Congress Considering CISPA Amendments 85
Posted
by
samzenpus
from the ACTA-by-any-other-name dept.
from the ACTA-by-any-other-name dept.
First time accepted submitter casac8 writes "As Friday's House vote on CISPA nears, it appears Congress members are getting nervous. Literally millions of people around the world have signed petitions voicing their opposition, and it appears Congress has heard their concerns, as House members are considering a number of amendments aimed at limiting the negative impacts the legislation would have on Internet privacy. For instance, one amendment likely to pass would tighten the bill's language to ensure its provisions are only applied in the pursuit of legit crimes and other rare instances, rather than whenever the NSA wants to target Joe Web-user. And another would increase possible liability on the parts of companies who hand personal information over to the government."
Hopefully a moot point (Score:3, Informative)
Looks a veto is looming..... http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57421267-281/white-house-takes-aim-at-cispa-with-formal-veto-threat/ [cnet]
Re:Personal Responsibility (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Personal Responsibility (Score:4, Informative)
Yep.
I'd like to take this opportunity to point these guys out [demandprogress.org], while we are on it. Also these [movetoamend.org].
Re:Tor (Score:5, Informative)
Thought that Tor was outlawed by repressive governments like US (backspace, backspace) China, Iran, etc.
Ron Paul says corporations will âact as government spiesâ(TM) under CISPA. "It represents an alarming form of corporatism, as it further intertwines government with companies like Google and Facebook." LINK - http://runronpaul.com/web-media/ron-paul-corporations-will-%E2%80%98act-as-government-spies%E2%80%99-under-cispa/ [runronpaul.com]
Re:Personal Responsibility (Score:5, Informative)
yeah, that letter will get results.
I can't tell if you are trolling or not but if you were serious, you should have an adult proofread your text before you get yourself into trouble (so many gov trouble-maker lists, I can't keep track anymore).
seriously, there is a way to deal with critters in office; and then there is your style...
I agree with your feelings, but your methods won't accomplish what you hope.
Re:Your Cheese? (Score:5, Informative)
Just so. Google "is working behind the scenes" [thehill.com] to get CISPA enacted. I wonder if that isn't because they maybe think they can exempt themselves from something by getting involved, or perhaps they were threatened elsewhere for their embarrassing (to its proponents) public opposition to SOPA. Another reason -- as explained in this Lifehacker [lifehacker.com] story -- is that CISPA pushes the role of censor onto the state expressly, where SOPA would have required Google et al. to take on that task themselves, and at the behest of any copyright holder. CISPA is much broader and gives the government all sorts of powers it really shouldn't have under any rational reading of the Bill of Rights (the first and fourth amendments, particularly).
Re:Getting the foot in the door. (Score:2, Informative)
-- Times editorial, published on August 28, 2002
Re:Tor (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Your Cheese? (Score:5, Informative)
There's a good reason why Facebook and Microsoft and other tech companies are supporting CISPA.
You see, CISPA provides one monster carrot to those who "voluntarily" participate, and that's complete and total immunity from EVER being sued for failing to safeguard the privacy of your users.
http://www.isights.org/2012/04/cispas-good-faith-carrot-needs-no-stick.html [isights.org]