Doomsday Clock To Advance 283
Dik Zak writes "Many news sites are reporting that the magazine Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists intends to move the hands of the Doomsday Clock on Wednesday 17 January. The clock was started at seven minutes to midnight during the Cold War and has been moved forward or back at intervals, depending on the state of the world and the prospects for nuclear war. Midnight represents destruction by nuclear war. It is not revealed in which direction the hands of the clock will be moved, but it should be safe to assume that they will move closer to midnight: the magazine cites 'worsening nuclear [and] climate threats.' The clock stood at two minutes to midnight when both the United States and the Soviet Union tested nuclear weapons in 1953. The farthest away from midnight it ever got was 17 minutes, in 1991 when both superpowers signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. It currently stands at seven minutes to midnight."
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:2, Informative)
It looks to me as if what is significant is not what the time is (unless of course it is midnight), but instead how much the hand moves by. When a significant leap is made towards nuclear disarmament, it moves back significantly, vice versa when a situation appears to be escalating.
Re:Midnight? (Score:2, Informative)
Related to troop increase in Iraq? (Score:3, Informative)
Be prepared! Read and print... (Score:4, Informative)
The good news about nuclear destruction
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51
What to do if a nuclear disaster is imminent!
http://www.ki4u.com/guide.htm [ki4u.com]
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, I live in the Seattle area:
What they ruled on was that it was a scientific theory with more than one side to the story and that "An Inconvenient Truth" was not a dispassionate, non-partisan, objective look at the science involved. They were also concerned that none of the producers and Al Gore were scientists, and that showing it in a class without context would be a disservice to students.
It was widely misreported, probably helped by the fact that the most vocal opponent to the film being shown is a nut-job zealot parent, and the fact that Seattle PeePee, uh, P-I ran an editorial as news and the fact that local right-wing radio really went ape-shit. But, that doesn't mean we have to get the reporting wrong here. Wait, this is /., I'm sorry, go about your business.
Re:Not Climate Threats directly (Score:3, Informative)
I think the Cambodians would be very surprised to learn that Pol Pot killed a bunch of Vietnamese too.
Seriously, if you're going to use historical analogies to bolster your arguments, you should at least try to get the elementary facts right.
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:2, Informative)
Watch Threads. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:2, Informative)
Also the metric/SI system is a lot more logical because the difference between each unit are multiples of 10, which makes it easy to perform calculations with.
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:2, Informative)
The meter was actually intended (back in the 1790s) to be one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the pole along a meridian.
Reality Check Boys and Girls (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stor
Israel is drawing up plans for a NUCLEAR strike on Iran's nuclear power program.
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?
In the last several weeks Bush has fired and reassigned several high level military and intelligence people that were in some way in his way to a broader mid-east war. Generals John Abizaid and George Casey who were opposed to an escalation in Iraq and John Negroponte who has recently stated that Iran is 10 years from having the Bomb.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010807R.shtml [truthout.org]
I'd say that the doomsday clock is definitely ticking, and we are in for a shit storm in 2007.
Re:Arbitrary? (Score:3, Informative)
Same thing happened with the kilogram.