Segways on the Campaign Trail 25
smooth wombat writes "The Segway is being used in a way probably not considered during its design: on the campaign trail. CNN's story talks about how a few candidates in different states are using the device to meet more people. According to one campaign consultant, who cited a Yale University study, knocking on voters' doors can account for a 7 percent to 12 percent increase in overall voter turnout. Using the Segway a candidate can reach three times the people compared to simply walking."
So that's how Bobby McAllister will defeat Asthma! (Score:2, Informative)
In the second episode, it's revealed that he suffers from asthma- definately a down side to a politician going door to door asking for votes. He must have used a Segway!
Re:So that's how Bobby McAllister will defeat Asth (Score:1)
Re:So that's how Bobby McAllister will defeat Asth (Score:2)
Re:So that's how Bobby McAllister will defeat Asth (Score:2)
For one thing the Secret Service would probably give a few people a heart attack. To say nothing about the size of the entire country.
And that show is unrealistic. By the time 2041 comes around, we'll probably have an alien for president. And I for one look.... (duck and cover)
Old news (Score:1)
Fat. (Score:5, Funny)
And they can get 3x fatter as well.
Re:Fat. (Score:1)
and how many compared to.. (Score:2)
or an electrical kick board thingy?
Re:and how many compared to.. (Score:2)
what about other short-distance vehicles? (Score:1)
What the hell's wrong with a bicycle??
Plan your campaign routes downhill and voila!
I'd vote for the candidate that comes to
my house and busts out a nollie hardflip...
-g
Re:what about other short-distance vehicles? (Score:4, Interesting)
Since the candidate in question is a HUGE believer in door-to-door campaigning, being able to still do it despite advanced years is a big deal.
Re:what about other short-distance vehicles? (Score:1)
agreed.
for anyone ELSE who couldn't tell, i was joking.
(how many campaign routes could really be simplified to 'downhill' or 'uphill' anyway? ^^)
Who read that as (Score:2)
Better up your insurance (Score:1)
Bike? (Score:2)
Wouldn't a bicycle do the same thing, only better? Plus it gives an image of someone who's in shape and frugal, as opposed to someone who can't pedal for themselves and likes to blow money on toys and look "hip".
Re:Bike? (Score:2)
Yeah, great way to relate to the common man... (Score:2, Funny)
Three times more? (Score:2)
For this to make sense, the transport time between visits must be incredibly high compared to the time speeched at-the-front-door. As an example, for a 4 minute speech, you'd need a 14 minute transport time reduced by a factor of seven to see 3 times more people in the same timelapse.
Are candidates aware that they don't have to visit their voters list alphabetically?
Feel ready to own one or many Tux Stickers [ptaff.ca]?
Speaking as a candidate... (Score:4, Insightful)
The net result is, you can visit more probable voters' homes in less time - and get more votes on election day. Kudo's for "IT."
walking precincts - an elected official who did it (Score:4, Interesting)
When I ran for Sunnyvale City Council I talked every predict in the city of ~125k people; knocking on some +30k doors of regular voters introducing myself and asking people to consider voting for me in November.
It was a very valuable experience. I had plenty of experience listening to the voters and answering their questions. By the time it came to the televised debates I had a solid grasp of the concerns of the voting public. I won with ~50% of the vote in a 3-way race.
Doing that much walking was hard work! I walked 6 to 8 hours a day, 7 days a week for nearly 8 months. Not only was to good exercise, it gave me some key insights into important neighborhood issues while I was in office.
Walking for another candidate is a fine thing to do. Even after I was selected I walked a number precincts for a number of candidates that I endorsed. Still, there is no substitute for a voter talking one-on-one with the actual candidate.
What all of that said: About 1/2 of the my time in a precinct was at the door:
The Segway will not help you with the door time.
Another ~1/6 of my time was spent going from the street to the door. This was the time that one had to remain alert for:
Using the Segway to go from the curb to the door would be a bad idea ... even if you
had room to navigate your way without
running over plants, pets, etc. :-)
The many stairs and steps would also be an issue
with the Segway.
The other ~1/3 of my time was spent going to the next door. Some of that is finding the next address of a regular voter. Some of that is attempting to look up their name (I always attempted to address them personally if possible), etc.
The Segway would be able to help going to the next door.
I mostly walked in the suburbs. I am sure other types of areas have different time ratios. For my case: even if the Segway could cut my time to the next door to zero, it would have only saved me about 1/3 of my time.
Segways are fun, but I don't see how they can 3x your voter reach in the types of areas that I was walking in.
FIRST 2002 Opening Presentation (Score:1)
I know that any techno nerds that see a candidate flying around on one would definitely think of voting for them.
90% of the people they knock on (Score:2)
Using the Segway a candidate can reach three times the people compared to simply walking.
So they will discuss the segway, and perhaps hint that if they vote for them, maybe everyone can have one!
Yes, sure, you can have a go, but be quick I have a lot of houses to go to...