Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Biotech Politics Science

Hungarian Sequencing Company Vets DNA For 'Gypsy Or Jew' Genes 467

Posted by timothy
from the borat-plus-hitler-plus-gattica dept.
ananyo writes "Hungary's Medical Research Council (ETT), which advises the government on health policy, has asked public prosecutors to investigate a genetic-diagnostic company that certified that a member of parliament did not have Roma or Jewish heritage. The MP in question is a member of the far-right Jobbik party, which won 17% of the votes in the general election of April 2010. He apparently requested the certificate from the firm Nagy Gén Diagnostic and Research. The company produced the document in September 2010, a few weeks before local elections. Nagy Gén scanned 18 positions in the MP's genome for variants that it says are characteristic of Roma and Jewish ethnic groups; its report concludes that Roma and Jewish ancestry can be ruled out." Adds ananyo: "The test is of-course nonsense, and notions of 'racial purity' have long been discredited." Just when you think the world is too modern for such things, modernity gets hijacked by flim-flam.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hungarian Sequencing Company Vets DNA For 'Gypsy Or Jew' Genes

Comments Filter:
  • As a hungarian (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:04PM (#40297623)

    I feel like throwing in the towel and getting the hell out of this country.

  • by Trepidity (597) <delirium-slashdo ... g ['kis' in gap]> on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:08PM (#40297713)

    1. How accurate are these tests?

    and 2. How ethical is doing something like that?

    I think the answer on #1 is actually more complex than this summary makes it sound. The notion of pure ethnic groups is a fiction, but you can trace some kinds of population lineages using genetic markers. That's in fact some of how we've recreated early human population movements; by estimating when in time certain markers diverged between Asian and European populations, for example, we can estimate when those populations migrated out of the Middle East / Africa area where their ancestors likely originated. The HapMap [nih.gov] project maps some more recent geographical correlations.

  • by MightyMartian (840721) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:19PM (#40297887) Journal

    Anyone with even a brief understanding of the history of that region of Europe realizes that notions of racial purity are bunk. Now it is possible that the Roma and Jews are still sufficiently genetically distinct due to lower rates of interbreeding, but the fact is that the Hungarian people are, to put it vulgurally, mongrels. Even the ancient Huns themselves were likely a hodge podge of ethnic/racial groups from all over Eurasia, and Hungary has so many layers of occupation and invasion dating back to Classical times that while we can say the progenitor population probably spoke a Uralic mothertongue, you have a wide array of later groups; early Indo-Europeans, Turkic, Germanic, Latin, Slavic and on and on. If you want to find a population approaching a full blooded Hungarian, I suggest you go to Finland.

  • Re:Nonsense? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:22PM (#40297937)

    I have one picture for you: http://i.imgur.com/PTol8.jpg [imgur.com]

    So much for race not existing.

  • by pla (258480) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:23PM (#40297945) Journal
    The test is of-course nonsense, and notions of 'racial purity' have long been discredited." Just when you think the world is too modern for such things, modernity gets hijacked by flim-flam.

    Sorry, but you either descended from Jacob (insert the comparabl\, or you did not. We currently have the technology to measure that with a high degree of confidence.

    Now, if you want to talk about whether or not an adopted Jew, or a convert, count as "really" Jewish, that gets into matters of dogma, not genetics - And don't think this extends only to the "racists" - Just as some groups would hold such ancestry against someone, orthodox Judaism considers it (specifically, matrilineal descent) a requirement.


    And for the record, I consider both stances equally stupid.
  • Re:Nonsense? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Sir_Sri (199544) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:25PM (#40297977)

    They aren't even always ethically suspicious. I'm a pasty white guy with a father from india. 2 generations from now my descendants could wonder if my father is really my father and they actually have a great grandfather from india. That could be especially important if it turns out we carry some genetic disposition to disease that would effect women, that we will never see manifest.

    If you're Black in the US you may want to know what tribe or area you ancestor was kidnapped from in africa.

    Testing like this can also, on a macroscopic level, pose serious questions about any notion of racial purity. This jackass in hungary may be definitely not be partially roma or jewish, but that doesn't ask what percent of the population in hungary are.

  • by readin (838620) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:47PM (#40298295)

    Sorry, but you either descended from Jacob (insert the comparabl\, or you did not. We currently have the technology to measure that with a high degree of confidence.

    Jacab was how many years ago? Maybe 5000? With an average childbearing age of 25, that makes 200 generations. Ignoring inbreeding for the moment, the number of ancestors you have doubles every generation. 2 to the power of 200 is....I don't have a calculator but it is pretty darn big, many many times the number of people there were on this planet 5000 years ago or even today.

    Even if you go back a mere 2000 years ago, you have 80 generations meaning you have far more ancestors than there were people.

    What this implies is that you are almost certainly the descendant of every single person who was alive and had progeny in your ancestors region 2000 years ago. You can argue that that still doesn't make you descended from certain minorities, but think about that exponential growth in ancestors again. All it takes is one foreigner to come in and mix with the gene pool. 1000 years later everyone is that foreigner's descendant. There might not have been a lot of travel back then, but there was enough.

    About the only way one could reasonably claim not to have ancestors of a certain race is if that race was almost completely isolated - like the American Indians or Australian aborigines. But anyone with ancestors from Europe, Asia or Africa can be pretty sure they have Jacob as an ancestor.

  • Test Results (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Jason Levine (196982) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:49PM (#40298331)

    I can't speak for the Roma, but on behalf of the Jewish people, I accept the results of this test. This idiot has nothing to do with us genetically. Cue other ethnic groups demanding he test himself so they can wash their hands of him as well. (Sadly, people like this take: "Nobody wants me" to be a compliment rather than an insult.)

  • Re:But.. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ShanghaiBill (739463) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:55PM (#40298441)

    I think the larger question would be, why in the world would there be a law in finding out anything you want pertaining to your own genes??? They ARE your genes aren't they?

    A few months ago I was listing to NPR, and they were having this exact debate. There was a representative from the AMA arguing that ordinary people were too stupid to interpret DNA tests, and therefore they should be illegal unless a doctor requests them. So this is not just a Hungarian thing, there are plenty of Americans who also think the world is "too modern" for you to be allowed to have knowledge about your own body.

  • by Prune (557140) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:59PM (#40298495)
    In talks with Hungarian friends, some of which still live there, they seem keenly aware of the poor image their country has in the eyes of the rest of the world. It's a country best known for giving the origins to history's most prolific serial killer, Elizabeth Bathory (killed ~600 young girls with torture methods that make the Spanish Inquisition look like amateur hour), and for being the de facto porn capital of Europe. Worse, the attempts of Hungarians to whitewash haven't made things much better, yet they persist. For example, last year there was quite a bit of drama on the Wikipedia page for the countess, with Hungarians trying to sanitize the Bathory article of some of the more gruesome details and putting in claims that the evidence against her was hear-say and/or politically motivated (veritably and verifiably false, as there were plenty of well-documented witnesses). When this didn't work out and much of the dishonest editing was undone (though I've still been unable to fully restore the article), they tried to shift the blame for the edit attempts on feminists. Which might have been convincing, had I not hang around Hungarian IRC channels in one of which the whole whitewash campaign was discussed.
  • by fiannaFailMan (702447) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @02:25PM (#40298825) Journal

    +3 Informative? Because you can't be on the right without hating Jews and Roma people I guess...

    Yes, +3 informative. Neo-Nazi parties in Europe are on the far right and labelled as such in the European media. Only in American journalism does the term "far right" not exist. Anytime extremist parties like the National Front or British National Party are mentioned in America it is conveniently omitted that these are parties of the right.

  • by Hatta (162192) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @03:38PM (#40299797) Journal

    The DNA of Africans and Europeans/Asians differs a lot.

    Very true. The DNA of any two random africans differ a lot as well.

    I always find it amusing when people who don't know anything about genetics talk about it as if they do. Especially on slashdot.

    Genetics is my job, bitch.

  • by Pfhorrest (545131) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @03:44PM (#40299873) Homepage Journal

    The left-right dichotomy is not exclusively about the means of production and distribution of wealth. It began as a divide between the aristocracy and the commoners, and what is now called "libertarian" (generally considered "right-wing" in America) was originally a left-wing position, being against the established powers of the nobles.

  • by demachina (71715) on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @04:41PM (#40300559)

    There was a controversial 2005 paper [wikipedia.org] that did suggest Ashkenazi Jews may have above average math and verbal intelligence, and inferior spatial intelligence

    Some 40% of Ashkenazi Jews have mitochondrial DNA descended from just four women. If those four women had DNA that encouraged above average intelligence it would be quite plausible for the same tendency to extend to a large percentage of Ashkenazi Jews.

    Physical characteristics of our brains are determined to a significant extent by our genes, along with nutrition and other factors, but it is entirely plausabile that there are genetic factors that would result in above average intelligence, just like there are genetic factors that result in above average strength, stamina or speed.

    Its just a matter of time before someone is going to try to genetically engineer superintelligent humans.

    P.S.

    Last laugh at all the people, especially interkin3tic, who fileted me on the slashdot thread a few weeks about $1000 DNA sequencing when I pointed out how neo nazi's would immediately latch on to it as a way to determine racial purity. Assorted liberals asserted that we had moved beyond Nazi's, eugenics and race and it would never happen again. I pointed out then Hungary already had a neo Nazi government going down this path again, and today here you are.

... when fits of creativity run strong, more than one programmer or writer has been known to abandon the desktop for the more spacious floor. -- Fred Brooks

Working...