The only thing Nader is good for these days is confusing democrats to vote for him. I'd love to see him on the ballot but really overall he just doesn't matter.
You're so contemptuous of democracy, and the people, that you'll root for Nader, who opposes Bush more extremely than Kerry, if he helps your boy to game another election. Of course you're a Republican - and of course you're proud - you people have no shame.
and the Democrats have plenty of shame to spread around
Misery is spread equaly, those who succeed must feed the mouths of those who don't in the eyes of those socialist dogs.
I want Nader to stay in the race to take Democrat votes. In these times, we can't afford a tax raising Kerry to stifle the economic increase that is happening right now. That and I've never seen someone flip flop so much, fish probably envy him:D
And i'm only 17 years of age too, so i cant vote anyway, but I like to get involved with this stuff!
they are registered Democraps (yes, demo-craps, because the democrat party is a bunch of CRAP!)
Aah, political discourse in 2004.
You'd better be careful. Right now you're a far more effective and damning indictment of our educational system than a Kerry campaign commercial could ever hope to be. (Yes, indictment, because I'm saying u r teh SHEEP!)
Make the best use of your next 4 years until your first presidential election, so you'll understand the consequences of the means to your ends. You wind up getting stuck with the means, whether you achieve your ends or not. If you listen carefully, you will learn, regardless of what they try to teach you.
2) Are you accusing Kerry of being socialist? He's a bloody free trade advocate, and took a lot of slack for it in the democratic primary!
3) A "tax raising Kerry" - hopefully you're aware that his only proposed increases are repealing the Bush tax cuts on the top several percent. Bush's tax cuts have left us with a 4-5 hundred billion dollar defecit. Is this fiscal responsibility? It's like putting huge amounts of money on your credit cards - and don't try and claim that Democrats are derailing associated budget cuts, since the Republicans control all branches of government. Also, don't pretend it's short term - even Bush's budgets don't hold that out, let alone the GAO, and he's pushing for even more tax cuts.
1) He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected. "I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it!" How about: "...Christmas in Cambodia is SEARED into my memory." Well, maybe it was just near Cambodia after all. Do I really need to continue?
2) He may be less of a socialist than some of his European pals rooting for him, but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected.
You can be both. Dubya is nothing...I mean "neither".
... but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
Your opinion is not a fact. Do not presume to speak for the U.S., thank you.
"Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes".
That's just like "Not pressing Congress to continue the assault weapons ban" == "Being in favor of letting it lapse despite statements to the contrary". Flip
Hey, you asked... Kerry is, for example, a proponent of socialized medicine. I never said Bush wasn't, I was answering your query.
Second, which part of "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes" do you not understand? Or are you denying they are the same thing? So maybe we should never have called Bushes tax cuts "tax cuts", we should have said he repealed previous tax increases?
Again, I never said anything positive about Bush, I answered your questions... if you can't handle the truth, you shouldn't ask
As you consider both presidential politics, and the job markets they manage, you might be interested in the job growth under the past 10 US presidents [sagarmatha.com]. Unless you're some kind of Republican martyr, or corporate welfare candidate, your parents' Democrat alliance will start to make a lot more sense when you finally free yourself from the tyranny of their allowance.
"Flattery is all right -- if you don't inhale."
-- Adlai Stevenson
Nader is just an attention whore (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nader is just an attention whore (Score:0, Flamebait)
I want Bush to win
BUSH 2004!
brownshirt (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:brownshirt (Score:0, Troll)
Misery is spread equaly, those who succeed must feed the mouths of those who don't in the eyes of those socialist dogs.
I want Nader to stay in the race to take Democrat votes. In these times, we can't afford a tax raising Kerry to stifle the economic increase that is happening right now. That and I've never seen someone flip flop so much, fish probably envy him
And i'm only 17 years of age too, so i cant vote anyway, but I like to get involved with this stuff!
Re:brownshirt (Score:3, Funny)
Aah, political discourse in 2004.
You'd better be careful. Right now you're a far more effective and damning indictment of our educational system than a Kerry campaign commercial could ever hope to be. (Yes, indictment, because I'm saying u r teh SHEEP!)
Re:brownshirt (Score:1)
Re:brownshirt (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:brownshirt (Score:4, Insightful)
2) Are you accusing Kerry of being socialist? He's a bloody free trade advocate, and took a lot of slack for it in the democratic primary!
3) A "tax raising Kerry" - hopefully you're aware that his only proposed increases are repealing the Bush tax cuts on the top several percent. Bush's tax cuts have left us with a 4-5 hundred billion dollar defecit. Is this fiscal responsibility? It's like putting huge amounts of money on your credit cards - and don't try and claim that Democrats are derailing associated budget cuts, since the Republicans control all branches of government. Also, don't pretend it's short term - even Bush's budgets don't hold that out, let alone the GAO, and he's pushing for even more tax cuts.
Re:brownshirt (Score:2)
2) He may be less of a socialist than some of his European pals rooting for him, but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
3) "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes". Perhap
Re:brownshirt (Score:1)
He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected.
You can be both. Dubya is nothing...I mean "neither".
Your opinion is not a fact. Do not presume to speak for the U.S., thank you.
"Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes".
That's just like "Not pressing Congress to continue the assault weapons ban" == "Being in favor of letting it lapse despite statements to the contrary". Flip
Re:brownshirt (Score:2)
Second, which part of "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes" do you not understand? Or are you denying they are the same thing? So maybe we should never have called Bushes tax cuts "tax cuts", we should have said he repealed previous tax increases?
Again, I never said anything positive about Bush, I answered your questions... if you can't handle the truth, you shouldn't ask
Re:brownshirt (Score:1)
Re:brownshirt (Score:2)