NZ MPs Outlaw Satire of Parliament 282
mernil writes "New Zealand's Parliament has voted itself far-reaching powers to control satire and ridicule of MPs in Parliament, attracting a storm of media and academic criticism. The new standing orders, voted in last month, concern the use of images of Parliamentary debates, and make it a contempt of Parliament for broadcasters or anyone else to use footage of the chamber for 'satire, ridicule or denigration.' The new rules are actually more liberal than the previous ones, but the threat of felony contempt is new."
Re:Daily Show (Score:3, Interesting)
Who is going to police it? (Score:3, Interesting)
Who is going to police it? The newly set up Ministry of Truth?
In this case, perspective is useful. (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyhow, apparently some New Zealanders think that N.Z. has an exaggerated self-importance. So they joke about their country. For example: Adult Sheep Finder [adultsheepfinder.com] "New Zealand's #1 Internet Dating Site". (The site is partly a reference to the fact that raising sheep is the main agricultural activity in New Zealand; although there are only 4 million people, there are 60 million sheep.)
I doubt the N.Z. parliament will stop "satire, ridicule or denigration". In fact, the idea is absurd. Remember, the story Alice in wonderland [wikipedia.org] was partly a parody [victorianweb.org] of the English king and queen, when saying negative things about the monarchy was illegal. That was in England, and it is sometimes said that New Zealanders are "more English than the English".
Are you sure this law is legal? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Most local New Zealand media sickens me (Score:4, Interesting)
I have had to stop watching the 6pm news. All it does is make me angry, I end up exasperated near yelling at the screen "This is not news!!, of all thats going on in the world today,.. you give us fluff!"
Just to Godwin this thread... (Score:3, Interesting)
Needless to say, while I am well aware that NZ can hardly be compared to Nazi Germany, I found this news quite disturbing.
The site linked is NSFW if your co-workers are ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, the result of the N.Z. parliament making criticism illegal will be that the criticism becomes much, much worse. Tthe old rules were not followed, either. Quote from the article: "However, the old rules were frequently breached, as the media often used wider-angled shots or published photographs of MPs napping, reading comics, eating lollies, and in one notable case, giving another MP the finger."
One National Party News. (Score:1, Interesting)
Ever since Prime Minister Helen Clark made the hideous error of criticising the NZ$800,000-per-year Saint Judy Bailey was paid by the state broadcaster for reading from a teleprompter and making 'News Faces', TVNZ has been out to get her. (And Labour out of power.)
The disgusting and overtly pro-National Party stance TVNZ took during the last election was unforgivable. They were in effect campaigning for them. And they are still doing it.
Big Money Corporate Media...gotta love it. Not.
Re:NZ is a state of Australia (Score:2, Interesting)
Wikipedia tells me also that New Zealand decided against joining the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901, and instead changed from being a colony to a separate "dominion" in 1907, equal in status to Australia and Canada.
YouTube law (Score:3, Interesting)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=r90z0PMnKwI [youtube.com]
http://youtube.com/watch?v=f99PcP0aFNE [youtube.com]
and the remixes...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EtOoQFa5ug8 [youtube.com]
Well, one might say that sound bites are not a fair way of characterizing the entire work of a politician. I think they are right: with Stevens and Allen, the rotten attitudes seem to go far deeper.
Laws like this aren't going to be very effective, but these people are running scared.
Re:Most local New Zealand media sickens me (Score:4, Interesting)
Things aren't as bad as they could be, trust me, we've got it good here compared to the states.
It may be influenced by recent BBC failures (Score:3, Interesting)
This is we the people being manipulated by professional liars. It seems to me that the NZ parliament has every right to demand that footage of its debates not be manipulated to suggest things that are not true.
Interestingly, a recent opinion poll in the UK suggested that younger people are less worried about media distortion of public events and people. I suggest this is a mistake. They should be. They have the least political power, the least share of the national wealth. Allowing people who are mostly rich, overentitled middle aged white males to foist lies on them by distorting apparent photographic footage suggests that, at the very least, compulsory reading of _1984_, the history of the 1920s in Russia and history of the 1930s in Germany should be considered.
Hmmmm. (Score:5, Interesting)
Medicating the symptom (Score:3, Interesting)