Geeks In the Public Forum? 326
Posted
by
Soulskill
from the ask-not-what-your-country-can-hack-for-you dept.
from the ask-not-what-your-country-can-hack-for-you dept.
cedarhillbilly writes "In his new book The Geek Manifesto, Mark Henderson 'pleads for citizens who value science to force it onto the mainstream political agenda and other main walks of life.' There are some important questions that need answers: 'Do you have to give up your tech practice to undertake a public role?' Also, 'Is political life (compromise, working by consensus, irrationality) antithetical to the "geek" values?'"
The Guardian's coverage sums up the idea nicely: "What I desperately want is a move toward an evidence-based culture in politics. Politicians are free to say: 'I think people on drugs should be punished because drugs are immoral.' That's a moral call, albeit a rather stupid one in my opinion. What they shouldn't do is say: 'I want to reduce drug use, and sending all users to prison is the most cost-effective way to achieve that.' That's not a moral call, it's a factual statement; as such it should be evidence-based, or else the person making it should shut the hell up."
Re:Technocrats (Score:4, Informative)
In a two party system you are right. You must have a majority and then you can ignore all the others.
In a multi party system, you can not ignore them and that means compromising.
Yes, that means that nobody gets 100% what they want. However many more will get more or less what they want.