Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Democrats Government The Almighty Buck The Internet Politics Your Rights Online

Senate To Vote On Internet Sales Tax (For Real This Time) 326

New submitter JoeyRox writes "On 3/22 the Senate approved a non-binding proposal to allow states to tax online sales to residents outside their state. That vote was a trial balloon to gauge the support for the Marketplace Fairness Act. This week Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid filed a cloture to allow the law to be voted on for real this time. The vote may occur as soon as tomorrow. eBay is attempting to rally Americans against the bill via a massive email campaign."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senate To Vote On Internet Sales Tax (For Real This Time)

Comments Filter:
  • by smpoole7 ( 1467717 ) on Sunday April 21, 2013 @01:44PM (#43510573) Homepage

    > How in the hell is income tax unconstitutional when Amendment XVI of the constitution specifically authorizes Congress to levy it?

    Good heavens, don't feed the trolls. You'll get a dozen answers and the net result is that you'll be late for dinner. :)

    I strongly recommend Dan Evans Tax Protester FAQ. He covers all of the arguments (and why they've failed in court) in more detail than you probably want.

    http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html [evans-legal.com]

  • Smarten up (Score:5, Informative)

    by fnj ( 64210 ) on Sunday April 21, 2013 @02:10PM (#43510715)

    The title of the summary is STUPID and most of the commenters have absolutely no clue whatsoever what this is. It's not an "internet sales tax", guys. It is simply legilation which would ALLOW the states to collect state sales tax on purchases made via the web, just as they do on other purchases. It doesn't mandate that any state has to do it. It just removes a barrier that currently exists, whereby no state may enlist and compel the services of internet sellers to collect that state's sales tax for them. It doesn't give the FEDS any additional power to collect any new federal tax whatsoever.

    Most or all states already require their own taxpayers to volunteer purchases they made out of state, by WHATEVER means, and cough up the sales tax for same on their tax return. Of course only about one millionth of taxpayers are sucker enough to so volunteer. All this does is make payment unavoidable by burdening the red tape and collection on the sellers.

    I am entirely against the measure, on various grounds, but come on, let's at least realize what this is.

  • by Runaway1956 ( 1322357 ) on Sunday April 21, 2013 @02:17PM (#43510753) Homepage Journal

    The government does a lot of crap that I disagree with. And, in fact, I see a lot of their crap as unconstitutional. But - the concept that all taxes are unconstitutional is pretty insane.

    The federal income tax clearly has a lot of constitutionality issues surrounding it. Social security has some. Sales taxes? No way. Local governments are largely funded by sales taxes. They have to be funded from SOMEWHERE, so they are funded by local sales. When the internet was new, internet sales were exempted from local sales tax. Now, congress is going to change that. How is it unconstitutional? If anything, the exemption was unconstitutional, because it interfered with local government's ability to generate legitimate revenues.

    Lighten up dude - not all taxes are unconstitutional. Taxes suck, but they are a necessary evil. Concentrate on those taxes that are actually unconstitutional, or at least very controversial.

    As for which jurisdiction collects taxes on internet sales - the purchaser's home address serves as a point of contact, for billing purposes, mailing purposes, and for tax purposes.

  • Re:Why? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 21, 2013 @02:51PM (#43510961)
    You're a retard. If you buy a gun on the internet, it's shipped to a local FFL that performs a background check before it's handed over to you.
  • Re:Why? (Score:4, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 21, 2013 @04:05PM (#43511323)

    That's not alway true. I live in Oregon, and I buy stuff in Washington and fill out a short, simple form with my Oregon ID and pay no sales tax. Washington has what most states have now, a "use based" sales tax which means it depends not upon where the item is sold, but where it's primary use will be, which means the tax actually does depend upon the resident's location. I know this because I've recently had to implement such a system for a Washington and Oregon based business with almost 200 retail location. between the two states.

  • by roman_mir ( 125474 ) on Sunday April 21, 2013 @04:40PM (#43511549) Homepage Journal

    Interstate commerce tax imposed by USA Congress is a constitutional tax, it's an excise, an import even, a duty, basically a federal sales tax is legal if it is uniform.

    What is in fact illegal is an income tax [slashdot.org], payroll tax, Medicare tax, death tax, those are in fact illegal taxes but the system doesn't care about the legality of it, it just imposes itself.

    By the way saying that a tax is 'regressive' means approving discrimination. You want to apply laws differently to different people based on their specific circumstances, that's injustice and discrimination.

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...