NSA and CIA Have Classified Evidence the Russians Had Placed Malware in the Election Registration Systems of at Least Two Florida Counties, Bob Woodward Reports (cnn.com) 291
Legendary journalist Bob Woodward reports in his new book new details on Russia's election meddling, writing that the NSA and CIA have classified evidence the Russians had placed malware in the election registration systems of at least two Florida counties, St. Lucie and Washington. From a report: While there was no evidence the malware had been activated, Woodward writes, it was sophisticated and could erase voters in specific districts. The voting system vendor used by Florida was also used in states across the country.
If there's anything to this... (Score:4, Interesting)
...then this is the first time that the Russians have meddled in an American election in a way that is genuinely dangerous to our country. This isn't an indirect attack on us via an email server hacking, or the spread of disingenuous Facebook stories. This is a DIRECT attack on our democratic system, and any evidence that this occurred should be brought to light immediately to expose the bad actors.
If this is true, Russia should then be sanctioned economically up to the gills by our allies. This can't go unanswered. (Will they risk having their energy supply to do this? Not likely... but they should because if they don't, the bad actors will just go after them, too.)
Re:If there's anything to this... (Score:4, Insightful)
Russia should then be sanctioned economically up to the gills by our allies
The same allies that were screwed over time and time again by the Trump administration? Good luck with that.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, they wouldn't do it for us at this point, but the more novichok incidents that keep cropping up, the more likely they are to respond to those.
I guess though at this point the Russian power structure has decided they are such a pariah they have nothing left to lose.
Re:If there's anything to this... (Score:5, Insightful)
Russia knows you aren't going to do anything, that's why they are getting bolder. Trump recently questioned if they poisoned Alexei Navalny with Novichok, helping them deny trying to murder an opposition leader. Trump wants them to interfere because he knows they will help him, so good luck stopping it.
Russian election meddling is dangerous (Score:2, Insightful)
There's an old Sci-Fi book by Bruce Sterling called "Distractions" that touches on this idea. e.g. that you could actually "call out a hit" on somebody just by putting it out on the net that they ought to be shot. We've got some of those loons right out in the open lately. And don [azcentral.com]
Seriously? (Score:3, Interesting)
With all of the bombshells in Woodward's new book, including the significant fact that Trump himself said at the onset that Covid-19 was deadly but in order to "reduce panic", Trump abdicated responsibility and sought to downplay the health risks, along with other really damning revelations on Trump really being the worst person for the job, and the one thing you want to report here is two small Florida counties have malware installed?
Re: (Score:2)
That is a very good point and it summarizes the last four years.
The Woodward book is sure to prove that Trump's presidential record is abysmal. But instead all the attention goes to Russia claims which - and I've looked into them, have nothing substantial of truth in them, often are made up, and will end up putting FBI people in jail.
Why is this possible? Direct attack? (Score:2)
Second, is this targeted or just drive-by malware because the systems are just that badly protected?!?
Were these systems compromise allowed so that methods could be observed by intel agencies?
Past Russian actions were designed to sow confusion/discord/division vs ac
Re:Why is this possible? Direct attack? (Score:4, Informative)
First, why is it possible to infect the machines? If you want to see actual security, look at Vegas slot machines. Audited code, write on Roms potted into the board so any change is very tamper evident and requires a dremel and hours of time.
Money. Having secure voting machines costs those that produce (Diebold et al) and use the machines (local govs) money. Whereas with slot machines, having secure machines means the owners of the machines (casinos) actually save (or rather, make) money.
OK. Let's pack. The enemy has won. (Score:2)
And I'm not even talking about this petty crap here. I'm not talking about the news. Or what doubles as news these days. I'm talking about the comments. Look at this garbage.
A while ago, a very smart man (you may guess who) said that at this point, the US has hegemony. There is nobody that could stand up against the US and face it without getting beaten to a pulp. The only thing that could possibly push the US from its throne is it itself.
And this is what we're witnessing right now. 170 years ago a presiden
Covid revelations (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
The covid revelations are more damning indeed.
The claim from Jeffrey Goldberg is made up. Because it's Goldberg, he makes up stuff to suit his agenda. Several people, even walrus mustache said Trump didn't say these things. Is it plausible? Sure. Trump has probably said worse than that.
Re: (Score:3)
False. "Hours after the Atlantic story broke, the Associated Press had two unnamed sources - a senior Defense Department official and senior Marine Corps officer - confirm the report. Per the AP, Trump decided not to visit the cemetery in France after receiving his daily briefing on November 10, 2018, the day of the planned trip. And while members of the National Security Council and the Secret Service told Trump he could still drive to th
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, Glenn Greenwald wrote about that new meaning for the word 'confirm':https://theintercept.com/2020/09/05/journalisms-new-propaganda-tool-using-confirmed-to-mean-its-opposite/
People told Goldberg something and then also told other journalists the same thing and then it's called confirmation. Confirmation is supposed to be independent. The aim of the quote is to push military and pro-military people away from Trump.
And Bolton and others undercutting the story is significant because Trump not going is lin
These Are the Florida hacks (Score:2)
The florida hacks were analyzed in this article a few years back. Segment "NSA Finds a GRU Election Plot " in
https://consortiumnews.com/201... [consortiumnews.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Bollocks. And the author of that article is Gareth Porter and he is a progressive.
Sure..... (Score:2)
so we'll need to wait for the next whistleblower to find out it's a load of crap?
Bigger story is that Trump knew COVID was deadly (Score:4, Interesting)
I've asked this before, but how much is it going to take? Trump's polls are back up. The 538 average has him at 43.6% with likely voters. Shutting down the post office is likely to cost the other side thousands of key votes and trump is calling for poll watchers [cnn.com] which if you know anything about politics means threats of violence and intimidation.
For the people still on the fence, is there any line that can be crossed?
Um... did you bother reading my post (Score:3)
Also, Jesus fucking Christ. You're literally OK with Trump completely fucking up the Corona virus response either out of malice or incompetence (your choice) because Biden can't speak well off the cuff?
No wonder this country is a shit show. Instead of putting smart people or even competent administrators in charge we put whoever can ramble without a teleprompter. I mean, if
You're not a fence sitter (Score:3)
This is vulgar, but it's apt. I once read that a Conservative would let Trump shit in their mouth if it meant a Democrat has to smell it. That's you right now. You should think about whether that's really the sort of person you want to be...
More reasons elections should be manual (Score:3)
If not the Russians then someone else. I used to be pro-electronic voting, even vote by app. But I've done a 180 and am for paper ballots counted by hand. Hanging chads and all. Waiting for a few days for results is a much better option than the outright hacking that is inevitable.
Would also be great if Facebook and Twitter would voluntarily shut down for 30 days prior to vote.
Re: (Score:2)
A manual election wouldn't help this problem. The problem is that they had access to create or erase registrations. Erasing registrations would invalidate manual votes. You'd have to go to full paper registration and not using computers at all to make registration lists but instead checking every voter back to the original paper. That's a nightmare with the population we have. The near impossible to fully man polling stations would become truly impossible.
I do wonder if they've been checking identification
Legendary (Score:2)
Legendary journalist Bob Woodward
And in Warcraft, what is the color of Legendaries?
Oh come on, man! That's funny! To hell with you if you get bent out of shape over it.
Turnabout Is Fair Play (Score:5, Funny)
Impossible to hack Russia (Score:2)
When the entire electoral system is a spreadsheet that runs on Putin's laptop where he decides how many votes he got.
Pouring fuel on the fire (Score:2, Informative)
It now appears the con artist and his cabal deliberately altered intelligence reports on threats to this country [cnn.com] posed by Russia to fit the con artist's narrative.
The whistleblower claims that acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf instructed DHS officials earlier this year to "cease providing intelligence assessments on the threat of Russian interference" and, instead, focus their efforts on gathering information related to activities being carried out by China and Iran. .
. .
Separately, both Wolf and Cuccinelli also tried to alter a report to downplay the threat posed by White supremacists and instead emphasize the role of leftist groups due to concerns about how the initial language would reflect on the President, according to a source familiar with the claims raised by the whistleblower.
Despite the attempts by Wolf and Cuccinelli to alter the report, the report clearly shows DHS considers white supremacists are the greatest terror threat to this country [politico.com].
In looking at the con artist's antics, it is clear both articles are true. The con artist has never said a word about Russian interference and has even gone on record as saying h
He still does this shit (Score:2)
Respect!
Re:Easy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Easy (Score:5, Insightful)
Tens of thousands of people who have pledged their loyalty to the US ...
Trump prefers it when people pledge loyalty to him first.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Easy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Easy (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Also don't forget, when there is a claim Trump is colluding with Russia there are people in the US who will object and push against it. When there is a claim about Russia doing bad things you can get away with anything. It was very obvious with Barr. He'd instantly believe everything about russia but for the stuff against trump he is going to make people go to jail. At least FBI people. Clinesmith is the first and the coming months will have more.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
True. I talked too soon here. I have to think that over for a moment.
But which eletoral officials (Score:2)
Deliberately installed the Russian malware on the voting machines?
Hacking an election yourself entails a small amount of risk, which can be easily avoided by letting the Russians do it for you.
Re:Easy (Score:5, Insightful)
The guy who delivered the presidency to Trump [Comey] was working against Trump last time?
And he's still a weasel (Score:2)
> The guy who delivered the presidency to Trump [Comey] was working against Trump last time?
Comey was actually trying to quietly close out that investigation so that nobody could do anything with it later, the letter he sent got released by the Republicans without him wanting it.
So he may have had some effect there, but it was accidental on his part.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think it was accidental. I think that since everyone knew Trump had no chance to win Comey thought he could afford to display the power of the FBI before Clinton would take power.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
That is not journalism, it is a report to which over 100 people contributed. It describes 4 game scenarios, clear and narrow Biden win, and clear and narrow Trump win. Every scenario blows up.
Re:Easy (Score:4, Insightful)
By putting people in place at the top of intelligence agencies to conspire against Trump? I'm not following, exactly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Easy (Score:4, Funny)
By putting people in place at the top of intelligence agencies to conspire against Trump? I'm not following, exactly.
What they mean is the GOP is aiming to disrupt the gravy train by increasing the funding for the various intelligence agencies and the military so they can show they're strong on defense and protecting this country while simultaneously putting people in place who will lie about no interference in our elections. That way they can push through more laws to spy on U.S. citizens claiming they need to know who might be a threat to this country since antifa is the biggest terror threat going [politico.com].
At the same time the GOP will shovel more taxpayer money into socialist policies designed to prop up the multitude of failing corporations in this country and violate the Constitution by giving taxpayer money to religious organizations.
And thus, through these actions, the gravy train will be stopped once and for all.
Re: (Score:2)
> By putting people in place at the top of intelligence agencies to conspire against Trump? I'm not following, exactly.
Most of those people were holdovers from Obama. Trump fired Dan Coats and there was a big thing over it, but I guess most people weren't paying attention.
Re: (Score:3)
We were discussing the CIA. At least the top three people at the CIA are Trump appointees. Exactly zero were holdovers from Obama.
Re:Easy (Score:4, Insightful)
Who cares about that.. These issues didn't happen with Bush(s) were in office, or other Republicans (and the same for Democrats)
The problem is not which party is voting, but rather, most of the people in government know TRUMP (not party) is terrible because they see the reality when we are only seeing a slice of things. (I have a lot of friends in the fed sector that have been working there for 30+ years that have said, he is literally the worst thing to ever come to Washington because he literally knows nothing and makes NO attempt at learning anything).
Think about this, just about EVERYONE that has worked with him has not had anything positive to say about him. (contrast that with Bush, or Obama, or Clinton).. While people may have complained about some policies, but no one questioned their integrity, ethics, intellect (in most cases, Bush Jr. got ragged on that), or even "un-american". Trump is the only one that fits into that category. And its not because he's doing anything "special".. in fact the vast majority of his "accomplishments" have been in the baking and making for 4+ years.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/04/26/the-public-the-political-system-and-american-democracy/
Re: (Score:3)
But I know [...] - The story about the Russians wanting Trump to win is made up
- the story about the Russians thinking they could make Trump win is made up
- And certainly the Russian want Trump to win even less now.
Provide evidence to support these claims, or admit you're the one just making shit up.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait a minute. I thought it usually had to go the other way round.
Re: (Score:2)
We actually have evidence that all those things are true. Do you need me to provide it, or can you use google unlike Luckyo? I'm not here to wipe your ass for you.
Re: (Score:2)
There is four years of evidence and it was all crap, Show me something you still believe is true.
Re: (Score:2)
There is four years of evidence and it was all crap, Show me something you still believe is true.
In regards to the Mueller report: Standing DOJ guidelines are that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for crimes, so Mueller did not investigate him for them. He also unequivocally stated that it should not be taken that Trump was innocent of those crimes. Barr then turned around and tried to spin it before the report was fully released (because he got to see it first) that Trump was exonerated by the report in order to control the narrative. Multiple associates of Trump and Giuliani have been cha
Re: (Score:3)
I consider Barr's statement correct. 3 years of investigation on an incumbent president and not being able to find collusion? That is outrageous. That this president then may have tried to obstruct something really has little weight.
Multiple people have been arrested and convicted. Some unjustly (Carter, Flynn) some for other reasons (Manafort, Stone)but which one was conspiring with Russia?
Re: Easy (Score:2)
3 years of an investigation that wasn't allowed to look for collusion not finding collusion is not an exoneration.
Re: (Score:2)
There was no meaningful interference from Trump with the investigation. What are you going to claim, it was there but Trump made sure htey couldn't find it?
Re: (Score:2)
By Trump, and to the extent that it undercut the investigation?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No. and my grammar always has been a bit crooked too.
Re: (Score:3)
That is clever. Putin wanted better relations with the US and Trump is standing right next to him. Putin's judgement on Trump, like anyone's judgmement won't be captured in one sentence. On one hand he claims he wants better relations with Russia. On the other hand he seems a completely unreliable buffoon who is unlikely to win and on the other side you have "the devil we know."
You know what, let's just show our bad faith by doing some inept interference so that we'll be off to a good start with Clinton!
Yea
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, but Russian interference with elections fits in with the general condition of Russia -- a nation too broke to effectively compete as a world super power militarily, economically or diplomatically and needing to lean on intelligence-based manipulation to not sink into global irrelevance.
My guess is that with Nord Stream 2 now threatened by the Navalny poisoning that Russia is going to go full-tilt/all-in on election manipulation in the desperate hope that they can get Trump back in and pressur
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the Republican led, Republican-majority Senate Intelligence Commission is against Trump? How does that work, exactly?
Re: (Score:3)
... and guess who is in charge of that committee???
You'll never hear the MSM tell you.
Richard Burr R-NC is the Senate Intelligence Committee Chair. Says so right there in the article the parent linked.
Re: (Score:2)
You got it backwards again, Vlad. It would be a Biden "echo chamber" in this context. No turnip for you today.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thing is the CIA have picked sides. There is no such thing anymore of the secret services not meddling in politics.
People have picked sides, but it's not the career workers in the intelligence agencies:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/09... [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know what they do... (Score:2)
> What sides is the CIA playing against, and to whose benefit?
The CIA is on their own side. Are you aware of what they actually do? Here are some samples:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_by_the_CIA [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, you're very confused, I've seen that.
But no, the NSA is on Trump's side, actually. The SIC is definitely against him, or at least some of them are (Nunez sure isn't). About half of the FBI leadership involved in Crossfire Hurricane was purged for misconduct of some kind or another, but Wray is highly untrustworthy. As for the CIA, I'm trying to figure out when they've ever been trustworthy to begin with. The story seems to be about older Obama appointees, though, who have the political slant one mi
Re: (Score:2)
And, why did Trump appoint anti-Trump people to head all of his intelligence agencies?
Re: (Score:2)
Trump has been in office for almost four years. He's had almost four years to appoint people loyal to him, if that's what he wanted to do (some would argue that he has). Why are you talking about people who haven't been in office for years? What do they have to do with the original post
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
In America, we are having a treason problem.
Don't forget these lines from the article as well:
Woodward writes that Coats "continued to harbor the secret belief, one that had grown rather than lessened, although unsupported by intelligence proof, that Putin had something on Trump." Woodward continues, writing that Coats felt, "How else to explain the president's behavior? Coats could see no other explanation."
Woodward writes that Coats and his top staff members "examined the intelligence as carefully as possible," and that Coats still questions the relationship between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. "Coats saw how extraordinary it was for the president's top intelligence official to harbor such deep suspicions about the president's relationship with Putin. But he could not shake them."
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
No one mentioned the Steele Dossier. It's far more likely that Trump either had business dealings with people in the Russian government or, Russian banks are some of the last places willing to actually do business with him (banks don't like working with people who keep declaring bankruptcy) so that is the source of a lot of his capital, they can prove he's not as wealthy as he claims (at least, claims to the media/public, not to the IRS). And as for collusion, I will simply quote one of my posts from belo
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why would Trump be embarrassed by Russian hookers peeing on Obama's bed?
Maybe because Trump was allegedly in that room at the time and allegedly ordered the hookers to do just that?
Weird how you don't seem to know that.
Re: (Score:2)
> Maybe because Trump was allegedly in that room at the time and allegedly ordered the hookers to do just that?
I doubt he'd lose a single voter to that unless they died laughing. Oh, there's also the fact that it was a 4 chan hoax to begin with channeled via that McMuffin or whoever guy who was trying to snatch an EV in Utah. And that I anticipated it in one of my Slashdot comments from before the dossier came out (as you can find waaaaay back there in my post history). But yeah.
> Weird how you don
Re: (Score:2)
Why would Obama be embarrassed that some creep rented a hotel room he stayed in a long time ago and hired hookers to piss on the bed? I wouldn't.
If you trust anything on /pol you should seek treatment for a morbid case of gullibility.
Anyway, I know precisely 0 people interested in seeing that tape, because they would not be able to unsee it. Most people will vote against Trump for much better reasons.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Vote for a clown, expect a circus.
Re: (Score:2)
Chekov's russian accent? He pointed out he had to practice to make it really over the top.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:If 'classified,' why are we hearing about it? (Score:4, Informative)
Nope. If you want bottom of the barrel, try RT.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably because Donny Loose Lips let it slip.
Re: (Score:2)
It is not. Wishing is free thought, which is protected by the first amendment. Saying specifically that you are going to shoot the President in the head is a federal crime.
It's much like the difference between "I think you are an asshole" versus "you are an asshole" - one is protected speech, the other is libel or slander.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, the possibility of doing it. Buying plane tickets, owning a firearm are examples. I could threaten to shoot you all day but without even knowing your name, little well your address, the courts here would throw it out, and if I knew that stuff and you lived a long ways away, conviction would be very doubtful. The bar for evidence might be a bit lower for your President but there still has to be a possibility of carrying out the threat, though I would expect some investigation.
Re:To help Trump... (Score:4, Interesting)
More like all the money laundering for Russians the corrupt family is doing [businessinsider.com]. A quote from the failure's son:
"In terms of high-end product influx into the US, Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets," Donald Trump Jr. said at a New York real-estate conference that year. "Say, in Dubai, and certainly with our project in SoHo, and anywhere in New York. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I saw a guy background-bombing a news reporter today with a Trump 2020 flag that said Make The Liberals Cry Again.
So you can't say Trump voters don't vote on "issues". They obviously have plenty of "issues."
Re: To help Trump... (Score:3, Interesting)
As a German, let me tell you that the main mechanic of how it happens, is when you start referring to whole.groups by the flaws of their fringe groups. (Next step: Exaggerate and make up a narrative around it.)
This moron is not Trump supporters.
SJWs are not "liberals".
Feminists are not women.
Chauvinists are not men.
Putin is not Russians.
You catch my drift.
They are a tiny, loud subset.
Most people are just normal people.
Some got a bit stronger triggers.
But if you (assuming you're an American man) went to Mosc
Re: (Score:3)
That's a fair criticism. I should have said "some" Trump voters.
We do see this here where last-weeks political ploy was to try to make people think all the BLM rallies were riots (93% were entirely peaceful according to a recent report [time.com])
Re: (Score:3)
But I have to be vocal, otherwise the only voice there is in this Internet wilderness, is the racists/bigots/haters. The easily-led types need to hear *us*, too, not just the loudmouth ha
Trump money from Russia (Posted above, also.) (Score:4, Informative)
Book about Trump having been involved in money-laundering:
House of Trump, House of Putin: The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia [amazon.com].
Beginning on page 265, that book lists 59 Russians who Trump helped get money out of Russia.
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt Putin would leave his fingerprints on the money laundered through Deutsche Bank to fund the allege president. He'll have his cronies do it, they'll have some lessor cronies do it, and those will have some thugs do it. Thugs that can make la presidenta tweetie pay up or can be easily offed if they do anything stupid like getting caught.
Re: (Score:2)
my dead grandma's clit could hack into them.
What was her porn name when she was young? Asking for a friend.
Re:This is dumb. (Score:4, Insightful)
The US voting system is by far the worst in the developed world. It's not just the voting machines (I recall the articles about Diebold when Gore lost the elections) but the gerrymandering, making it hard to vote, delisting people for all kinds of reasons. And then two parties who give you no real choice. Nice system.
Re: (Score:2)