Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Republicans Science

After Rick Perry's Stem Cell Treatment, Misplaced Enthusiasm? 340

oxide7 writes "Presidential candidate Rick Perry underwent a controversial stem-cell treatment this past month, prompting some doctors to fear the high-profile event would send the wrong signal to desperate patients. 'As a highly influential person of power, Perry's actions have the unfortunate potential to push desperate patients into the clinics of quacks,' Dr. George Q. Daley said."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

After Rick Perry's Stem Cell Treatment, Misplaced Enthusiasm?

Comments Filter:
  • !surprise (Score:4, Insightful)

    by MrEricSir ( 398214 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @04:52PM (#37171460) Homepage

    A candidate who has prayer rallies as part of his campaign is into quackery? Gee, who possibly could have seen this coming.

  • by ArcherB ( 796902 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @04:54PM (#37171498) Journal

    Don't use Stem Cells. Mr. Perry - please explain yourself.

    Your Friends,
    ~The Tea Party

    Sigh. Looks like my comment didn't make it in time to educate this ignorant AC. Here it is again:
    Yes, Rick Perry is against embryonic stem cell research. Yes, this treatment did NOT use embryonic stem cells.

    Please do not say that Republicans or conservatives are against stem cell research. Conservatives are against the destruction of an embryo for the purposes of scientific research. Embryonic stem cell research is still government funded provided that it uses old stem cell lines or adult derived stem cells.

    With that said, let's leave the straw-men in the field.

  • Re:Dayum.... WTF (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @04:57PM (#37171548) Journal

    Yes, if you're going to be The Decider, your decisions will be under a lot of scrutiny. If you've fallen prey to false claims in the medical field, you're likely to be manipulated by political quacks too.

  • Re:Not embryonic (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jedidiah ( 1196 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @04:59PM (#37171570) Homepage

    That's just focusing on the very tail end of the research process.

    You still need to ask whether or not any of this could have happened at all without research he doesn't approve of over religious grounds that aren't even that well founded in doctrine to begin with. (thus the problem of embedding religious doctrine in public policy)

  • by i kan reed ( 749298 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @05:00PM (#37171596) Homepage Journal

    That's true. I made a similar post further down the page. However, republican opposition to embryonic stem cells is still absurd. It comes to the assumption or belief or whatever you want to call it that something without a brain is somehow human. It's just another tally in the table of republicans don't understand or believe science and the act on that

  • by ravenspear ( 756059 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @05:06PM (#37171682)

    As we all know, life begins at ejaculation.

    That's why masturbation is wrong.

    If you masturbate, you've committed lust in your heart and spilled an innocent life on the ground.

  • by interkin3tic ( 1469267 ) on Monday August 22, 2011 @06:43PM (#37172734)
    We've gotten quickly off-topic. Embryonic stem cells do not come from abortion. Ever. Don't confuse the two issues.

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...