Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government Politics News

Senate Proposes Patriot Act Extension 519

geekylinuxkid writes "Senate leaders reached a bipartisan agreement Wednesday night to extend expiring and controversial provisions of the Patriot Act for six months. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Republican from Tennessee, announced the agreement from the Senate floor, ending an impasse over the measure." From the article: "Last week, the House voted 251-174 to renew the 16 provisions after striking a compromise that altered some of them. The provisions were set to expire at year's end if not renewed. Controversial measures include those allowing the FBI -- with a court order -- to obtain secret warrants for business, library, medical and other records, and to get a wiretap on every phone a suspect uses." More commentary on the BBC. We reported on last week's failure of the original renewal.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senate Proposes Patriot Act Extension

Comments Filter:
  • OUTGOING (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 22, 2005 @02:50PM (#14320025)
    HELLO WORLD
    51596 51596
    HELLO WORLD
    92767 92767 35000 35000 60456 60456 36752 36752 17830 17830
    64664 64664 97327 97327 46977 46977 61133 61133 17346 17346
    61009 61009 73048 73048 04488 04488 14216 14216 60017 60017
    14441 14441 56190 56190 63745 63745 23710 23710 72740 72740
    32909 32909 37659 37659 25417 25417 81921 81921 94564 94564
    09618 09618 86777 86777 35751 35751 30903 30903 36870 36870
    04051 04051 45024 45024 46030 46030 52779 52779 98768 98768
    38939 38939 29424 29424 95370 95370 39757 39757 76214 76214
    33500 33500 58176 58176 94996 94996 92452 92452 16297 16297
    24778 24778 35811 35811 98084 98084 90029 90029 97702 97702
    99755 99755 70093 70093 36424 36424 57894 57894 70371 70371
    87049 87049 43212 43212 23903 23903 17700 17700 33073 33073
    64065 64065 13431 13431 90689 90689 44727 44727 50351 50351
    98864 98864 48740 48740 99279 99279 27447 27447 40314 40314
    85236 85236 97076 97076 50861 50861 23611 23611 83147 83147
    57005 57005 71753 71753 16389 16389 13966 13966 13618 13618
    37166 37166 12873 12873 30693 30693 64918 64918 48449 48449
    96404 96404 67312 67312 59294 59294 19951 19951 08499 08499
    21144 21144 39413 39413 71627 71627 07912 07912 94296 94296
    37792 37792 67016 67016 45949 45949 23139 23139 65740 65740
    06660 06660 32074 32074 15119 15119 96948 96948 12434 12434
    79349 79349 61727 61727 45158 45158 75881 75881 23601 23601
    78865 78865 21369 21369 92445 92445 80072 80072 13166 13166
    50122 50122 16099 16099 51338 51338 65928 65928 51766 51766
    36956 36956 61388 61388 45702 45702 75546 75546 71002 71002
    94310 94310 58215 58215 11011 11011 29324 29324 02989 02989
    29839 29839 82972 82972 56978 56978 96742 96742 05657 05657
    91297 91297 82901 82901 61185 61185 49621 49621 79394 79394
    88201 88201 18289 18289 30302 30302 31584 31584 94910 94910
    14995 14995 52830 52830 69678 69678 85053 85053 22278 22278
    06356 06356 70765 70765 25725 25725 20200 20200 59708 59708
    59047 59047 49455 49455 45113 45113 30602 30602 75747 75747
    30578 30578 69407 69407 27291 27291 44910 44910 23350 23350
    73531 73531 96793 96793 07500 07500 19480 19480 06608 06608
    52659 52659 75081 75081 98042 98042 27358 27358 54724 54724
    45991 45991 56287 56287 08159 08159 47227 47227 76929 76929
    81268 81268 26746 26746 88085 88085 93360 93360 08168 08168
    84328 84328 29303 29303 38533 38533 00309 00309 10721 10721
    88195 88195 99790 99790 47440 47440 29006 29006 60352 60352
    54061 54061 98113 98113 45106 45106 17090 17090 24873 24873
    12199 12199 73385 73385 99149 99149 33412 33412 77686 77686
    30304 30304 97093 97093 04154 04154 47475 47475 55999 55999
    63794 63794 43445 43445 06303 06303 13797 13797 90818 90818
    69437 69437 42013 42013 82334 82334 17349 17349 35296 35296
    96763 96763 76696 76696 73162 73162 84108 84108 45154 45154
    42612 42612 44543 44543 31428 31428 84843 84843 36842 36842
    66922 66922 46271 46271 67169 67169 99539 99539 91786 91786
    13719 13719 66292 66292 88132 88132 51422 51422 32296 32296
    26984 26984 12138 12138 39254 39254 39919 39919 21240 21240
    92942 92942 17325 17325 81790 81790 11751 11751 81921 81921
    42251 42251 20926 20926 19611 19611 45354 45354 92705 92705
    30664 30664 13342 13342 88716 88716 40052 40052 56567 56567
    77002 77002 43633 43633 88702 88702 44343 44343 32118 32118
    04393 04393 93946 93946 89395 89395 45091 45091 49429 49429
    76774 76774 05188 05188 58770 58770 49249 49249 26073 26073
    03128 03128 05166 05166 19292 19292 77286 77286 86852 86852
    93097 93097 26296 26296 01125 01125 98395 98395 04372 04372
    43995 43995 69364 69364 54108 54108 29726 29726 27111 27111
    12419 12419 09389 09389 31476 31476 18572 18572 19719 19719
    64154 64154 81995 81995 51032 51032 51721 51721 57858 57858
    24811 24811 86985 86985 27585 27585 62910 62910 77359 77359
    29956 29956 70889 70889 13625 13625 47114 47114 53765 53765
    21904 21904 75522 75522 96875 96875 23400 23400 00381 00381
    44202 44202 27549 27549 18478 18478 26804 26804 26951 26951
    62776 62776 431
  • by rscrawford ( 311046 ) <rscrawford&undavis,edu> on Thursday December 22, 2005 @02:56PM (#14320129) Homepage Journal
    Why would the FBI need a warrant when King George can simply bypass FISA and issue a secret and pointless decree allowing domestic spying without a warrant? Especially when, under FISA, a wiretap or other device can be requested without a pre-existing warrant (as long as a warrant comes within 72 hours)?
  • by frdmfghtr ( 603968 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @03:07PM (#14320276)
    I haven't read the linked article yet, but I did read a story in the Wisconsin State journal about it...

    Apparently the bill still needs to go to the House, as the House originally voted for it to be renewed in it's original form, not an extension. According to that article, because it's different than what the House voted to pass, it has to go up for another vote.

    It was also pointed out that the House is scheduled to be in recess until January 31, a month after the original provisions will expire and be off the books--and it's hard to extend something that is already expired (although I wouldn't put anything past this administration--I'll be so glad when W is out of office!)

    In my not-so-educated opinion, it would appear that given what little I know, the extension doesn't stand much chance of passing since a recessed House would have to reconvene, debate, and vote on the changes, in less than nine days, during the holiday season.
  • by NorthWoodsman ( 606357 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @03:48PM (#14320850) Homepage
    These are the text from number stations, they broadcast messages to spies using a one-time pad. numbers stations [wikipedia.org] for more info; so really, parent should be modded up
  • by kpang ( 860416 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @03:54PM (#14320921) Homepage
    America may be falling apart, but it's because of people like you. Oh how quickly we forget that our country was founded on the questioning of authority. Balance of powers, representation, freedom...those words ring a bell? Why are the ones that are so adament about spreading "freedom" to other countries (at least, those we have an economic interest in...oh, and aren't strong enough to fight back) so willing to give up their own? http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=11054&c =130 [aclu.org] Do those look like rights that the government already has? Or maybe we should be asking, do those look like rights the government SHOULD have? I'm really getting sick of Republicans using FUD to scare the ignorant masses into sacraficing their civil liberties in the name of security and the war on terror. Let's use the secret wiretaps as an example here. Are there terrorist threats in the world today? Yes. Would allowing secret wiretaps of American citizens help monitor them? Yes. Do these two facts justify the use of allowing secret wiretaps of American citizens? NO! Jesus tapdancing Christ people, why not have a camera in every household monitoring your actions while we're at it? Maybe a CIA officer handcuffed to you at all times? Hell, why not just station each of us in some massive jail with no outside contact? At least we'd be safe right? No terrorist going to get us that way! Sacraficing liberty and freedom in the name of security is anti-American and the way Bush and his administration is spinning it off is terrorism. Don't forget your roots and don't forget how quickly one bad dictator can ruin a powerful nation. Countries with seemingly unlimited power have fallen before, we are no different. You ever wonder how all those great empires fell and think "how in the hell did they let that madman drive their nation into the ground?". That's what's happening now. And if we aren't careful, we're going to end up becoming a footnote in history as another world power that toppled because of poor leadership that drew way too many enemies. That's when the terrorist will have won, when we start living in fear and sacraficing the freedom we tout. Hell, I'm not all that convinced they haven't already won. Time will tell. P.S. The bill was passed by an overwhelming majority because it was thrown together at the last minute because they needed to do something to prevent mass hysteria in the wake of 9/11.
  • Votes database (Score:3, Interesting)

    by holovaty ( 678950 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @03:55PM (#14320946) Homepage
    The Washington Post recently launched a comprehensive votes database [washingtonpost.com] that lets you browse every vote in the U.S. Congress since 1991 and is updated several times daily.

    Here [washingtonpost.com], for instance, is the House vote mentioned in this Slashdot blurb.

    Disclaimer: I'm the Web developer who worked on this database.
  • I will not leave.... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by foolish_to_be_here ( 802344 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @04:00PM (#14320999)
    Hell no! I will not leave this country. It is my country. Every time I read a suggestion that "We" find a new place to live, because "Our country is going down the tube, I cringe. I will not run away but will stay the course to restore citizens rights. If "They" don't like it they can leave but "I'm" staying put.
  • Dems Cave in Again (Score:3, Interesting)

    by tom's a-cold ( 253195 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @04:25PM (#14321305) Homepage
    The renewal was killed originally because the Democrats showed something resembling backbone by threatening a filibuster. Then, what? a couple weeks later, the same bill is being extended, and not a peep from the gutless idiots. So it was all posturing. They want it just as bad as the Republicans do, but they want to be seen to be reluctant.

    The Senate Democrats showed themselves to be toothless watchdogs when they joined the 98-1 vote in favor of the original Patriot Act. It was later disclosed that most Senators joining in the vote didn't even read the legislation. And they slavishly voted in favor of the resolutions leading to the Iraq war with just as little questioning of the administration (with a very small number of honorable exceptions). Later, they trot out lame excuses: that they were deceived, they didn't know what they were voting for, they were just supporting the president in time of need, etc. This is what is wrong with the Democratic Party. They'll whine a litte, try to mitigate some effects, but they're part of the same rotten system, and are part of a herd mentality that afflicts the entire power elite in Washington. If the Republicans adovated the genocide of ten million, the Dems would offer a counter-proposal of five million, and fret about getting a Presidential assurance that only humane killing methods would be used.

    They don't WANT the soap on a rope.

  • by operagost ( 62405 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @05:09PM (#14321841) Homepage Journal
    Significant Terrorist Incidents 1961-2003 [state.gov]

    Terrorists seem to be a lot more dangerous than bears.

  • Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @05:16PM (#14321924)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Sir_Eptishous ( 873977 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @05:21PM (#14321965)
    Here, let me install a camera in every room in your house and a gps monitoring system on your person.
    You're not hiding anything, right?

    Sheep...
  • by laughingcoyote ( 762272 ) <(moc.eticxe) (ta) (lwohtsehgrab)> on Thursday December 22, 2005 @06:01PM (#14322406) Journal

    You may be correct. But it's still one more paving stone on one very famous road...

    America is referred to as the Land of the Free for a reason-our freedoms are what makes us a great nation. Not our military, not our economic strength, not our President, good or bad, not our Congressional system, not our massive land area. Our freedoms, as enshrined in the US Constitution.

    The PATRIOT Act undermines those guarantees-and therefore, no matter what else is to be said about it, it is unpatriotic in the extreme. It may be done with the best of intentions, but it is still the worst of laws. In the America that I know and love, the government is the one who follows "If you've got nothing to hide, don't hide anything", and opens its workings transparently to the American people. The government has no problem following the rules set forth for it, in terms of the due process of law and the Congressional guarantee of freedom.

    I will oppose anything which will destroy this America, that I love. The PATRIOT Act is one of those things-and so, regardless of good intentions, bad intentions, or simple inattention, on the part of those who pass it, I oppose it.

  • by demachina ( 71715 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @07:13PM (#14323010)
    "Congress and the Senate, similarly, were populated by votes. Granted there was some dubious redistricting by a guy who's now under criminal investigation - but those offices were all populated by votes and can have their population changed by votes. Again, pretty much democracy in action."

    Actually MOST congressional districts are so gerrymandered that very few of the seats are actually seriously contested in each election. The districts have been drawn so that the party that did the gerrymandering pretty much has a lock on the seats so they pick just their man, the voters vote a party line and they usually win. Incumbents almost always win reelection if they run.

    Delay in Texas was just one of the more extreme and recent examples of this. The way you seize control of the house is by winning control of state legislatures and then redistricting. You create a jigsaw puzzle of a district overloaded with democrats/blacks and the dems win that seat but you create 4 or 5 suburban districts around it where Republican's have a comfortable majority. I forget exactly but the gerrymandering in Texas gave the Republicans a lock on something like 6 additional seats for their majority. Of course the Democrats have been just as bad at gerrymandering its just they've lost the edge to Republicans lately.

    All in all its extraordinarily naive to pretend that the American political system is democratic, that it represents the will of the people or that it works at all. It is a badly broken system.

    The fact that the American political systems is dominated by two equally corrupt and morally bankrupt parties with a stranglehold on power means there really is no good choice when you step in to a voting booth.

    It is just a very corrupted system and is getting more corrupt every day on both sides of the isle. Lobbyists, big campaign contributions and corporations have a stranglehold on decision making.

    Most voters are completely snowed at election time by misinformation, negative campaigning, and misleading TV ads paid for by people who expect a payback when their man wins office. This is why the American taxpayers are footing the bill for a $240 million bridge to no where in Alaska, campaign contributions leading to pork laden payoffs to big companies and rich fat cats.
  • A Numbers Station? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Majikk ( 60247 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @07:45PM (#14323257)
    Interesting. This looks very much like a numbers station. Notice how it's structured.

    HELLO WORLD -- Station identification?
    51596 51596 -- One time pad?
    HELLO WORLD -- Station identification?

    And then the message starts.

    5 numbers per group, with each group repeated once, which is very common, as well.

    This has me thinking, really. Spies used to get messages like these from shortwave radio stations because shortwave can't be traced to the recipient and shortwave radios were commonplace. But shortwave radios aren't commonplace at all any longer. A website like Slashdot, on the other hand, is all but ubiquitous. EVERYBODY reads slashdot. I realize it's probably just someone messing around, but maybe the internet has become commonplace enough that we've gone from numbers stations to numbers posts.
  • Re:Who's the Liar? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by TheSkyIsPurple ( 901118 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @08:21PM (#14323489)

    >> If you are tapping communication to/from US, if any party is unknown, that any reasonable person would agree that there is SUBSTANTIAL likelyhood that it involves a citizen.

    They could use the theory that if you are calling a private Al Qaeda number, then you are likely affiliated with them. If you are affiliated with them, you are probably not a legal citizen, etc. It doesn't guarantee you aren't... but it is in interesting (if disturbing) connection. I'd hate to accidentally dial one of the numbers =-/

    I've found that "reasonable person" in court scenarios cn be a little wacky. We would need to know what was actually targetted to get a better idea of theory/intent, I think.

    >>And if you do inadvertantly tap US citizen's communications, you HAVE to get the warrant (even if it is after the fact). That is what section 1805 is all about.

    Where does it actually say that? I'm getting lost in alot of the cross referencing.

    >> And did you read the definitions? Section 1801? It CLEARLY states that FISA DOES NOT cover US citizens (and legal aliens)

    I did read it.

    The part you refer to is "Agent of a foreign power", not "foreign power"

    1802 (a)(1)(A)(i) states explicitly "as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3)", not 1801 (b), so CLEARLY it does cover the possibility of including some United States Persons.

    Anyway, this still doesn't address the court's opinion that it is a constitutional authority of the president, which would exeed legal authority by definition.

    If we don't like it, we need to ammend it.

  • by StikyPad ( 445176 ) on Thursday December 22, 2005 @08:53PM (#14323693) Homepage
    6873

    That's the number I get from adding up the number of casualties listed, although I ignored the couple dozen assassinations, because those are, well.. assassinations. Of course, it's not (and doesn't claim to be) an exhaustive list, and some of the numbers are "at least," so we'll generously double it and say ~14,000 people died worldwide as a result of terrorism from 1961-2003.

    That's about 318 per year (at double the available statistics)

    In an average year, in the US alone:

    360 people are struck by lightning, about 90 fatally.
    120 people die in airplane crashes
    776 people die from the accidental discharge of firearms
    3,840 people drown
    12,760 people are poisoned
    15,000 people are murdered
    16,250 people are killed by a fall
    40,000 die in car crashes
    936,923 die from heart disease

    (Sources: http://www.nsc.org/lrs/statinfo/odds.htm [nsc.org], http://www.the-eggman.com/writings/death_stats.htm l [the-eggman.com])

    That's not to say that we should ignore the threat of terrorism. However, the threat should be kept in perspective, and our response should be measured accordingly.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...