Australian Enterprises Block Sex Party's Political Site 160
schliz writes "Corporate web filters in some organizations are blocking web access to the Australian Sex Party, which is a registered political party that is contesting Australia's upcoming August 21 Federal Election. The site features policies and campaign material, including opposition to the Government's mandatory internet filtering proposal. Party convener Fiona Patten said that although the term 'sex' in the party's website URL could be responsible for its filtering woes, the party is unlikely to consider a name change: 'I think the fact that people are still blocking our site just because of the word "sex" in the name shows that we need this political movement.'"
Re:A filter method doomed to fail? (Score:3, Funny)
Gotta be a condom joke here, somewhere . . . (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Though to ponder. (Score:1, Funny)
I'd rather go to expertsexchange.com for my operation than amateurSexChange.com
Re:Though to ponder. (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe they also have a few other words mixed in that the filters object to:
Re:sex party? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:sex party? (Score:3, Funny)
From Wikipedia (ie. probably authored by them, but still they're obviously serious):
This looks like a copy-paste from the sex party's own web site, the text at a glance is identical as what I just read there. So this is surely authored by them.
And when it comes to the core points of what a political party stands for, asking them directly is of course the most reliable way to get trustworthy information.
Re:Though to ponder. (Score:3, Funny)
Pizza Ordered Regularly, Nearly Obviously, Gives Rise to A Phallus Handling Youth??