Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Government United States Politics

U.S. Deploys Orbital Communications Jammer 619

kpwoodr writes "An interesting article at the Washington Times makes note of a recent satellite launch by the U.S. It seems we have put a jammer in space that will allow us to disrupt enemy communication systems at will. From the article: 'The U.S. military is bracing for future attacks in space, and the Air Force has deployed an electronic-warfare unit capable of jamming enemy satellites, the general in charge of space defenses says. "You can't go to war and win without space."'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

U.S. Deploys Orbital Communications Jammer

Comments Filter:
  • by bsandersen ( 835481 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @05:48PM (#13625156) Homepage
    I thought there was some notion that we would not attempt to militarize
    space. Given the problems we already have with "space junk", orbiting
    materials left over from previous launches ranging in size from rivets and
    nuts to whole satellites, encouraging a "space race" of orbiting weapon
    systems (including weapons against communication) seems crazy and
    deeply disappointing.

    I can only hope that such a space-race doesn't clog the low-Earth-orbit
    regions so legitimate, peaceful endeavors can continue without being
    pelted by the space-borne mine-field of junk left over from this disaster.
  • by CDMA_Demo ( 841347 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @05:58PM (#13625258) Homepage

    The shadowy shape of a bird spread its wings and rose into the air near him. Darkness engulfed the bridge. Dim lights danced briefly in the black eyes of the bird as, deep in its instructional address space, bracket after bracket was finally closing, if clauses were finally ending, repeat loops halting, recursive functions calling themselves for the last few times.
  • If you'll forgive a departure from the normal patented Slashdot Cynicism(tm), the future really will be different. Give it, say, 50 or 100 years.

    Europe was by far the bloodiest continent for hundreds and hundreds of years. What changed? Simple -- Democracy. It's extremely rare that stable democracies war on each other. Eventually, the rest of the world will join civilization and the entire world will be stable constitutional democracies. China, Korea, the Middle East -- Yeah, it seems far away from where we're standing right now, but it'll happen eventually.

    Once the entire world has been "de-dictator-ized", war will be pretty much over. There will still be the old hatreds (*ahem*India and Pakistan), but that only takes a few generations of children who don't know and don't care the border used to be different. They'd rather have peace than move a few lines on the map. Britain and Northern Ireland are already well on this course. Israel and Palestine probably won't happen until Palestine has actual real estate to call their own and has had a stable democracy for a few generations.

    But it'll happen. It's only a matter of time. I hope I see it in my lifetime.

  • by FredThompson ( 183335 ) <fredthompson&mindspring,com> on Thursday September 22, 2005 @06:02PM (#13625283)
    This kind of thing has been possible/discussed for a long time. In the early 80s there were rumors the Soviets had wood-encased satellites which were harder to detect. They were to move close to comm satellites then blow themselves up, suicide satellites, if you will. There's no reason to think such things haven't been deployed for at least a generation. What's interesting here is the open public announcement of directed energy satellites for jamming. Most miltary systems have been deployed for quite a while before the public hears anything about them. There have probably been dual-use birds from a number of countries for quite a while. Nothing new here...
  • by alan_dershowitz ( 586542 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @06:49PM (#13625638)
    Maybe it's a response to this [findarticles.com]. I don't think you have to be a space-faring nation to engage in space-warfare. Some other nations have been jamming our satellites, so we're deploying a superior response, I guess.
  • by Vitriol+Angst ( 458300 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @07:25PM (#13625873)
    No, perhaps this is a "Bad News Weapon". It may be tough to stop a specific frequency ... more to kill all radio in an area.

    What if its purpose is to just "buy time"? Meaning, it could be used as a fail safe to stop bad news from getting out.

    Heres a scenario: actual treason charges that could bring down the house of cards that is BushCo are brought forth. The satellite is fired and stops all broadcasts getting out of Washington. The private mercenaries are used as a Pretorian Guard to secure Fitzpatrick and any witnesses. After the "cleanup", a suitable explanation along with a defrosted "insta-terrorist" is put in place, and then the media can fill the airwaves with a "human tragedy" or terrorist act. Something that makes enough sense that half the country can argue with the other half... like we have been dealing with for 5 years now.

    This satellite may be no big deal and actually help our country. Normally, I wouldn't worry about it. But I am so paranoid about these fascists in office I wouldn't trust them with a butter knife--much less our country.

    If we think BushCo can lie us into a war that doesn't benefit US interests--or anybody but a bunch of crooks. If we think BushCo would steal an election. What don't you think BushCo would do?

    Not enough? Ok if torture were somehow legalized. If people could be imprisoned without their will? Oh, those are bad guys...

    Not enough? OK, an administration that would use its own people as guinea pigs (especially abused children), how about that?
    ahref=http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2004/2004 -02-23-02.asprel=url2html-15268 [slashdot.org]http://www.ens-news wire.com/ens/feb2004/2004-02-23-02.asp >
    ahref=http://www.ewg.org/issues/humantesting/20040 219/letter.phprel=url2html-15268 [slashdot.org]http://www.ewg.org /issues/humantesting/20040219/letter.php >
    ahref=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content /article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701511.htmlrel=url2ht ml-15268 [slashdot.org]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte nt/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701511.html >
    ahref=http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2005/Feb ruary/Day-08/t2371.htmrel=url2html-15268 [slashdot.org]http://www .epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2005/February/Day-08/t23 71.htm >
    ahref=http://pubs.acs.org/hotartcl/ci/00/may/schmi dt.htmlrel=url2html-15268 [slashdot.org]http://pubs.acs.org/hotar tcl/ci/00/may/schmidt.html >

    The proposal was later dropped when the public got wind of it... but now it is back again (like the media consolidation bill). In fact, they pushed it through while people were drowning after Katrina. Our government, too busy to rescue citizens but not too busy to sneak in legislation. I've just heard the rumor but I can't find a link yet. I just hope that when we find a way to test roach killer on kids, it will be legal.
  • by Vitriol+Angst ( 458300 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @07:33PM (#13625910)
    I think the idea that we got more civilized has been ruined for me... Europe and America just moved the battle ground. The desperation and poverty in the third world is used to make us cheap tennis shoes. For now, we are all sipping tea and pleasantly competing on who owns more of the exploited.

    What happens when less oil comes out of the ground than the year before? What happens when clean water gets more scarce? What happens when the gulf stream shuts down and Europe has to find new crop land or warmer/wetter weather?

    Are we too civilized to have resource wars? How civilized were we to turn back food and water going to the victims of Katrina just last week in the US of A?

    I have become much more cynical and worried about the future than ever. I have kids of my own now and I worry if they will be spared being drafted into a resource war. I'm sure they'll leave feeling like they are great heroes off to defeat some evil -- they will return with hollow looks in their eyes when they have killed too many of the hungry and desperate.
  • by Cryptnotic ( 154382 ) * on Thursday September 22, 2005 @07:46PM (#13625982)
    He's not saying that it's impossible, only that it hasn't happened yet.

  • by Vitriol+Angst ( 458300 ) on Thursday September 22, 2005 @07:52PM (#13626014)
    We didn't elect Bush.

    Here is one article that sums it up, surprisingly on cable news from Keith Obermann http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6368819/#041119a [msn.com]

    America is only 49% idiots.
  • by Jim_Callahan ( 831353 ) on Friday September 23, 2005 @05:06AM (#13627762)
    Well, the difference is that the turning points of WW2 actually hinged on american deployments (and, in Europe, British intelligence and Germany's lack of effective intelligence) whereas slavery was an institution picked up from association with european governments that used the practice, in turn picked up from the african natives that needed something to do with their captives. If we're going to take credit for something bad, it needs to be something bad that we were mostly responsible for. Like keeping certain dictators in power that should have just been allowed to die, for instance.
  • by killjoe ( 766577 ) on Friday September 23, 2005 @05:48AM (#13627861)
    A long time ago (seems like another lifetime) I was in the military. I was fond of muttering the phrase "people in charge of me who should not be in charge of their own lives" anytime some dork officer came out with a brilliant plan which for some crazy reason involved all the enlisted personell running around cleaning and painting all the buildings.

    When my enlistment ended that was the happiest day of my life.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...