Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Republicans Government Politics

Bush Service Memos Questioned 619

Twirlip of the Mists writes "Last night, CBS News released a set of memos dated 1972 and 1973 that are purported to raise questions about President Bush's National Guard service. Some are saying those memos might have been produced with a computer. Blogger Scott Johnson ran with the story first this morning, raising questions about the typography of the memos. Blogger Charles Johnson (no relation) went one step further, actually reproducing one of the memos in its entirety using Microsoft Word's default settings. Matt Drudge is running the story now with a link to a CNS News article that includes quotes from typography experts at font foundries Afga Monotype and Bitstream. There's a round-up of key facts about the story on this blogger's web site." The experts in the CNS News story and others could come to no conclusion, and even if the documents are not originals or photocopies of originals, that doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't faithfully retyped copies of originals. CBS continues to assert the documents are authentic.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bush Service Memos Questioned

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 09, 2004 @07:32PM (#10207530)
    Spoken by someone who either doesn't know the differences or doesn't want you to know.

    Spoken like a true party sheep.

    The relatives of 1,000 soldiers who died needlessly in Iraq disagree with you.

    How do you know they died needlessly? Do you think Iraq was not planning their own terrorist attacks against the US? Do you think that Iraq wasn't providing safe haven and supporting terrorists?

    Those of us who live near toxic waste sites that were slated for cleanup until Bush was appointed disagree with you.

    Proof?

    Minotities in Florida whose votes were not counted disagree with you.

    Proof?

    Women who value their right to choose abortion disagree with you.

    You mean their right to choose murder? If women have a right to choose murder, why can't I do it also? The fact that feminist groups base their 'rights' on the ability to kill unborn children is sickening. Do you realize that 30 million children have been killed by abortion in America? Do you realize the western world which has embraced abortion and birth control is DYING? That is right, there is a 'baby bust' among most nations with a western culture while China, India, and the Islamic world continue to grow. We are killing ourselves and our culture and we have been too blinded by the insanity of killing the young and the family unit to realize it.

    A women has a right to choose...to keep her legs closed or use birth control. Every time I have sex with a women I realize that it could be a life long commitment if I knock her up. I would never try to weasel my way out of it either, even if it's a meaningless fuck. Why don't other people have any sense of responsibility?

    Even judges who value the constitution disagree with you.

    According to the constitution, judges shouldn't be making law, yet they are.
  • Yeah, and (Score:3, Interesting)

    by autopr0n ( 534291 ) on Thursday September 09, 2004 @07:34PM (#10207559) Homepage Journal
    Kerry (now that I think about it) really looks like a Tool for not sticking up for Bush's service record the way Bush has for his. He could at least say something like "I don't know what the deal is with Bush's TANG service history, but I don't think that issue affects his ability to be president" Because honestly, it doesn't.

    I've never understood why this was an Issue democrats kept brining up. No undecided voter is going to care at all. If it could be shown that he'd lied about something (as these documents purport) then it would be an issue.

    Kerry has really disappointed me as a democrat, and I'm worried we might be stuck with bush for another 4 years due to his idiocy. Wish we'd nominated Edwards.
  • The Hand of Karl (Score:1, Interesting)

    by RobertB-DC ( 622190 ) * on Thursday September 09, 2004 @07:54PM (#10207739) Homepage Journal
    Yesterday on NPR's Fresh Air [npr.org], I listened to long-time Austin reporter Wayne Slater talk about his book (soon a movie) "Bush's Brain", about Karl Rove and the power behind the president. Rove is a master of dirty tricks, and damned proud of it. I see his hand at work.

    His methods, dating back to Bush's election as Texas' Governor, are to get dirty deeds done in ways that can't possibly be traced back to him or his candidate. Things like the whisper campaign against Ann Richards here in Texas, the "McCain is crazy" rumors in the primaries, and the Steamboat Veterans (whatever) for Truth fiasco now.

    What could be better than creating an obvious forgery about Bush's service, and slipping it into some CBS exec's inbox? It fits Rove's pattern perfectly: the president will have a chance to look persecuted, everyone will be angry at whoever was evil enough to try to set up Bush. There will be enough of us liberals who fall into the "we got him!" trap to keep Rove's fingerprints off the whole thing.

    I also think Rove is behind the supposedly-unexpected appearance of demonstrators at Bush's appearances... listen to the Fresh Air interview with Slater, especially the part where he sets up a nearly identical disruption of his opponent's event in the early '70s.
  • by Futurepower(R) ( 558542 ) on Thursday September 09, 2004 @08:51PM (#10208170) Homepage

    See this analysis [slashdot.org]. There were IBM Selectrics that had proportional spacing.

    Most people now know nothing of typesetting, because their computers do a better job than the $40,000 to $1,100,000 typesetters ever did. However, those who know about typesetting know that Microsoft Word and the old Selectrics are imitating the same font. Both are trying to look like typesetting.

    Times Roman, for example, was designed for the London Times in the 1770s, for example.

    IBM put some quirky symbols on the Selectric type balls because there was room for more than just the standard characters. I don't specifically remember which symbols, and there were many balls with many selections of characters.

    The old one-use carbon ribbons used in the Selectrics made a more clean impression than a laser printer, and impression quite like letter press, which is still the standard in fine-looking type.
  • by Twirlip of the Mists ( 615030 ) <twirlipofthemists@yahoo.com> on Thursday September 09, 2004 @09:33PM (#10208525)
    I can only find one other case in which Dr Philip Bouffard has provided advice concerning a typewriter font on the net.

    The significant contributions of Dr. Philip D. Bouffard to the examination and classification of typewriting [asqde.org], Mary W. Kelly, 2004 Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.

    He's the recognized authority. Look harder.

    The biggest reason to doubt the bouffard claims is that the gif image that has been posted is of such a miserable resolution that it is impossible to see what is going on at all.

    What? GIF image? What the hell are you talking about? The documents CBS released are PDFs containing 108-dpi (appx) scans of the memos.

    I do not even agree that the font is definitely Times Roman

    Well, since you're not a recognized expert in the field of the forensic analysis of typewriting, you'll excuse me if I can't be bothered to give a shit.

    Ignore all the evidence you want.
  • by deanj ( 519759 ) on Friday September 10, 2004 @12:02AM (#10209591)
    This is all very interesting, but all completely wrong. Good try though.

    See the following:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9 96 7-2004Sep9.html

    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Politics/Vote2004 /b ush_documents_040909-1.html

    One of the key quotes from the Post article:

    " William Flynn, a forensic document specialist with 35 years of experience in police crime labs and private practice, said the CBS documents raise suspicions because of their use of proportional spacing techniques. Documents generated by the kind of typewriters that were widely used in 1972 space letters evenly across the page, so that an "i" uses as much space as an "m." In the CBS documents, by contrast, each letter uses a different amount of space.

    "While IBM had introduced an electric typewriter that used proportional spacing by the early 1970s, it was not widely used in government. In addition, Flynn said, the CBS documents appear to use proportional spacing both across and down the page, a relatively recent innovation. Other anomalies in the documents include the use of the superscripted letters "th" in phrases such as 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, Bush's unit."

    One of the key quotes from the ABC News article:

    "The font used in the memos is Times Roman, which was in use for printing but not in typewriters. The Haas Atlas -- the bible of fonts -- does not list Times Roman as an available font for typewriters."
  • That would be the cretin you want to get elected to the Whitehouse.

    It's two words: White House.

    Several people are claiming that they used Selectric golfballs with proportional pitch.

    Impossible. The pitch on a Selectric isn't controlled by the type ball. It's controlled by the motor drive. The type ball just rotates and elevates to strike a letter on the paper. There's nothing about it that controls how far the type head advances on each letter strike.

    but I certainly don't see how you claim to know the exact capabilities of every typewriter owned by the US military.

    I've had sixteen hours now to work on this story. ;-) How many people from IBM have you talked to today?

    IBM sold selectric golfballs with the th superscript at the time.

    Yes. They were custom items that were machined to order and that cost a fortune. And they also could not produce variable-pitch type, nor could they produce Times New Roman type.

    There is no reason why they could not have offered their IBM Executive series machines with a similar option.

    Yes, there is: the Executive machines didn't use interchangeable type balls. They used a lever-arm mechanism. Either all Executive typewriters would have had the "th" glyph or none of them would have. None did. IBM never made one with that glyph.

    And no, the typeface is not MICROSOFT anything, Microsoft has never designed a typeface ever. The Microsoft fonts are from Monospace corp.

    LOL. You mean "Monotype?" Heh. When TrueType came along in the early 1990s (or was it late 1980s?) Microsoft licensed the name and the letter forms from Monotype, now Agfa Monotype. Microsoft implemented the font, which means they determined the letterspacing, kerning pairs and so on.

    The CTO of Agfa Monotype, incidentally, is on the record saying that it was highly unusual for anyone to use proportional-pitch type in the 1970's. The technology just wasn't there.

    The 'expert' you refer to is not regarded as such outside the US republican party.

    Sorry, but that's simply not true. He's so influential in the industry of forensic document analysis that other researchers write papers about him.

    There is only one google hit for Bouffard and typewriter that relates to a forensic case and that is a crank case involving UFOs.

    Your Google-fu is lacking.
  • Re:An analysis (Score:5, Interesting)

    by gleam ( 19528 ) on Friday September 10, 2004 @01:33AM (#10210038) Homepage
    Thank you.

    Here's what the original blogger gives us as proof that this was rare, courtesy of the ever-accurate freerepublic.com (where "Unfit for Command" co-author Jerry Corsi conflated islam, catholicism, and "boy buggery"):

    "Every single one of the memos to file regarding Bush's failure to attend a physical and meet other requirements is in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatine or Times New Roman. In 1972 people used typewriters for this sort of thing (especially in the military), and typewriters used mono-spaced fonts.

    The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction high-end word processing systems from Xerox and Wang, and later of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers. They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's.

    Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang and other systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used mono-spaced fonts. I doubt the TANG had typesetting or high-end 1st generation word processing systems."

    That's absurd, and demonstrably false. You mentioned the selectrics. IBM's electric typewriters had proportional fonts as far back as 1945. Even if the base had a typewriter that was nearly 30 years old, it would still be capable of creating proportional fonts.

    Doubters should also remember that today's most popular proportional fonts have been used in typesetting (and on selectrics) since well before TrueType.

    Furthermore, Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, mentioned in the memos and involved in the back-and-forth, has confirmed that Killian expressed to him the same sentiments contained in the memos.

    Regarding the superscripted 'th' argument, this document from Bush's official records also contains a superscripted 'th': http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/9-Miscellane ous.pdf [usatoday.com]. The superscripted th is on page three, in the second line of the log.

    The White House even admits the authenticity of the documents, so why is this even an issue?

    Because people don't want to realize that Bush disobeyed a DIRECT ORDER from his superior officers.

    Because people don't want to think that the plane Bush flew continued to be used regularly through 1975, despite Bush and Bartlett's claims that it was "being phased out" and that Bush didn't need to take the physical because the planes wouldn't be used.

    The best line I've heard lately, courtesy of Kevin Drum:

    This story is a perfect demonstration of the difference between the Swift Boat controversy and the National Guard controversy.

    Both are tales from long ago and both are related to Vietnam, but the documentary evidence in the two cases is like night and day.

    In the Swift Boat case, practically every new piece of documentary evidence indicates that Kerry's accusers are lying.

    Conversely, in the National Guard case, practically every new piece of documentary evidence provides additional confirmation that the charges against Bush are true.

    regards, ed
  • Re:An analysis (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mdielmann ( 514750 ) on Friday September 10, 2004 @02:06AM (#10210175) Homepage Journal
    My mom had a selectric back in the day, and may still have it kicking around. It was probably bought about the time this whole fiasco was occuring. I seem to recall that it did proportional spacing, and had the th symbol, but it's been a long time (I mean, come on, who on /. has used a typewriter in the last 10 years?). It was definitely the golf ball style. I remember popping that thing off just for fun, and probably screwing up the adjustments in the process.

    I'll have to check it out, and post any corrections here, if she still has it lying around.
  • Re:Try this (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bonkedproducer ( 715249 ) <paul&paulcouture,com> on Friday September 10, 2004 @08:26AM (#10211319) Homepage Journal
    Look here [bonkedproducer.com] and tell me that the document wasn't typed in Word.

    Oh, and the guy who claims to have found this stuff, well, he has very little credibility so before you go bashing everyone - even a lot of people who want the memos to be real are saying it looks and smells fishy.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 10, 2004 @10:56AM (#10212664)
    I'm afraid that, yes, it is really fancy. What you're describing is fixed (or track) kerning. What we see here is pair kerning: compare the pairs 'fe', 'fr' and 'ee' to see that the spacing in each pair is different - this certainly wasn't available on any mechanical typewriter.
  • by demachina ( 71715 ) on Friday September 10, 2004 @12:27PM (#10213638)
    "He let his flight status lapse because he knew he wouldn't be flying any more and because a physical examination is not a fun thing to do with your day."

    He didn't take his physical because this is when the Guard instituted drug testing as part of it. Its ridiculous to suggest he'd risk landing in Vietnam just because taking the physical was not fun.

    Its no secret was a frequent cocaine user during this period. He would have been nailed for drug use if he hadn't so he refused. He did and he should have been remanded to regular service for the insubordination and would have if he didn't have connections.

    You did know W. was busted in Texas for cocaine possession. Again thanks to family connections he got off with six months of community service at PUSH. I assure you he didn't do community service for poor black folks out of the goodness of his heart. If he'd been poor or black he would have gotten a felony conviction and it would have ended his political career. America and the world would be a better place too.

    I imagine the new documents are forged. I wish they'd sneaked by. The problem we have here is the Bush family and their very skilled and ruthless operatives went around destroying all the evidence of his pathetic excuse for a life, including gaining unsupervised and illegal access to his guard file when they destroyed all the really embarrasing documents. As a result there is no proof that he isn't fit to be President, though he isn't, so he has the Teflon coating.

    "George W. Bush was born on third base and he thinks he hit a triple" Ann Richards

    "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

    George W. Bush, December 2000

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...