Libertarians Lose Case to Block Presidential Debate 153
PMoonlite writes "As a followup to the previous Slashdot story, the judge ruled in favor of the Commission on Presidential Debates, refusing a restraining order on the basis of the doctrine of laches (unfairness due to delay of suit) and public interest, but allowing the Libertarians the possibility of seeking damages. So the debate will go forth at Arizona State University with only two of the three candidates on the state ballot."
shocked (Score:2, Funny)
Commission on [fake] Presidential Debates (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Does this shock anyone? (Score:3, Funny)
Reminds of the old line:
If you want get ahead in politics, you've got to have sincerity. Once you can fake that, you can do anything.
Re:Does this shock anyone? (Score:4, Funny)
Thanks.
Re:Libertarian voters don't otherwise vote Republi (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Does this shock anyone? (Score:3, Funny)
If Bush loses this election I would expect history to look at the first debate as the reason why.
If Bush loses this election, it's because of his debate performance and not all the past four years of his administration's BS?