Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Government Piracy Politics Your Rights Online

US Negotiators Cave On Internet Provisions To ACTA 80

Posted by timothy
from the difference-between-law-and-legislation dept.
Hugh Pickens writes "Ars Technica reports that with the release of the 'near-final' ACTA text (PDF), it is becoming clear that the US has caved on the most egregious provisions from earlier drafts (advocating 'three strikes' regimes, ordering ISPs to develop anti-piracy plans, promoting tough DRM anticircumvention language, setting up a 'takedown' notification system, ordering 'secondary liability' for device makers) and has largely failed in its attempts to push the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) onto the rest of the world. Apparently, a face-saving agreement is better than no agreement at all — but even the neutered ACTA could run into problems, with Mexico's Senate recently approving a nonbinding resolution asking for the country to suspend participation in ACTA, while key members of the European Parliament have also expressed skepticism about the deal."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Negotiators Cave On Internet Provisions To ACTA

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Kill it (Score:3, Funny)

    by grahamd0 (1129971) on Friday October 08, 2010 @08:54AM (#33835304)

    As a "non-treaty treaty" negotiated in secret without any attempt at public accountability or a public vote of adoption, ACTA represents an abuse of process and should be opposed even if all it did was support Motherhood and Apple Pie.

    At first I read that as "Motörhead and Apple Pie" and was thinking that sounded like a pretty awesome treaty.

The biggest mistake you can make is to believe that you are working for someone else.

Working...