Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government Businesses Google Politics Technology

Germany Quits EU-Based Search Engine Project 135

anaesthetica writes "The Quaero project, a French initiative to build a European rival to Google, has lost the backing of the German government. The search engine was announced in 2005 by Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schroeder, but the German government under Merkel has decided that Quaero isn't worth the $1.3-2.6 billion commitment that development would require. Germany will instead focus on a smaller search engine project called Theseus. From the article: 'According to one French participant, organizers disagreed over the fundamental design of Quaero, with French participants favoring a sophisticated search engine that could sift audio, video and other multimedia data, while German participants favored a next- generation text-based search engine.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Germany Quits EU-Based Search Engine Project

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Weird project (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Gnavpot ( 708731 ) on Sunday January 07, 2007 @07:45AM (#17496644)
    we (in France) have a trillion euros debt, an economic situation (among others) that could be better and we're pumping 2 billions into THAT?

                Of course. This makes a lot more sense than say, creating work for unemployed youths. /sarcasm


    Even here in the EU with all its strange use of money, I suppose that most of those 2 billions would eventually be spent on manpower. So it might actually also help in solving an employment problem.
  • Re:Google Rival? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Da Fokka ( 94074 ) on Sunday January 07, 2007 @07:51AM (#17496666) Homepage

    Its too the point that Google is a cultural icon.
    So was Altavista, back in the day.

    There is a lot of critisism on google about privacy concerns. It is conceivable that Google will not be able to preserve their 'do'nt be evil' image. However, if that would happen I don't think a government built search engine would be a suitable replacement.

  • by zappepcs ( 820751 ) on Sunday January 07, 2007 @09:33AM (#17497066) Journal
    ... and thats how they want it. What they want, they get.

    I've noticed that there are a number of ways that innovative IT projects get done:

    1 - Somebody gets an idea, doesn't ask permission, just implements it and it grows
    2 - Somebody has an idea, pays others to implement it and it grows, or dies
    3 - Somebody has an idea, wastes untold funds on implementing it the wrong way, it dies
    4 - Somebody has an idea, government wastes untold funds implementing the wrong idea
    5 - variations on one of the above

    The trouble with saying that we are going to do something different than what the current market leader has done is that it seldom works if it is supposed to supplant that current leader. Some recent examples? VHS vs. Betamax? HD-DVD vs DVD? Zune vs. iPod?

    Google has not quite been iconized to the point that Hoover or Kleenex have been, but trying to replace Google at this point is the same as the Intel vs. AMD issues except that Google is way ahead of anyone else (don't bother pointing out the other available search engines at this point since it is not germane).

    Germany and the EU may well demand that there is an EU equal to Google, but it does not follow that this government alternative will become self sustaining. If it can't function without life supporting funds from governments, it will be discontinued at some point.

    Even if the technology is mature, there doesn't seem to be any business model to make this EU funded search engine self supporting. When the funds begin to dry up, so will innovation at this new search engine company, and that will signal the end of it. If Google stops innovating, it too will find its own end of life coming. Lack of innovation == lack of relevance in the fast pace of high tech. Governments are notorious for 'lack of innovation' problems.

    Whether this is a good idea on Germany's part or not, there doesn't seem to be any historical evidence to indicate that this project will be long lived.
  • Re:Why not? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by DoktorTomoe ( 643004 ) on Sunday January 07, 2007 @09:52AM (#17497172)
    Usually, I have a policy not to feed trolls, but I won't let *this* stand in the open...

    Yes, I (and many europeans nowadays) have some very strong opinions about the contemporary US. "Fascist rouge state" is one of the more friendly ones. This is mainly based on the all to similar politics excercised by your political leadership. Lets elaborate on this some more, shall we?

    Reichstagsbrand [wikipedia.org] - 9/11 [wikipedia.org]
    Ermächtigungsgesetz [wikipedia.org] -
    Patriot Act [wikipedia.org]
    Internement Camps [wikipedia.org] (note: I speak of camps for political prisoners, not of death camps who are a different matter) - Cuba [wikipedia.org]
    Fighting a war that every sane person knew cannot be won beforehand [wikipedia.org] - Fighting a war that every sane person knew cannot be won beforehand [wikipedia.org]

    Pretty strong similarities, I think. I'll refrain from prognoses when the US will start another genocide...
  • Re:Google Rival? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by suv4x4 ( 956391 ) on Sunday January 07, 2007 @11:26AM (#17497672)
    Google, while great for english speakers, is quite a ways behind for other languages (not necessarily French, but when I use google in Japanese or in eastern-european languages, for example, it's pretty crap).

    Google has very good internationalization features and I'm also looking up information in Eastern European language (Bulgarian) with it.

    You have to understand though: the results can only be as good and as much, as is the available content on the lookup topic. You realize the enormous amount of sites on the Internet are written in English, and a small fraction in all other languages.

    You can see the same in Wikipedia where the non-English editions have worse and less content, and lots of common items missing from them. You want too suggest this is fixable not by more people improving on a category, but creating special EU Wikipedia... Well, sorry to burst your bubble about it.

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...