California Proposes to Ban Incandescent Lightbulbs 1074
Posted
by
ScuttleMonkey
from the coming-to-your-house-to-smash-the-old-ones dept.
from the coming-to-your-house-to-smash-the-old-ones dept.
zhang1983 writes to tell us CNN is reporting that California Assemblyman Lloyd Levine wants to make his state the first to ban incandescent lightbulbs with the "How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act". The act will promote Compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs) to replace the inefficient incandescent lightbulbs. According to him, "Incandescent lightbulbs were first developed almost 125 years ago, and since that time they have undergone no major modifications, meanwhile, they remain incredibly inefficient, converting only about 5 percent of the energy they receive into light."
how many? it's simple, really. (Score:5, Funny)
It takes a vote of more than half of the legislative body considering the measure. The full Assembly requires a majority vote of 41 and the full Senate requires 21, based on their memberships of 80 and 40 respectively.
Hey! I Heat My Home With Incandescents (Score:5, Funny)
If they want to target something, let them ban electric heaters. People ought to be running P4 servers as space heaters. At least *do* something with all that electricity!
Ban inefficient politicians (Score:5, Funny)
Great!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I don't like this (Score:5, Funny)
known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Re:Hey! I Heat My Home With Incandescents (Score:2, Funny)
Well, considering that, here in CA, we all walk around in bikinis and Speedos sipping iced margaritas year-round, we *do* require a smidge of heating.
But, seriously, I live on the coast in Northern California, and, while it's a moderate, Mediterranean climate, it *does* get chilly in the mornings sometimes.
I guess HIDs are next (Score:5, Funny)
These homes usually have a very musky odor teamed up with the occaisional U-Haul or Ryder truck parked out front.
Re:Wrong target (Score:5, Funny)
Ouch, my wallet!
Re:Wrong target (Score:5, Funny)
That's 5 words
Re:What's next? (Score:3, Funny)
Logic, whoda thunkit? (Score:5, Funny)
Thus and so, I recommend that all Californians be unscrewed.
Or screwed some more, I haven't decided yet.
Re:I repeat, "What about RFI?" (Score:3, Funny)
Re:CFLs not always a good choice (enclosed fixture (Score:2, Funny)
Only Logical... (Score:5, Funny)
Up next, I propose manditory minimum sentences of at least five years for people who don't floss (poor dental hygene hurts all of us! Including the children!) And only one of those gosh-darned extremist Libertarians would oppose the reasonable action of sending in a paramilitary SWAT team every time someone leaves their faucet running too long!
And, without a doubt, reading blogs like Slashdot is harmful to your health... it keeps you from being outside and getting exercise! Not to mention the millions of lost man-hours to our economy caused by people reading Slashdot at work. And don't get me started on the energy wasted running the Slashdot servers 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Only someone totally brainwashed by the Capitalist system to destroy the enviornment, and someone who hates Democracy and Social Welfare to the core, would suggest that we don't criminalize Slashdot!
Thank god for the progressive state of California to realize that personal freedom and individual choice is simply a barrier to be smashed and destroyed in the struggle to make a better world!
Re:No great loss... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OT: Smoking Bans (Score:1, Funny)
In a related story... (Score:2, Funny)
What world do these people live in? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A: depends on who's asking and (heh) how (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Mee too (Score:5, Funny)
Just a thought...