      In Spain, freedom of speech doesn't exist, at least when it comes to criticizing the police. The rappers at 9:50 are facing fines and jailtime over their anti-police lyrics: https://www.diagonalperiodico.... [diagonalperiodico.net] (you can't make this shit up) Puppeteers are facing terrorism charges over a play depicting police planting fake evidence to set someone up on terrorism charges: https://roarmag.org/essays/tit... [roarmag.org]

      You g

      • by gmack ( 197796 )

        I'm inclined to doubt this, mainly because this doesn't look like the Spain (Or at leas the Madrid area where I spent 5 years) where they tolerated regular protests to the point where they got annoying. During the Occupy movement, the squatters stayed for months with a mini tent city where people were even managing to run businesses/recruit for religious movements from the tents and the police did nothing until the pope was about to arrive and they wanted to clear space in the main square, and the unions s

      • by sabbede ( 2678435 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @08:00AM (#52170509)
        Okay, that's lousy behavior on the part of apparently corrupt officials. How exactly is anonymous vandalism any better? If his political views are so sophisticated, why isn't he engaging the political process and using valid means to promote said views? Like organizing nonviolent protests, engaging with the electorate, using the democratic process to bring about systemic change?

        Vandalism only discredits his cause. A sophisticated political actor should have the sense to avoid such blunders; these are the acts of an immature fool. Gandhi was no vandal. Martin Luther King Jr. was no vandal. They were brave, sophisticated and wise enough to use the system to correct its injustices. They persuaded others to join them instead of attacking those who disagreed.

        • by coofercat ( 719737 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @08:51AM (#52170811) Homepage Journal

          Okay, that's lousy behavior on the part of apparently corrupt officials. How exactly is anonymous vandalism any better? If his political views are so sophisticated, why isn't he engaging the political process and using valid means to promote said views? Like organizing nonviolent protests, engaging with the electorate, using the democratic process to bring about systemic change?

          Hmm... let me see now... because none of those methods work, perhaps?

          Vandalism only discredits his cause.

          Only if you think that way. If you're expecting a nice non-violent protest where everyone picks up their own litter and goes home at the time the police say they should, then of course you're going to think anything other than that is 'discrediting'.

          I'm not going to say 'hactivism' is the Right Thing, but as we saw with the recent Panama leaks, it sure can make changes in the world. In that sense, I'd place it above non-violent protest, which recent history shows does pretty much nothing.

          • First, those methods do work. They have been successful time and time again. A broad capacity for nonviolent change is one of the advantages of a democratic system. They fail when the advocates fail to persuade their fellow citizens. Maybe they weren't persuasive enough, weren't patient enough, or simply had a lousy idea nobody else would get behind.

            Second, the Panama papers were released by an inside whistle blower.

            • In the UK, around a million people marched through London in opposition of the (then proposed) UK involvement in the Iraq war (part 2). It was probably the biggest single peaceful march in the UK in decades, and was accompanied by thorough analysis and critique by various media outlets. Indeed, many millions more marched in other countries as well. I think we can say that 'the people' were pretty well convinced.

              We still ended up in a war, which to this day many (qualified) people consider to gave been illeg

              • One million is a whole lot of people, but what about the other 63 million? Having 1.5% of the population on your side is great, but it is not 'the people'. More importantly, just because it didn't work for them, doesn't mean it doesn't work at all.
        • by Agripa ( 139780 )

          Based on his description of the situation, why would you think any of those things would work?

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

          • Never read that story, but I am familiar with the specific criticism of nonviolent resistance. It is valid. You don't even need to turn to fiction for an example, China provided one in Tiananmen Square. For an oppressive regime, nonviolent resistance may just look like target practice.

            But, in a democratic society, it can work. Moreover, violent protests tend not to go over very well (I'm only counting planned events, riots are spontaneous and have mixed results), they turn people off instead of provok

      • My shame is being too much like americans and becoming completely fucking useless, like all americans.

        So useless that our economy divided up by population is higher than half of Europe? The Per capita GDP of the US is double Spain's, we are so lazy we do double the work output that your country does! Lazy indeed...

        http://data.worldbank.org/indi... [worldbank.org]

        Perhaps you should rethink your bigotry about lazy Americans, as it doesn't fit the actual truth of the matter.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      "sophisticated political views" = "views I agree with and I think I am sophisticated".

      Is it just me or has the amount of propaganda-language like this recently increased a lot in /. stories?

    • How sophisticated can one's political views be if the acts they promote are as unsophisticated as vandalism?
    • "how about an example of his "sophisticated political views"?"

      It's easy to whomp up a political justification for one's actions. Now all the black hat hackers will reclassify themselves as red hats and blue hats.

    • His views basically come down to limited the free speech of people he disagrees with.

      We as a culture will need to adapt to the mass messages spewed all around us. Much of it we will not like or agree with. However censoring opposing ideas even ones you think are just evil will only move the speech into a black market of ideas. Where people with such opposing ideas will discuss amongst themselves, becoming more radicalized due to their inability to discuss it with the rest of the world. As well it mak

    • If you read TFA the author is saying that Fisher's reasoning is sophisticated when compared to Anonymous or LulzSec. The author attributes this in part to Fisher doing his thing by himself as opposed to being part of a group, and therefore having concise messaging. The author is confusing "sophisticated" with "concise."
    • by Udom ( 978789 )
      My understanding of the political views of Hacking Team and FinFisher is that they have none. They appear to be motivated purely by profit. The people identified by their software are often tortured and murdered, but we're to believe that's OK because for these guys its only business? Not without precedent, of course, IBM reportedly provided early computer systems to the Nazis before and during WW2 that was used to organize the holocaust.
  • How thoroughly modern and such a novel idea.
  • "sophisticated political views" seems to be synonymous with being a vandal.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Is it bad that I want to see the police beat this guys ass?

  • Wow, attacking a union. Way to go, strikebreaker. Stay on the good guys' side. What an asshole.
  • More inmates for the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I hope they like fried Spam sandwiches and Kool-Aid. And did I mention sex? Yeah! Lots of sex.

  • And it is utterly lacking in sophistication. What's so special about his politics that he gets to work outside the normal, agreed upon, process? Are his views so sophisticated that he's above everyone else, deigning to reach down and impose his views on others? It would be one thing if he was fighting corrupt and oppressive regimes, but a Spanish municipal police department?

    It is no more valid an approach to the democratic process than is terrorism.

  • Anon was a bunch of hardened 4chan trolls herding an army of impressionable kids into their own living botnet. At least this guy doesn't make others do the hard work and bear the risk of prison instead of him. That being said, his "sophisticated" political ideas, such as:

    I wanted to strike a small blow at the system...I don't want to be the lone hacker fighting the system.

    aren't exactly new. Just like the punks of old, "hacktivists" use the same ill defined phrases to try and create an ideology around vanda

  • Yeah, man! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by KermodeBear ( 738243 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @07:29AM (#52170383) Homepage

    Yeah, man! *Puff!* Gotta attack the system, man! *Puff!* Like, dude, the system is keeping us all down, like, dude, it's all part of *Puff!* the military industrial complex, man! I'm so, like, sophisticated in my political views, *Puff!* like, dude, you know? It's all about the system and the man, man! This is strong shit! *Puff!*

    The 60s called. It wants its pot smoking hippies back.

    Sorry, Phineas, but someone with "sophisticated" political views doesn't talk about "The System." They talk about specific policies, they talk about history, they talk about context and cause and effect. I respect your abilities to compromise computer systems, but if all you have is "fight the system" then you are not ready, at all, to talk about politics.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      well.... if you actually click the link......under to the video, you would see that there is a ghostbin link with a text file full of links to articles and documentary siting specific things he sees as injustices, like a bibliography. And in his previous post about the HackingTeam hack he had just as many sources linking to specific things that caused him he act on them. Whether you agree with his reasoning is one thing. But he is specific in his intent.
      • well.... if you actually click the link......under to the video, you would see that there is a ghostbin link with a text file full of links to articles and documentary siting specific things he sees as injustices, like a bibliography.

        He sees bibliography as injustice? Yeah - I've been saying that for years! Fight the bibliographs! Down with Chicago style! End MLA's repressive regime! The Aims of Argument will be targeted, themselves! Freedom for Footnotes!

  • Is he out to just cause political damage? How about identify and support a realistic political alternative.
  • I think dumping information like the Panama papers is the best way to do hacking that makes the world better. The ls the global elite can hide their corruption the better.

We are Microsoft. Unix is irrelevant. Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.

Working...