The only thing Nader is good for these days is confusing democrats to vote for him. I'd love to see him on the ballot but really overall he just doesn't matter.
You're so contemptuous of democracy, and the people, that you'll root for Nader, who opposes Bush more extremely than Kerry, if he helps your boy to game another election. Of course you're a Republican - and of course you're proud - you people have no shame.
and the Democrats have plenty of shame to spread around
Misery is spread equaly, those who succeed must feed the mouths of those who don't in the eyes of those socialist dogs.
I want Nader to stay in the race to take Democrat votes. In these times, we can't afford a tax raising Kerry to stifle the economic increase that is happening right now. That and I've never seen someone flip flop so much, fish probably envy him:D
And i'm only 17 years of age too, so i cant vote anyway, but I like to get involved wi
2) Are you accusing Kerry of being socialist? He's a bloody free trade advocate, and took a lot of slack for it in the democratic primary!
3) A "tax raising Kerry" - hopefully you're aware that his only proposed increases are repealing the Bush tax cuts on the top several percent. Bush's tax cuts have left us with a 4-5 hundred billion dollar defecit. Is this fiscal responsibility? It's like putting huge amounts of money on your credit cards - and don't try and claim that Democrats are derailing associated budget cuts, since the Republicans control all branches of government. Also, don't pretend it's short term - even Bush's budgets don't hold that out, let alone the GAO, and he's pushing for even more tax cuts.
1) He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected. "I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it!" How about: "...Christmas in Cambodia is SEARED into my memory." Well, maybe it was just near Cambodia after all. Do I really need to continue?
2) He may be less of a socialist than some of his European pals rooting for him, but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected.
You can be both. Dubya is nothing...I mean "neither".
... but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
Your opinion is not a fact. Do not presume to speak for the U.S., thank you.
"Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes".
That's just like "Not pressing Congress to continue the assault weapons ban" == "Being in favor of letting it lapse despite statements to the contrary". Flip
Hey, you asked... Kerry is, for example, a proponent of socialized medicine. I never said Bush wasn't, I was answering your query.
Second, which part of "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes" do you not understand? Or are you denying they are the same thing? So maybe we should never have called Bushes tax cuts "tax cuts", we should have said he repealed previous tax increases?
Again, I never said anything positive about Bush, I answered your questions... if you can't handle the truth, you shouldn't ask
Nader is just an attention whore (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nader is just an attention whore (Score:0, Flamebait)
I want Bush to win
BUSH 2004!
brownshirt (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:brownshirt (Score:0, Troll)
Misery is spread equaly, those who succeed must feed the mouths of those who don't in the eyes of those socialist dogs.
I want Nader to stay in the race to take Democrat votes. In these times, we can't afford a tax raising Kerry to stifle the economic increase that is happening right now. That and I've never seen someone flip flop so much, fish probably envy him
And i'm only 17 years of age too, so i cant vote anyway, but I like to get involved wi
Re:brownshirt (Score:4, Insightful)
2) Are you accusing Kerry of being socialist? He's a bloody free trade advocate, and took a lot of slack for it in the democratic primary!
3) A "tax raising Kerry" - hopefully you're aware that his only proposed increases are repealing the Bush tax cuts on the top several percent. Bush's tax cuts have left us with a 4-5 hundred billion dollar defecit. Is this fiscal responsibility? It's like putting huge amounts of money on your credit cards - and don't try and claim that Democrats are derailing associated budget cuts, since the Republicans control all branches of government. Also, don't pretend it's short term - even Bush's budgets don't hold that out, let alone the GAO, and he's pushing for even more tax cuts.
Re:brownshirt (Score:2)
2) He may be less of a socialist than some of his European pals rooting for him, but by U.S. standards he is, in fact, a socialist.
3) "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes". Perhap
Re:brownshirt (Score:1)
He was a war hero before he was an anti-war hero before deciding that being a war hero would help him get elected.
You can be both. Dubya is nothing...I mean "neither".
Your opinion is not a fact. Do not presume to speak for the U.S., thank you.
"Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes".
That's just like "Not pressing Congress to continue the assault weapons ban" == "Being in favor of letting it lapse despite statements to the contrary". Flip
Re:brownshirt (Score:2)
Second, which part of "Repealing Tax Cuts" == "Raising Taxes" do you not understand? Or are you denying they are the same thing? So maybe we should never have called Bushes tax cuts "tax cuts", we should have said he repealed previous tax increases?
Again, I never said anything positive about Bush, I answered your questions... if you can't handle the truth, you shouldn't ask
Re:brownshirt (Score:1)