Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Canadian Movie Camcording Addressed With Legislation

Posted by Zonk on Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:01 AM
from the cameras-down dept.
dottyslashdottydot writes "During Arnold Schwarzenegger's visit to Ottawa yesterday, it was confirmed that Prime Minister Stephen Harper will be introducing a bill to make camcording in movie theaters illegal in Canada. However, people are skeptical that this will make any difference in the amount of pirated movies available. Doug Frith, president of the Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association was quoted as saying, 'is really the first step — not only for the movie industry — where the government has shown it will seriously address the whole area of intellectual-property theft.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Entertainment: Putting Canadian Piracy in Perspective 188 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Over the past year Slashdot has pointed to many industry claims and governmental pressure over Canada piracy issues. Canadian law prof Michael Geist has produced Putting Canadian 'Piracy' in Perspective, a video that demonstrates how the claims are hugely exaggerated. For example, it shows how despite the MPAA's claim of movie piracy, Canada was the industry's fastest growing market last year. Similarly, while the recording industry says Canada is the world's top P2P country, the data shows that the Canadian music industry is experiencing record gains and that most of the decline from the major labels is due to retail pricing pressures."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by davecb (6526) * on Friday June 01 2007, @11:04AM (#19351875) Homepage Journal
    Since the last major public study on movie piracy in 2003 [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/drm03-tr.pdf], concluded that 77 percent of pirated movies actually come from industry insiders and movie reviewers, "camcording" is not something the Motion Picture Association of America should really be concerned with. I suspect we'll see an act making any copying of a DVD an indictable (criminal) offence rather than somthing one deals with in a lawsuit.
    • by seaturnip (1068078) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:11AM (#19352003)
      Anyway, it seems preposterous to assume anything can be done about camcording: it can only have an effect if all attempted camcordings of a given movie are prevented. A single recording provides an infinite supply of pirated copies. This is even more hopeless than the War on Drugs.
      • by Pojut (1027544) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:15AM (#19352081) Homepage
        This is even more hopeless than the War on Untaxed Drugs

        fixed.
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)


          To continue with this. What is next?

          Making it illegal to sell illegal drugs to an undercover officer wearing a bikini within 100 yards of a fire hydrant?

          My point is that copyright laws, and probably a few other ones, already makes camcording a movie illegal. Or at least the distribtion of it, which is what I would assume the law is designed to prevent.

          I'm not a fan of minutely specific laws because 99% of the time a more general law already makes the behavior illegal.

    • by Applekid (993327) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:13AM (#19352059)
      Except the MPAA can't summon police forces to take care of inside jobs... that would be civil infractions that wouldn't immediately carry criminal charges (maybe they can peg fraud or something, but IANAL).

      If camming is made illegal in the letter of the law, however, now they don't have to do any work though their Intenal Affairs departments. Fighting whatever percentage of priacy that comes from cams can basically become outsourced to government.
    • by ajanp (1083247) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:28AM (#19352293)

      But why look at problems within your own distribution system or try to address the larger concern of finding ways to secure the high quality DVD screeners that magically find their way to the interwebs when you can just as easily find that the real problem stems from those evil canadian bacon eating molsen drinking bastards.

      It amazes me that you've all apparently forgot those 2 magic words that should rule every aspect of both your personal and professional lives.

      BLAME CANADA!

  • by chill (34294) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:06AM (#19351909) Homepage Journal
    How big of a deal is this, really?

    I've always found captures of camcordered movies to be of crap quality. It has never stopped me from later buying the DVD, or from even going to the theater. From me, they've never lost a dime because of this.

    Well, okay. Once when in high school, when living in Europe, the only way we got to see some movies was camcorder rips of U.S. screens. There may be one or two that I never actually paid theater tickets for. This was back in the days of VHS and 300 bps modems.

    Still, considering the amount of money being made in theatrical releases, is this really a problem or just another smokescreen?
    • by deadsquid (535515) <asx.deadsquid@com> on Friday June 01 2007, @11:21AM (#19352185) Homepage
      It's a big deal because it's a first step to trying to bring Canadian copyright protections to a level the media companies are happy with. We have a set of laws that have a decent amount of balance between protecting the property rights holder and protecting the consumer. There's tremendous pressure from various interest groups to change our copyright laws to bring in things like provisions in the US DMCA without fair use guarantees. So while this by itself is a very small thing, it opens the door into a much bigger deal.
    • by Scrameustache (459504) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:38AM (#19352437) Homepage Journal

      How big of a deal is this, really?
      Camcorders? Not big at all.

      A foreign cartel forcing a supposedly sovereign nation to change their law according to their whims, THAT is a big deal.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      What's the big deal? I can tell you. If you only know the previews and ads and teasers, you might think it's a great movie.

      After you've seen the movie, in whatever crappy quality, you know that those 30 seconds of previews, ads and teasers actually were ALL the good parts of the movie. Are you gonna go watch it and pay for it?
      • by Your Pal Dave (33229) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:36AM (#19352417)

        This was back in the days of VHS and 300 bps modems.


        Gee, Uncle Chill, it must have taken forever to transfer those divx/xvid'ed VHSes via a 300 bps modem!!! ;)
        Nobody's sure how long it would take, the TRS-80 hasn't finished encoding the video yet.

  • Bah. (Score:4, Funny)

    by TripMaster Monkey (862126) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:14AM (#19352075)
    Camcorder piracy is for those who don't have the technical expertise to commit proper piracy. ^_^
  • Sigh.. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by fadeaway (531137) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:21AM (#19352177) Homepage
    I would like to take this opportunuty to thank my American friends for allowing their corporate owned administration to spin so far out of control as to spill their misguided witch hunt into my country. Now not only will YOUR taxpayers money be wasted on chasing, prosecuting, and imprisoning IP "criminals", ours will too!

    I would also like to thank my own government for being such slack-jawed pansies and allowing the Governator to actually influence Canadian policy.

    I want to wretch.
  • by gstoddart (321705) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:23AM (#19352213) Homepage
    Interestingly enough, the movie theatres here in Canada are already claiming it is illegal.

    When I went to Spiderman 3 the other week, they had a sign up in the lobby that said something like "for everyone's safety end enjoyment, we remind you that recoding devices are illegal".

    I was quite surprised by that, as I knew it wasn't yet in law.

    That, and I have no idea how my safety is affected by such things. Once again, the fear card gets played -- "OMG, we could all die if someone has a recording device".
  • by Rik Sweeney (471717) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:26AM (#19352267) Homepage
    well, you can be prosecuted if you're caught filming a movie in the cinema.

    What I've always wanted to do though is very obviously erect a camera with tripod in one of the aisles and then continuously tell people off for eating too loud / whispering / getting in the way of the shot.

    "Guys, will you keep it down! I'm trying to film this!"
  • Great Solution (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Baavgai (598847) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:35AM (#19352393) Homepage
    For, say, 1990. Seriously, what decade are these people living in?

    Pirated copies don't come from some idiot wielding a camcorder, they come digital copies usually leaked from within the industry itself. "Review copy" only means "my kid will be torrenting this in three hours, here it comes."

    And the minimum wage salary surf shining a flashlight on people fondling each other is now a also a policeman? If a guy holding an illegal recording device looks able enough to abuse a baby seal and isn't bothering anyone, what possible incentive does a theater have to confront them?

    This type of legislation is a cry for help on the part of the legislator. It's a sign they're so out of touch it's not even funny.
  • by FreeKill (1020271) on Friday June 01 2007, @11:44AM (#19352523) Homepage
    We were already subjected to random search at every movie these days. Check out this flyer that now hangs ever 2 feet and above every ticket counter at every theater I've been to lately:

    http://img161.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cineplexs earchconsentwr9.jpg [imageshack.us]

    This will do nothing more then make the big theater chains more afraid and implement more ridiculous policies that in the end only make non-pirates stop going !
  • by MobyDisk (75490) on Friday June 01 2007, @12:09PM (#19352877) Homepage
    This should already have been illegal: it's copyright violation, right? Is this one of those redundant laws like it is illegal to sell illegal drugs to a minor, when selling illegal drugs is already illegal? Or it is illegal to commit a "hate" crime against someone of another race or ethnicity, but it is already illegal to commit a crime against anyone at all? More charges don't solve the problem.
  • Never Happen. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by arthurpaliden (939626) on Friday June 01 2007, @12:12PM (#19352935)

    Minority government.

    Election coming sooner rather than later.

    It will die on the order paper if it ever gets there.

    • by davecb (6526) * on Friday June 01 2007, @11:09AM (#19351969) Homepage Journal

      It's ok, the clean copy from a screener DVD or a quality film scanner will be along in a second (;-))

      --dave

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Thats the thing most of what the scene calls good releases are not camra recordings, TS can sometimes be okay, but I think what hurts the industry more is the DVD releases that perviewers leak and such. I mean I love going to the movie, but if its not something I really really am excited about like the 300 or spider-man 3 or what ever and I can get a DVD release and watch it at home without the little kids yelling, I would prefer it.

      Thats why I rent and buy a lot of dvds and wait for video release. I don'
    • Yes... Excellent... Keep focusing on the cams. They are the problem...

      *Jedi hand wave* These aren't the cams you are looking for...

    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 01 2007, @11:28AM (#19352289)
      I refuse to go to a movie theatre that searches people. I used to go 30-40 movies a year, I don't go at all anymore since they started this practice, and I've made sure they know exactly why I'm not attending.