"Tubes" Senator Being Investigated For Corruption 613
DragonTHC writes "Senator Ted Stevens, Republican of Alaska, is being investigated in a federal corruption probe that has implicated his son Ben. Part of the case involves a fishing co-op whose members allegedly paid Ben Stevens $500,000 to get a federal bailout from his father." The other Alaskan senator, also a Republican, is under a cloud as well.
Young is a representative, not a senator (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Are these the senators that wanted the bridge? (Score:5, Informative)
Not surprised (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Who are these guys? (Score:1, Informative)
Also, I think you need to double-check your math. The proposed bridge, which has not been built, is to cost about $350 million. That's quite clearly not "upwards of 1/2 BIL". Further, that decision had nothing to do with Stevens (he didn't think of it, plan it, vote for it, or campaign for it.) His only involvement in that issue was to stop the federal government from taking back the money it had already promised to Alaska for the bridge because they felt like giving the cash to a different state instead. You would be pissed too, if the feds promised your state $350 million, and then later changed their minds and sent it to someone else.
Re:Who are these guys? (Score:4, Informative)
Rep. Don Young is not a Senator (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Earmarks are good? (Score:5, Informative)
let's not forget Stevens OTHER inumerable fiascos (Score:5, Informative)
Stevens' case is not particularly odd either; it's symptomatic of Congress' Culture of Corruption (if you want it to be catchier, replace them with "Edgy" Ks) wherein a bunch of fatcats scratch each otheR's back. I know its a cliché - but damn it, it's true and casesd like these and Tom Delay's just shove it down our throats day after day after day. What will it take for the ystem to change, or BE changed (forcefully)?
Re:Who are these guys? (Score:5, Informative)
The bridge would service Ketchikan, population 7,500 or thereabouts. It would also service tens of thousands of tourists each year.
The bridge is to connect Ketchikan with its airport, which is on Gravina island. Ketchikan has been trying to get enough money to build the bridge for as long as I can remember (at least 30 years). Right now, transport to and from the airport is via a couple of small ferries. There *is* a valid reason for this bridge. It's *not* a bridge to nowhere.
It's still a farce that the federal government porked up the money, though.
Re:A little balance Keith? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:we need to call BS on "small government" (Score:2, Informative)
The federal budget was in surplus (took in more than it spent) in each of Clinton's final four budgets.
In the past 46 years, the budget has been in surplus for 5 of them. The fifth one was LBJ's last budget (FY 1969).
Fiscal discipline has nothing to do with what the money is spent on... only that spending does not exceed income.
Your point about military spending had nothing to do with the point of the grand parent poster, that the last time we had fiscal discipline was during the Clinton Administration.
BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:2, Informative)
Anyone who has been to the area of the proposed bridge will agree that it needs to be built. It is in Ketchikan, Alaska. Ketchikan is completely out of space. Land prices have skyrocketed because there is no land. On the other side of the proposed bridge is land just waiting to be developed. Oh, and the AIRPORT is on the other side of the "bridge to nowhere". Do you think it might be nice if they could drive to the airport instead of having to take a ferry?
Look at it on a map...
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=Ketchikan,+Ke
The project is totally reasonable and makes sense to anyone with even a small portion of the facts. Quit parroting the stupid rantings of national media "pundit" (read as a-hole with an axe to grind...) and come up with you own opinion.
Oh, and who cares what the politicians do on their own time. I really think the news media's constant need to entertain us and invent news stories has killed the political process in this country.
(At least they are protecting the corporations!)
Re:BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Who are these guys? (Score:3, Informative)
Why was that money going to go elsewhere? Hurricane Katrina. It was going to go to be used in the disaster recovery effort and play a part in helping the millions of people affected.
Imagine that you were a parent and you promised Timmy, one of your kids, a toy. While you're looking around the store, Molly, your other kid breaks her nose whilst running around, so you tell Timmy that the present will have to wait while you take care of Molly, but Timmy doesn't give a shit and practically screams the store down because you're more concerned about Molly bleeding all over the place than you are about his new toy. Well, Timmy in this story is Senator Stevens, Molly is all the Katrina victims.
What a wonderful guy.
Re:BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:1, Informative)
But it's actually worse than that. Unlike the Bridge to "Nowhere" the Big Dig wasn't filling a need. It was replacing a highway with a tunnel that runs underneath the city. (A tunnel which used glue to hold the ceiling tiles on - an idea so great that the tiles eventually became unglued and crushed a woman.) There was already a highway. It was nearing capacity but it could have been expanded at far less cost.
But no. It was instead buried, in order to improve the city's skyline! Apparently the old elevated highway was "an eyesore" and needed to be moved to a tunnel in order to get it out of the way.
The Big Dig would be like taking a completed Bridge to "Nowhere" and replacing it with a tunnel: completely unnecessary and far more expensive than just expanding it.
All paid for with federal tax dollars, to a state that most assuredly doesn't need them.
Re:also a Republican ... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:4, Informative)
The funniest (saddest) part of the whole thing is that the so-called "greenway" (which is the new land area above the tunnel that was formerly the elevated highway "eyesore") is now just an open sore construction area - sand, barrels, etc. Meanwhile all the entrenched interest groups fight over how it should be finished and how to get other people to pay for that work. Uggggh.
Re:BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:4, Informative)
Even among supporters of the project, though, few really believe in the urgent need for a bridge. Mostly what the supporters believe in is the need for an infusion of construction dollars in Ketchikan. Try asking the community to tax itself to pay for 5% of the bridge costs and you will see how tenuous support for the bridge project really is. If you're not willing to buy something even when it's marked down 95%, it's hardly a necessity now, is it?
Re:BZZZT thankyourforplaying... (Score:2, Informative)
In short, you're full of it.
It's *not* a "Bridge to Nowhere" (Score:2, Informative)
But the bridge isn't a "bridge to nowhere". It's a bridge to the island with the Ketchikan Airport. [yahoo.com] Sure, almost nobody lives on the island, but the reason for building it wasn't just to spend $300M to benefit the few people who do or to make it easier to go fishing there or give lots of pork to Teddy's friends in the construction business. It's so the 8000 people who live in Ketchikan don't have to take a ferry-boat across the river to get to the airport, which can take half an hour and cost $6 and occasionally gets delayed by weather (but so do the airplanes.) And the bridge needs to be that expensive not only because it's Alaska but because it needs to be tall enough for shipping to get through, and a drawbridge simply wouldn't do.
Of course, for a small fraction of that $300M, the Feds could fund a free helicopter taxi service to get people across even faster, but it's so obvious that that's a subsidy, and it's easy to cancel, even if you've built some sort of Helicopter Trust Fund to stash the money in. When you've nailed down the pork by building it into a bridge, other people can't walk off with it and give it to their own buddies.