New York To Ban iPods While Crossing Street? 487
An anonymous reader writes to mention Reuters is reporting that New York State Senator Carl Kruger is looking to institute a $100 fine for using electronic gadgets while crossing the street. Citing three pedestrian deaths in his Brooklyn district as the main driving reason he believe Government has an obligation to protect its citizens. "Tech-consuming New Yorkers trudge to work on sidewalks and subways like an army of drones, appearing to talk to themselves on wireless devices or swaying to seemingly silent tunes. 'I'm not trying to intrude on that,' Kruger said. 'But what's happening is when they're tuning into their iPod or Blackberry or cell phone or video game, they're walking into speeding buses and moving automobiles. It's becoming a nationwide problem.'"
Natural Selection At Work (Score:4, Funny)
It's just like the government to try to make laws to keep stupid people from killing themselves. How else are we going to evolve as a species if the government tries to legislate out of existence those activities that get people into the Darwin Awards?
- Greg
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:5, Funny)
Re:government might want to step back (Score:5, Funny)
Why even do that? If the pedestrian has the right of way, he has the right to wear headphones.
Hahaha. Right of way? Right of way in New York is for tourists and pansies. This thing happens in New York where we, as New Yorkers, walk out into the middle of traffic in a tourist-friendly area (like Rockefeller Center) and watch the tourists instinctually follow us because if we're doing it, it must be safe. Hilarity ensues.
Talking about right of way in New York is a waste of time.
--Triv
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:5, Funny)
Joke ---------> *whoosh*
O <--- You
--|--
|
/ \
(from SeenOnSlash [seenonslash.com], which is actually from here [slashdot.org])
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:5, Funny)
That's basically what I was getting at, perhaps my sarcasm was too subtle.
easy solution (Score:4, Funny)
If one pedestrian in fifty had a couple of kilos of nitro-glicerine (sp?) in their backpack, no pedestrian would ever be hit again.
"OMG it's a pedestrian - look out!!!"
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:2, Funny)
What a coincidence. Fundamentalist Christians and people who don't watch where they're going when they're crossing the street: two groups I would happily sweep into the skimmer of the ol' gene pool.
If they'd both have a problem with the idea, it must be good.
An interesting dilemma... (Score:2, Funny)
Who's at fault?
Re:Sounds like... (Score:3, Funny)
To paradise?
His legs! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:In Germany... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:government might want to step back (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:3, Funny)
Won't someone please think of the emergency service workers who, thanks to helmet laws, don't have to scrape human grey-matter up off of the roads???
I think thats the main reason for those laws, not insurance, not saving lives; its saving the people who have to clean up after you from chucking their lunches quite so often.
Re:Natural Selection At Work (Score:3, Funny)
Traffic would probably be a lot safer if the airbag in the steering wheel was replaced by a sharp steel spike.