Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Facebook Government The Almighty Buck United States Politics

Senators To Unveil the 'Ex-Patriot Act' To Respond To Facebook's Saverin 716

Posted by timothy
from the why-schumer-is-my-least-favorite-congresscritter dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has a status update for Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin: Stop attempting to dodge your taxes by renouncing your U.S. citizenship or never come to back to the U.S. again." See this earlier story on Saverin's plan to make the leap out of the U.S. tax system.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senators To Unveil the 'Ex-Patriot Act' To Respond To Facebook's Saverin

Comments Filter:
  • by Hadlock (143607) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:38PM (#40031175) Homepage Journal

    There's a reason why Texas' legislature only meets every other year (excepting emergency sessions)

  • Re:Not Just Saverin (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Lynchenstein (559620) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:39PM (#40031195)
    And extend this to the "other" people, AKA corporations that do this. Apple, Coke, Microsoft...the list goes on. If you don't like the loopholes, then close them. But start from a position of honesty and integrity before criticizing others.
  • Re:Not Just Saverin (Score:5, Interesting)

    by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:43PM (#40031253) Homepage Journal

    The easiest way for a corporation to avoid corporate income taxes is to "increase its costs" - that is, hire more people, raise salaries, and generally do all the things a good citizen of a corporation should do.

    Corporate income taxes aren't like personal income taxes. The biggest "loopholes" aren't really bad things.

  • it's envy (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:44PM (#40031281)

    I think they're pissed off because it's the most uncomplicated way (and fully legal) of avoiding taxes. You don't even need to hire expensive lawyers or anything, like many of them senators probably have, in order to evade taxes. It's ENVY!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:53PM (#40031445)

    Texas is far less oppressive compared to more liberal states.

  • by GameboyRMH (1153867) <gameboyrmh.gmail@com> on Thursday May 17, 2012 @02:53PM (#40031459) Journal

    Not that I sympathize with this slimy tax-dodger, but I hope he gets away with it.

    The value of his demonstration on how the rich view the world is worth more to the world (and the American public) than the taxes he owes. I don't want that demonstration stopped.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 17, 2012 @03:12PM (#40031751)

    Yes they are, if you have ever dealt with the IRS as a expat, or tried to setup banking in another country with the US as your nationality you would do exactly the same thing. No bank wants to deal with you, the IRS requires immense amounts of info on every single account you hold and the fines for making a mistake as unbelievable.

    If you don;t plan on returning its actually a decent way out of the IRS system.

  • by SethJohnson (112166) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @03:17PM (#40031829) Homepage Journal
    Since corporations have been ruled to be people by the Supreme Court, I'm excited to see the Democrats finally concoct a distraction for enacting legislation that will ultimately put Dick Cheney's employer in jail.

    Back in 2007, Halliburton was making so much money off no-bid war-related contracts, it moved headquarters out of America in order to avoid paying taxes on all the money it was making from the US government. [go.com]

    Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-N.H., called the company's move "corporate greed at its worst." He added, "This is an insult to the U.S. soldiers and taxpayers who paid the tab for their no-bid contracts and endured their overcharges for all these years. At the same time they'll be avoiding U.S. taxes, I'm sure they won't stop insisting on taking their profits in cold hard U.S. cash."

    Very clever Mr. Schumer!

  • by Joce640k (829181) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @03:31PM (#40032011) Homepage

    If a guy leaves because he has to pay $67 million after earning $4 billion then he doesn't deserve citizenship.

    It was the 'system' who allowed him to earn that money in the first place.

  • Re:Not Just Saverin (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sandytaru (1158959) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @04:01PM (#40032511) Journal
    Unfortunately, CEOs and CFOs get their jollies by "cutting costs" in order to please the shareholders. "Increasing costs" sounds terrible to your board of directors. The term used instead is "expanding" and/or "growing" or to be really obscure about it, "investing in future growth opportunities." It's the lack of such expansion that caused the recession to stick around for so long, because even the companies that had the capital on hand to continue expanding were afraid to do so in the off chance the economy worsened again. So, it was "keep costs low" to please the financial markets.

    My very Republican, very stalwart conservative father in law went on an unexpected rant last weekend, regarding day traders of all things. He feels that taxes on stocks kept less than 24 hours should be 90% of profits, dropping to 50% after a week, and then back down to standard capital gains after one year. I'd never thought I'd hear such words fall from his lips, but then again he is a player in the long game of the stock markets.
  • by bws111 (1216812) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @04:05PM (#40032601)

    What do you think allowed Facebook to incorporate in the first place? What do you think allows them to issue stock? What do you think allows private individuals to own property (such as stock)?

    Finally, they are not threatening to end his citizenship, HE RENOUNCED IT.

    Are you really that stupid?

  • by tlambert (566799) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @04:27PM (#40032931)

    The government is effectively paying him $67M to take $4B and invest it in Singapore instead of the US.

    More power to him, so long as the government is insisting on getting paid AMT or capital gains now on unrealized income from an appreciated investment which hasn't been sold.

    The problem is that they want their poind of flesh now, rather than waiting for it to turn from an investment into "mall money" (money you can take down to the mall and spend).

    I knew, though not well, a Netscape guy who was a paper multimillionaire when the Netscape IPO happened. In order to make it a long instead of a short term capital gain, and thus pay less tax, he did an exercise and hold, rather than a same day sale. Then the .bomb happened and the stock price tanked. So there he was with a couple hundred thousand in share value, and the government wanted their 35% of the $27M they valued it at at the time the options were exercised.

    Eventually he killed himself, rather than going to Federal (debtor's) prison for tax evasion, since you can't dismiss taxes owed through bankruptcy.

    Capital gains taxes as a matter of public policy are potentially defensible, even though they make you pay taxes on an investment of after-tax income and therefore amount to a surtax, but AMT is just asinine: the government can wait to get its money until I get my money.

    -- Terry

  • Re:Sour Grapes (Score:4, Interesting)

    by shutdown -p now (807394) on Thursday May 17, 2012 @04:59PM (#40033481) Journal

    someone wanting to renounce their citizenship- and hence the protection and rights offered by the US constitution

    The protection and rights offered by the US Constitution apply to all people in US jurisdiction, not just citizens, except where otherwise specified. E.g I'm not a citizen, just a resident; but the courts have ruled that my First and even Second Amendment rights are protected just as much as yours. There's a reason why it says "The right of People"...

  • by LordLimecat (1103839) on Friday May 18, 2012 @02:17AM (#40038277)

    Do you really think the solution to "rich people want to leave for somewhere more friendly" is "lets go after these guys"?

Hey, diddle, diddle the overflow pdl To get a little more stack; If that's not enough then you lose it all And have to pop all the way back.

Working...