Iran Shuts Down US Virtual Embassy 451
bonch writes "Less than 12 hours after the U.S. launched a virtual embassy for Iran, the Iranian government blocked access to the website, directing visitors to a government page proclaiming the site illegal. The White House condemned the move, calling Iran's internet policies 'an electronic curtain of surveillance and censorship around its people.'"
Re:Really now? (Score:3, Interesting)
"If it could be worse, then the current situation is objectively good..."
Not what he said. What he said was it could be actually *bad*, but that it wasn't, at least not for the moment.
I would add that it could also be *better*.
An electronic curtain of surveillance & censor (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Really now? (Score:5, Interesting)
US: Hey, Iran! Stop blocking foreign websites!
Iran: We are just blocking websites that break our laws. You did the same thing when it came to copyright infringement!
US: Well that was different. Copyright infringement is theft!
Iran: Yeah well those foreign websites amounted to an attempt to coerce our citizens to rebel against the government! That is even worse!
US: Well uhh you see...you are doing it for political reasons, so that is bad!
Iran: Well what is up with your copyright lobbyists and the influence they wield over your congress and executive branch?
US: herp derp.
Re:U.S. (Score:5, Interesting)
Straighten up your own act before whining about the rest of the world.
People still complain about the last time the US tried that. World War II, I think it was. Didn't last very long (although, who knows what would have happened if the Japanese had left well enough alone.)
Re:U.S. (Score:3, Interesting)
I posted anonymously because, well mainly I don't care, but also unlike you I'm not looking for an ego boost.
The real question here is why the US thinks it can interfere in the running of any country it decides to.
If the Iranian government tried to set up a web site for US citizens to read propaganda from, how long do you think it would stay up?
This isn't about culture it's about hypocrisy.
Re:U.S. (Score:5, Interesting)
Just the one with the most prisoners. And legal bribery of your politicians. And more military than basically the world combined. Yeah, just your average modern utopia.
Re:U.S. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:U.S. (Score:5, Interesting)
Before judging blindly, have the decency to look at the website : http://iran.usembassy.gov/ [usembassy.gov]
There seems to be some strange reflex that everything the US does, must be for some evil agenda.
I'm European , so i recognize the tone. However, our own leaders are just as bad ( if not worse ).
Re:U.S. (Score:4, Interesting)
I think the complaint is that the US was involved in countless (well, about 175 by copy/pasting Wikipedia article starting here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_military_operations#1900.E2.80.931909 [wikipedia.org], into text editor, counting lines, dividing by 2 due to double-spacing) military conflicts during the 20th century, but somehow managed to sit out of about half of each of the World Wars, as though they were either too insignificant, or perhaps not lopsided enough, or maybe sympathies with the other side were too strong (hi Prescott Bush).
Yeah, I think it's the hypocrisy that's the issue.
Re:U.S. (Score:5, Interesting)
Sorry, this required a second reply.
Following quote from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Blitz [wikipedia.org].
US stayed out when Britain suffered this:
76 consecutive nights of bombing.
Now, compare to 9/11, and America's reaction and expectation that the entire world would jump immediately to their side, and ... well sometimes the gag reflex is hard to suppress.
Further case in point, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Blitz_(American_football) [wikipedia.org].
Yes, it appears that an American football team, based in London, named themselves after the 76 nights of consecutive bombing.
How'd America like a European-style football (soccer) team based in NY naming itself the New York Nine Elevens? Boggles the mind.
Re:U.S. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:U.S. (Score:4, Interesting)
But as soon as we did we would have dozens of Countries asking or begging for our support.
Are you aiming for +5 Funny? Last time I saw this argument it was called the White Man's burden or something.
The fact that you're instead modded as +5 Insightful sickens me.