Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech Government The Almighty Buck Politics Science

Indonesia Stops Sharing Avian Virus Samples 243

dankrabach writes "Indonesia has apparently decided to play the IP game, with the world's health at stake. The country, one of the hardest-hit by avian flu, has stopped submitting virus samples to the World Health Organization, and is negotiating to sell them to an American drug company that makes the vaccine. They feel slighted when they give away such samples, but then cannot afford the patented vaccines. Logical to me, given the rules of the game; however, can't we come up with some GPL'ish license to free any product based on this data?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Indonesia Stops Sharing Avian Virus Samples

Comments Filter:
  • Avian Flu (Score:4, Insightful)

    by celardore ( 844933 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @02:54PM (#17937132)
    I live near where a recent 'outbreak' of Avian Flu has occurred in England. Forgive me for perhaps not seeing the bigger picture, but what's the big deal? regular flu kills more people every winter in the UK alone than Avian Flu has the world over - ever. AFAIK anyway.

  • Re:A Solution (Score:2, Insightful)

    by HomelessInLaJolla ( 1026842 ) * <sab93badger@yahoo.com> on Thursday February 08, 2007 @02:54PM (#17937142) Homepage Journal
    Land of the free...
  • by arkham6 ( 24514 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @02:56PM (#17937166)
    Instead of "Indonesia has apparently decided to play the IP game, with the world's health at stake.", you could easily say "American Drug company decided to play the IP game, with Indonesia's health at stake."

    I'd be pissed too if i was indonesia.
  • Damn Straight! (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08, 2007 @02:58PM (#17937200)
    Sorry but the pharmaceutical companies should be sending them the drugs for free.

    I agree with them, why give some company everything they need to make record breaking profits just so you cant get the benefit from the help you gave them??

    I have an idea! why don't all of you write some great stories for Sc-FI channel to make into movies and they can charge you $29.95 to watch them.

  • by null etc. ( 524767 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @02:59PM (#17937212)
    Simple solution. Wait until 75% of earth's population dies when H5N1 mutates into human-spreadable form, and then the rich and all powerful shareholders of major corporations (such as pharmas) will have the backs of no peons on which to step.
  • Re:A Solution (Score:3, Insightful)

    by TubeSteak ( 669689 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:01PM (#17937254) Journal

    Forbid any American drug company from buying the samples. Problem solved.
    That may seem like a simple solution... but it wouldn't work.

    American Companies would just form joint 'research' partnerships (or some other shell game) with European/African/Asian/Any company & buy it through that.

    Vaccines are problematic, because they're expensive to test, usually expensive to manufacture, and aren't needed year round. Companies don't want to make 'em because they aren't ludicrously profitable like every other patented drug out there.

    Compulsory licensing (of the patent) is another option, but it ruffles feathers.
  • No net change (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Angst Badger ( 8636 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:05PM (#17937324)
    Considering the amounts of money involved, I suspect the only thing that is going to change is that American drug companies will send their own people into the field in Indonesia to collect their own samples.
  • by spun ( 1352 ) <loverevolutionary&yahoo,com> on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:06PM (#17937330) Journal
    What are you, some kind of commie, pinko, free-market hating anti-American scumbags? This is the free market we're talking about, it's power is Divine and it can do no wrong. Sharing things is bad, we should be charging for everything. I mean, if these Avian Virus samples aren't privately owned, we might be facing the dreaded Tragedy of the Commons here! Sharing of scientific data is socialism, plain and simple, and it goes against everything America stands for: profit at the expense of all else.

    Seriously, though, I wonder how long it wil be before some misguided Libertarian offers up a serious excuse as to why this is a good thing. I can't wait, it's been a while since I've seen a good contortionist show.
  • by Rufty ( 37223 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:12PM (#17937432) Homepage
    Indonesia does the grunt-work of collecting the samples, for free. The drug companies, Baxter et al., charge for the "IP" of the drugs made based from these samples. Not just the drugs, the IP that Indonesia helped gather. At the very least this warrents some share of the IP, say, gratis licences to manufacture the drugs so researched.
  • A Geek Solution (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:16PM (#17937494)
    "Forbid any American drug company from buying the samples. Problem solved."

    I guess this is why geeks aren't called to solve world problems. It isn't an "American" problem, but an economic one. As the other poster pointed out vaccines cost money to develop, and test. A GPL license isn't going to solve that problem. A socialist solution were the entire planet pays for the process might. But then "the world" isn't noted for working together for the common good either.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:20PM (#17937548)
    "Free market" and "patent" are mutually exclusive.
  • by Bastian ( 66383 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @03:53PM (#17937976)

    can't we come up with some GPL'ish license to free any product based on this data?"


    No. Drug companies don't play games like this. None will sink money into developing a vaccine based on a virus sample if they cannot be granted exclusive rights to produce that vaccine for a period of time. They'll go spend their R&D dollars on fighting developing some other drug that they can use to rake in big stinking piles of cash instead.

    That's the way capitalism works - when people decide what to invest in, they rarely look at putting money behind something that they realize is not likely to give them a large return out of the goodness of their hearts. They figure out what's going to make them the most money. The market is not known for rewarding altruism. As a result, any drug company that wants to continue to exist as a drug company is going to do very little in the way of charity research, and instead do the kind of stuff that attracts capital.

    The only way we're going to get drug research without patent protection is to start some sort of government agency whose primary purpose is to do this stuff. But good luck getting that to happen (in the US, anyway) voters don't have a history of being in favor of things like this, and the drug industry would viciously lobby against any sort of government-sponsored competitor.
  • by moracity ( 925736 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @04:00PM (#17938052)
    ANOTHER license. I'm so sick of hearing about licensing.

    I know everyone is going to side with Indonesia...in fact, I think they should do what they need to do in order to secure their own access to medicines derived from the samples they give. However, if it were the U.S holding virus samples hostage for its own benefit, people would be calling for blood.

    Another perfect example of hypocrisy. People want everything equal until someone or something they don't like gets to exercise the same equality.
  • Capitalism (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Duncan3 ( 10537 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @04:01PM (#17938070) Homepage
    If drug companies cannot patent a sell a cure for hundreds a dose (see for example the current controversial HPV vaccine) they will not develop the cure. They are far too busy working on penis pills to work about something that will kill 60% of the world population anyway.

    That's the rule, that's what corporations do, that's America! If they don't they very quickly get thrown out by the shareholders and replaced by those that understand this rule. Why are people shocked?

    Nobody in their right mind expects Indonesians will be able to afford the vaccine, they will die en mass. This is why we have universities and the WHO, where scientists who haven't crossed over to the dark side develop cures for things.
  • Waitaminute. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Garridan ( 597129 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @04:10PM (#17938200)

    They feel slighted when they give away such samples, but then cannot afford the patented vaccines.
    How is this Indonesia being evil? They've gotten tired of getting fucked in the face by greedy american pharm companies. It's like, "Hey! Give us some virus, and we'll make a cure!". "Here's the cure! Oh... you can't afford it? Well, sorry all your people are dying. BTW, do you have any samples of the new strains? We'd really like to make a new cure."

    I'd get pretty tired of that, too. This isn't "playing the IP game, with the world's health at stake". This is fighting back against the IP trolls, who are holding the world's health hostage.
  • by dazedNconfuzed ( 154242 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @04:23PM (#17938402)
    A vaccine is hard to make.
    A vaccine is expensive to make.

    If there's no profit, there's no incentive.
    If there's no funding, there's no resources.

    Tragic, but you don't want to do the work - no matter how helpful - if it doesn't put food on your table and a movie on your TV.
    Sure you can volunteer a bit, but only if it doesn't harm your personal bottom line.

    What are YOU doing to prepare the Avian Flu vaccine? Thought so.
    In the long-shot chance you _are_ working on an Avian Flu vaccine, are you doing it for free? Thought so.

    Yes, it makes sense for drug companies to charge a fortune for the Avian Flu vaccine - it will cost them a fortune to create it.
    Yes, it makes sense for Indonesia to make arrangements to assure they get the vaccine (either thru barter or billing).
    Yes, it sounds perverse to sell the disease to buy the cure.
    Welcome to the real world.
    You don't cure a pandemic for free.

    You got a better idea?
  • by NeutronCowboy ( 896098 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @04:49PM (#17938772)
    This is exactly the scenario for which I'm paying taxes. I'm already gainfully employed, and there are a good chunk of people who are a lot better than me at creating vaccines. Taxes are supposed to be transferred from me (who is offering a service that is in immediate demand) to someone who is offering a service with delayed demand. Instead, what are we paying taxes for? Some dumb ass bridge to nowhere. Statues of politicians who ought to be in prison. Pork that reaches hundreds of billions of dollars in total.

    Here's my idea: make every politician pay for pork out of his own pocket. I'm sure that suddenly there'll be a couple of billion dollars left over from my (and yours and everybody elses) taxes to fund some serious research into a bird-flu vaccine. I'm also not opposed to shooting politicians who dole out pork, but some might consider that animal-cruelty.

    See, the free-market has known limitations, and we have solutions to the problems that a free-market economy has. The problem is neither the free market (nor your implied accusation that people want to have their cake and eat it too), but the fact that our current political system is unable to deal with any crisis, due to the corruption of its actors (politicians) and the overall greed, lazyness and stupidity of its stakeholders (the voters). I fully expect that if a crisis hits, we'll be run by a dictator in a heartbeat. Sort of like now, except all out and fully accepted by everyone.
  • by Baki ( 72515 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @06:54PM (#17940768)
    Something important with national and international importance obviously cannot be left to "the market" and commercial interests. It is long overdue to nationalize all drug companies and let the government(s) decide what research is done and what not (viagra etc.).
  • by Goonie ( 8651 ) * <robert.merkel@b[ ... g ['ena' in gap]> on Thursday February 08, 2007 @07:59PM (#17941762) Homepage
    This would be OK if the average Indonesian actually saw some benefit from the money gained from the licensing. Instead, the money will just be siphoned off by corrupt officials. Indonesia is one of the most corrupt places on Earth.

    Instead of the usual situation where virus samples go to Big Pharma, who make patented vaccine, and get rich saving the developed world and wealthy people in the developing world, while Indonesian proles get neither vaccine nor money, we'll have the situation where virus samples go to one part of Big Pharma, who will (hopefully) make vaccine, and get rich saving the developed world and rich people in the developing world, and send royalties back to already rich Indonesians. Again, Indonesian proles will get neither vaccine nor money.

    This is just a cynical money grab by the Indonesian elite, and, worse, by restricting who gets access to virus samples they just might be delaying the development of a vaccine that will save millions of lives.

  • by rejecting ( 824821 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @08:27PM (#17942238)
    Why is it inevitable that bird flu will mutate into a form capable of this sort of transmission? Would it be safe to say that if in the entire kingdom of viruses that if all were inevitably mutating to forms that transmit via air that 'Bird Flu' would be one of the least of our problems?
     
      Does modern genetics have a solid grasp on this process? Is there any indication that Bird Flu's Transmission capabilities are evolving to this end?
     
      You may think i'm coming down on this point rather hard, but terms such as "eventual mutation" in relation to air transmission make me wonder where you, and it seems the larger population, are getting this idea from.
     
      I feel like spending all this money and time and mindshare on the 'Threat of the week' is going to seem foolish in light of any real threat. Which it seems will without a doubt come from the last place humanity expects it.
  • Re:Avian Flu (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Watson Ladd ( 955755 ) on Thursday February 08, 2007 @08:32PM (#17942302)
    The third world has the majority of the human population and you begruge them a measly 1/3rd of the sustainable carbon buget while America, with 5% of the world population, emits 20% [osaka.jp] of all CO2? What about the fact that most enviromental damage happens as a result of 1st-world countries wanting 3rd world resourses? Does the International Decleration of Human Rights mean nothing to you? Are you seriously suggesting that we kill a huge number of people for the inequalities in the system that we imposed on them?
  • Re:A Solution (Score:4, Insightful)

    by MrNaz ( 730548 ) on Friday February 09, 2007 @12:55AM (#17944560) Homepage
    I think this is quite reasonable of them. If they were giving the samples for free, and then told "you have to pay a price for the vaccine", a price they were not able to afford, then it is only fair for them to say that "we contributed the sample, which lead to the vaccine, therefore we deserve a) a share of the profits from the vaccine or b) rights to the vaccine for a reduced cost".

    The easiest way to achieve this is to charge for the samples, effectively providing funding for the purchase of the vaccine. Seems quite reasonable to me.

"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight

Working...