Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Security Government News Politics

Lessons From the Papal Conclave About Election Security 183

Posted by timothy
from the ok-who-dropped-the-black-ball? dept.
Hugh Pickens writes "The rules for papal elections are steeped in tradition. John Paul II last codified them in 1996, and Benedict XVI left the rules largely untouched. The 'Universi Dominici Gregis on the Vacancy of the Apostolic See and the Election of the Roman Pontiff' is surprisingly detailed. Now as the College of Cardinals prepares to elect a new pope, security people like Bruce Schneier wonder about the process. How does it work, and just how hard would it be to hack the vote? First, the system is entirely manual, making it immune to the sorts of technological attacks that make modern voting systems so risky. Second, the small group of voters — all of whom know each other — makes it impossible for an outsider to affect the voting in any way. The chapel is cleared and locked before voting. No one is going to dress up as a cardinal and sneak into the Sistine Chapel. In short, the voter verification process is about as good as you're ever going to find. A cardinal can't stuff ballots when he votes. Then the complicated paten-and-chalice ritual ensures that each cardinal votes once — his ballot is visible — and also keeps his hand out of the chalice holding the other votes. Ballots from previous votes are burned, which makes it harder to use one to stuff the ballot box. What are the lessons here? First, open systems conducted within a known group make voting fraud much harder. Every step of the election process is observed by everyone, and everyone knows everyone, which makes it harder for someone to get away with anything. Second, small and simple elections are easier to secure. This kind of process works to elect a pope or a club president, but quickly becomes unwieldy for a large-scale election. And third: When an election process is left to develop over the course of a couple of thousand years, you end up with something surprisingly good."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lessons From the Papal Conclave About Election Security

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Its racist (Score:5, Informative)

    by CatWrangler (622292) on Sunday February 24, 2013 @12:22PM (#42995583) Journal
    Show the documentation that Mickey Mouse voted. This is false. The Mickey Mouse thing is legitimate. It's been distorted like the McDonalds coffee case. If you hand somebody a registration form, and they put Mickey Mouse on it, BY LAW, you are not allowed to discard it. You MUST turn it in. What most groups like ACORN did was segregate these suspicious registrations before turning them in. Legally they had no choice. It has become a right wing talking point that they were all eager to register Mickey Mouse. This is false. Quit believing email forwards from your grandparents.
  • by baKanale (830108) on Sunday February 24, 2013 @02:29PM (#42996239)
    It's less the "someone buying your vote using their own money" and more the "someone buying your vote by promising not to break your kneecaps with a baseball bat" that you should be worried about.

Air is water with holes in it.

Working...