Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Republicans The Media Politics

State of Alaska Prints Out Palin's E-Mails; Online Distribution 'Impractical' 516

ZipK writes "Three years after numerous citizens and news organizations requested the release of Sarah Palin's gubernatorial e-mails, the State of Alaska is finally making ready to make them available. In print. In Juneau. News organizations must fly or sail to Juneau and pick up the 24,000 page disclosure in person. The state claims it impractical to release the original electronic versions of the e-mails, so the Associated Press, Washington Post, New York Times, Mother Jones, ProPublica and MSNBC each plan to turn some or all of the printouts back into searchable, easily distributed electronic data. Thanks, Alaska." Where's WikiLeaks North?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

State of Alaska Prints Out Palin's E-Mails; Online Distribution 'Impractical'

Comments Filter:
  • by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Friday June 10, 2011 @10:53AM (#36400738) Journal

    You don't understand that Richelieu quote, grasshopper.

    Ya see, what Richelieu was saying there was basically just flaunting his abuse of power. That's it. It has nothing to do with the usual idiotic interpretations like too many laws, or everyone is guilty of something, or anything.

    What Richelieu actually did was employ forgers to write whole contracts with the devil in the handwriting of his opponents. Then have them waterboarded until they confess, and then execute them.

    You think I'm kidding? Check out for example Urbain Grandier [wikipedia.org] for a documented case of such a victim of Richelieu.

    THAT is what he needed six lines in the handwriting of someone for: as a writing sample for the forgers Richelieu employed.

    And while in that quote he's clever enough to not directly say that, it's a very thinly veiled reminder of why it's not wise to cross him. If you can write and ever wrote anything, he can "find" something else in your handwriting to hang you for, even though you don't remember ever writing that.

    I hardly think that Palin's emails are in any similar danger. And releasing them as paper is hardly a solution. If they're worried about forgeries in her name, then the sane way would be to release them as a file with a public secure hash value. That way if anyone says they found a damning email in there, you can see if their file actually matches the hash value. If it doesn't, it's been tampered with, and you can ignore the accusation.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10, 2011 @12:29PM (#36402254)

    One of the thing that's most striking with those who support the half-term governor is their often instance that liberals 'fear her'. Ha. Personally I click on every mention of her name, just to keep up her click value. People who legitimately want to be President (like Romney) don't know what to do about her and her unforced gaff ratio is becoming legendary. She's a distraction who may eventually leave the Republican party in a huff and could take 10% of the party with her.

  • Re:WTF? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by FrootLoops ( 1817694 ) on Friday June 10, 2011 @01:45PM (#36403320)

    Palin really is an idiot. She's just a political anomaly. Lemme explain what I mean. When someone tells you 3+4 = 8, you have the urge to correct them. If they're very convinced 3+4 = 8, most people will want to correct them all the more. Palin is the same way. She says stupid things with great conviction. People want to correct her, but they can't, so they do the next best thing: they talk to other people about how wrong she is, or how horrible it is that she might be a serious candidate for the presidency, or whatever is cathartic for them. This generates buzz for her, and is why I read this story and these comments in the first place. This effect is an anomaly--an unintended (to her; maybe not to people who run her or related campaigns) side effect of who she is and how she presents herself to the public. To be honest, I think she's deeply insecure and is simply defensive. Defensive people display the traits she displays: digging her heels in on issues; saying nonsensical things with great conviction; making things personal (her vs. the media). If I didn't fear her gaining office, I'd just feel sorry for her.

    She also has a large base of support made up of people who relate to her as a pseudo-middle-class working mom with strong Christian beliefs and morals who's fighting against the decay they see in our society. These people tend to believe her (and, as an overt sterotype, anyone they consider authoritative) without question. These two types of people--roughly, those who want to correct her and those who believe her--bring together the traditional fights of liberal vs. conservative and religious vs. not, which is absolutely fantastic fodder for discussions, news reports, and talk radio.

    Palin is an accident. She happened to tap some nerves in our society through how she behaves without her intending to. Sometimes people notice the level of emotion Palin seems to generate. That's backwards. It's actually emotion that generates Palin, politically.

  • by Enry ( 630 ) <enry@@@wayga...net> on Friday June 10, 2011 @02:34PM (#36403908) Journal

    I don't think it was easy for them to print all 24,000 copies. It cost more money in toner/paper/printer depreciation than it would have to release a CD-ROM. A citizen of the state would have a valid complaint for waste of taxpayer dollars.

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...