bhmit1 writes "BusinessWeek is reporting about Science Debate 2008, an attempt to put the scientific issues front and center in the US Presidential race. They include a few bits about which candidates have already taken good positions. But more importantly, there is a link to a comparison on the current candidates. (Yes, Ron Paul is included.)" Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
It is alarming that so many blindly accept the notion that all life is the product of the stewing of some primordial ooze over billions and billions of years ago. No, this is not science and it is an insult to attach the religious belief in evolutionism to science. Science simply means knowlege gained by OBSERVATION.
I will support anyone that will have the guts to dare question the holy sacred cow of evolutionism. I know everyone protects the sacred cow, but there are some people that still believe in
anti-science? (Score:1)