Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Social Networks Politics Technology

Tech Credited With Reducing Nigerian Election Death Toll 58

jfruh writes: Dozens died in the runup to Nigeria's most recent election — a shocking statistic to many Westerners, but a relief in comparison to the much more serious violence that plagued earlier elections. Observers are crediting technology with making the election safer: the use of biometric IDs gave voters more confidence in the results, and social media gave people a chance to blow of anger that might've otherwise results in street brawls.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tech Credited With Reducing Nigerian Election Death Toll

Comments Filter:
  • This is a common misconception. You cannot "get your anger out" by indulging in it. Hitting a pillow or screaming until you're hoarse, or verbally thrashing someone on the internet does not make you act like a gentle person the rest of the day.

    If that was the case, you'd see most of our professional athletes; especially hockey players, football players, and boxers, as some of the most gentle, even-keeled people that ever existed.

    If anything, this makes us more used to binge angry, as we acclimate to it physiologically and psychologically. Perhaps this is why it seems those above atheletes are prone to excessive and often illegal violence on and off the field.

    • by Anonymous Coward
      You don't prove your point by mentioning people who have steroid rage. Normal people can absolutely get their anger out by spending some time with a punching bag.
      • You don't prove your point by mentioning people who have steroid rage. Normal people can absolutely get their anger out by spending some time with a punching bag.

        Wrong [mtholyoke.edu].

        • I have some issues with the experiment design.

          Although they don't explicitly state this, it seems that all of this happens over a relatively short period of time. I suspect that when people normally resort to physical release to blow off steam, they isolate themselves from the person or source of their stress. This may not even be measuring how people typically use this type of behavior to manage their anger.

          More importantly, the following comes from the description of the study procedure:

          If the participant did not rank the punching bag activity first, the experimenter asked if the participant would be willing to hit the punching bag, explaining that ratings were needed for each activity on the list and that more ratings were needed for the punching bag activity.

          Participants were told that they should think about their partner while hitting the bag.

          Next, participants completed a mood form that measured anger and positive affect. The anger measure consisted of 15 adjectives (e.g., angry, annoyed, furious) from the hostility subscale of the revised Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist (Zuckerman & Lubin, 1985).

          So first of

          • by naasking ( 94116 )

            The experiment excluded a certain class of catharsis theories. Fortunately, it's hardly the only [psychology...eguide.org] such experiment [psychwiki.com]. Catharsis theory has basically no evidence supporting it at this point, and enough evidence against it that it's pretty safe to say that indulging your anger does not "expend it" in any meaningful sense.

            • I wasn't saying that catharsis theory is valid (I honestly have no clue and have never read any research on it outside of what's been linked here) but merely that the study that was presented has some serious flaws in the way it was implemented. It seems like they proved that if you piss someone off, have them focus on their anger, and keep them thinking about it that they will react more violently than people who were not subject to the same.

              If there are other studies that also support the same claim th
      • You don't prove your point by mentioning people who have steroid rage. Normal people can absolutely get their anger out by spending some time with a punching bag.

        As I recall from one of my psych classes a few years back, the evidence is that catharsis does not, in fact, help people. However, Wikipedia says there's some debate. Personally I suspect this is BS and that social media intensifies stratification and group formation while discouraging meaningful intergroup norm exchange.

    • by UncleGizmo ( 462001 ) on Thursday April 30, 2015 @12:42PM (#49587559)

      Perhaps more accurately, the article could hypothesize that using social media to vent removes the people from venting in the streets - not reducing the anger, per se, but rather creating distance which could reduce actual violence.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Resulted, not results.

    Come on guys.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    but here in the u.s. a well-connected, socially-networked public just riots [bbc.co.uk], instead.

  • Maybe it is just because in Nigeria they have continuous violence (mostly from Muslims against Christians - with a couple of hundred victims some days), so no need the "election day" for the violence to spread?

    I understand that technology can help in many cases, but i think this is not one of them (at least not in that way).

    • by axlash ( 960838 )

      Where do you get this completely idea information from?

      Nigeria isn't just about media-reported Boko Haram, you know.

      • Where do you get this completely idea information from?

        Nigeria isn't just about media-reported Boko Haram, you know.

        Well, even from Nigerians themselves... as a Greek a have the privilege to be their first and often permanent host when uninvited introduce their presence to Europe! How many Nigerians (not just Africans, but Nigerians) do you have in your neighborhood?

  • Use of Biometrics enables identity thieves to automate their crimes on an industrial scale. How many times must this be said before it begins to sink in?

    Every system of security is eventually compromised. If someone harasses you by calling your phone all the time, you can change your phone number. If someone steals your credit card, you can challenge the charges and your bank can issue you a new card with a different number.

    If someone gets hold of your fingerprints, an image of your iris, your facial mea

  • In Amerika, we just manipulate the count the bring the "perfect" candidate to office. That's, what technology can do.
  • So that Nigerian prince lives? I hope so, he owes me 10 grand.

  • There is little reason to intimidate, threaten, maim, and kill to get people to vote for you when you can just hack the voting machines.

Fast, cheap, good: pick two.

Working...