Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Government United States Politics Your Rights Online

Restrictions On Social Sites Proposed In Georgia 349

A state senator in Georgia, Cecil Staton, has introduced a bill that would require parents' permission before kids could sign up at a social networking site such as MySpace and Facebook, and mandate that the sites let parents see all material their kids generate there. Quoting: "[Senate Bill 59] would make it illegal for the owner or operator of a social networking Web site to allow minors to create or maintain a Web page without parental permission [and require] parents or guardians to have access to their children's Web pages at all times. If owners or operators of a company failed to comply with the proposed law, they would be guilty of a misdemeanor on the first offense. A second offense would be a felony and could lead to imprisonment for between one and five years and a fine up to $50,000 or both." The recently offered MySpace parental tools fall short of the bill's requirements. This coverage from the Athens Banner-Herald quotes Facebook's CPO saying that federal law forbids the company to allow anyone but the account creator to access it..

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Restrictions On Social Sites Proposed In Georgia

Comments Filter:
  • Misquote (Score:2, Informative)

    by tuxlove ( 316502 ) on Monday January 29, 2007 @08:12PM (#17807256)
    the Athens Banner-Herald quotes Facebook's CPO saying that federal law forbids the company to allow anyone but the account creator to access it..

    This isn't at all what the article quotes. It says:

    Under the Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act, we cannot give anyone access to or control of an individual's profile on Facebook

    I don't see how this would preclude rules that require all future account creations to be done by an adult...
  • QFT - idiot. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Irish_Samurai ( 224931 ) on Monday January 29, 2007 @08:19PM (#17807346)
    From TFA:
    "Staton said the bill does not tell the companies exactly how to ensure that minors don't log on without parental permission. The companies can figure that out on their own, he said."

    There is no real way to do that. Who is liable if the minor works around the security and makes a page? What if said minor created a page and NOTHING happened aside from a parent finding out the page exists? What is an acceptable form of verifying parental consent?

    This proposal is a prime example of people who don't know jack about how the technology works trying to legislate it.
  • by anagama ( 611277 ) <obamaisaneocon@nothingchanged.org> on Monday January 29, 2007 @08:21PM (#17807362) Homepage
    Indeed, a quick google search turned up this: http://www.districtadministration.com/pulse/commen tpost.aspx?news=no&postid=18080 [districtad...ration.com]

    Choice quote:

    [chart showing 40% decline in sex abuse between 1990 and 2000]
    All forms of child abuse, not just sexual abuse, are undergoing a dramatic decline. Of course, you'd never know this from the hype the media is giving the cases of online related sexual abuse that they can trace back to MySpace or Facebook.

    [chart breaking down sex abuse by relationship]
    The amazing and sad statistic that is so often overlooked and rarely discussed is that 95% of Child Abuse and Sexual Abuse is perpetrated by family members. 79% of perpetrators are parents. Other relatives accounted for 7% and unmarried partners of parents and "other" accounted for 4% and 5% of abuse.
  • by anagama ( 611277 ) <obamaisaneocon@nothingchanged.org> on Monday January 29, 2007 @08:41PM (#17807616) Homepage
    That should be DHMO -- you link to a typo squater. The real link is: http://www.dhmo.org/ [dhmo.org]
  • by sanyasi ( 900484 ) on Monday January 29, 2007 @08:53PM (#17807780)
    NO!
    "I disagree with what you have to say but will fight to the death to protect your right to say it" - Voltaire.

    Myspace might be horrible in your opinion but this is when if you truly believe in freedom of speech you would still support them.

  • by happyemoticon ( 543015 ) on Monday January 29, 2007 @09:38PM (#17808294) Homepage

    Just as a side note, the biggest problem with rooting out or finding child sexual abuse is that children under the age of 10 can be made to say anything if goaded long enough, and eventually they will fabricate elaborate false memories to supplement these statements. If you put any determined adult in a room with any 8-year old, given enough time, they could eventually have that kid saying up was down or Uncle Benny touched him this way or that way, which, ironically, could be classified as abuse. Many law enforcement agencies have done exactly that, because at best the officers or attorneys in question were simply convinced they were right and that the kid had repressed memories or some other such bullshit, and at worst they were corrupt jerks out to catch bad guys - who cares if they have to brainwash a few little shits in order to catch em?

    Mind you, I have no special knowledge in this subject beyond some college psychology classes.

  • Re:As usual...idiots (Score:3, Informative)

    by dsoltesz ( 563978 ) * <deborah.soltesz@gmail.com> on Monday January 29, 2007 @10:21PM (#17808678) Homepage Journal
    Actually, the more applicable law (at least similar to what Georgia's attempting) here might be COPPA [wikipedia.org] (see the text of Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 [ftc.gov]) which addresses what kids can do on the 'net more than what adults can put online that children might be exposed to. By requiring minors (under 13) to have verifiable consent from a parent/guardian, so it does part of what Georgia's trying to do. Not sure why the law didn't extend to teenagers - possibly because of conflicts with "age of consent" related laws (yeah, IANAL). IMHO, leave these types of laws to the Federal government -- state laws are too varied and difficult to enforce. There needs to be consistency across the board.

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...