sidenote on spelling: Where I grew up in the midwest potatoe and tomatoe were indeed the official correct spellings. Those spellings also follow that an e on the end of a word makes the proceeding vowel long by default.
With that said, this so called debate seems to be primarily to see which candidate will cut loose with the most money as government grants to various academics who would be forced into a real job if said grants weren't available. It is no wonder then that they don't want a Libertarian candidate on the panel. The money cut loose will be similar, just where it might go will be a little different, that's all, and not much at that. We have a military/industrial complex that runs this nation, so that's where the tax money will go, that and to pay off their office drones and mercenaries.
And really, just apply occams razor to the odds of the phenomenon of two similar age white males both from a highly restrictive and priveleged background with a membership in skull and bones fraternity being the "official candidates". Anyone honestly paying attention and not approaching that fact from a partisan D or R viewpoint would tend to see the obviousness that at super high levels the "fix is in" and US presidents are picked well in advance and people are given an illusion of choice and "voting for their candidate". It's laughable. I mean, giggling guffawing laughable. I doubt we've had an honest election for 4 to 5 generations now. We have one political party, the Globalist Corporate NWO party, and their candidate always "wins".
Dodging Yet Another Debate? (Score:0)
Wouldn't you be reluctant to participate in a public chat if you were him?
Remember what happened to the last Republican that tried to outspell someone over the age of 6... POTATOE
what debate? (Score:1)
With that said, this so called debate seems to be primarily to see which candidate will cut loose with the most money as government grants to various academics who would be forced into a real job if said grants weren't available. It is no wonder then that they don't want a Libertarian candidate on the panel. The money cut loose will be similar, just where it might go will be a little different, that's all, and not much at that. We have a military/industrial complex that runs this nation, so that's where the tax money will go, that and to pay off their office drones and mercenaries.
And really, just apply occams razor to the odds of the phenomenon of two similar age white males both from a highly restrictive and priveleged background with a membership in skull and bones fraternity being the "official candidates". Anyone honestly paying attention and not approaching that fact from a partisan D or R viewpoint would tend to see the obviousness that at super high levels the "fix is in" and US presidents are picked well in advance and people are given an illusion of choice and "voting for their candidate". It's laughable. I mean, giggling guffawing laughable. I doubt we've had an honest election for 4 to 5 generations now. We have one political party, the Globalist Corporate NWO party, and their candidate always "wins".