"Net Neutrality" Coiner Tim Wu Is Running For Lt. Governor of New York 40
speedplane (552872) writes Tim Wu, the popular Columbia Law Professor, author of The Master Switch, and the guy who coined the term Net Neutrality, is running for Lieutenant Governor of the great state of New York. He "has waged a shoestring anti-establishment campaign," that is well underway, and has even begun receiving attacks from the incumbent: "It has not always been smooth for Mr. Wu .... Surrogates for Mr. Cuomo have pounced on his admitted lack of 'message discipline' for comments he made comparing net neutrality to the suffragist movement (which he says were taken out of context) and sympathizing with Airbnb (which he says is 'fair game' because he has a 'wait-and-see approach' to regulating start-ups)."
reality show: schooling a law prof (Score:2)
Suffrage (Score:1)
Suffrage not suffragist
What else does he do? (Score:4, Insightful)
Net Neutrality is another name for "Give me the Internet, not a subset." and is a key part of what a legitimate ISP does, as opposed to a censored ISP like sometimes exists in the USA and often exists overseas.
Re: (Score:3)
Yep... And — for a car analogy — if I'm driving, I want to be able to drive on any road with any speed by car can go, and park wherever I see fit. No matter, who built the road or attends to the parking lot.
Legislating service is a losing proposition. The service provider will get around the legislation (have we not seen it just recently, when telcos were forced to allow other DSL-provid
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:3)
Meant to moderate insightful, fat fingered it, so I am just removing that moderation.
Re: (Score:2)
A better analogy is one where you purchase a vehicle capable of going 60MPH, but unbeknownst to you ahead of time, it gets throttled remotely to lower speeds if you drive to Chicago or LA because those cities did not pay the manufacturer enough extortion money. Oh, and it can go 90MPH to Destroit because the manufacturer is based there.
This is a perfectly good car analogy. Why is it modded troll? I guess it was a troll doing the modding.
Re: (Score:2)
Or, perhaps, you didn't read someone else's "posting to undo my mod", despite its prior timestamp?
Except as of now, the post I was referring to still has a troll mod on it? Check to mod history for yourself. What is your agenda?
Re: (Score:3)
Except you purchased a car and I sold you a horse and buggy. You see, the problem without net neutrality is that you believe you are purchasing 10 megs of unlimited internet but if the website you are trying to reach is popular enough but doesn't pay your provider additional money or the serv
Re: (Score:3)
Yep... And — for a car analogy — if I'm driving, I want to be able to drive on any road with any speed by car can go, and park wherever I see fit. No matter, who built the road or attends to the parking lot.
How about a phone analogy? When I pick up the phone, I want to be able to call anybody else who has a phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. And you can. The price might differ depending on the destination, though...
Fortunately, we have some choice of phone companies now — so if one of them is not to your liking, you can switch. Until a similar choice appears in the ISP-market, attempting to legislate the behavior of existing monopolies will remain in vain.
Tea party (Score:4, Interesting)
It is about time we got some tea party democrats.
I know, tea party is a bad word, but anti-establishment is almost synonymous with it. It finally sound like we might see a democrat who is still actively supporting the working man instead of riding the coat tails of the real democrats who went before him.
There already are a bunch (Score:1)
There already are a bunch of Democrats in the TEA Party - NOT at the top, but at the grass-roots and they tend to be blue-collar working types who've voted "D" their entire lives (because that's the way all their friends and families voted and that party las long pretended to be "for the working man"). Some of those more-conservative rank-and-file Democrats who, like many conservative base voters, have "caught-on" to the game the leaders of both parties are playing and the destruction that is resulting have
Re: (Score:1)
A: That 'instant nationwide media coverage' is usually "look how racist and crazy these nutjobs are loooool!!"
B: 95% of political donations by journalists go to Democrats.
Lift the blinders.
Bull (Score:1)
The GOP Estavlishment DESPISES the TEA Party
When the TEA Party first got going, the GOP establishment thought they were just another energetic little speciel interest group that they could fool into contributing cash and boots-on-the-ground during elections ... but once they found out that the "TEA People" wanted actual changes (including lots of anti-corruption reforms) they went nuts. Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey actually showed-up at a TEA Party office brandishing a gun and trying to take the
Dogma... (Score:2)
Yeah, Tea Party is too specific to an existing dogma. But, there are quite a few liberals who skew closer to Noam Chomsky's brand. I think a number of liberals take anti-establishment seriously and believe that libertarianism has some insightful observations on how things work ( e.g. regulatory capture). But a number of liberals have different solutions. Very different from Chomsky's "Anarchist Social Libertarianism" (or whatever he calls it). And especially different from the pro big business of "libe
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, this is exactly it. It is the polarization in politics. We argue with each other to support our prejudiced conclusions without looking at our own motivations first. Problems can potentially be solved with moderate, incremental, and mutually agreeable solutions. But that doesn't satisfy the dogmatic, extreme ideas from each side. Add moneyed interests, stubborn defensiveness, and how can we possibly get out of our own way?
Why should I agree to support any liberal / conservative politicians when I k
Re: (Score:2)
Until third party candidates take state and local offices to a point they are know as well as the R and D parties they are wastes of voted on a federal level. They are generally so close in all but a few issues that few people care about specifically that they either pull votes from whomever is closest to them and cause the opposite candidate to win or they are so radically different, only a fringe set of people look at them seriously.
Re: (Score:2)
hell we had this conversation since at least 96 (dont blame me i voted kodos) and people still believe the same stupid bullshit. If everyone who said "a 3rd party vote is a wasted vote" actually voted 3rd party...it wouldnt be a fucking wasted vote!
Re: (Score:2)
No votes have more power than third party votes. Like I said, the third party candidate is either so close to the other parties that their one or two differences aren't enough to gather a majority (remember, not everyone thinks like you and no everyone will think those differences are important enough to vote outside their party) or they are so different from those parties that they appear like loons.
We have had that conversation since before 96 too. Ross Perot took enough voted from Bush that Clinton could
Re: (Score:2)
Vote for whomever you want. Just understand that when voting for a candidate with no potential to win or little chance of accomplishing anything if they do win, you are taking one vote against whomever you want to win the least away.
That's why I think it is better to infiltrate and work from within. You do your battles in the primaries, if you win, you have both a chance of winning and change, if you lose, the one candidate you don't want in the most doesn't benefit from your vote not strengthening the most
Re: (Score:2)
If you have three candidates, one you want to win but will not likely gat enough votes, one who you like a lot less but could get enough votes to win, and one you do not want to win at all but could slso win, and if you vote for the first instead of the second, you are making it easier for the third to win.
As for the primaries, each party that is registered with the state and has more than one candidate running for any office up for election gets a ballot to settle which candidate they officially want to su
Re: (Score:2)
I don't need to look up instant run off voting. I know what it is and do not care for it.
Agreed that straight ticket voters are stupid, but they are the prevalent constituency in the US and there is little if anything that can be done about it. Many people don't even bother voting unless they are somehow inspired by a single candidate or scared into not wanting another. Many people are two busy with all the other crap that goes on in their life to invest in 30 or so different politicians running for 10-15 s
NY Times Endorsed Only Wu Out of All Candidates (Score:5, Informative)
An interesting development was the New York Times not endorsing any candidate for governor, but did endorse Wu for Lt. Governor over incumbent Cuomo's choice. The editors liked Wu's desire to transform the position of Lt. Governor into a public advocate, where he can proclaim the messages for fairness not only in Internet governance, but in governance in general.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/28/opinion/timothy-wu-for-lieutenant-governor.html
Democracy Now! recently had an interview with running mates Teachout and Wu as well as gubernatorial candidate Randy Credico, whose quest against inequality includes fighting Rockefeller drug laws.
http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/4/new_york_candidates_zephyr_teachout_randy
I live in New York (Score:3)
And I think that incumbents have things way too easy for re-election.
I live in Rome, New York (Score:1)
You mean, recumbents.
great state of New York - Citation needed (Score:3, Funny)
>> great state of New York
Citation needed.
Re:great state of New York (Score:1)
"New York is well called the Empire State ... not only because of the vastness of its resources, but because it so conspicuously illustrates the imperial power of law-abiding liberty among the people." Alexander Flick, 1902.
Now it refers to entrenched political cronyism, Cuomo's promises notwithstanding.
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably a cross-state dig, but prefacing every state with "the great state" of looks kind of frantically desperate to the rest of the world.
He's got my vote (Score:1)
Can't stand the other guy. He's a crook.
Wu & net neutrality (Score:2, Interesting)
While Wu is a smart, well-meaning guy, his coining the phrase "net neutrality" set back the public debate by a couple of decades. Introducing a new term for an old concept was, at best, dumb. If he had stuck with "common carrier" - a centuries old legal term - which is well understood, we'd probably have "net neutrality" today.
The US made telegraphs common carriers in the 1840s and later, telephones. The term also applies to railroads - whose bad behavior outraged farmers in the 1800s -and trucking companie