France Leading Charge Against OOXML
Posted by
kdawson
on Tue Nov 27, 2007 05:29 AM
from the ceci-n'est-pas-ouvert dept.
from the ceci-n'est-pas-ouvert dept.
Bergkamp10 writes "As Microsoft's Office Open XML document format waits in ISO limbo, South Africa, Korea, and the Netherlands are now actively pursuing the alternative Open Document Format instead, said the ODF Alliance. The Alliance now claims 500 members, and by their count 13 nations have announced laws or rules that favor the use ODF over Microsoft's Office formats. Those nations include Russia, Malaysia, Japan, France, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, and Norway. The French have been the most aggressive in their rejection of Microsoft's standard; nearly half a million French government employees are being switched to OpenOffice. There has been no similar move in the US, though in a speech at Google last week Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama called for data to be stored in 'universally accessible formats.'"
Related Stories
Firehose:France leading charge against OOXML by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

Viva la french! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Viva la french! (Score:4, Informative)
Look who's talking. How about the high-profile Hollywood screenwriter strike? And it's not "la French", it's "LES French".
I can't avoid feeling antipathy for the French, but I must concede to them, it takes balls to stand up for their rights the way they do. It's hard to be on strike and lose many days of pay.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh hang on.........
Re:Viva la french! (Score:5, Interesting)
I believe there is a strong connection between the Puritan work ethic and the Stockholm effect in conditions of kidnap. To some degree it's culturally normal for the North American to bond with his abuser, to tolerate abuse, to see those who reject abuse as weak and those who organise to collecitvely challenge abuse as "troublemakers". The puzzle, is that this flies directly against their stated values of freedom and democracy.
Re:Viva la french! (Score:4, Insightful)
Let me tell you a story.
A few years ago there was a song that got a lot of play at Republican campaign events, that had the lyrics, "I'm proud to be an American/where at least I know I'm free."
Now, being the kind of nerd I am, my immediate reaction was, "How do you know you're free?" and "What do you mean by at least?" I suspect the answer to the former is "Because I was told I'm free," and the latter is "I may not have control over my work or personal privacy, but it's nice to be told that I'm free nonetheless."
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
In the context of that song, it means that "everything might not be perfect in my life, but even if I have nothing else, I have my freedom". You probably don't need to spend a lot of time reading between the lines there.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Viva la french! (Score:4, Interesting)
We recognize that left unchecked, the workers will destroy the business. They have essentially done that in the united states. People with high school degrees used collective bargaining to get college level wages and even better retirement plans. Now the industry is collapsing under that weight.
We also recognize that the executive class is currently unchecked and looting and pillaging our large businesses at grossly abusive rates ( I personally cannot see the justification for paying *ANYONE* over about $10 million a year-- much less giving them $150+ million dollars for being fired).
America is big on capitalism. When constrained by social values, it produces a very good outcome. Unproductive activities are terminated fairly rapidly (and everyone loses their job). Costs are aggressively reduced. Until recently the result was more wealth for us on average with some short term damage to a lot, and a small group people's lives destroyed periodically as buggy whips, or osbourne's or whatever went out of fashion.
We also see that socialism will grow to the point that a lot of society becomes unproductive and leeches off of the working classes. Our welfare system was reaching a point that many people born in it, died in it and had more children who would enter the system and keep it expanding.
Until fairly recently, when the capitol requirements became so high and the existing businesses successfully set up fairly high barriers to new competition, it was fairly easy for an american who wanted to be rich to get out and start a business and make it work.
As the rich get a stranglehold on the company- as the republicans become identified with corporations and the wealthy more than with religious and ethical causes- this is going to change. I expect us to swing hard left very soon. High taxes on the rich, limits on executive compensation, limits on corporate power, stronger better social services nets.
Personally, i think the french have it right. I prefer to work 37 hour weeks myself and usually find a way too. It is ridiculous that after decades of constant productivity improvements we STILL have to work 8 hours a day to earn a living- I suppose it is an artifact of the 24 hour day. 7 hours is reasonable but perhaps 6 hours is what we should drive for- or 8 hours 4 days a week.
I was talking to a labor lawyer on a flight last year and he said that labor's ability to strike effectively in the us has basically been removed. For example- you can't do industry strikes if I understand him correctly.
So if you want to strike against amalgamated butter, all the other butter companies keep churning it out. Back in the 60's, you could shut down butter production period by striking at all companies- and even the butter delivery companies.
We are not conditioned to see striking as worse than quitting. We have less unions tho. So when a union effectively strikes and takes away our ability to get garbage collected or police protection- we just get pissed at the strikers. And really- there is an ongoing debate on whether vital services people should have a right to strike.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Considering that he wrote the first word in Spanish and the last word in English, it probably doesn't matter if the middle word isn't proper French.
Re:Viva la french! (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh well, I guess I'll burn some karma for this topic.
High profile? Are you kidding? Paris Hilton, Brittney Spears, and Lindsy Lohan got more press coverage for drunk driving in one day than this entire strike has garnered this entire time. In fact, the last I heard in the news was how the Screenwriters are screaming conspiracy because they're NOT getting the air-time they want!
You're right, but I think he was going for "la France" as that's the popular phrase, but this isn't French class. Would it be too ironic to call you a French grammar Nazi?
Why?The France are generally great people (as much as I love to give them the hardest time about their poor government programs, shitty service at banks and government offices, or their military victories [albinoblacksheep.com]). Speaking as an American who's engaged to and has been dating a French woman for over 4-years. By no means am I an expert, but I've a fair share of French Culture, sometimes the hard way.
That would be a first. You'd definitely take them by surprise. ;P
See, now I know that you don't understand the French. It doesn't take balls. It doesn't take much at all. Striking in France is practically a hobby. They... Do... It... All... The... Time... Seriously, I cannot remember a time I was in France that didn't have strikes (or riots). I only laugh when CNN or some other outlet covers it as some sort of "end of France" like story.
Sadly, there's a group of people (usually college students) that don't even know half the facts about what they're striking about. All they want to do is participate in a strike. Strikes also go far beyond "right". Just ask all the students and professors that where forcibly turned away from their classes (during important exams no less) by other students that were protesting. "My 'Rights' trump yours" is a more realistic motto for for some.
France is also as media driven as the U.S. All it takes is one news broadcast or paper to say "train works will have to work more for less" to send all government workers on Strike without understanding the situation. Simply put, protest is part of the French culture. Just ask Marie Antoinette, who took away their baguettes and she lost her head. =P
Tell that to the endless number of people who are not striking and cannot make it to their jobs against their will because they rely on public transportation. How about the harm to their countries economy? For what? The reasons for these strikes are just asinine. They're not trying to abolish the train system, striking to show what it would be like to not have trains isn't going to make a point. They're not trying to layoff the train work force. Striking to show how less workers would mean less trains and poorer service is not going to make a point.
In fact, that extra 6 billion euros a year they will get for moving the retirement age back to 55, instead of 50, could be spent to INCREASE the number of jobs available. Something that France still needs badly. But this small group of French activists don't see it like that. It's "more work, less pay" and that's how the media totes it. Good thing the majority of France isn't that stupid and support president Sarko's reforms despite the hardships the monopolist unions are trying to strangle the French citizens with by forcing them into submission and making their lives hell.
The real story about the recent train strikes isn't the
Re: (Score:3)
Unions are financially supported by workers. So, if they have funds to cover for strikes, good. It's their money, they do whatever they want with it.
About French politics, I can't argue with you, I don't know enough.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Korea (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Korea (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Korea (Score:5, Funny)
God don't get me started. I spent a week working at a customer site in S Korea about a month ago. At one point I had to get a deb package for my laptop and asked if I could plug it into their internet facing network. But it was no-go. Whatever URL I put in got back a javascript redirect to a page apparently telling me I had to use IE. Not an easy thing to do in Ubuntu.
So I gave a USB stick to a Korean co-worker and he tried to download the same file. Again no go. Gets the same page. Then he gave me the USB stick back and retried the page on the off chance and the bloody thing worked. This machine only gets you to real web pages if you are on windows and don't have a USB storage device mounted. Its meant to be secure I suppose.
For some reason the Koreans just love hacks like that. I don't know why. I was happy to get back home after that.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Barack Obama called for data to be stored in... (Score:5, Insightful)
And all it takes is for Microsoft to say "Look, our document format is also universally accessible, we even have 'open' in the name," and most people would believe them. Good thing though, Obama seems to have some sort of grasp about the concept of computers and the interwebs.
Re:Barack Obama called for data to be stored in... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Barack Obama called for data to be stored in... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
an old trick. from the brilliant series "yes minister"
Re:Barack Obama called for data to be stored in... (Score:4, Funny)
That would explain this [microsoft.com] Vista site then.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not France, the UK is! (Score:5, Funny)
Not quite that open yet (Score:2, Funny)
*ducks*
UK has a very bad record on this (Score:5, Interesting)
Unfortunately it's easy for a country to say it supports open standards, just as it's easy for a country to say it's "helping" in Iraq. Reality is often much different.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
France... (Score:5, Informative)
Two different replies to this. (Score:5, Insightful)
- What? Everybody uses Word.
- Oh, dear god, please let them reach a consensus.
Guess which one works as the step between scientific writers and printing services.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Two different replies to this. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Great, now the U.K. has to support Microsoft. (Score:3, Funny)
- Greg
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, now that France is surrendering to open formats, the americans will have no choice but to create a new "Freedom Office", co
Re:Great, now the U.K. has to support Microsoft. (Score:4, Informative)
AIDS = SIDA
kB = kO
OPEC = OPEP
And the list goes on. We do that less than the French speaking Canadians though... KFC = PFK is my favorite.
Re:Great, now the U.K. has to support Microsoft. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Really Accessible (Score:2, Funny)
Like printouts?
France submitted 591 comments on the OOXML spec (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Barack Obama called for... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
When it comes to technology politicians are clueless, with few exceptions. However, the fact that he bothers to pander to someone about it means that the issue has made at least some headway.
Re:Barack Obama called for... (Score:5, Informative)
Apparently he's also pro network neutrality: http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060608-network_neutral/ [senate.gov]
Becasue OOXML is absolutely *not* open (Score:5, Informative)
Wrong. ODF is honestly open, OOXML is absolutely *not* open. In the OOXML specs there are several sections that essentially say: "do this the same as in Word-95" but the Word-95 specs are still closed.
BTW: ODF does not exclude msft. There are pluggins that allow ms-office to work just fine with ODF. Also, msft is entirely free to incorporate ODF if msft so choses. Msft's claims that ODF excludes msft is pure bullsh!t.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, I also think that the big distinction is: You're allowed to use whatever format you damned well please. In most cases where they're talking about a government adopting "open formats", they're talking about using open formats for specific kinds of co
Re: (Score:3)
Free choice for whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Where the free choice of the government should be limited is that they should not be allowed standardize on formats that are entangled with legal limitations.
Apart from that, we can argue on technical merits on what formats to standardize on.
Re:ODF? (Score:4, Informative)