Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Government Politics

Lessig Predicts Cyber 9/11 Event, Restrictive Laws 479

A number of readers are sending in links to a video from the Fortune Brainstorm Tech conference last month, in which Lawrence Lessig recounts a conversation over dinner with Richard Clarke, the former government counter-terrorism czar. Remembering that the Patriot Act was dropped on Congress just 20 days after 9/11 — the Department of Justice had had it sitting in a drawer for years — Lessig asked Clarke if DoJ had a similar proposed law, an "i-Patriot Act," to drop in the event of a "cyber-9/11." Clarke responded, "Of course they do. And Vint Cerf won't like it." Lessig's anecdote begins at about 4:30 in the video.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lessig Predicts Cyber 9/11 Event, Restrictive Laws

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Encryption (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @07:09PM (#24488589)

    We need to start encrypting basic stuff.

    Until the US government demand ISPs start blocking all encrypted traffic that doesn't have an SSL certificate provided by 'authorised' suppliers.

    Remember that to stop someone doing something, non-essential: not eating or breathing, you just need to make it hard enough to be not worth their while. An example of this is the Chinese firewall, people know the government are watching, so they don't bother looking at anything that isn't authorised. In this case, if nerds start demanding everyone encrypt everything, they'll be ignored. Who can be arsed to purchase an SSL certificate, just to run a small Web site, or IM their friends?

  • by oldhack ( 1037484 ) on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @07:23PM (#24488739)

    remember what happened to u.s. tourism after that patriot act shit was dropped in the congress ? u.s. tourism sector NEVER recovered from it.

    The US tourism is recovering now, due to the falling dollar.

  • by natedubbya ( 645990 ) on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @07:24PM (#24488747)
    Umm, the u.s. tourism sector did recover. Now that the dollar is so low against the euro, european tourism is way up. Don't use the word "never", and check your facts.
  • by DrgnDancer ( 137700 ) on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @08:36PM (#24489569) Homepage

    Bob Barr? You're worried about a nanny state so you want to vote for Bob Barr? The guy wants to control your bedroom and your religion. He led the fight for the Defense of Marriage act (he won that). He led the fight to try and get the Army's first Wiccan Distinctive Faith Group disbanded (he lost that one). He's a real "Christian Nation" kind of guy. He's was a huge supporter of the War on Drugs and opposed to medical marijuana. He's recanted that last bit, I'll admit, but his overall pattern is on of a guy who supports people's liberties only when they fit into his personal moral code.

    I like some of his stances, but he has a habit of converting to a a stance in favor of rights only after he has voted to take those rights away. He regrets his PATRIOT act vote, and his medical marijuana work, but it's too late now, he already voted to put them in place. Add tot hat the fact that the Libertarians would demolish the what little control the government still exercises on Corporate America and I have to say Barr scares the Hell out me.

  • Re:Just wait ... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @08:39PM (#24489617) Journal

    What makes you think Obama will be any better? He's already shown us that he thinks national security is more important than the rule of law. But the rule of law is a prerequisite for any kind of security! The fact is, both candidates are part of the authoritarian corporate class.

  • Re:Godwin Jr's Law (Score:3, Informative)

    by Adambomb ( 118938 ) on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @08:43PM (#24489671) Journal

    Nah, this is plain old Godwin.

    Any story that involves the Patriot Act will have it compared to the Order of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State [wikipedia.org].

    Course, its an apt comparison but still holds with the original law.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 05, 2008 @11:30PM (#24491465)

    Who wrote it ? In which administration ? Curious minds want to know.

    It was obvious to me in 2001 that this had been previously prepared, and it astounded me that anyone would fall for this BS.
    Unfortunately, history indicates they would probably do it again.

    Before he became the self-promoting book-selling prophet of 9/11, Richard Clarke was raising the alarm of a "digital Pearl Harbor":

    http://archives.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/12/08/security.summit.ap/ [cnn.com]

    U.S. cyberspace chief warns of 'digital Pearl Harbor'

    December 8, 2000
    Web posted at: 1:52 PM EST (1852 GMT)

    REDMOND, Washington (AP) -- The nation's top cyberspace official Friday called on the next president to shore up the government's computer security to prevent a "digital Pearl Harbor."

    "What this presidential election year showed is that statistically improbable events can occur," Richard Clarke of the National Security Council said at a Microsoft-organized conference.

    "It may be improbable that cyberspace can be seriously disrupted, it may be improbable that a war in cyberspace can occur, but it could happen."

    On coming to office, the next president will find that several nations have created information-warfare units, Clarke said.

    "These organizations are creating technology to bring down computer networks. Some are doing reconnaissance today on our networks, mapping them," he said.

    Clarke, appointed by President Clinton as the first national coordinator for security, infrastructure protection and counterterrorism, spoke at the SafeNet 2000 summit, which brought together computer experts to discuss ways of improving Internet security and privacy.

    Clarke said the next president should appoint a government-wide chief information officer, with authority to oversee all the government's computer security, and whose appointment would need confirmation from Congress.

    He also said the Clinton administration is creating a scholarship program to increase the number of government computer security experts. Students who study computer security would receive $25,000 a year in return for each year they agree to work for the government.

    Another way to improve security throughout the Internet is to create secure lines of communication between the technology industry and the government, Clarke said. That way, they could share information about hackers and viruses without worrying about the public learning about it.

    Clarke said the plan would require an exemption from the Freedom of Information Act.

    Others at the conference expressed the same notion. Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of America, said that a nonprofit organization of 18 companies would be created early next year to share information.

    "You'll want to have the ability to share high-level intelligence on an anonymous basis, without believing it's going to show up in an AP article the next day," Miller said.

    Copyright 2000 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    RELATED STORIES:

            U.S. official: Superpower status risks cyberattack
            August 25, 2000
            U.S. government agencies shape cyberwarning strategy
            August 15, 2000
            Hackers are naughty and nice at Def Con
            August 3, 2000
            Report finds progress in cybersecurity in private sector
            December 6, 2000
            Industry group: Security key to 'next generation' Web
            November 8, 2000

  • by HungWeiLo ( 250320 ) on Wednesday August 06, 2008 @12:45AM (#24492035)
    The draw may have already been broken...or at least someone thinks it will be soon...

    You will be taxed on all your assets if you give up your US citizenship [thestreet.com]

    . This little-known provision was passed as part of the Heroes Act of 2008 on 6/17. Looks like Congress foresees a mass exodus of Americans at some point in the foreseeable future - at least the ones that matter.
  • Re:Anonymous Coward (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 06, 2008 @01:06AM (#24492183)

    Uh. Check your history. Your thesis seems iffy, almost backwards.

    The IRA merrily targetted high-profile commercial financial targets like the London Stock Exchange itself and other parts of the City, Manchester city centre, the docklands, etc. Doing billions of british pounds of damage for each bomb(truck-sized, btw, typically about a tonne of low-yield explosives), and killing surprisingly few civilians (warnings to evacuate usually telephoned in in advance).

    Whereas the islamic terrorists in Britain have managed to kill tens of "common man" people on the tube and bus and did relatively little commercial damage. The WTC attacks in the USA are another matter, but it seems highly likely the US government wanted that "reichstag" type event to justify fascism.

  • Re:Just wait ... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Elldallan ( 901501 ) on Wednesday August 06, 2008 @07:51AM (#24494245)
    No, there is an oppressive price on gasoline not an oppressive tax, atleast not in the United States.

    The average state tax on gasoline in the United States was 28.6 cents per gallon in the first quarter of 2008. During the same period the gasoline tax in Germany was 7.6 dollars per gallon and 5.2 dollars per gallon in the United Kingdom.

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...