How exactly did Trump incite violence? He condemned the insurgents. He said today that killing cops should result in the death penalty. How exactly is he inciting violence?
He called for the violence. He celebrated the violence. To the people who perpetrated the violence, he told them 'I love you.'
He is the cause of the violence, and continues to call for more violence.
He uses the word "fight" 23 times during the 1 1/4 hour rambling speech. This is what he says towards the end:
“Something’s wrong here. Something’s really wrong. Can’t have happened.” And we fight. We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore....
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’r
How do you read that? By going back in time and turning up in greater numbers at the ballot box 2 months ago? Is that what you think he's saying?
After being impeached, Trump should stand trial for the murder of the capital police officer.
No, Biden should be standing trial. If he hadn't stolen the election, none of this would have happened. And yes, Biden very likely did steal the election, or at least, someone stole it for him. Consider the following:
* Joe Biden's Twitter account had 20 million followers. Trump's Twitter account had 88.8 million followers.
* Joe Biden's Facebook account had 7.78 million followers. Trump's Facebook account had 34.72 million followers.
How likely is it that a person with four to five times the following of his ri
How likely is it that a person with four to five times the following of his rival lost the election?
Do you really think this way? Really? That "followers" on social media equate to votes cast?
Let me introduce this wild theory for you to ponder:
1. There are literally more than 100,000,000 registered voters that don't "follow" either candidate. 2. There are followers of Trump that wouldn't vote for him if he were the ONLY candidate on the ballot - either they follow his text vomit because they have to / need to for employment purposes (journalists, pundits, news organizations, staff of opposition members of Congress, etc) or they are not registered to vote in the United States (as it turns out, Twitter and Facebook are available outside this country, you fucking nitwit.) 3. So if "follower count" is the foundation of your argument, and followers are not just restricted to the United States, it sounds like the foundation of your argument has a bunch of illegal votes in it - non-Citizens!
Oh shit, looks like your "follower theory of Democracy" is amazingly stupid.
As for the rest of it - no there was not an enthusiastic following of Joe Biden. There was, however, a very wide and deep channel of enthusiasm for throwing Trump out that happened to coincide with Joe Biden's nomination as his opposition.
The rest of your post is mindless drivel and unsubstantiated claims that require proof, but you provide none.
explain (Score:-1, Troll)
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: explain (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:5, Informative)
Here you go: https://www.rev.com/blog/trans... [rev.com]
He uses the word "fight" 23 times during the 1 1/4 hour rambling speech. This is what he says towards the end:
“Something’s wrong here. Something’s really wrong. Can’t have happened.” And we fight. We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore. ...
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’r
Re: (Score:-1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
How do you "take back 'our' country" with "strength"? How do you read that? By going back in time and turning up in greater numbers at the ballo
Re: (Score:-1)
How do you read that? By going back in time and turning up in greater numbers at the ballot box 2 months ago? Is that what you think he's saying?
After being impeached, Trump should stand trial for the murder of the capital police officer.
No, Biden should be standing trial. If he hadn't stolen the election, none of this would have happened. And yes, Biden very likely did steal the election, or at least, someone stole it for him. Consider the following:
* Joe Biden's Twitter account had 20 million followers.
Trump's Twitter account had 88.8 million followers.
* Joe Biden's Facebook account had 7.78 million followers.
Trump's Facebook account had 34.72 million followers.
How likely is it that a person with four to five times the following of his ri
Re: explain (Score:2)
How likely is it that a person with four to five times the following of his rival lost the election?
Do you really think this way? Really? That "followers" on social media equate to votes cast?
Let me introduce this wild theory for you to ponder:
1. There are literally more than 100,000,000 registered voters that don't "follow" either candidate.
2. There are followers of Trump that wouldn't vote for him if he were the ONLY candidate on the ballot - either they follow his text vomit because they have to / need to for employment purposes (journalists, pundits, news organizations, staff of opposition members of Congress, etc) or they are not registered to vote in the United States (as it turns out, Twitter and Facebook are available outside this country, you fucking nitwit.)
3. So if "follower count" is the foundation of your argument, and followers are not just restricted to the United States, it sounds like the foundation of your argument has a bunch of illegal votes in it - non-Citizens!
Oh shit, looks like your "follower theory of Democracy" is amazingly stupid.
As for the rest of it - no there was not an enthusiastic following of Joe Biden. There was, however, a very wide and deep channel of enthusiasm for throwing Trump out that happened to coincide with Joe Biden's nomination as his opposition.
The rest of your post is mindless drivel and unsubstantiated claims that require proof, but you provide none.