Would Charles Darwin Have Made a Good Congressman? 155
sciencehabit writes "It's a good 130 years too late to answer that question empirically, but at least symbolically Charles Darwin has won support from more than 4000 voters in the 10th congressional district of Georgia, thanks to an initiative headed by James Leebens-Mack, a plant biologist at the University of Georgia in Athens. Like many others, Leebens-Mack was deeply troubled by a speech his Congressman, Paul Broun (R-GA), gave at an Athens church in October deriding teachings on evolution, embryology, and the big bang theory as 'lies straight from the pit of Hell.' Broun, a medical doctor, is a member of the U.S. House of Representative's Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and chair of its Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. Leebens-Mack says the 'protest vote should make it clear to future opponents that there are a lot of people in the district who are not happy with antiscience statements.'"
It sickens me (Score:3, Funny)
He would take one look at Congress . . . (Score:5, Funny)
. . . and decide that humanity was not evolving, but devolving.
Would Isaac Newton have made a good mechanic? (Score:4, Funny)
Would Julius Caeser have worked out in a boy band?
Would Abraham Lincoln have been a good NASCAR driver?
Would Queen Victoria have been a decent haberdasher?
These, and the question posed by the article, are all equally important.