Two US States Restrict Used CD Sales 500
DrBenway sends us to Ars Technica for a report that Florida and Utah have placed draconian restrictions on the sale of used music CDs; Wisconsin and Rhode Island may soon follow suit. In Florida, stores have to hold on to CDs for 30 days before they can sell them — for store credit only, not cash. Quoting: "No, you won't spend any time in jail, but you'll certainly feel like a criminal once the local record shop makes copies of all of your identifying information and even collects your fingerprints. Such is the state of affairs in Florida, which now has the dubious distinction of being so anal about the sale of used music CDs that record shops there are starting to get out of the business of dealing with used content because they don't want to pay a $10,000 bond for the 'right' to treat their customers like criminals."
Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:5, Funny)
Hey! Is this first post? I think it is! Umm... W00t?
Re:Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:5, Interesting)
But no matter. Many years ago my album and cassette collection was stolen. I tracked down the pawn shop they were sold to. Pawn Shops were I lived were required to hold items for 30 days before selling them - and to take ID. This led to the person who stole them being convicted.
I never got my albums or cassettes back though. The pawn shop claimed that I had no evidence that the ones they bought were mine and I, of course, not having individually labeled each item had no proof they were.
Re:Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:5, Insightful)
That doesn't make sense. How could there possibly be enough evidence to convict somebody of stealing them, but not any evidence that they were yours?
Re:Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:5, Informative)
I had no proof that what they sold was all "my collection" and not someone elses. I suppose if I would have hired a lawyer I may have had them returned. In the criminal case the Crown (Canada's DA) paid for all that.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Jeez, I think I ate so many mashed potatoes at dinner that it affected my brain.
Re:tax on blank cds (Score:5, Informative)
this does NOT suck (Score:5, Interesting)
In fact, this could be exactly what we need. This is clearly such a ludicrous measure that if it goes into law everywhere, the apathy-riddled consumer might actually sit up and notice. When average Jimbo down the street gets hit with fees and taxes and fingerprints and anal probes while trying to sell his old stash of CDs, there should at least be a little more awareness about what the RIAA f**kheads are trying to do. Hopefully, that will lead to consumer action and eventually enough agitation to overturn this measure and also place some iron clamps on what the RIAA can and cannot do.
In other words, the more ludicrous the little battles are, the better chance we have of winning the war. Now the lawyers here can strike me down.
Re:this does NOT suck (Score:5, Insightful)
Anti consumer, anti business. Pro RIAA.
I guess Craigslist will get a surge for CD sellers/buyers in those states for the time being.
Once they criminialze your average Joe from selling used CDs person-to-person like it's a controlled substance, the pitchforks and torches will come out.
No torches, same voting. (Score:5, Insightful)
Well (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Well (Score:5, Interesting)
Basically, you run into the average house, what's the most valuable stuff you can steal in a few seconds? If you think "The TV!"
If they've got time, they'll clean you out entirely, but for quick petty theft, they go for the easy score. And, given college students pawning their CDs all the time anyway, it's not too unusal to see it happen.
So, MAFIAA influence and some crime numbers made this happen. I think it's stupid, but used-CD stores were becoming fences, and that's not good for anyone.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Have you sold any CDs or DVDs to a "used" record store?
think 10 cents on the dollar.
They still have value, don't get me wrong, just not the gold mine you make them out to be.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Most things like this are pro-business, but you have to consider which business is really benefiting.
Re:this does NOT suck (Score:4, Insightful)
And the reason why we're just going to bend over and take it is the same reason why we're grabbing ankles for the DMCA: the politicians that make the laws were bought and paid for a long time ago and they aren't available for purchase in the aftermarket.
Re:this does NOT suck (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I wish it worked that way, but it doesn't. What happens is that we get accustomed to each new ludicrous action, and in the end, we've got ridiculous laws that few people have much of a problem with. Too few people are concerned about restrictions on selling used CDs, and the same will be true of the next draconian measure taken.
Three hundred million people in the US, it's pretty h
Re:Holy SHIT that sucks. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
This is why fark has a Florida tag (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This is why fark has a Florida tag (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They want your money any way they can get it. After you've bought your CD it is yours so instead of selling it to some stupid store sell it to your buddy.
A fancy way for these guys to get around the restriction. Heres a $10 voucher for store credit... Dont worry you can redeem it for cash after this transaction is over. Boom all nice
Inaccurate. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Still inaccurate (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds better with no qualifiers.
wow (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:wow (Score:5, Interesting)
Want to know how shit like this is passed? Read this [tampabays10.com]. I realize it is written horribly, but the video speaks for itself: the Florida legislature votes largely by proxy. Most legislators do not attend the full sessions, when they attend at all.
What do you expect from a state that fields Rhonda Storms [google.com]? (For a kick, read the first result description.)
Re:wow (Score:5, Interesting)
But, still better than 6 in Schnectady / Albany, whom I had to call to inform that "The reports of my death were greatly exagerated".
I would love to see who started this bill. We have Nelson as a senator, who is the deepest in the pocket of the RIAA of ANY Senator. And to those who care, he is a Democrat.
Re:wow (Score:5, Funny)
Ha Ha!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Bzzt, wrong, try again. The main reason that Utah was the other state to enact this is their Republican Senator, Orrin Hatch, who has also long been in the pocket of the movie and music industries. There are numbnuts on both sides of the aisle in Washington, so let's not partisanize this. Special interest money is corrupting both parties badly which is why we are in su
Florida media (Score:3, Interesting)
As someone who worked in Florida local media (WTSP-TV in St. Pete), I can tell you that Florida media completely ignores stories of magnitude and focuses on the retarded, weird shit.
Have you heard about how Fox News WTVT (Ch 13) [foxbghsuit.com] tried to squash news about the health risks Monsanto's BGH, bovine growth hormone, has? A husband and wife team of reporters spent months talking to ranchers, healthcare workers, and scientists about BGH. They were about to air the report when Monsanto called Fox and wanted to
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Slightly moist glow?!!
wow.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:wow (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
hmph... hello FTC? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
(Not that I'm saying that the expansion of Interstate Commerce is a good thing, but if they can stop Californians from getting marijuana despite state laws making it legal, you'd think they could enforce FTC restrictions over the will of a bunch of asshat legislators in Florida.)
This law would have mattered... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This law would have mattered... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow, I didn't realize you were the only person who ever bought CDs.
Therefore, the law clearly doesn't matter.
protip: The world doesn't revolve around you, buddy. Other people do buy and sell used CDs.
Florida + Utah? No surprise... (Score:3, Interesting)
Florida, well... I don't even need to describe the dumb things that go on down there.
Utah? They're best known for things like the "Clean Port 80" act (all internet porn should go on one port!), crazy anti-tech laws, "Yarro's Law" apparently passed at SCO's behest, and SCO, where we have Brent Hatch behind some of the crazy laws, not to mention their senator Orin Hatch and his crazy ideas.
Now, there are lots of nice folks in both states, of course, but any state that allows SCO folk to help write laws, well, I have to think they're positively Utarded.
Just dump 'em on ebay (Score:5, Insightful)
rubbish (Score:5, Interesting)
This is clearly irrelevant, since they should then apply this to the sale of _any_ second-hand goods - any of which _might_ be stolen or counterfeit.
Even if they did that, what is the point of "in-store credit"? Will they then stipulate that said credit can _only_ be used for the purchase of _new_ media, rather than other second-hand media?
Gosh, I'm glad I only live in a US colony (Australia) instead of mainland US! It seems the RIAA-pists won't be happy until there's an income tax component for "expected music/media consumption."
Re:rubbish (Score:5, Funny)
Re:rubbish (Score:4, Interesting)
I do not blame a lack of law or holding period for my cds being stolen or resold. It happens. This law does not directly help the people that have merchandise stolen, it MAY attempt to make it not worthwhile for someone to target CDs but I agree that the main goal seems to be to please the RIAA. Maybe not directly related to theft but people that copy and then sell the originals.
Re:rubbish (Score:5, Funny)
Re:rubbish (Score:5, Funny)
Garth Brooks won??? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since I have always only bought used CDs, I guess now I will need to start downloading and burning all my music instead. No way I'm paying $20 for 2 good songs, and I don't want an ipod.
Shameful Reporting (Score:5, Funny)
Why doesn't Slashdot report all the good news? Like the PATRIOT Act, and the USA Act (I am no lawyer so I haven't read them, but the names really tell me all I need to know). I am sick of people acting as if politicians don't always look after my best interests.
If you commies don't like our system, why don't you all go live in Afghanistan?!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Because that would require visiting MySpace.
I'd rather stab myself in the ears with a pair of forks, and never listen to music again. Is it really worth degrading yourself that much, just to listen to some music? Do have no self-respect?
Pawn shops (Score:5, Informative)
Hey I know how to fix it.... (Score:2, Funny)
Then it can't be bootleged..... right??
Buying Used records is STEALING (Score:2, Insightful)
After all, you've acquired a copy of the songs, but the artist has recieved no compensation from you.
*sighs* These people just do not understnad some conecpts integral to society (reuse, second hand sales, etc).
Stealing? Maybe. But from whom? (Score:4, Informative)
Her view on the issue is that the music industry is a huge, profiteering middleman and artists are swindled by them. She's of the opinion that for an artist, more exposure, however it comes, is a good thing and will lead to people buying more stuff.
The music industry is whining just because they're being cut out from a direct experience between an artist and the listener.
Re:Stealing? Maybe. But from whom? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Buying Used records is STEALING (Score:5, Funny)
WHEN will the agencies crack down on this atrocity!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That so few people are commenting on this... (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this the RIAA trying to curb rights? Is this Garth's revenge? Or is it something less? And, anybody know where in Florida the police were investigating? Is there any way to have this looked at by the media? I think most people would care if the local news did a nice little piece about how their hard-earned tax dollars were being spent making sure Johnny couldn't buy a used CD, rather than #insert EVERYBODYPANIC.h
Ars, thanks for bringing this up.
(and hey, someone else comment - I can't believe that so few people care)
CDs are more dangerous than GUNS??? (Score:4, Insightful)
What THE HELL is wrong with this country???
Re:CDs are more dangerous than GUNS??? (Score:5, Funny)
Guys, we have our game plan from here on out.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah well, duh... which shop or gun manufacturer would like to be linked to a murder? I don't think any. After all guns don't kill people, people do, isn't it?
But second hand CD sales... which must be related to illegal copying... what is more noble now then helping to catch those horrible music pirates!
The above of course all ironic... this note is for humourless people.
Re:CDs are more dangerous than GUNS??? (Score:5, Informative)
As for the second part of that statement, it only shows how much misinformation Brady puts out, and how little understanding there is by most people on how traces are conducted. When a dealer sells a firearm, they are required by law to keep the 4473 form on file for as long as the business remains open. When/if the business shuts down, the 4473s are sent to the ATF. If a gun is recovered from a crime, the serial numbers get sent to the ATF, who then will go through the chain of possession to the last FFL who possessed it (the dealer). That dealer will then give them the 4473, which has contact information on the purchaser (which is verified at time of sale using state-issued current identification). At that point the buyer can be tracked down, and contated to find out the disposition of the firearm. Local police do not need to keep their own sale records because such a system is already in place, and doing its job quite well. Brady would like to have records of every time any firearm is touched by a human being, with DNA records attached, and under realtime surveillance. Or just a total ban.
Other posters are correct: turning to the Brady Campaign for information on firearms is a perfectly analagous to looking to the RIAA for info on piracy.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:CDs are more dangerous than GUNS??? (Score:5, Insightful)
In other news... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:In other news... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Entire Florida population last seen flocking for ... points north.
Thank gods! I thought they'd never go home.
hmmm... (Score:4, Funny)
I though these were CDs, not guns!
Ugh.. (Score:3, Interesting)
TLF
P.S. Yes it's overdone but... fuck, I have nothing else to say to this than Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
GooD! (Score:2)
Next we can ban selling and buying used cars. The exercise costs the auto industry billions of un-verifible money from potential revenue every year. Poor starving automotive engineers and CEO's work very hard to design and build the latest cars that are copyrighted under US law thanks to selling used cars.
Infact just about everything is copyrighted so we should just ban the sale of anything used. Think about how
A reminder (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Rip 'n Sell (Score:4, Insightful)
It seems like the days of the used CD store are almost gone anyway. Despite the DRM politics, it's awfully convenient to buy online. And with CDs so easy to rip and resell, used CD stores are little more than rent-to-steal shops these days.
Re:Rip 'n Sell (Score:5, Funny)
You're welcome to store them at my place. Let me know and I'll send you my shipping address. Also if you lose your HD or something you can come by and listen to them any time you like.
Ah wonderful (Score:4, Insightful)
For the record, I was buying back CDs at a used record store in Washington State in the early nineties. We required photo ID. We wrote the information on your photo ID in a Big Scary Book. After we bought your CDs, we held on to them for 30 days. Then, after 30 days, we typically sold them. And it was no big deal. Didn't hurt business, didn't scare customers. Didn't have a damn thing to do with filesharing (I don't believe the original Napster existed yet). We caught a decent number of CD thieves by matching sales of odd CDs to lists of stolen CDs. It worked to everyone's benefit except maybe the thieves.
By the way, it's Really Freaking Obvious when someone's selling stolen goods. Seriously. We're checking the lists of stolen CDs before they even walk out the door. Thieves are idiots, and not subtle idiots either.
These laws are similar. They include a fingerprint provision presumably to combat fake ID's. I think that bit is unneccessary and odious (because, in my experience, we were able to catch all of our fake-ID-using thieves because they kept coming back). It requires a business permit. Sigh, whatever. It requires trading for store credit rather than cash. That's stupid--people selling their old CDs hardly ever want store credit, even if the value of that store credit is more than the cash. Reason? People sell their old CDs with "I'll finally dump these old CDs" on their mind. Buying new CDs is typically not what they want to do. We offered trade or cash to people, and most chose cash.
So it's basically a dumber version of a law that has existed for over a decade in my state. Big freakin' deal.
So two things are going on here: (Score:4, Informative)
But there seems to be hints that this is just a way for the recording industry to stop the reselling of CDs.
But there would have to be a closer studying of the legislation and the people backing it to find out which one is the real reason this is being pushed.
On the face of it, though, I find it a little unlikely that this is an anti-theft measure. Especially the part about "only to be used for store credit". It seems unfair to target CDs like this, when there are plenty of other things: cars, guns, jewelry, musical instruments, home electronics, sporting equipment, that are also likely targets of theft (I would think all of those named would be better targets for theft than CDs), but (AFAIK), there isn't any specific laws that say you can't sell your skis or guitar for cash.
Follow the money? (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder if... (Score:5, Interesting)
I worked in retail management with a focus on loss prevention. The connection between hard-core drug addicts and reselling stolen multimedia was insane.
90% of the chronic offenders we prosecuted cited drug money as their motivation and the resellers in New England, my market, were often little more than enablers. One employee of a major reseller in the area told me 'off the record' that a guy we had busted recently came in several times a day for several MONTHS with DVD box-sets still shrink wrapped and stickered from one of our stores. When I asked why they didn't call us he just shrugged.
These new regulations are short-sighted and egregious, but it is possible the RIAA is not solely to blame. The war on drugs is still going on and from what I saw, shoplifting multimedia is a habit of choice for drug offenders.
Some numbers:
It was not unusual to see multimedia loss numbers from a single location at my former company top $100k for a single year. New box set titles @ the time I was doing this resold between 40-60 cents on the dollar within the first two weeks of release. So a single box-store multimedia outlet could have been subsidizing local criminals with an average of +/- $50k/year.
I don't like the new laws, but the RIAA is most likely not solely to blame.
well fine then (Score:4, Interesting)
k?
And what about the CD show LOOPHOLE!?!?!?! (Score:5, Funny)
I did, ladies and gentlemen, mention the "person to person" aspect. May I remind my esteemed colleagues about the known threat to our families, our schools, our re-election financing, and our very way of life by the criminals, perverts, and terrorists that use these so-called "P2P" computer programs to exchange copyrighted material, 93% of which is pornography, over the computerized internet tube. Hooligans, drug-users one and all, and of the same ilk as these CD swappers!
I say it's high time we closed this loophole, and bring peace, justice, and accountability to these havens of immorality. The lash of reason must be brought to bear, and the firm hand of democracy must crush this evil trend before it destroys all that we have labored so hard to impose.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
CD's are dead completely in 5 years anyway (Score:3, Interesting)
Could somebody please enlighten me? (Score:5, Interesting)
My first question, anyway, is this: What is the difference between secondhand CD's and secondhand books? Should we be looking forward to having our reading controlled in the same way they want to control our music selections? Is it time to spend a paycheck at Thriftbooks just in case?
My second question is more technical: What does one need to know to intelligently purchase an "analog" tunes system these days? (I assume that would be turntable and some associated accoutrements. In the dark ages it would've involved pre-amps, amplifiers, speakers, etc.) If you have one, are there suggestions or references for ripping tracks off that treasured old vinyl to be played on something more portable like an ipod?
Taking the long view, this is just a symptom of how desperate the music mafia has become. It's another nail in their coffin. I'm not surprised that Utah is one of the states. You can apparently gull their legislature into enacting just about anything by playing on their paranoia.
Re:Could somebody please enlighten me? (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.ion-audio.com/ittusb.php [ion-audio.com]
Alternatively, you can buy a nice sound card something with a 24-bit 96khz input and use a turntable with appropriate cabling to connect to the jack.
http://www.smarthouse.com.au/How_Stuff_Works/Real
This site goes over some options.
Re:Could somebody please enlighten me? (Score:5, Informative)
When I pay for music, I buy the CD. I just can't envisage paying money for an ephemeral lossy digital file (hard drives crash more often than houses burn down). Now, I haven't actually listened to a CD in a couple of years, but at least for now, that's the way to buy.
And when I like something that's released by a RIAA member (plug: RIAA Radar [riaaradar.com]), I buy the CD used; so this sucks.
Real information (Score:3, Informative)
He kindly pointed me to Utah House Bill 402 [utah.gov] which seems to cover any second hand store.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What a bunch of fucking idiots. (Score:5, Funny)
I AGREE COMPLETELY!!!
First those Republicans required those Parental Advisory [wikipedia.org] stickers on CDs, then that Republican President signed the DMCA [wikipedia.org] in law, now this. If those Republicans keep this up I'm moving to France!
Re:What a bunch of fucking idiots. (Score:5, Funny)
O
/ | \
| You
|
/ \
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
libertarian and trhe power grid (Score:3, Funny)
I'm a libertarian who believes in completely nationalizing the power grid.
I am a Libertarian and I support personalizing the power grid.
FalconRe: (Score:3, Informative)
We've been (this) close, twice, to getting rid of the criminal Doyle, but for reasons dictated by emotion rather than logic, the idiot got elected and then reelected. Yet he trusts criminals to be the only ones armed, and the RIAA to dicate how we listen to our CDs. So
Re:Perhaps you can stop the crooks from stealing (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's why pawn shops take your name and your address (and your prints in some places) and have a list of serial numbers for when the cops come by - for that exact reason.
I'm not advocating the Florida law here, I think it's retarded, but I'm pointing out that there are already many restrictions on the sale of easily ripped-off used goods.
Re:Who Cares (Score:5, Insightful)
What exactly are you getting at here? A used record is just a used record. You can buy a Britney Spears CD today and sell it tomorrow as used. It's not your right to be entertained. If you don't enjoy something anymore, don't use or pay for it anymore! It doesn't give you a right to steal it!
But we are talking about buying real CDs, are we not? With your reasoning, would it also be illegal to give away CDs that you have already purchased? You don't have to be entertained constantly!!! Support your local artists directly!
Maybe your friends need it. I have no friend who needs 24/7 entertainment. Support my local artists? I listen mostly to radio music and don't give a shit about local artists. Why should I support them just because they create music? In that case, I want them to support me because I am a graphical artists. I demand that they buy my paintings.
The issue is not that we don't want artists to get paid. Quite frankly, there is a lot of great music that is not produced by "local bands" and I like diversity. I don't mind paying for it, but I refuse to sign a contract on what I may and may not do once I purchase a CD. If I have bought it, I want to be able to sell it to anyone I want without having anyone watching my back.
Re: (Score:3)
In short, you're the stereotypical opportunity criminal.
What are you going to steal?
TV? Too big, a bitch to carry out, hard to off load immediately. Craig's List or eBay will work... in about a wee